Overview
Illinois counties and municipalities (or local governments [LGs]) have demonstrated stable or improved credit characteristics during the past year despite the effects of the pandemic because of the receipt of substantial pandemic relief aid, strong revenue patterns, and generally conservative budgeting, that enabled many Illinois LGs to outperform expected forecasts. S&P Global Ratings expects credit quality for Illinois LGs will remain stable in the near term. Credit pressures remain, though, with macroeconomic trends, particularly higher inflation and the risk of recession, presenting new challenges for Illinois LGs in the coming year. Continued increases in annual pension contributions to address large unfunded liabilities could create budget pressure leading to weaker credit quality for some.
S&P Global Ratings maintains ratings on 253 LGs in Illinois--22 counties and 231 municipalities. The credit trajectory was mostly positive over the past year with one county and four municipalities upgraded since November 2021, following a sustained period of improved reserves. Over the same period, we revised the outlook on one county and eleven municipalities to stable from negative and downgraded two municipalities (Granite City and Palos Hills), both due to structural imbalances due to poorly funded pension plans. Currently, 95% or 242 of our ratings on Illinois counties and municipalities have a stable outlook, while seven municipalities and one county carry negative outlooks, with two counties and one municipality having positive outlooks (see rating distribution table below).
Credit Fundamentals
Potential Challenges
- With five metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that we consider broad and diverse, including the Chicago MSA, most LGs have favorable access to major population and economic centers, which provide uplift to our view of the economy, although downstate LGs have more limited local economies
- Reserves as a percent of expenditures across Illinois LGs are very strong at a 49% median for counties and a 56% median for municipalities, providing both financial cushion and liquidity to absorb the potential for weakening macroeconomic conditions
- Illinois LGs have weaker pension funding levels than LGs in other states, and their annual pension contributions typically comprise a greater share of the budget
- High inflation is eroding purchasing power leading to higher than anticipated costs
- Many Illinois municipalities are likely to experience ongoing material increases in pension contributions for their public safety pensions, as they seek to address unfunded liabilities, which could create budgetary pressures
- As the labor market continues to tighten, Illinois LGs could experience difficulties staffing certain positions, absent material increases in pay which could strain budgets
What We're Watching In 2022 And Beyond
We anticipate continued overall stability for Illinois LGs in the next year given the availability of federal pandemic relief aid and mostly stable revenue trends, although higher expenditures associated with significant personnel cost increases could lead to budgetary stress. Property tax revenue, typically the largest revenue source for most Illinois LGs, improved or at least remained stable for most Illinois communities during the pandemic and we expect this revenue stream will continue to be resilient. In addition, state-shared revenue such as income taxes and personal property replacement taxes outperformed expectations in the past year.
S&P Global Ratings expects unfunded pension liabilities will remain relatively high for Illinois municipalities. These pressures arise primarily from poor historic funding practices and market volatility. The state's efforts a decade ago to reduce pension costs through the implementation of statutory minimum funding requirements and tiered pension benefits have had mixed results. While the implementation of pension benefit tiers limited the increase of plans' total liabilities, the statutory minimum funding requirements are based on weak funding assumptions which defer costs. We expect Illinois municipalities' pension liabilities will continue to increase substantially, potentially pressuring budgets and heightening credit risk. In addition, market volatility in 2022 is causing many pension funds to fall well short of anticipated investment rates of return. For more information regarding our views on the recent market volatility and their effects on pension funding, see "How Do U.S. Pension/OPEB Credit Analysis Guidelines Stand Up Amid High Inflation And Lower 2022 Market Returns?" published Aug. 23, 2022 on RatingsDirect.
We anticipate pension consolidation—the combination of single-employer police and firefighter pension plans, with the investments administered by the State of Illinois—will likely reduce administrative costs for issuers and enable smaller municipalities to invest in a greater diversity of investments. However, the absence of improved statutory minimum funding requirements paired with newer pension funding sources likely means that annual pension contributions for many municipalities will continue to fall short of minimum funding progress.
Spotlight On Environmental, Social, Governance Factors
While Illinois, similar to other states in the U.S., is experiencing more frequent environmental events, including periodic flooding and tornadoes, we do not expect these conditions will result in immediate risks to the credit quality for Illinois LGs. Despite specific adverse flooding occurrences in Illinois from the Mississippi, Illinois, and Des Plaines rivers and the ongoing erosion of the Lake Michigan shoreline from increased storm intensity, we view environmental physical risks as neutral in our credit rating analysis for most Illinois LGs. Furthermore, while fairly isolated, Illinois LGs are located in a region where stakeholders are beginning to address energy transition trends from exposure to coal mining or manufacturing of high-emission vehicles, which could lead to economic pressure. But we view this as a long-term risk that has limited influence in our credit rating analysis for now. Illinois is also home to large-scale clean energy manufacturing, with an electric vehicle plant in Normal and a new electric bus factory in Joliet scheduled to begin production later this year.
