articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220726-energy-transition-and-energy-security-on-the-path-toward-net-zero-12454535 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Energy Transition And Energy Security On The Path Toward Net-Zero

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates

COMMENTS

Americas Sovereign Rating Trends 2025: Average Credit Quality Hits Highest Point Since 2017


Energy Transition And Energy Security On The Path Toward Net-Zero

image

Increasing awareness of the physical impacts of climate change and urgency around taking action to decarbonize the global economy has proliferated among citizens, policymakers, economic actors, and other market participants in recent years. This has only been intensified by the key findings of the latest United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. But rising energy and commodities prices and increasing energy supply concerns following Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine have forced governments to rethink their priorities. Economies are now facing tough choices about how to balance their immediate energy security needs with longer-term energy transition plans—and these trade-offs will likely have implications for decades to come.

Against this backdrop of uncertainty, markets can play a key role in shaping the path to net-zero.

Inflation, energy security, and geopolitical uncertainty currently pose the most prominent risks to global credit conditions. If the war in Ukraine delays the global transition from carbon-intensive to clean energy sources, policymakers may struggle to balance short-term social and economic priorities with long-term decarbonization ambitions. Nonetheless, the significant disruptions to global supplies of oil and gas so far this year have emphasized the importance of non-fossil-fuel power generation, particularly from renewables like solar, wind, and hydro alongside hydrogen and nuclear, according to S&P Global Ratings research.

We analyzed the vulnerability to and readiness for climate change over the next 30 years for 135 countries. The research shows that physical climate risks could expose global GDP to losses of 3.3% by 2050 under the Paris Agreement climate pathway, 4% under current policies, and 4.5% if no adaptation is undertaken and all risks materialize. The physical impacts of climate change are more pronounced in lower- and lower-middle-income countries, which are likely on average to experience losses 3.6 times greater than higher-middle- and higher-income countries, and are most pronounced regionally in South Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, according to the scenario analysis.

Corporate boards will need to address several intersecting pressures and challenges related to their transparency, disclosures, and actions. Data collected in the 2021 S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment indicates that most companies globally have not yet set targets to initially reduce emissions or commit to net-zero—with just 36.8% of the approximately 5,300 companies reviewed having announced plans to curb their direct or indirect emissions. Concurrently, just 11% of nearly 12,000 equity mutual funds and exchange-traded funds representing more than $20 trillion in market value worldwide are currently aligned with the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, according to S&P Global Sustainable1. New green bond issuance has also slowed alongside tightening financing conditions with global corporate bond issuance falling far below the record-setting volumes seen over the past two years.

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors become integral considerations in the marketplace across many types of analyses, S&P Global Ratings and S&P Global Sustainable1 have jointly researched two dimensions of ESG materiality: stakeholder materiality and financial materiality. Materiality mapping can evaluate the evolving and dynamic interactions between the two in a given sector. Some ESG factors may only have the potential to yield a financial impact, while others may have limited financial impact but have a high impact on stakeholders.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Molly Mintz, New York;
Molly.Mintz@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Alexandra Dimitrijevic, London + 44 20 7176 3128;
alexandra.dimitrijevic@spglobal.com
Ruth Yang, New York (1) 212-438-2722;
ruth.yang2@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in