articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230111-u-s-auto-loan-abs-tracker-november-2022-performance-12609165 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: November 2022 Performance

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

Covered Bonds Uncovered

COMMENTS

2025 U.S. Residential Mortgage And Housing Outlook

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update


U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: November 2022 Performance

U.S. auto loan collateral performance saw mixed results month over month in November. Prime performance improved with declining loss rates and higher recoveries, while subprime performance continued to normalize with increasing loss rates and declining recoveries. However, prime and subprime delinquencies both continued to worsen as the year closed due to seasonal factors and early signs of consumer financial stress, with delinquencies rising month over month, year over year, and even exceeding the November 2019 pre-pandemic levels.

Given the growing concern about a potential recession this year and the impact it could have on the subprime auto loan ABS that are rated by S&P Global Ratings, we recently conducted a scenario analysis (see "How The Next Downturn Could Affect U.S. Subprime Auto Loan ABS Ratings," published Dec. 8, 2022).

Losses Declined Month Over Month For Prime But Increased For Subprime

Prime losses decreased month over month to 0.45% in November, but increased year over year from 0.33% in November 2021 when recoveries were approximately 72.00% (see table 1 and chart 1). Further, prime losses remained approximately 33.00% below the pre-pandemic level of 0.67% in November 2019.

Subprime losses increased month over month to 8.29% in November, as well as year over year from 4.57% in November 2021 and from 8.75% in November 2019. Moreover, after netting out the three largest deep subprime issuers (American Credit Acceptance, Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust, and Drive Auto Receivables), modified subprime losses rose to 6.79% year over year from 6.59% in November 2019.

Table 1

Net Loss Rate Composite(i)
Nov-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Nov-16 Nov-17 Nov-18 Nov-19 Nov-20 Nov-21 Oct-22 Nov-22
Prime (%) 0.53 0.46 0.51 0.64 0.65 0.58 0.67 0.40 0.33 0.50 0.45
Subprime (%) 6.88 7.86 8.78 9.70 8.84 9.33 8.75 4.87 4.57 8.04 8.29
Subprime modified (%)(ii) 4.39 7.20 7.64 7.40 7.16 7.08 6.59 3.76 3.41 6.56 6.79
(i)Represents monthly annualized losses. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 1

image

Recoveries Increased Month Over Month For Prime But Declined For Subprime

Prime recoveries increased to 65.84% in November from 52.07% the prior month, and from 53.52% in November 2019. GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust, Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust, and Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust, which combined represent approximately 37.85% of the prime index, reported higher recoveries in November 2022. These four issuers saw recoveries rise to 76.44%, 338.28%, 60.71%, and 125.54% in November, respectively, from 56.64%, 65.62%, 52.53%, and 54.97% the prior month.

Subprime recoveries declined to 39.28% in November from 42.51% a month earlier. However, they are marginally higher than the November 2019 pre-pandemic level of 38.84% (see table 2 and chart 2). Some issuers have reported lower recoveries because of increased full-balance charge-offs from longer-than-usual vehicle repossession times due to the shortage of repossession agents.

We expect recovery rates to continue to normalize as new vehicle supply imbalances ease and higher auto loan borrowing rates reduce used vehicle demand.

Table 2

Recovery Rate Composite(i)
Nov-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Nov-16 Nov-17 Nov-18 Nov-19 Nov-20 Nov-21 Oct-22 Nov-22
Prime (%) 57.32 59.68 60.13 55.14 51.16 56.56 53.52 69.32 72.41 52.07 65.84
Subprime (%) 43.58 40.27 37.77 37.39 37.38 37.91 38.84 49.00 50.02 42.51 39.28
Subprime modified (%)(ii) 53.26 40.83 38.64 38.60 37.91 38.61 38.27 49.14 51.73 41.49 38.39
(i)Represents monthly recovery rates. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 2

image

Delinquencies Rose Month Over Month And Continue To Exceed Pre-Pandemic Levels

The prime 60-plus-day delinquency rate increased month over month to 0.51% in November from 0.48% in October, and it is approximately 13% higher than the November 2019 pre-pandemic level of 0.45% (see table 3 and chart 3). Similarly, the subprime 60-plus-days delinquency rate rose to 5.72% in November from 5.29% a month earlier, and it is approximately 6.00% higher than the November 2019 pre-pandemic level of 5.37%.

