Overview
- UNSW's financial profile is improving, supported by stronger operating surpluses, growing available resources, and lower debt levels.
- Despite lingering challenges, we believe that the university will maintain a strong market position, allowing for a gradual recovery in international enrolments.
- We are revising our outlook on UNSW to stable from negative and affirming our 'AA+/A-1+' issuer credit ratings.
Rating Action
On July 21, 2022, S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on University of New South Wales (UNSW), an Australian public university, to stable from negative. At the same time, it affirmed its 'AA+/A-1+' issuer credit ratings on the university.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects our view that UNSW will maintain its strong market position, while managing its budgetary pressures such that its operating margins will roughly balance, available resources will remain more than 35% of expenses, and debt levels relatively low. We also expect that our assessment of the university's role and link to the Australian government will not change.
Downside scenario
We could lower our ratings in the next two years if UNSW's financial profile weakens. This could be evidenced by available resources falling beyond our expectation, persistent operating deficits, or a substantial rise in debt.
Upside scenario
Although unlikely in the next two years, we could raise our ratings on UNSW if the university were to increase its available resources and endowments to similar levels of 'AAA' rated peers, while keeping debt low or if the likelihood of government support strengthened.
Rationale
The outlook revision reflects our view that pandemic-related risks to UNSW's finances and operations are receding. We believe UNSW's strong reputation will continue to attract solid student demand and that the university will maintain a high level of financial resources and low annual debt service. Our ratings on UNSW are supported by the university's strengthening financial position and declining debt. UNSW is likely to continue displaying fiscal flexibility to support its financial position.
Our ratings on UNSW reflect its standalone credit profile, which we assess at 'aa+', based on its extremely strong enterprise and financial profiles. The ratings also reflect our opinion of a moderately high likelihood that the Australian government would provide extraordinary support in the event of financial distress. Together, these result in an issuer credit rating of 'AA+'.
Enterprise profile underpinned by UNSW's quality reputation; student numbers to recover after two years of COVID-19 disruption
We consider the global higher-education sector to be low risk. It tends to be characterized by countercyclical revenues, considerable barriers to entry from startups, and stable but slim industry profit margins. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has buffeted the finances of universities across the globe and severely tested their management teams (see "Outlook For Global Not-For-Profit Higher Education: Out Of The Woods, But Not Yet In The Clear," published Jan. 21, 2022).
We expect domestic demand for higher education to remain resilient. Australia's wealthy and diversified economy--with a GDP per capita of about US$63,600 in 2022--supports the fundamentals of its higher-education sector. With high vaccination coverage, the state of New South Wales (NSW) has phased out virtually all COVID-19-related public health restrictions. UNSW's domestic campuses are open, after mandatory closures during parts of 2020 and 2021, though many classes are being delivered through a mix of on-campus and online modes.
As we previously anticipated, international student numbers could take several years to recover. In December 2021, the Australian government reopened the country's international borders after having sealed them to inbound travelers for two years. Lockdowns and travel restrictions in China stemmed student flows this year from an important source market.
UNSW, established in 1949, has a well-regarded reputation for quality teaching and research. This has allowed it to develop an excellent market position. It is highly ranked globally, with a Times Higher Education (THES) ranking of 70th in 2022 and QS University ranking of 45th in 2022. We believe a well-executed 2025 strategy--to focus on becoming a leading research and teaching university--could improve its ranking. The NSW Auditor-General audits its accounts and the report is tabled in the NSW parliament.
UNSW's strategy should ensure ongoing demand from high quality domestic and international students. UNSW is focused on student experience and commitment to educational excellence. Its median entry score of about 90.2 (of a possible 99.95) in 2021 is well above the national average and one of the highest in Australia. In 2021, postgraduate students accounted for about 26% of total students. International students represented 35% of total students. This exposure to international students has provided strong revenue growth in recent years. However, it also exposes UNSW to the performance of foreign markets, particularly China. Chinese students account for roughly two-thirds of all international students at UNSW. Based on application rates, demand from new domestic students remains robust. We believe this will continue, given UNSW's high global rankings. Total full-time equivalent student numbers exceed 47,000 as of Dec. 31, 2021.
The university showed its financial acumen over the past two years by deferring nonessential and many infrastructure projects that weren't underway. The university established Taskforce 2020-2021 working groups to update its organizational and divisional structure, resulting in employee savings. Under its long-term strategic "2025 Strategy," UNSW delayed some short-term spending, such as for campus activities when students were unable to attend.
UNSW appointed an experienced new vice-chancellor, Professor Attila Brungs, and a new chief financial officer, Elizabeth Stratford, in January 2022. The university continues to attract high-caliber executives who execute consistent strategies and identify and address financial and operational risks.
Recovering operating position and lower debt is improving the university's financial profile
UNSW's financial profile has improved to extremely strong. Supporting our opinion are the university's stronger operating surpluses and lower debt levels than we previously expected.
