articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230118-what-rising-interest-rates-could-mean-for-u-s-business-and-technology-services-companies-rated-b-and-b-12613219 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

What Rising Interest Rates Could Mean For U.S. Business And Technology Services Companies Rated 'B' And 'B-'

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Capacity Market Update: High Or Low, Capacity Prices Are Their Own Solution

COMMENTS

Capacity Market Assumptions For Power Corporate And Project Financings

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Capital Markets: The Effects Of Sukuk Defaults


What Rising Interest Rates Could Mean For U.S. Business And Technology Services Companies Rated 'B' And 'B-'

Higher Interest Rates, Here Today And Tomorrow

The federal reserve will likely continue to hike rates through early 2023, albeit at a slower pace.  Policy rates increased by more than 400 basis points in the U.S. last year, and we believe additional increases are likely due to persistently elevated inflation and low unemployment. S&P Global economists expect the federal funds policy interest rate will rise to just over 5% by the middle of this year, before the Fed reverses course later this year, leading to rates somewhat declining in 2024. The expectation for lower rates in 2024 and 2025 could present issuers with opportunities to implement longer-dated interest rate hedges on terms more attractive than those currently available.

We estimate a roughly one-in-three chance the fed funds rate could peak at about 6% this year in our downside scenario.   While some recent indications suggest inflationary pressures have started to ease, key economic variables currently indicate more rate hikes will be required this year to tame inflation. In our macro downside scenario, to which we ascribe a one-in-three likelihood, higher interest rates will be required to cool demand and reduce inflation such that the fed funds policy interest rate increases to greater than 6% this year and remains higher than 4% through 2024. This could result in increased liquidity strain and longer-term refinancing difficulties for highly leveraged, unhedged borrowers with tight cash balances also facing macroeconomic headwinds.

Chart 1

image

Higher Interest Rates Pose Near-Term Risk To Credit Quality

Issuers rated in the 'B' category are particularly exposed given their large debt overhang.   Following a period of heavy refinancing activity in 2020 and 2021, issuers built up cash balances and extended their debt maturity profiles. In the absence of significant near-term debt maturities and a general weakening of covenants and other credit protective measures, we view an extended period of higher interest rates, together with weakening economic growth and higher input costs due to persistent inflation as key risks to credit quality in the sector.

As the federal reserve aggressively hikes interest rates to curtail inflation, the cost of hedging rising interest rates has correspondingly increased sharply. As a result, only about 50% of business and technology services issuers rated 'B' or 'B-' are currently hedged through interest rate derivative contracts, and these hedges provide protection for an average of only 64% of the total notional value of outstanding debt.

A small number of surveyed issuers who remain unhedged through interest rate derivative contracts are somewhat insulated by natural hedges from interest income, or by their larger proportions of fixed-rate debt issuance. That said, we expect interest expense for unhedged issuers in the 'B' and 'B-' rating categories to increase by over 40% on average this year, from 8% last year. Coupled with recently implemented limitations on the tax deductibility of interest expense, we believe higher debt service costs will challenge cash flow generation and liquidity improvement across the sector this year.

Chart 2

image

Companies That Implemented Hedges Are Well Positioned, For Now

Borrowers that entered into hedges are temporarily well protected, but many will likely face higher costs as hedges expire.   On average, across the 93 issuers we reviewed, those that implemented hedges have locked in a base interest rate of 2.5% and most companies that entered into hedges prior to last year have locked in base interest rates below 2%. This provides significant protection relative to peers who remain unhedged. For example, this lower base interest rate would allow hedged companies to maintain steady EBITDA-to-interest credit metrics in 2023, relative to a 0.6x decline year on year for unhedged floating rate borrowers. Our analysis assumes no change in earnings, capital expenditures, or working capital. These assumptions are conservative because we believe companies in the business and technology services sector are generally able to reduce variable costs, pass through price increases to offset inflation to some extent, and would likely benefit from a source of cash from working capital due to declining accounts receivable in an economic downturn.

Table 1

Key Credit Metrics: Hedged 'B' And 'B-' U.S. Business And Technology Services Companies
2022 2023 2024
EBITDA-to-interest coverage (x) 2.2 2.2 2.2
FOCF-to-debt (%) 2.9% 3.0% 3.0%
FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

Key Credit Metrics: Unhedged 'B' And 'B-' U.S. Business And Technology Services Companies
2022 2023 2024
EBITDA-to-interest coverage (x) 2.3 1.6 1.7
FOCF-to-debt (%) 3.4% 0.7% 1.3%
FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Nevertheless, just over half of the derivative contracts implemented by these issuers are set to expire within the next 24 months. If interest rates remain high, these issuers may be unable to renew their protection on favorable economic terms.

Chart 3

image

The Outlook Bias Will Likely Become More Negative This Year

Our sector rating outlook bias has recently begun to shift negative indicating a rising risk of downgrades due to higher rates and slowing growth.   The negative outlook bias for business and technology services issuers rose to 16% from 13% since October 2022, reflecting our expectation for greater pressure on margins and cash flows from rising interest rates and slowing growth. 'B' rated companies are better positioned than 'B-' rated companies to withstand a sustained increase in debt service costs given their higher cash balances, lower leverage, more resilient business models, and slightly higher proportion of fixed-rate to floating-rate debt. Issuers facing slowing demand, limited ability to pass through higher costs, and unhedged floating rate debt exposures are concentrated at the 'B-' rating threshold and are more vulnerable to downgrades and negative outlook revisions within the next 12 to 24 months.