Table 3

60-Plus-Day Delinquency Rate Composite(i)
Nov-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Nov-16 Nov-17 Nov-18 Nov-19 Nov-20 Nov-21 Oct-22 Nov-22
Prime (%) 0.41 0.44 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.36 0.40 0.48 0.51
Subprime (%) 3.91 4.66 4.93 5.40 5.23 5.48 5.37 4.02 4.40 5.29 5.72
Subprime modified (%)(ii) 2.35 4.05 4.15 4.09 3.75 3.90 3.91 2.90 2.91 4.01 4.35
(i)Represents 60-plus-day delinquencies. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 3

image

Extension Rates Fell Month Over Month But Remain Above Pre-Pandemic Levels

Prime and subprime issuers both saw improved extension rates month over month in November when rates fell from the elevated levels reached in October because of Hurricane Ian (see the Prime Extension Rates section below for more details). However, despite this decline, extensions increased both year over year and relative to the November 2019 pre-pandemic levels. Although prime extensions declined to 0.42% in November from 0.46% the previous month, it is higher than the 0.37% reported in November 2021 and the 0.40% in November 2019. Similarly, extensions for subprime public and 144a transactions declined in aggregate to 3.16% in November from 3.47% the prior month, but they exceeded the 2.81% reported in November 2021 and the 3.01% level in November 2019 (see chart 4).

Chart 4

image

Subprime extension rates

144a subprime issuer extensions decreased to a weighted average of 4.59% in November from 4.82% the prior month, but they were higher than the 3.85% reported in November 2021 and the November 2019 pre-pandemic level of 4.01%.

Similarly, extension rates for subprime public issuers decreased to a weighted average of 2.22% in November 2022 from 2.64% the previous month, but increased from 1.86% in November 2021 and 2.00% in November 2019.

Of the 17 subprime issuers we rated in November, six issuers reported higher month-over-month extension rates, while 15 reported a year-over-year increase. Ten issuers also reported increases from their November 2019 pre-pandemic levels (see table 4a).

Other noteworthy changes in November include the following:

  • The top three issuers to report month-over-month declines were American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust (fell 158 bps to 2.82% from 4.40%), Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust (143 bps to 3.81% from 5.24%), and United Auto Credit Securitization Trust (UACST; 95 bps to 4.48% from 5.43%).
  • The top three issuers to report month-over-month increases were CPS Auto Receivables Trust (rose 75 bps to 3.82% from 3.66%), DT Auto Owner Trust (61 bps to 3.26% from 2.65%), and GLS Auto Receivables Trust (37 bps to 1.66% from 1.32%).
  • The Westlake and UACST transactions had the highest extensions, at 6.80% and 4.48%, respectively.
  • Westlake and Prestige Auto Receivables Trust reported the highest increase in extensions relative to the November 2019 pre-pandemic levels. Westlake's extensions rose 182 bps to 6.80% from 4.98% and Prestige's increased 172 bps to 4.07% from 2.35%.

Table 4a

Subprime Issuer Shelf Extension
% based on balance
Shelf Nov-19 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 Nov-21 Oct-22 Nov-22
American Credit Acceptance 3.83 2.84 3.66 5.15 2.28 4.40 2.82
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2.87 2.48 4.11 6.93 2.30 2.96 3.00
Avid Automobile Receivables Trust 2.04 2.88 3.43 2.82 3.49 3.94 3.22
Carvana Subprime N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.04 2.76 2.37
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 4.81 3.71 6.18 10.21 3.55 2.93 3.68
Drive Auto Receivables 1.71 1.14 8.14 20.64 1.48 2.54 2.02
DriveTime Automotive Group Inc.(i) 2.12 2.27 3.06 8.88 2.68 2.65 3.26
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 4.66 3.02 4.34 11.80 3.81 5.24 3.81
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 3.57 2.79 4.38 3.94 1.92 3.50 3.28
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2.84 2.01 9.26 18.81 3.82 4.35 4.05
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 3.66 2.80 4.92 11.39 3.27 3.45 3.82
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2.35 2.69 2.85 6.24 2.97 4.23 4.07
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 1.38 1.07 7.04 17.84 1.23 1.87 1.53
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust 2.23 0.96 1.59 8.36 2.38 1.32 1.66
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 4.59 4.75 7.54 6.02 4.03 5.43 4.48
Westlake Automobiles Receivables Trust 4.98 4.85 11.73 7.41 5.92 6.63 6.80
World Omni Select 1.29 1.58 14.72 19.58 1.21 2.66 1.89
(i)The October and November 2022 extension rates for DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. include only the series 2021-3 through 2022-2 transactions. These are the only transactions with at least four months of performance in which the servicing reports provide extension data on a dollar basis (versus account-based). The company previously provided dollar-based extensions through Dec. 31, 2021, for all of its outstantanding transactions issued in August 2019 and later. N/A--Not applicable.
Prime extension rates

The weighted average extension rate for prime auto issuers declined to 0.42% in November from 0.46% the previous month, but increased from 0.40% in November 2019. Of the 16 prime ABS auto issuers we rate, five reported higher month over month extensions, nine reported declines, and two reported stable levels (see table 4b).