UNSW's adjusted operating margins outperformed our previous expectations. Operating margins improved to 3.9% in 2021 from 3.2% in 2020. We expect the university's margins to narrow and roughly balance over the next two years. We exclude a few nonrecurring items from our measure of operating revenue (and expenses). The largest of these revenue items is A$100 million in Australian government financial assistance, specifically from the Research Support Program received in 2021. We also adjust one-off A$95 million investment income related to Education Australia Ltd.
UNSW responded to the COVID-19 shock by curtailing capital and discretionary expenditure, including pay cuts or freezes, reductions in staff headcount, and deferrals of capital investment and discretionary spending to help minimize the financial effects. Staff redundancies undertaken in 2020, at the height of the pandemic uncertainty, locked in operating savings of A$75 million, mitigating some of its revenue losses from weaker international student revenue.
In late 2020, the Australian parliament passed the Job-ready Graduates Package of reforms. The reforms alter the mix of tuition fees paid by domestic students and Commonwealth Grant Scheme subsidies contributed by the Australian government for different courses. This could place further strain on sector wide operating margins (see "Australian University Finances Under COVID-19: Degrees Of Discomfort," published April 26, 2021). However, a three-year government transition fund should mitigate the financial effect.
UNSW has ample levels of unrestricted financial resources and robust financial policies. We expect the university to maintain financial resources well above 35% of operating expenses and higher than 2x its total debt. Its consolidated cash and investments increased to 6.4x total debt in 2021 from 3.3x in 2020. UNSW's available resources has grown since the onset of the pandemic, due to strong investment returns and internal cash generation. We expect the value of these assets to remain elevated despite current market volatility. This is because a large proportion of these assets is held in cash, term deposits, and other defensive assets. Our definition of financial resources doesn't include UNSW's endowment fund, Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme assets, and other special-purpose reserves because these assets are generally restricted and unavailable to repay debt.
Our view of UNSW's maximum annual debt service has improved. On our measures, it stands at about 0.92% of operating expenses, down from 2.35% last year. In October 2021, the university repaid and terminated two of its drawn bank lines--totaling A$150 million--which were maturing in April 2022. This reduced debt levels to about A$263 million. UNSW's debt levels and service costs are relatively low compared with its international peers. The university's liquidity is strong/improving.
Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) 16, a new standard adopted in 2019, removed the distinction between operating leases and finance leases. We continue to exclude what were formerly classified as operating lease liabilities from our measures of UNSW's debt, in line with our criteria.
Limiting UNSW's exposure to contingent liabilities is an agreement between the Commonwealth and New South Wales governments to cover its unfunded superannuation retirement benefits. The agreement is outlined in the States Grants (General Revenue) Amendment Act 1987.
Moderately high likelihood of extraordinary government support
Our view of a moderately high likelihood of extraordinary government support reflects our assessment of UNSW's important role and strong link to the Australian government.
UNSW plays an important role in fulfilling the government's public policy and tertiary education objectives. As an independent, not-for-profit entity, it educates students and helps to develop Australia's human capital. We believe recent government funding reforms haven't weakened this role.
We consider UNSW to have a strong link to the Australian government. This is demonstrated by the government's track record of funding and oversight of the higher education sector. The government remains the largest source of income for the higher-education sector. UNSW reports on its spending of Australian government funding to the commonwealth Department of Education, which is responsible for developing higher-education policy and programs.
Further, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency regulates the sector and sets standards that registered higher-education providers must meet to maintain their registration.
Environmental, Social, And Governance Factors
In our view, higher-education entities face elevated social risk due to uncertainty over the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The prolonged period of international border closure inhibited 2022 enrollment numbers. We view the risks posed by COVID-19 to public health and safety as a social risk under our ESG factors. Despite the elevated social risk, we believe UNSW's environment and governance risk are in line with our view of the sector. For more information, see the criteria article "Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings," published Oct. 10, 2021.
