articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220630-harsher-headwinds-raise-risk-of-credit-stress-12430635 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Harsher Headwinds Raise Risk Of Credit Stress

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates

COMMENTS

Americas Sovereign Rating Trends 2025: Average Credit Quality Hits Highest Point Since 2017


Harsher Headwinds Raise Risk Of Credit Stress

image

After an unprecedented era of remarkably favorable financing conditions, circumstances are rapidly changing--redefining the global economy and challenging credit markets. These intensifying headwinds could expose many borrowers to operational and structural pressures as central banks aggressively tighten monetary policy. At the same time, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war continues to exacerbate inflation and cost pressures with high commodity, energy, and food prices, and slowing global economic activity signals consumers' concerns.

Recession risks are rising around the world alongside the heightened prospect of markedly deteriorating credit conditions. On a global scale, the second half of this year will likely be characterized by limited access to, and a higher cost of, credit. As Russia's invasion of Ukraine drags on, the humanitarian crisis, degrees of uncertainty and risk, and economic costs continue to grow--as reflected in the latest downward revisions to our global economic forecasts and our risk assessments. Central banks are hastily reversing a decade of ultra-loose monetary policy, even against the backdrop of slowing growth and heightened recession risk in the U.S. and Europe.

But for now, fundamental credit quality is proving resilient--whether looking at ratings actions, the net ratings bias, or the level of defaults (which remain low). Many factors are underpinning this: headroom built into ratings given the strength of the post-COVID recovery; the solid liquidity position of most companies amid highly favorable financing conditions in recent years, which allowed them to extend maturities; and overall lower ratings levels now than prior to the pandemic.

We see market volatility as a response to new or developing fundamental stressors. In the past three decades, each period of acute market stress has appeared during or before a recession--which is more of a driver of ratings downgrades and defaults than the market volatility itself. Lower-rated issuers will be the most vulnerable if access to capital markets becomes restricted.

While U.S. market participants have become more accepting of the increasing presence of issuers rated 'B-', which account for roughly a quarter of our rated speculative-grade issuers, investors now face increased risk of higher default rates and lower recoveries amid rising rates and fewer protections from credit deterioration. With slowing growth and rising policy rates pushing U.S. speculative-grade spreads higher, the U.S. distress ratio recently had its biggest increase since May 2020.

Even in our current base-case default-rate projections, we believe U.S. and European speculative-grade corporate defaults will rise from their very low levels, to 3% by March 2023. To be sure, overall global nonfinancial speculative-grade refinancing risk will likely remain manageable through 2023 in North America and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa following last year's record issuance.

Against this backdrop, S&P Global Ratings has run multiple scenario analyses to assess potential challenges from varying degrees of downturn--evaluating the implications of interest rate and EBITDA stresses for rated U.S. speculative-grade corporates; how a recession could affect rated European speculative-grade nonfinancial corporates; what implications higher borrowing and inflation costs will have on Asia-Pacific rated corporates overall; and the direct fiscal cost to sovereigns from a 300 basis-point (bps) increase in the cost of refinancing central government debt. These stress tests followed the publication of a stress scenario analyzing what a 300 bps rise in both interest rates and inflation could mean for unrated corporates globally.

Under current conditions, we believe between 16%-25% of rated Asia-Pacific entities could face downside risks to credit quality through 2023. But a renewed recession could put particular pressure on U.S. and European speculative-grade entities ratings.

In the U.S., a moderate-stress environment will likely increase the proportion of rated U.S. speculative-grade issuers with negative outlooks to 20%-25% by year-end, from the 15% seen today--with 'B-' rated issuers most vulnerable to downgrades, after those in the 'CCC' category. In a high-stress scenario, the proportion of issuers generating negative free operating cash flow could double. While our scenario analysis found that most rated European speculative-grade corporate entities are better positioned to endure a mild or moderate downturn, a severe recession would deliver a 20% decline in EBITDA by the end of 2023, in line with previous cycles.

Unrated corporates would face similar risks in the face of a 300 bps rise in interest rates and inflation. According to our analysis, loss-makers could nearly double--to 12% from an already-high 7%--with China's corporates most affected.

And for sovereigns, the first-order effects of a 300 bps rise in refinancing costs could be fiscally challenging for at least six out of 19 emerging market economies, including Brazil, Egypt, Ghana, Hungary, Kenya, and Ukraine.

As we continue to assess evolving global credit conditions and their implications for borrowing costs, credit quality, and markets, S&P Global Ratings developed and is trialing its proprietary Credit Cycle Indicator (CCI) to track and consolidate leverage, asset prices, and market liquidity globally. Covering Asia, emerging markets, the eurozone, and North America, the CCI will be a leading indicator for potential credit stress. Our preliminary results show that peaks in the CCI tend to precede major credit stress events by six to 10 quarters. The CCI currently indicates that heightened credit stress is likely to develop in late 2022 or early 2023.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Molly Mintz, New York;
Molly.Mintz@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Alexandra Dimitrijevic, London + 44 20 7176 3128;
alexandra.dimitrijevic@spglobal.com
Ruth Yang, New York (1) 212-438-2722;
ruth.yang2@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in