articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/221011-u-s-cmbs-ratings-likely-avoided-the-path-of-hurricane-ian-12526313 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

U.S. CMBS Ratings Likely Avoided The Path Of Hurricane Ian

COMMENTS

Scenario Analysis: Refinancing Prospects For Triple-Net Lease Securitizations If Higher Interest Rates Persist

COMMENTS

Scenario Analysis: How North American Corporate Securitizations Fare Amid Higher Refinancing Rates

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit


U.S. CMBS Ratings Likely Avoided The Path Of Hurricane Ian

NEW YORK (S&P Global Ratings) Oct. 11, 2022--While it is too early to assess the full impact of Hurricane Ian on S&P Global Ratings rated U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), broad rating downgrades relative to the properties located in the impacted areas appear unlikely. This is based on the initial (mostly visual) evidence that we have been able to gather so far, combined with our CMBS industry standards typically requiring borrowers to maintain adequate insurance coverage, especially when assets are in zones considered at risk.

To better understand the exposure of property outstanding allocated loan amounts (ALA) to the effects of Hurricane Ian, we used the FEMA-4673-DR Florida Disaster Declaration as of September 29, which lists the 19 counties for which individual assistance is available. The resulting exposure amounts from that mapping exercise are broken out in table 1 by major property type.

Although there are roughly 100 at-risk transactions consisting of more than 300 properties, we estimate the potential exposure to be roughly $3.4 billion by property ALA--less than 1.5% of the U.S. CMBS universe that we rate. Roughly half of the exposed amount is multifamily.

Table 1

Exposure To Hurricane Ian By Property Allocated Loan Amount
Property type Property outstanding ALA (bil. $) Property outstanding ALA (%) Largest property outstanding ALA (mil. $)
Multifamily 1.6 46.1 117.9
Lodging 0.5 15.8 68.0
Office 0.5 14.0 53.1
Retail 0.3 9.7 102.9
Other 0.5 14.4 43.1
Total 3.4 100.0 10.7
Source: Trepp Inc. ALA--Allocated loan amount.

We identified only two U.S. CMBS securitizations that have 20% or more of their outstanding ALA in the affected counties: GSMS 2021-DM and GSMS 2021-STAR (see tables 2 and 3, respectively).

The first transaction, GSMS 2021-DM, has 18 multifamily properties totaling 3,483 units spread across Florida (16 properties; 58.6% of ALA), Massachusetts (one; 22.1%), and Utah (one; 19.3%).

Table 2

GSMS 2021-DM ALA In Hurricane Ian-Impacted Counties
City Property count (no.) Property outstanding ALA ($) % of deal
Tampa 5 73,854,120
Bradenton 2 73,536,240
Lakeland 2 40,105,860
Temple Terrace 1 15,152,280
Tarpon Springs 1 12,185,400
Total 11 214,833,900 41
Source: Trepp Inc. ALA--Allocated loan amount.

The other transaction with some form of geographic concentration is GSMS 2021-STAR, a single-asset single-borrower (SASB) transaction. Its three properties are part of a larger portfolio of seven multifamily properties totaling 2,494 units across Florida (three properties, 37.3% of ALA), Texas (one, 22.3%), Arizona (one, 17.3%), North Carolina (one, 13.0%), and Georgia (one, 10.2%).

Table 3

GSMS 2021-STAR ALA In Hurricane Ian-Impacted Counties
City Property count (no.) Property outstanding ALA ($) % of deal
Tampa 2 122,356,780
St. Petersburg 1 56,472,360
Total 3 178,829,140 38
Source: Trepp Inc. ALA--Allocated loan amount.

To our knowledge (which also includes feedback from colleagues living in the area), most of these locations experienced traumatic events (including but not limited to heavy winds, power outages, debris, and the like), but they luckily did not sustain the extent of damage suffered by the city of Fort Myers. We nonetheless drove by the one property in St. Petersburg (see table 3) to confirm our understanding of the unfolding events. Based on our inspection, there were no apparent signs of damage and the property seems to be operating as usual. We also drove by the two properties located in the city of Bradenton, which may have been more exposed to the hurricane than those in the Tampa area. We did not notice obvious signs of damage.

Table 4 lists the five largest properties by outstanding ALA in the FEMA list above. We toured the largest (Bowery Bayside Stepstone) because it has the largest property outstanding ALA at $117.9 million. Again, our inspection did not reveal signs of damage (in fact, it looked unchanged from our site visit in 2021), and the property appears to be operating normally.

