articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220920-u-s-local-governments-credit-brief-illinois-counties-and-municipalities-means-and-medians-12500067 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Local Governments Credit Brief: Illinois Counties And Municipalities Means And Medians

COMMENTS

Banks Can Help, Not Fix, Shandong's LGFV Issues

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, April 2025

COMMENTS

U.S. Public Finance Rating Activity: April 2025

COMMENTS

Global Tariff Tracker: Rating Actions As Of May 2, 2025


U.S. Local Governments Credit Brief: Illinois Counties And Municipalities Means And Medians

Overview

Illinois counties and municipalities (or local governments [LGs]) have demonstrated stable or improved credit characteristics during the past year despite the effects of the pandemic because of the receipt of substantial pandemic relief aid, strong revenue patterns, and generally conservative budgeting, that enabled many Illinois LGs to outperform expected forecasts. S&P Global Ratings expects credit quality for Illinois LGs will remain stable in the near term. Credit pressures remain, though, with macroeconomic trends, particularly higher inflation and the risk of recession, presenting new challenges for Illinois LGs in the coming year. Continued increases in annual pension contributions to address large unfunded liabilities could create budget pressure leading to weaker credit quality for some.

S&P Global Ratings maintains ratings on 253 LGs in Illinois--22 counties and 231 municipalities. The credit trajectory was mostly positive over the past year with one county and four municipalities upgraded since November 2021, following a sustained period of improved reserves. Over the same period, we revised the outlook on one county and eleven municipalities to stable from negative and downgraded two municipalities (Granite City and Palos Hills), both due to structural imbalances due to poorly funded pension plans. Currently, 95% or 242 of our ratings on Illinois counties and municipalities have a stable outlook, while seven municipalities and one county carry negative outlooks, with two counties and one municipality having positive outlooks (see rating distribution table below).

What We're Watching In 2022 And Beyond

image

We anticipate continued overall stability for Illinois LGs in the next year given the availability of federal pandemic relief aid and mostly stable revenue trends, although higher expenditures associated with significant personnel cost increases could lead to budgetary stress. Property tax revenue, typically the largest revenue source for most Illinois LGs, improved or at least remained stable for most Illinois communities during the pandemic and we expect this revenue stream will continue to be resilient. In addition, state-shared revenue such as income taxes and personal property replacement taxes outperformed expectations in the past year.

S&P Global Ratings expects unfunded pension liabilities will remain relatively high for Illinois municipalities. These pressures arise primarily from poor historic funding practices and market volatility. The state's efforts a decade ago to reduce pension costs through the implementation of statutory minimum funding requirements and tiered pension benefits have had mixed results. While the implementation of pension benefit tiers limited the increase of plans' total liabilities, the statutory minimum funding requirements are based on weak funding assumptions which defer costs. We expect Illinois municipalities' pension liabilities will continue to increase substantially, potentially pressuring budgets and heightening credit risk. In addition, market volatility in 2022 is causing many pension funds to fall well short of anticipated investment rates of return. For more information regarding our views on the recent market volatility and their effects on pension funding, see "How Do U.S. Pension/OPEB Credit Analysis Guidelines Stand Up Amid High Inflation And Lower 2022 Market Returns?" published Aug. 23, 2022 on RatingsDirect.

We anticipate pension consolidation—the combination of single-employer police and firefighter pension plans, with the investments administered by the State of Illinois—will likely reduce administrative costs for issuers and enable smaller municipalities to invest in a greater diversity of investments. However, the absence of improved statutory minimum funding requirements paired with newer pension funding sources likely means that annual pension contributions for many municipalities will continue to fall short of minimum funding progress.