We consider social factors for Illinois LGs to be neutral, although certain areas of Illinois are experiencing ongoing population declines and some adverse demographic trends, and the state's population decreased slightly according to the 2020 census. These weaker demographic trends are more pronounced in rural areas and downstate, which have experienced decades of resident outmigration. In addition, in recent years many residents moved to warmer parts of the country and to states with a lower tax burden. While Chicago and its surrounding suburban area have been less affected by demographic shifts, those Illinois LGs experiencing declining population, a shrinking tax base, and weakened economic growth could find it difficult to sustain current levels of services and budgetary balance.
Governance risks for Illinois municipalities and counties are elevated. This largely reflects funding pressure associated with significant unfunded pension liabilities, which is especially common among municipalities that maintain single-employer police and firefighter pension plans. In addition, some Illinois municipalities demonstrate higher governance risk because of vulnerable management practices, weak internal controls, and management turnover. These risks have could result in weaker budgetary performance or inability to maintain a stable credit profile, and when material, we have sometimes lowered ratings or revised outlooks to negative.
Illinois Local Government Data
Table 1
Illinois Counties: Medians | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | ||||||||||||||||
AAA | AA+ | AA | AA- | A+ | A | A- | ||||||||||
Projected per capita EBI (%) | 134.6 | 102.8 | 101.4 | 83.0 | 74.9 | 80.8 | 76.9 | |||||||||
Market value per capita ($) | 129,752 | 90,717 | 82,995 | 50,498 | 49,568 | 62,135 | 43,407 | |||||||||
Available general fund (%) | 61.4 | 77.0 | 64.3 | 55.2 | 49.1 | 21.2 | 9.8 | |||||||||
General fund performance (%) | 7.3 | 24.2 | 9.9 | 8.1 | 16.0 | 1.5 | 18.6 | |||||||||
Cash and expense (%) | 96.3 | 78.3 | 102.2 | 146.0 | 63.7 | 54.0 | 5.0 | |||||||||
Carrying charge (%) | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.1 | |||||||||
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense | 4.9 | 4.1 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 5.3 | |||||||||
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits. |
Chart 1
Chart 2
Table 2
Illinois Municipalities: Medians | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | ||||||||||||||||||
AAA | AA+ | AA | AA- | A+ | A | A- | BBB+ or lower | |||||||||||
Projected per capita EBI (%) | 170.4 | 123.5 | 98.1 | 85.0 | 81.4 | 71.1 | 71.8 | 73.7 | ||||||||||
Market value per capita ($) | 168,310 | 111,349 | 92,003 | 70,374 | 49,430 | 39,958 | 38,035 | 36,547 | ||||||||||
Available general fund (%) | 59.3 | 58.3 | 67.2 | 76.4 | 52.7 | 48.4 | 29.9 | 35.5 | ||||||||||
General fund performance (%) | 3.2 | 6.6 | 10.4 | 8.0 | 6.8 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 10.0 | ||||||||||
Cash and expense (%) | 113.2 | 126.7 | 94.2 | 114.0 | 80.6 | 84.8 | 118.4 | 55.8 | ||||||||||
Carrying charge (%) | 8.0 | 7.2 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 6.9 | 9.2 | ||||||||||
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense | 11.2 | 10.3 | 11.6 | 8.3 | 12.9 | 11.9 | 11.7 | 12.7 | ||||||||||
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits. |
Chart 3
Chart 4
Table 3
Illinois Counties: Ratings List | ||
---|---|---|
As of Sept. 1, 2022 | ||
This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of Sept. 1, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com. | ||
Organization | Rating | Outlook |
Adams Cnty | A | Stable |
Cook Cnty | A+ | Stable |
DuPage Cnty | AAA | Stable |
Fulton County | A+ | Stable |
Grundy Cnty | AA | Stable |
Jefferson Cnty | A- | Positive |
Jersey Cnty | AA- | Stable |
Kane Cnty | AA+ | Stable |
Kendall Cnty | AA | Stable |
Lake Cnty | AAA | Stable |
Logan Cnty | A+ | Stable |
McDonough County | AA- | Stable |
Monroe Cnty | AA | Stable |
Peoria Cnty | AA | Stable |
Richland Cnty | A | Negative |
Rock Island Cnty | A | Positive |
