Initial Assessment Is That No Material Rating Impact Is Likely
S&P Global Ratings rates approximately 70 utility credits in Florida, 31 of which have been affected by Hurricane Ian with main breaks, power outages, and system reliability issues including lack of water and boil notices. As the deadly storm progresses, we will continue to monitor potential impacts in Georgia and the Carolinas.
Since the rebuild and recovery in the hardest hit areas could take months, and some communities may be displaced, substantial liquidity will be necessary to cushion reduced collections and to bridge the period until Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) loans are available. Given the robust liquidity available and sophisticated emergency response, which is assessed in our Operational Management Assessment (OMA), we do not believe near-term rating impact is likely. Our OMA assessment considers the breadth of each credit's resiliency planning, particularly those in coastal or low-lying areas, including whether the utility has prioritized its assets under a range of climate scenarios, and identified or completed potential adaptive measures, such as sea wall construction, pump station hardening, manhole rehabilitation, energy redundancy, and other flood mitigation decisions.
Based on the most recent data available (see table), most of the utilities within the affected portfolio have significant liquidity and prudent OMAs, which includes emergency preparation and response. None of the credits within the affected area have vulnerable OMA scores or cash positions below five months of operations. The average water/sewer credit in Florida maintains more than 700 days of cash on hand, driven by a recognition that the region has heightened exposure to storm-related risks.
Utility damage from storm surge, wind, and flooding is expected to be significant
President Joe Biden declared a major disaster in Florida, providing federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts. We expect utilities to rely primarily on FEMA as well as other water infrastructure aid programs, through the Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Short-term drinking water contamination: Hurricanes can damage water and sewer lines, or flood treatment facilities and storage facilities, increasing risk of water contamination. Past storms suggest that safe drinking water can become a major concern. Hurricane Harvey, for example, caused substantial water quality concerns to southwest Louisiana and southeast Texas when floodwater contaminated reservoirs. Following Hurricane Sandy, nearly 700 wastewater and drinking water utilities in Washington, D.C., and 11 states were damaged. Sewage treatment can be slower to recover given that it is sometimes under the deepest water given the location of many facilities, which are at low points of the area to take advantage of gravity.
Typically, operations resume within days or weeks, though early reports suggest some areas may take months to fully recover. Several Florida utilities were without water and have since resumed service--albeit under multi-day boil notices. EPA reported that following Hurricane Rita more than 85% of drinking water and 95% of wastewater treatment facilities in the region were operational within two weeks. However, those with infrastructure deficiencies may take longer to recover.
Customer Displacement Can Affect Revenue Collections
Given the nature of the flooding, there is risk that some systems may not be fully utilized as many citizens will be displaced and potentially unable to return for an extended period. We expect this will be the case for Fort Myers, given the magnitude of damage. FEMA is reporting thousands will likely be displaced for multiple months or longer. This can influence collections, reducing revenues available to repair systems, as demonstrated by the example below. Further, given construction cost inflation, as well as supply chain and labor challenges, rebuild could be more challenging than it has been historically. For smaller utilities or those with limited liquidity, this can be an even greater risk. Given the prevalence and magnitude of storms in recent years, insurance premiums have increased over time, with this trend expected to continue. Over the long term, this could influence rebuild, which could affect the rate base available to support debt. We believe this risk depends on the level of commerce and overall health and desirability of the service area economy.
Spotlight: Lynn Haven, Florida
Lynn Haven was nearly destroyed by Hurricane Michael, a category 5 storm, in October 2018. With 90% of homes ruined, total operating revenue decreased by about 17% at fiscal year-end 2019. Simultaneously, total expenses increased by 12% in 2019 and by 7% in 2020. Debt service coverage dropped by 75 basis points to 1.25x in 2019 from 2.0x in 2018, and then to 1.1x in 2020. The decrease was also exacerbated by the need to issue additional debt in the form of State Revolving Fund loans to support the repair and rehabilitation of some of the system's assets. Cash also declined by nearly 50%. This case study demonstrates the financial implication of severe storms as well as the timeline to recover.