Spotlight On Environmental, Social, Governance Factors

image

While Illinois, similar to other states in the U.S., is experiencing more frequent environmental events, including periodic flooding and tornadoes, we do not expect these conditions will result in immediate risks to the credit quality for Illinois LGs. Despite specific adverse flooding occurrences in Illinois from the Mississippi, Illinois, and Des Plaines rivers and the ongoing erosion of the Lake Michigan shoreline from increased storm intensity, we view environmental physical risks as neutral in our credit rating analysis for most Illinois LGs. Furthermore, while fairly isolated, Illinois LGs are located in a region where stakeholders are beginning to address energy transition trends from exposure to coal mining or manufacturing of high-emission vehicles, which could lead to economic pressure. But we view this as a long-term risk that has limited influence in our credit rating analysis for now. Illinois is also home to large-scale clean energy manufacturing, with an electric vehicle plant in Normal and a new electric bus factory in Joliet scheduled to begin production later this year.

We consider social factors for Illinois LGs to be neutral, although certain areas of Illinois are experiencing ongoing population declines and some adverse demographic trends, and the state's population decreased slightly according to the 2020 census. These weaker demographic trends are more pronounced in rural areas and downstate, which have experienced decades of resident outmigration. In addition, in recent years many residents moved to warmer parts of the country and to states with a lower tax burden. While Chicago and its surrounding suburban area have been less affected by demographic shifts, those Illinois LGs experiencing declining population, a shrinking tax base, and weakened economic growth could find it difficult to sustain current levels of services and budgetary balance.

Governance risks for Illinois municipalities and counties are elevated. This largely reflects funding pressure associated with significant unfunded pension liabilities, which is especially common among municipalities that maintain single-employer police and firefighter pension plans. In addition, some Illinois municipalities demonstrate higher governance risk because of vulnerable management practices, weak internal controls, and management turnover. These risks have could result in weaker budgetary performance or inability to maintain a stable credit profile, and when material, we have sometimes lowered ratings or revised outlooks to negative.

Illinois Local Government Data

Table 1

Illinois Counties: Medians
Rating
AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A A-
Projected per capita EBI (%) 134.6 102.8 101.4 83.0 74.9 80.8 76.9
Market value per capita ($) 129,752 90,717 82,995 50,498 49,568 62,135 43,407
Available general fund (%) 61.4 77.0 64.3 55.2 49.1 21.2 9.8
General fund performance (%) 7.3 24.2 9.9 8.1 16.0 1.5 18.6
Cash and expense (%) 96.3 78.3 102.2 146.0 63.7 54.0 5.0
Carrying charge (%) 4.9 4.3 4.9 2.4 5.2 6.0 5.1
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense 4.9 4.1 5.8 5.8 4.5 5.4 5.3
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Table 2

Illinois Municipalities: Medians
Rating
AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ or lower
Projected per capita EBI (%) 170.4 123.5 98.1 85.0 81.4 71.1 71.8 73.7
Market value per capita ($) 168,310 111,349 92,003 70,374 49,430 39,958 38,035 36,547
Available general fund (%) 59.3 58.3 67.2 76.4 52.7 48.4 29.9 35.5
General fund performance (%) 3.2 6.6 10.4 8.0 6.8 10.2 10.7 10.0
Cash and expense (%) 113.2 126.7 94.2 114.0 80.6 84.8 118.4 55.8
Carrying charge (%) 8.0 7.2 6.8 7.1 7.6 8.7 6.9 9.2
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense 11.2 10.3 11.6 8.3 12.9 11.9 11.7 12.7
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Table 3

Illinois Counties: Ratings List
As of Sept. 1, 2022
This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of Sept. 1, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com.
Organization Rating Outlook
Adams Cnty A Stable
Cook Cnty A+ Stable
DuPage Cnty AAA Stable
Fulton County A+ Stable
Grundy Cnty AA Stable
Jefferson Cnty A- Positive
Jersey Cnty AA- Stable
Kane Cnty AA+ Stable
Kendall Cnty AA Stable
Lake Cnty AAA Stable
Logan Cnty A+ Stable
McDonough County AA- Stable
Monroe Cnty AA Stable
Peoria Cnty AA Stable
Richland Cnty A Negative
Rock Island Cnty A Positive
Sangamon Cnty A+ Stable
St Clair Cnty AA- Stable
Stephenson Cnty A+ Stable
Union Cnty A+ Stable
Will Cnty AA+ Stable
Williamson Cnty A+ Stable