Sangamon Cnty | A+ | Stable |
St Clair Cnty | AA- | Stable |
Stephenson Cnty | A+ | Stable |
Union Cnty | A+ | Stable |
Will Cnty | AA+ | Stable |
Williamson Cnty | A+ | Stable |
Table 4
Illinois Municipalities: Ratings List | ||
---|---|---|
As of Sept. 1, 2022 | ||
This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of Sept. 1, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com. | ||
Organization | Rating | Outlook |
Addison Vill | AA | Stable |
Algonquin Vill | AAA | Stable |
Alsip Vill | AA | Stable |
Altamont | AA- | Stable |
Alton | A | Stable |
Amboy | A | Stable |
Antioch Vill | AA- | Stable |
Atkinson Vill | A+ | Stable |
Aurora | AA | Stable |
Bannockburn Vill | AAA | Stable |
Barrington | AA+ | Stable |
Beardstown | A | Stable |
Bedford Pk Vill | AA- | Stable |
Belleville | A | Stable |
Bellwood Vill | A | Stable |
Bensenville Village | AA | Stable |
Berwyn | BBB | Stable |
Bloomingdale Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Bloomington | AA- | Stable |
Bolingbrook Vill | AA | Stable |
Bourbonnais Vill | A | Stable |
Bradley Vill | AA- | Stable |
Bridgeport | A- | Stable |
Bridgeview Vill | BB- | Stable |
Broadview Vill | A+ | Stable |
Buffalo Grove Vill | AAA | Stable |
Byron | A+ | Stable |
Calumet City | BBB | Stable |
Campton Twp | AA | Stable |
Canton | A | Stable |
Carbondale | BBB+ | Stable |
Carmi | A | Stable |
Carpentersville Vill | AA- | Stable |
Carterville | A+ | Stable |
Charleston | A+ | Stable |
Chenoa | BBB+ | Stable |
Chester | A+ | Stable |
Chicago | BBB+ | Stable |
Chicago Hgts | BBB- | Stable |
Chicago Ridge Vill | AA- | Stable |
Clarendon Hills | AAA | Stable |
Coal City Vill | A+ | Stable |
Coal Valley Village | AA- | Stable |
Colona | AA- | Stable |
Country Club Hills | BBB- | Negative |
Countryside | AA | Stable |
Crest Hill | AA | Stable |
Crystal Lake | AAA | Stable |
Danville | BBB | Stable |
Decatur | A | Stable |
Diamond Vill | AA | Stable |
Downers Grove Vill | AAA | Stable |
DuQuoin | A- | Stable |
Dupo Vill | A- | Stable |
Dwight Vill | A | Stable |
East Alton Vill | BBB- | Negative |
East Hazel Crest Vill | A- | Stable |
East Peoria | A | Stable |
Effingham | AA- | Stable |
Elgin | AA+ | Stable |
Elk Grove Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Elmhurst | AAA | Stable |
Elmwood Pk Vill | AA- | Stable |
Elwood Vill | A+ | Stable |
Evanston | AA | Stable |
Evergreen Pk Vill | AA- | Stable |
Fairfield | BBB | Stable |
Fairview Hgts | AA- | Negative |
Farmer City | AA- | Stable |
Fisher Vill | A+ | Stable |
Flora | A- | Stable |
Flossmoor Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Forest View Vill | A | Stable |
Fox River Grove Vill | AA | Stable |
Franklin Pk Vill | A+ | Stable |
Freeport | A | Stable |
Fulton | BBB+ | Stable |
Galena | AA | Stable |
Geneseo | AA- | Stable |
Genoa | AA- | Stable |
Gilberts Vill | AA | Stable |
Glen Ellyn Vill | AAA | Stable |
Glencoe Vill | AAA | Stable |
Goodfield Vill | AA- | Stable |
Granite | BBB- | Negative |
Granville Village | A | Stable |
Green Oaks Vill | AAA | Stable |
Hanover Pk | AA | Stable |
Harvard | A+ | Stable |
Harwood Hgts Vill | A+ | Stable |
Hazel Crest Vill | A+ | Stable |
Herrin | A | Stable |
Hickory Hills | AA- | Stable |
Highwood | AA | Stable |
Hillsboro | A- | Stable |
Hillside Vill | AA- | Stable |
Hinsdale | AAA | Stable |
Hodgkins Vill | AA- | Stable |
Hoffman Estates | AA+ | Stable |
Homer Glen Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Homer Twp | AA+ | Stable |
Huntley Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Indian Head PK Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Inverness Vill | AAA | Stable |
Itasca Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Johnsburg Vill | AA- | Stable |
Joliet | AA- | Stable |
Kankakee City | BBB | Stable |
Kewanee | A+ | Stable |
La Grange Pk Vill | AA+ | Stable |
LaSalle | BB+ | Stable |
Lake Zurich Vill | AAA | Stable |
Lakemoor Vill | AA- | Stable |
Lakewood Vill | AAA | Stable |
LeRoy | A | Stable |
Lexington | A+ | Stable |
Lincoln | A+ | Stable |
Lincolnshire Vill | AAA | Stable |
Lockport | AA+ | Stable |
Long Creek Twp | A+ | Stable |