Florida Utilities In Hurricane Ian's Path | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Rating | Cash (mil. $) | Days cash | Operational Management Assessment (1=strong) | Asset adequacy | Organizational effectiveness | Rate-setting | |||||||||
Leesburg* |
AA-/Stable | 37.4 | 736 | 2 | Strong | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority |
A/Stable | 20.8 | 90 | 3 | Standard | Good | Good | |||||||||
Clearwater Stormwater* |
AA/Stable | 46.5 | 2,471 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Florida Keys Authority |
A+/Stable | 48.3 | 356 | 3 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Pinellas County* |
AA+/Stable | 56.4 | 447 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Brevard County |
AA/Stable | 57.3 | 865 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Broward County |
AA+/Stable | 31.5 | 144 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Cape Coral* |
A+/Stable | 61.0 | 415 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Clearwater Water & Sewer* |
AA+/Stable | 160.8 | 1,007 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Florida Govt'l Util Auth (Lehigh Util Sys)* |
A+/Stable | 20.9 | 1,007 | 2 | Strong | Good | Good | |||||||||
Hillsborough County* |
AA+/Stable | 611.5 | 1,105 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
JEA |
AA+/Stable | 75.7 | 130 | 3 | Strong | Standard | Standard | |||||||||
Miami Dade County |
AA-/Stable | 133.2 | 102 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Oviedo* |
AA/Stable | 18.9 | 541 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Palm Bay |
AA-/Stable | 18.4 | 214 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Palm Beach County |
AAA/Stable | 330.9 | 892 | 2 | Strong | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Pasco County* |
AA+/Stable | 222.4 | 837 | 3 | Standard | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Seacoast Utility Authority |
AA+/Stable | 78.9 | 955 | 2 | Strong | Good | Good | |||||||||
Tallahassee |
AA/Stable | 39.9 | 147 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Auburndale* |
A+/Stable | 11.0 | 395 | 2 | Good | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Cocoa |
AA/Stable | 57.2 | 462 | 1 | Strong | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Crestview |
A+/Stable | 3.0 | 191 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Davie |
AA/Stable | 66.6 | 1,712 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Fort Lauderdale |
AA+/Stable | 92.1 | 330 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Hernando County* |
AA-/Stable | 57.5 | 948 | 2 | Good | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Oakland Pk |
AA/Stable | 11.8 | 262 | 1 | Strong | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Seminole County* |
AA+/Stable | 95.0 | 1,067 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
St Augustine |
AA-/Stable | 21.3 | 522 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
St Johns County |
AAA/Stable | 111.2 | 1,274 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Tampa Water & Sewer* |
AAA/Stable | 348.4 | 869 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Winter Park* |
AA-/Stable | 9.9 | 155 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Standard | |||||||||
Winter Springs* |
AA-/Stable | 30.6 | 1,573 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Charlotte County Utility System* |
AA-/Stable | 44.8 | 311 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Deltona (Florida Water Services) |
A+/Stable | 32.7 | 1,201 | 3 | Standard | Good | Good | |||||||||
Emerald Coast Utility Authority |
A/Stable | 32.1 | 195 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Fort Myers* |
A+/Stable | 55.1 | 433 | 2 | Good | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Martin County |
AA/Stable | 38.6 | 718 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Palm Coast |
AA-/Stable | 22.7 | 312 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Polk County Utilities* |
AA+/Stable | 77.3 | 602 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Sarasota County* |
AA+/Stable | 189.8 | 819 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Tohopekaliga Water Authority* |
AAA/Stable | 127.6 | 577 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
West Palm Beach |
AA+/Stable | 115.9 | 501 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Winter Haven* |
AA-/Stable | 24.6 | 303 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Good | |||||||||
North Miami Beach Water |
A+/Stable | 17.8 | 279 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Miami Beach (water/sewer) |
AA-/Positive | 81.3 | 479 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Lee County* |
AA+/Stable | 120.3 | 640 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
North Sumter County Utility Dependent District - NSU Fund |
AA-/Stable | 46.1 | 2,637 | 3 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Bay Laurel Center Community Development District |
A+/Stable | 6.3 | 348 | 2 | Good | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Polk City* |
A/Stable | 3.3 | 967 | 3 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Miami Beach (stormwater) |
AA-/Stable | 55.1 | 1,648 | 4 | Vulnerable | Good | Good | |||||||||
Dunedin* |
AA-/Stable | 20.7 | 550 | 2 | Good | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Dunedin (stormwater)* | AA/Stable | 6.1 | 757 | 3 | Standard | Standard | Strong | |||||||||
Daytona Beach |
A+/Stable | 36.7 | 338 | 3 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Orlando* |
AAA/Stable | 143.3 | 617 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Venice* |
AA/Positive | 35.3 | 829 | 2 | Good | Strong | Good | |||||||||
Tarpon Springs* |
AA-/Stable | 11.0 | 350 | 4 | Standard | Standard | Standard | |||||||||
Fernandina Beach |
AA-/Stable | 15.8 | 1,225 | 3 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
St. Lucie County Water and Sewer District |
A+/Stable | 10.7 | 503 | 3 | Standard | Good | Good | |||||||||
Riviera Beach (Riviera Beach Util Special District) |
A+/Stable | 46.5 | 529 | 3 | Standard | Vulnerable | Strong | |||||||||
Holley-Navarre Water Sys Inc |
A+/Stable | 11.7 | 343 | 4 | Good | Standard | Standard | |||||||||
Village Ctr Comnty Dev District (LSSA fund) |
A+/Stable | 22.6 | 2,170 | 5 | Standard | Vulnerable | Standard | |||||||||
Village Ctr Comnty Dev District (VCSA fund) |
A+/Stable | 17.5 | 1,749 | 5 | Standard | Vulnerable | Standard | |||||||||
Port St Lucie |
AA/Stable | 79.2 | 690 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
Riviera Beach (stormwater) |
A+/Stable | 4.0 | 669 | 3 | Good | Good | Standard | |||||||||
Orange County* |
AAA/Stable | 148.5 | 341 | 1 | Strong | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
City of Ocoee* |
AA+/Stable | 23.0 | 791 | 2 | Good | Good | Strong | |||||||||
Lynn Haven |
AA-/Negative | 5.8 | 348 | 4 | Good | Standard | Good | |||||||||
Miramar |
AAA/Stable | 81.5 | 728 | 2 | Good | Strong | Strong | |||||||||
North Sumter Utility Dependent District (Central Sumter Utility) |
A/Stable | 3.0 | 422 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Miami-Dade County (Stormwater) |
AA+/Stable | 44.7 | 7,934 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Wildwood Utility Dependent District |
BBB+/Positive | 20.9 | 1,229 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
Immokalee Water & Sewer District* |
A+/Stable | 12.3 | 587 | 3 | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
* Within hurricane or mandatory evacuation zones. Reflects most current audited fiscal year. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Jenny Poree, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5044; jenny.poree@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Chloe S Weil, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5026; chloe.weil@spglobal.com |
John Schulz, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4385; john.schulz@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.