Table 4

Illinois Municipalities: Ratings List
As of Sept. 1, 2022
This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of Sept. 1, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com.
Organization Rating Outlook
Addison Vill AA Stable
Algonquin Vill AAA Stable
Alsip Vill AA Stable
Altamont AA- Stable
Alton A Stable
Amboy A Stable
Antioch Vill AA- Stable
Atkinson Vill A+ Stable
Aurora AA Stable
Bannockburn Vill AAA Stable
Barrington AA+ Stable
Beardstown A Stable
Bedford Pk Vill AA- Stable
Belleville A Stable
Bellwood Vill A Stable
Bensenville Village AA Stable
Berwyn BBB Stable
Bloomingdale Vill AA+ Stable
Bloomington AA- Stable
Bolingbrook Vill AA Stable
Bourbonnais Vill A Stable
Bradley Vill AA- Stable
Bridgeport A- Stable
Bridgeview Vill BB- Stable
Broadview Vill A+ Stable
Buffalo Grove Vill AAA Stable
Byron A+ Stable
Calumet City BBB Stable
Campton Twp AA Stable
Canton A Stable
Carbondale BBB+ Stable
Carmi A Stable
Carpentersville Vill AA- Stable
Carterville A+ Stable
Charleston A+ Stable
Chenoa BBB+ Stable
Chester A+ Stable
Chicago BBB+ Stable
Chicago Hgts BBB- Stable
Chicago Ridge Vill AA- Stable
Clarendon Hills AAA Stable
Coal City Vill A+ Stable
Coal Valley Village AA- Stable
Colona AA- Stable
Country Club Hills BBB- Negative
Countryside AA Stable
Crest Hill AA Stable
Crystal Lake AAA Stable
Danville BBB Stable
Decatur A Stable
Diamond Vill AA Stable
Downers Grove Vill AAA Stable
DuQuoin A- Stable
Dupo Vill A- Stable
Dwight Vill A Stable
East Alton Vill BBB- Negative
East Hazel Crest Vill A- Stable
East Peoria A Stable
Effingham AA- Stable
Elgin AA+ Stable
Elk Grove Vill AA+ Stable
Elmhurst AAA Stable
Elmwood Pk Vill AA- Stable
Elwood Vill A+ Stable
Evanston AA Stable
Evergreen Pk Vill AA- Stable
Fairfield BBB Stable
Fairview Hgts AA- Negative
Farmer City AA- Stable
Fisher Vill A+ Stable
Flora A- Stable
Flossmoor Vill AA+ Stable
Forest View Vill A Stable
Fox River Grove Vill AA Stable
Franklin Pk Vill A+ Stable
Freeport A Stable
Fulton BBB+ Stable
Galena AA Stable
Geneseo AA- Stable
Genoa AA- Stable
Gilberts Vill AA Stable
Glen Ellyn Vill AAA Stable
Glencoe Vill AAA Stable
Goodfield Vill AA- Stable
Granite BBB- Negative
Granville Village A Stable
Green Oaks Vill AAA Stable
Hanover Pk AA Stable
Harvard A+ Stable
Harwood Hgts Vill A+ Stable
Hazel Crest Vill A+ Stable
Herrin A Stable
Hickory Hills AA- Stable
Highwood AA Stable
Hillsboro A- Stable
Hillside Vill AA- Stable
Hinsdale AAA Stable
Hodgkins Vill AA- Stable
Hoffman Estates AA+ Stable
Homer Glen Vill AA+ Stable
Homer Twp AA+ Stable
Huntley Vill AA+ Stable
Indian Head PK Vill AA+ Stable
Inverness Vill AAA Stable
Itasca Vill AA+ Stable
Johnsburg Vill AA- Stable
Joliet AA- Stable
Kankakee City BBB Stable
Kewanee A+ Stable
La Grange Pk Vill AA+ Stable
LaSalle BB+ Stable
Lake Zurich Vill AAA Stable
Lakemoor Vill AA- Stable
Lakewood Vill AAA Stable
LeRoy A Stable
Lexington A+ Stable
Lincoln A+ Stable
Lincolnshire Vill AAA Stable
Lockport AA+ Stable
Long Creek Twp A+ Stable
Lyons Twp AA Stable
Lyons Vill A- Stable