Lyons Twp | AA | Stable |
Lyons Vill | A- | Stable |
Manhattan Vill | AA | Stable |
Manteno Vill | AA- | Stable |
Marengo | A+ | Stable |
Marion | AA- | Stable |
Markham | B | Stable |
Marseilles | A | Stable |
Marshall | A+ | Negative |
Maryville Vill | AA- | Stable |
McCook Vill | A- | Stable |
Mechanicsburg Vill | BBB+ | Stable |
Melrose Pk Vill (Cook Cnty) | A | Stable |
Metropolis | A | Stable |
Milan Vill | BBB+ | Stable |
Minooka Vill | AA | Stable |
Mokena Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Monmouth | A- | Stable |
Montgomery Vill | AA | Stable |
Monticello | AA- | Stable |
Morrison | A+ | Stable |
Morton Grove | AA | Stable |
Mount Prospect Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Mount Vernon | A+ | Stable |
Moweaqua Vill | A+ | Stable |
Mt. Zion Vill | A+ | Stable |
Mundelein Vill | A+ | Stable |
Naperville | AAA | Stable |
Nashville | AA | Stable |
New Lenox Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Niles Vill | AA | Stable |
Normal | AA | Stable |
North Aurora Vill | AA+ | Stable |
North Chicago | BBB | Stable |
North Riverside Vill | A | Stable |
Northbrook Vill | AAA | Stable |
Northfield Vill | AAA | Stable |
Northlake | AA- | Stable |
O'Fallon | AA+ | Stable |
Oak Forest | AA- | Stable |
Oak Lawn Vill | BBB- | Stable |
Oak Park Village | AA | Stable |
Oakbrook Terrace | AA | Stable |
Olympia Fields Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Oregon | A | Stable |
Orion | AA- | Stable |
Orland Hills | A | Stable |
Orland Pk Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Palatine Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Palos Hgts | AA+ | Stable |
Palos Hills | BBB+ | Stable |
Paris | A | Stable |
Paxton | AA- | Stable |
Peoria | A+ | Stable |
Pingree Grove, Village of | AA | Stable |
Plainfield Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Poplar Grove Vill | AA- | Stable |
Princeton | A- | Negative |
Quincy | A+ | Stable |
Rantoul Vill | A | Stable |
Richton Pk | BBB | Stable |
River Grove Vill | BBB+ | Positive |
Riverside Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Robinson | A+ | Stable |
Rochelle | A+ | Stable |
Rock Falls | A | Stable |
Rock Island | A+ | Stable |
Rolling Meadows | AA+ | Stable |
Roselle Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Round Lake Beach Vill | AA- | Stable |
Round Lake Pk Vill | A+ | Stable |
Salem | A+ | Stable |
Sandwich | AA- | Stable |
Schiller Pk Vill | AA- | Stable |
Shiloh Vill | AA- | Stable |
Shorewood Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Silvis | A+ | Stable |
South Chicago Hgts Vill | A | Stable |
Sparta | AA- | Stable |
Springfield | AA | Stable |
Sterling | A | Stable |
Stickney Vill | A+ | Stable |
Stookey Twp | A | Stable |
Streamwood | AA | Stable |
Streator | A | Stable |
Sugar Grove Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Summit Vill | BBB+ | Stable |
Swansea Vill | AA | Stable |
Taylorville | A | Stable |
Tilton Vill (Vermilion Cnty) | A- | Negative |
Tinley Pk Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Tolono Vill | A+ | Stable |
Toulon | A- | Stable |
Tremont Vill | A- | Stable |
Valmeyer Vill | AA- | Stable |
Vernon Hills Vill | AAA | Stable |
Vill of Skokie | AA | Stable |
Villa Pk Vill | AA | Stable |
Village of Rosemont | BBB | Stable |
Village of Schaumburg | AAA | Stable |
Watseka | A | Stable |
Westchester Vill | A- | Stable |
Westmont Vill | AA+ | Stable |
Wheaton | AAA | Stable |
Wheeling Vill | AA | Stable |
White Hall City | BBB+ | Stable |
Willowbrook | AAA | Stable |
Wood Dale | AA+ | Stable |
Woodstock | AA | Stable |
Worth Vill | A+ | Stable |
Yorkville | AA | Stable |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | David H Smith, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7029; david.smith@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Blake E Yocom, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7056; blake.yocom@spglobal.com |
Joseph Vodziak, Chicago + 1 312 233 7094; joseph.vodziak@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributor: | Hardik Dilip Dhabalia, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.