Even in cases where liquidity levels are currently sufficient and near-term debt maturities are minimal, persistently higher debt service costs could limit free operating cash flow generation and our longer-term view of capital structure sustainability. Furthermore, to the extent that cash flow pressures drive declines in debt trading prices, we believe issuers with healthy cash balances are generally at greater risk to execute subpar debt exchange transactions that we could view as distressed and tantamount to a default.

Rating Outlook Distribution: U.S. Business And Technology Services

Negative rating outlooks have marginally increased over the past three months. 

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Issuers Rated 'B' Or 'B-' At Risk Of Downgrade Or Outlook Revision

We expect rising interest rates to contribute to weak EBITDA-to-interest coverage and cash flow credit metrics this year, resulting in potential outlook revisions and downgrades.   Our ratings at the 'B' and 'B-' threshold generally place a greater focus on liquidity and capital structure sustainability. Companies at the highest risk for a downgrade are those exposed to rising debt service costs while simultaneously facing slowing demand, supply chain challenges, and higher costs for other inputs that collectively threaten to constrain cash flow and render debt burdens unsustainable.

Table 3

Business And Technology Issuers Rate 'B' And 'B-' At Risk For Downgrade
Company Long-term rating Outlook Rating Downside Risk Rationale

ABC Financial Intermediate LLC

B- Stable High risk Refinancing risk related to upcoming revolver maturity in January 2024 and the need to obtain a covenant waiver along with thin free cash flow generation as a result of investments in the business which could pressure liquidity.

Atlas CC Holding LLC (Cubic Corp.)

B- Stable High risk Supply chain delays, cost savings investments and rising interest expense drive ongoing cash flow deficits and pressure liquidity.

Cobra Holdings Inc.

B- Stable High risk Lower software bookings and ongoing integration resulting in negative FOCF and revolver borrowings.

ConvergeOne Holdings Inc.

B- Negative High risk Supply chain constraints, key vendor problems, and rising interest expense constrain cash flow and liquidity.

CoreLogic Inc.

B- Negative High risk Industry headwinds and higher interest costs could result in an unsustainable capital structure.

Dodge Construction Network LLC

B- Negative High risk Rising interest costs, industry headwinds, and revenue growth weakness limit cash flows.

Inmar Inc.

B- Negative High risk Rising interest costs and higher tax payments pressure cash flow and could hinder timely refinancing of 2024 maturities.

Orion Advisor Solutions Inc.

B- Stable High risk Weaker equity markets and higher interest expense pressure free operating cash flow.

Restaurant Technologies Inc.

B Negative High risk Cost inflation, higher capex, and interest expense could cause persistent free operating cash flow deficits and leverage to remain over 6.5x.

Tegra118 Wealth Solutions Inc.

B- Negative High risk Tight liquidity, higher labor costs, rising interest rate environment, investment/integration spending in affiliates burdening cash flow.

TKC Holdings Inc.

B- Stable High risk Sizeable floating debt burden along with inflationary headwinds impacting margins resulting in thin free cash flow generation.

Veregy Intermediate Inc.

B- Negative High risk Inflationary cost pressure, supply chain constraints, and rising interest expense tighten cash flow and liquidity.

W3 Topco LLC

B- Stable High risk Cost inflation and supply chain delays pressure cash flow and liquidity.

CD&R Vialto UK Intermediate 3 Ltd.

B- Stable Medium risk Business carve-out costs and execution risks are expected to result in cash flow deficits in fiscal 2023.

CommerceHub Inc.

B- Stable Medium risk Sizeable floating debt burden with an interest rate cap maturing in 1Q 2023 along with exposure to slowdown in consumer spending in a recessionary environment.

Conservice Group Holdings LLC

B- Stable Medium risk High leverage (above 8x) and minimal FOCF to debt as a result of elevated interest expense; increased risk of EBITDA to cash interest coverage declining toward the low 1x area.

EagleView Technology Corp.

B- Negative Medium risk High capital expenditures and interest costs limit cash flow generation and the sustainability of its debt burden.

Lereta LLC

B- Negative Medium risk Downside from greater-than-expected declines in mortgage originations and/or lower profit margins.

Mercury Borrower Inc.

B- Stable Medium risk Very high leverage with rising interest expense and high integration costs could render capital structure unsustainable.

Thermostat Purchaser III Inc.

B- Stable Medium risk High labor, fuel. and interest costs could pressure cash flow and the sustainability of its capital structure.
N/A--Not applicable. FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Ben Hirsch, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0240;
ben.hirsch@spglobal.com
Pranav Khattar, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2549;
Pranav.Khattar@spglobal.com
Ellie Price, New York +1 212 438 0257;
ellie.price@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Nishit K Madlani, New York + 1 (212) 438 4070;
nishit.madlani@spglobal.com
Daniel Pianki, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0116;
dan.pianki@spglobal.com
Thomas J Hartman, CFA, Princeton + 1 (312) 233 7057;
thomas.hartman@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in