Manhattan Vill AA Stable
Manteno Vill AA- Stable
Marengo A+ Stable
Marion AA- Stable
Markham B Stable
Marseilles A Stable
Marshall A+ Negative
Maryville Vill AA- Stable
McCook Vill A- Stable
Mechanicsburg Vill BBB+ Stable
Melrose Pk Vill (Cook Cnty) A Stable
Metropolis A Stable
Milan Vill BBB+ Stable
Minooka Vill AA Stable
Mokena Vill AA+ Stable
Monmouth A- Stable
Montgomery Vill AA Stable
Monticello AA- Stable
Morrison A+ Stable
Morton Grove AA Stable
Mount Prospect Vill AA+ Stable
Mount Vernon A+ Stable
Moweaqua Vill A+ Stable
Mt. Zion Vill A+ Stable
Mundelein Vill A+ Stable
Naperville AAA Stable
Nashville AA Stable
New Lenox Vill AA+ Stable
Niles Vill AA Stable
Normal AA Stable
North Aurora Vill AA+ Stable
North Chicago BBB Stable
North Riverside Vill A Stable
Northbrook Vill AAA Stable
Northfield Vill AAA Stable
Northlake AA- Stable
O'Fallon AA+ Stable
Oak Forest AA- Stable
Oak Lawn Vill BBB- Stable
Oak Park Village AA Stable
Oakbrook Terrace AA Stable
Olympia Fields Vill AA+ Stable
Oregon A Stable
Orion AA- Stable
Orland Hills A Stable
Orland Pk Vill AA+ Stable
Palatine Vill AA+ Stable
Palos Hgts AA+ Stable
Palos Hills BBB+ Stable
Paris A Stable
Paxton AA- Stable
Peoria A+ Stable
Pingree Grove, Village of AA Stable
Plainfield Vill AA+ Stable
Poplar Grove Vill AA- Stable
Princeton A- Negative
Quincy A+ Stable
Rantoul Vill A Stable
Richton Pk BBB Stable
River Grove Vill BBB+ Positive
Riverside Vill AA+ Stable
Robinson A+ Stable
Rochelle A+ Stable
Rock Falls A Stable
Rock Island A+ Stable
Rolling Meadows AA+ Stable
Roselle Vill AA+ Stable
Round Lake Beach Vill AA- Stable
Round Lake Pk Vill A+ Stable
Salem A+ Stable
Sandwich AA- Stable
Schiller Pk Vill AA- Stable
Shiloh Vill AA- Stable
Shorewood Vill AA+ Stable
Silvis A+ Stable
South Chicago Hgts Vill A Stable
Sparta AA- Stable
Springfield AA Stable
Sterling A Stable
Stickney Vill A+ Stable
Stookey Twp A Stable
Streamwood AA Stable
Streator A Stable
Sugar Grove Vill AA+ Stable
Summit Vill BBB+ Stable
Swansea Vill AA Stable
Taylorville A Stable
Tilton Vill (Vermilion Cnty) A- Negative
Tinley Pk Vill AA+ Stable
Tolono Vill A+ Stable
Toulon A- Stable
Tremont Vill A- Stable
Valmeyer Vill AA- Stable
Vernon Hills Vill AAA Stable
Vill of Skokie AA Stable
Villa Pk Vill AA Stable
Village of Rosemont BBB Stable
Village of Schaumburg AAA Stable
Watseka A Stable
Westchester Vill A- Stable
Westmont Vill AA+ Stable
Wheaton AAA Stable
Wheeling Vill AA Stable
White Hall City BBB+ Stable
Willowbrook AAA Stable
Wood Dale AA+ Stable
Woodstock AA Stable
Worth Vill A+ Stable
Yorkville AA Stable

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:David H Smith, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7029;
david.smith@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Blake E Yocom, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7056;
blake.yocom@spglobal.com
Joseph Vodziak, Chicago + 1 312 233 7094;
joseph.vodziak@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Hardik Dilip Dhabalia, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in