Other notably changes in November include:

  • The top three issuers to report month-over-month declines were World Omni Auto Receivables Trust (fell 26 bps to 0.64% from 0.91%), CarMax Auto Owner Trust (15 bps to 0.67% from 0.81%), and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust (5 bps to 0.11% from 0.16%).
  • Nine prime issuers reported higher extensions than their November 2019 pre-pandemic levels. The three highest reported were Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust (rose 32 bps to 0.48% from 0.16%), CarMax (22 bps to 0.67% from 0.45%), and Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust (22 bps to 0.49% from 0.26%).
  • Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust and CarMax reported the highest extension levels of 0.98% and 0.67%, respectively.

Table 4b

Prime Issuer Shelf Extension
% based on balance
Shelf Nov-19 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 Nov-21 Oct-22 Nov-22
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 0.35 0.37 12.01 7.49 0.43 0.51 0.55
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 0.17 0.17 2.00 7.58 0.17 0.16 0.11
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 0.01 0.01 0.82 1.94 0.07 0.08 0.05
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 0.45 0.38 3.33 7.33 0.36 0.81 0.67
Carvana Prime N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.12 0.32 0.28
California Republic Bank Auto Receivables Trust 1.03 0.93 7.68 11.84 0.55 N/A N/A
Fifth Third Auto Trust 0.12 0.12 0.97 4.91 0.08 0.14 0.15
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 0.85 0.75 6.30 6.35 0.75 0.94 0.98
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 0.35 0.32 0.81 2.27 0.24 0.35 0.34
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 0.26 0.20 1.85 4.00 0.27 0.53 0.49
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.15 0.11 2.03 4.51 0.08 0.16 0.13
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 0.34 0.25 2.03 4.22 0.25 0.42 0.42
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 0.16 0.15 4.62 7.21 0.25 0.48 0.48
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.67 0.44 4.19 5.57 0.31 0.30 0.33
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.35 0.28 2.79 6.24 0.16 0.25 0.27
USAA Auto Owner Trust 0.38 0.41 2.27 4.80 0.25 N/A N/A
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 0.16 0.21 0.60 5.81 0.11 0.14 0.14
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 0.55 0.38 5.85 8.82 0.30 0.91 0.64
N/A--Not applicable.

Extension rates for loans originated in Florida began to normalize in November as the rates declined for all public issuers that file REG AB II loan level data with the SEC. On a weighted average basis, prime extensions for Florida loans declined to 0.60% in November from 1.38% the prior month, while the subprime extensions fell to 2.38% from 5.57% (see table 4c).

Table 4c

Extensions In Florida
% of Florida loans by balance
Sep-22 Oct-22 Nov-22
Prime shelf
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 0.47 0.95 0.54
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 0.16 0.30 0.16
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 0.09 0.21 0.09
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 0.87 2.64 0.96
Carvana Prime 0.29 0.84 0.52
Fifth Third Auto Trust 0.00 0.78 0.34
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 0.92 3.27 1.24
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 0.35 0.82 0.33
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 0.46 1.18 0.54
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.14 0.70 0.19
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 0.51 1.15 0.57
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 0.47 1.31 0.53
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.30 0.84 0.52
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.31 0.70 0.30
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 0.06 0.65 0.31
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 0.53 1.39 0.67
Total prime 0.49 1.38 0.60
Subprime shelf
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2.99 4.59 2.72
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust (N Series) 3.43 4.66 3.78
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2.18 6.16 2.67
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 4.38 10.02 3.71
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 1.39 5 2.02
World Omni Select Auto Trust 1.69 3.74 1.73
Total subprime 2.1 5.57 2.38

Auto Loan ABS Rating Activity/Revised Loss Expectations

In December 2022, we revised our loss expectations and took the following rating actions:

These rating actions resulted in 28 upgrades and 75 affirmations, bringing the total number of upgrades on publicly rated U.S. and Canada auto loan ABS transactions to 416 and three, respectively, as of year-end 2022 (see tables 5 and 6).

We also took the following rating actions in the fourth quarter:

These rating actions brought the total number of classes on CreditWatch negative to eight as of year-end 2022.

Table 5

Historical Ratings Activity--U.S. ABS Auto Loans
Year Upgrades Downgrades
2015 177 0
2016 357 0
2017 322 0
2018 335 2
2019 432 5
2020 332 8
2021 579 0
2022(i) 416 6
Total 2,950 21
(i)As of Dec. 31, 2022. The six downgrades resulted from an error correction. Our ratings for six upgrades were too high due to an input error, and the degree of those upgrades was reduced with the error correction.

Table 6

Historical Ratings Activity--Canadian ABS Auto Loans
Year Upgrades Downgrades
2021 8 0
2022(i) 3 0
Total 11 0
(i)As of Nov. 30, 2022.

We lowered our expected cumulative net losses (ECNLs) on 31 of the 32 transactions we reviewed in August (see tables 7-13).