University Of New South Wales: Enterprise And Financial Statistics | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31-- | Medians for 'AA' rated public colleges and universities | |||||||||||||
('000s A$) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2020 | ||||||||
Enrollment and demand | ||||||||||||||
Headcount | 65,600 | 63,232 | 64,053 | 62,509 | 59,781 | MNR | ||||||||
Full-time equivalent | 47,141 | 45,594 | 47,867 | 47,117 | 45,516 | 38,513 | ||||||||
Freshman acceptance rate (%) | 37.0 | 36.6 | 29.2 | 30.1 | 30.6 | 68.9 | ||||||||
Freshman matriculation rate (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | 78.7 | ||||||||
Freshman retention (%) | 91.6 | 91.6 | 91.5 | 91.5 | 91.2 | 86.7 | ||||||||
Graduation rates (six years) (%) | 74.7 | 72.3 | 70.2 | 69.9 | 72.0 | MNR | ||||||||
Income statement | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating revenue ($000s) | 2,284,322 | 2,241,880 | 2,402,139 | 2,254,609 | 2,107,339 | MNR | ||||||||
Adjusted operating expense ($000s) | 2,199,091 | 2,172,217 | 2,386,542 | 2,200,372 | 1,959,268 | MNR | ||||||||
Net adjusted operating income ($000s) | 74,031 | 69,663 | 15,597 | 54,237 | 148,071 | MNR | ||||||||
Net adjusted operating margin (%) | 3.88 | 3.21 | 0.65 | 2.46 | 7.56 | 0.80 | ||||||||
Estimated operating gain/loss before depreciation ($000s) | 290,163 | 283,243 | 225,469 | 227,234 | 308,911 | MNR | ||||||||
Change in unrestricted net assets (UNA; $000s) | 292,846 | 210,000 | 8,000 | (113,000) | 340,000 | MNR | ||||||||
State operating appropriations ($000s) | 631,556 | 647,226 | 587,810 | 557,386 | 525,439 | MNR | ||||||||
State appropriations to revenue (%) | 27.8 | 28.9 | 24.5 | 24.7 | 24.9 | 19.3 | ||||||||
Student dependence (%) | 46.9 | 47.1 | 49.0 | 48.6 | 47.3 | 40.0 | ||||||||
Health care operations dependence (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | MNR | ||||||||
Research dependence (%) | 16.2 | 15.0 | 15.1 | 14.5 | 15.0 | MNR | ||||||||
Endowment and investment income dependence (%) | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | ||||||||
Debt | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding debt ($000s) | 262,944 | 406,940 | 370,627 | 370,770 | 358,341 | 1,021,735 | ||||||||
Proposed debt ($000s) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Total pro forma debt ($000s) | 262,944 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Pro forma MADS | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Current debt service burden (%) | 8.03 | 10.40 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 2.08 | MNR | ||||||||
Current MADS burden (%) | 0.92 | 1.21 | 1.69 | 1.81 | 2.08 | 3.30 | ||||||||
Pro forma MADS burden (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Financial resource ratios | ||||||||||||||
Endowment market value ($000s) | 337,000 | 280,000 | 269,000 | 245,000 | 245,000 | 999,171 | ||||||||
Related foundation market value ($000s) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | 681,584 | ||||||||
Cash and investments ($000s) | 1,687,846 | 1,338,284 | 1,118,260 | 1,085,179 | 1,227,665 | MNR | ||||||||
UNA ($000s) | 1,350,846 | 1,058,000 | 848,000 | 840,000 | 953,000 | MNR | ||||||||
Adjusted UNA ($000s) | 1,350,846 | 1,058,000 | 848,000 | 840,000 | 953,000 | MNR | ||||||||
Cash and investments to operations (%) | 76.8 | 61.6 | 46.9 | 49.3 | 62.7 | 53.0 | ||||||||
Cash and investments to debt (%) | 641.9 | 328.9 | 301.7 | 292.7 | 342.6 | 167.7 | ||||||||
Cash and investments to pro forma debt (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Adjusted UNA to operations (%) | 61.4 | 48.7 | 35.5 | 38.2 | 48.6 | 36.2 | ||||||||
Adjusted UNA plus debt service reserve to debt (%) | 513.7 | 260.0 | 228.8 | 226.6 | 265.9 | 104.9 | ||||||||
Adjusted UNA plus debt service reserve to pro forma debt (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
Average age of plant (years) | 11.0 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 11.8 | 11.5 | 13.6 | ||||||||
OPEB liability to total liabilities (%) | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | MNR | ||||||||
N.A.--Not available. MNR--Median not reported. MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Total adjusted operating revenue = unrestricted revenue less realized and unrealized gains/losses and financial aid. Total adjusted operating expense = unrestricted expense plus financial aid expense. Net operating margin = 100*(net adjusted operating income/adjusted operating expense). Student dependence = 100*(gross tuition revenue + auxiliary revenue) / adjusted operating revenue. Current debt service burden = 100*(current debt service expense/adjusted operating expenses). Current MADS burden = 100*(maximum annual debt service expense/adjusted operating expenses). Cash and investments = cash + short-term and long-term investments. Adjusted UNA = Unrestricted net assets + unrestricted net assets of the foundation. Average age of plant = accumulated depreciation/depreciation and amortization expense. |
Related Criteria
- General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021
- General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017
- General Criteria: Methodology: Not-For-Profit Public And Private Colleges And Universities, Jan. 6, 2016
- General Criteria: Rating Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions, March 25, 2015
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
Related Research
- Slow Burn For Australia Student Return, April 13, 2022
- Outlook For Global Not-For-Profit Higher Education: Out Of The Woods, But Not Yet In The Clear, Jan. 21, 2022
- Australia, Canada, Mexico, And U.K. Universities Medians Report: Credit Metrics Remain Largely Stable Through Persistent Headwinds, July 1, 2021
- Australian University Finances Under COVID-19: Degrees Of Discomfort, April 26, 2021
- Australian Universities Go From Boom To Zoom, April 26, 2021
Ratings List
Ratings Affirmed | ||
---|---|---|
University of New South Wales (The) |
||
Senior Unsecured | AA+ | |
Ratings Affirmed; CreditWatch/Outlook Action | ||
To | From | |
University of New South Wales (The) |
||
Issuer Credit Rating | AA+/Stable/A-1+ | AA+/Negative/A-1+ |
S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Rebecca Hrvatin, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2123; rebecca.hrvatin@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Martin J Foo, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2016; martin.foo@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.