While we did not stop by the Brookfield Properties-owned Coastland Center located in Naples, we understand from their website that the mall is now open for business after being temporally closed between September 28 and October 1 to ensure safety.

Sanibel Harbour Marriott Resort & Spa (a 347-key full-service water-front resort) is currently closed, according to the information available on the Marriott booking website. The property serves as unique collateral to the third largest loan within the COMM 2014-CR16 conduit transaction but represents less than 15% of the conduit. We will continue to monitor the situation as we expect to receive more information as it becomes available through the upcoming reporting packages.

Table 4

Five Largest Properties By Outstanding ALA In FEMA List
Deal name Property name City Property type Property outstanding ALA ($) % of deal Comments
BX Trust 2021-RISE Bowery Bayside Stepstone Tampa (FL) Multifamily 117,876,000 9.8 The property is a 2018-renovated 608-unit garden style apartment complex. The property is the fourth-largest property in BX Trust 2021-RISE, a Blackstone $1.2 billion SASB transaction secured by 17 multifamily properties totaling 6,410 units across Texas (four properties; 17.0% of ALA), Georgia (three; 23.7%), North Carolina (three; 13.3%), Arizona (two; 14.8%), Florida (two; 15.0%), Ohio (two; 7.7%), and Colorado (one; 8.5%).
COMM 2013-LC6 Coastland Center Naples (FL) Retail 102,901,709 23.5 The property, a Brookfield owned Coastland Center regional mall, serves as unique collateral to the largest loan within the COMM 2013-LC6 conduit transaction. We understand that the mall closed from September 28th through October 1st.
GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Trust 2021-STAR Tuscany Bay Apartments Tampa (FL) Multifamily 70,590,450 15 The property is a 2001-built 370-unit garden style apartment complex. The property is the third-largest property in GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Trust 2021-STAR, a $0.5 billion SASB transaction secured by seven multifamily properties totaling 2,494 units across Florida (three properties, 37.3% of ALA), Texas (one, 22.3%), Arizona (one, 17.3%), North Carolina (one, 13.0%), and Georgia (one, 10.2%).
FREMF 2019-K734 Mortgage Trust Park At Valenza Temple Terrace (FL) Multifamily 69,888,569 7.9 The property, a 1987-built, last-renovated in 2018, 776-unit garden style apartment complex, and serves as unique collateral to the fourth-largest loan within the FREMF 2019-K734 Mortgage Trust agency transaction.
COMM 2014-CR16 Sanibel Harbour Marriott Resort & Spa Fort Myers (FL) Lodging 67,965,045 11.1 The property, a 347-key full-service waterfront resort, serves as unique collateral to the third largest loan within the COMM 2014-CR16 conduit transaction. Per the hotel website, the hotel is currently closed.
ALA--Allocated loan amount. SASB--Single asset single borrower.

Historically, we haven't observed meaningful upticks in storm-related CMBS defaults. Nevertheless, our understanding of the scope of the damage evolves daily, and we will continue to assess the situation, monitoring the at-risk CMBS transactions and providing updates as warranted. Indeed, large amounts of rainfall from slow-moving storm systems can cause significant flooding. However, insurance coverage (for flood, windstorm, business interruptions, etc.) can mitigate an increase in mortgage defaults after such disasters. Given the importance of insurance coverage, commercial borrowers are contractually required to obtain and maintain adequate insurance coverage during the entire life of the loan. Further, U.S. CMBS transactions limit operational risks by allowing servicers to fund insurance costs directly, should a borrower fail to maintain its insurance coverage. Those advances (and the associated interest) rank ahead of the certificates to ensure property value preservation.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world's leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and financial sector entities. With over 1,400 credit analysts in 26 countries, and more than 150 years' experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt markets worldwide.

Primary Credit Analyst:Alexandre Hanoun, New York + 1 (212) 438 8615;
alexandre.hanoun@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:James C Digney, New York + 1 (212) 438 1832;
james.digney@spglobal.com
Ryan Butler, New York + 1 (212) 438 2122;
ryan.butler@spglobal.com
Global Structured Finance Research:James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028;
james.manzi@spglobal.com
Tom Schopflocher, New York + 1 (212) 438 6722;
tom.schopflocher@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in