Table 7

Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised expected lifetime CNL (revised December 2022) (%)
2018-D 0.55-0.65 0.35-0.45 up to 0.35
2019-A 0.55-0.65 0.35-0.45 up to 0.35
2019-B 0.55-0.65 0.35-0.45 up to 0.35
2019-C 0.55-0.65 0.35-0.45 up to 0.35
2019-D 0.55-0.65 0.35-0.45 0.30
2020-A 0.55-0.65 0.45-0.55 0.30
2020-B 0.90-1.10 0.45-0.55 0.30
2020-C 0.90-1.10 0.45-0.55 0.30
2020-D 0.90-1.10 0.45-0.55 0.30
2021-B 0.70-0.80 N/A 0.50
2021-C 0.60-0.70 N/A 0.50
2021-D 0.60-0.70 N/A 0.50
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 8

World Omni Auto Receivables Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised expected lifetime CNL (revised December 2022) (%)
2019-A 1.20-1.40 1.10-1.20 Up to 0.90
2019-B 1.20-1.40 1.05-1.15 Up to 0.85
2019-C 1.20-1.40 1.05-1.15 Up to 0.85
2020-A 1.30-1.50 1.15-1.25 0.85
2020-B 1.80-2.00 1.15-1.25 0.70
2020-C 1.80-2.00 1.15-1.25 0.85
2021-A 1.80-2.00 N/A 1.00
2021-B 1.55-1.75 N/A 1.10
2021-C 1.40-1.60 N/A 1.10
2021-D 1.40-1.60 N/A 1.15
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 9

AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised expected lifetime CNL (revised December 2022) (%)
2019-1 9.75-10.25 6.75-7.25 Up to 5.50
2019-3 9.75-10.25 6.75-7.25 5.50
2020-2 12.00-12.50 6.75-7.25 5.00
2021-1 10.75-11.25 N/A 5.50
2021-2 10.75-11.25 N/A 6.50
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 10

GTE Auto Receivables Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised expected lifetime CNL (revised December 2022) (%)
2019-1 2.90-3.10 1.75-1.85 Up to 1.00
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 11

Canadian Pacer Auto Receivables Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised expected lifetime CNL (revised December 2022) (%)
2019-1 1.10-1.30 0.35-0.55 0.35
2020-1 0.90-1.10 0.50-0.70 0.40
2021-1 0.70-0.90 N/A 0.60
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Appendix: Auto Tracker Frequently Asked Questions

How do you define prime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize prime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of 3.00% or less, average FICO scores of 700 or higher, and annual percentage rates (APRs) of 0.00%-5.00%.

How do you define subprime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize subprime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of at least 7.50%, average FICO scores of less than 620, and APRs that exceed 14.00%.

How do you calculate the monthly net loss rate?

The monthly net loss rate is annualized. It equals each transaction's net loss rate weighted by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. Transactions usually have zero or low losses during their first three months, which dilutes the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly recovery rate?

We calculate recoveries by taking the recovery amount reported (which typically includes all recoveries, including disposition proceeds, post-disposition proceeds, and any other reported recoveries) over the gross loss amount for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's recovery percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the index starting in its fourth month outstanding. During a transaction's first three months, unusually high or low recoveries are reported, leading to a spike in the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly 60-plus-day delinquency rate?

We calculate delinquencies by taking each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency amount over the ending pool balance for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the composite.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. During the transaction's first three months, zero or fewer delinquencies are reported, which dilutes the composite figures.

What is the Auto Loan Static Index (ALSI)?

Our ALSI monitors the credit performance of securitizations that were originated in the same year on a weighted average basis. The number of months displayed for each vintage is generally determined by the last month that all securitizations for that time period have a data point. We calculate the prime and subprime ALSI CNLs by taking the weighted average of the CNLs of the transactions that were completed in the same time period (generally a year). Each transaction's CNL is weighted by its initial pool balance over the aggregate initial pool balance of all the transactions included in the index for that period. In the subprime ALSI, transactions from Byrider Finance LLC (doing business as CarNow Acceptance Corp.), Credit Acceptance Corp., and DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. are excluded because they do not have the typical indirect auto loan business model.

Which transactions are included in the prime, subprime, and modified subprime composites and indices?

For a list of the transactions included in our prime and subprime composites and indices, see "U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: June 2022 Performance," published Aug. 17, 2022. However, note that we subsequently added transactions that have since closed.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Amy S Martin, New York + 1 (212) 438 2538;
amy.martin@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Jennie P Lam, New York + 1 (212) 438 2524;
jennie.lam@spglobal.com
Steve D Martinez, New York + 1 (212) 438 2881;
steve.martinez@spglobal.com
Sanjay Narine, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2548;
sanjay.narine@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Kapil Sharma, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in