Key Takeaways
- Brazil's credit unions have been posting above-average growth over the past few years, particularly in agribusiness lending, an industry that these types of lenders have historically served.
- Despite a relatively low market share in loans, cooperatives, in S&P Global Ratings' view, will maintain their competitive edge, stemming from their role in increasing financial inclusion in Brazil and their strong ties to professional and geographic communities.
- Nevertheless, cooperatives face economic and industry headwinds similar to those of banks, given stiff competition, rapid digital transformation, inflationary pressures, and macroeconomic uncertainties.
Credit Unions' Roots
Cooperatives were created during the 19th century in Europe, following the industrial revolution, in an attempt to improve the appalling social, economic, and working conditions experienced by workers at that time. While the first cooperatives were organized and owned by groups that had something in common, such as artisans and farmers, it didn't take long for the groups to realize that these institutions could expand their activities. Around 1850, 'loan societies' started to be developed in Germany, mainly to provide credit to farmers at reasonable rates.
The first credit union in Brazil was founded in 1902 in the southern state of Rio Grande do Sul, which German immigrants settled. The credit union, that still primarily grants agricultural loans, is now part of Banco Cooperativo Sicredi S.A. (Sicredi; BB-/Stable/--), which is currently the largest financial cooperative in the country. Sixty years later, the Brazilian government passed laws that formalized operations of credit unions, and the central bank was tasked to supervise and regulate these entities.
While in Germany and France, cooperatives have average market shares of 25%, their Brazilian counterparts control a much smaller share. As of June 2021, Sicredi had a loan market share of 2.6%, Sicoob 2.3%, and the cooperative sector granted only 5.1% of the country's loans. Despite such a low number, credit unions' market share almost doubled in Brazil between 2016 and 2020. Growth stemmed from robust performance of the domestic agribusiness, a segment in which cooperatives specialize, as well as the more attractive rates and fees offered to members, given that business stability, rather than short-term profitability, is a higher priority for credit unions.
Additionally, considering the number of members, Brazilian credit unions are closer to their European peers: Sicredi and Sicoob have together approximately 11.5 million members, while Group Crédit Agricole in France has 11.2 million and the cooperative sector of Germany has 20 million.
Chart 1
Recent Trends
If in terms of total loans, Brazilian cooperatives have lower market share than those of private and public-owned banks, a different picture emerges if we look at the agricultural lending sector. As of December 2020, credit unions extended 22% of personal agricultural loans.
Chart 2
Sicredi is the sixth-largest financial institution in Brazil in loans, holding a market share of about 2.6%, while Sicoob is the seventh largest with a 2.3% share. On the other hand, in the agricultural financing segment, Sicredi and Sicoob are the second- and third-largest players, respectively, with 10% and 7% market shares.
Chart 3
Additionally, not only is agricultural lending among credit unions outpacing that of other lenders, but the cooperatives' share of total loans is surging as well. As we previously stated in our report, "Growing Digitalization Of Brazil's Financial System Will Foster Efficiency And Intensify Competition", despite strong recent growth, Brazil's digital banks are still primarily offering credit cards and are not yet taking market share from traditional banks. However, credit unions are in fact doing so, as exemplified in data in charts 1 and 4 show.
Chart 4
Credit unions are known to have broad networks of branches, including presence in nonprofitable and rural areas, prioritizing proximity to members and their communities. Over the past years, while traditional commercial banks have been closing branches and focusing on digital operations to cut costs and expand their product offerings, cooperatives not only kept their physical presence, but expanded it, and started operating in what is called a "physital" model, which is the merger of physical and digital models.
Chart 5
Such a trend broadens the cooperatives' role in pulling unbanked Brazilians into the formal financial system across small municipalities. We expect this factor and credit unions' expertise in serving local communities to remain a competitive edge for them.
Moving Forward
Part of its initiative to stimulate innovation in the financial system, the Brazilian central bank launched in 2019 "Agenda BC". Under this program, the central bank is working with credit unions to increase access to financial products, competition, financial education among the population.
In addition, to widen the credit unions' role in the financial system, the regulator launched a program, "2022 Challenges", the following goals that the cooperative sector is to achieve by year-end:
- Increasing the cooperatives' loan market share to 20% of;
- Lifting the share of loans taken out by cooperative members. Currently, they account for only 24% of loans in the cooperative system, with the remainder granted to various financial institutions;
- Raising the share of cooperative members from lower-income brackets to 50% from 33% currently; and
- Broadening the presence of cooperatives in the country's northern and northeastern regions from the lenders' traditional concentration in the south, by expanding services to 25% of cities from 15% in 2019 in those two regions.
Another plank is to amend the law regulating cooperatives in order to improve governance rules of these lenders and expand the range of products and services from credit unions. Currently, Brazil's Senate is reviewing this amendment.
We view favorably these initiatives because, once approved/implemented, they will not only strengthen the sector but help accelerate the country's economic and social development, the latter of which serves as one of cooperatives' main goals since their founding.
Main Challenges
Despite the promising prospects for Brazilian credit unions, the global and domestic economies are currently grappling with a large number of shocks. First, the inflationary pressures in the country can weigh on cooperatives' asset quality. While they usually have lower risk profiles than those of commercial lenders, credit unions are not immune to market downturns. In addition, funding costs for the entities are increasing because of the rising policy interest rates in Brazil. Although cooperatives benefit from very stable funding bases, given that depositors are members of the cooperative system, these lenders still must make the efforts to reprice their loan portfolios.
Furthermore, despite efforts to expand their presence around the country, credit unions offer services in 94% of the municipalities in the southern region, but only 27.6% of those in the northern region and 11.8% in the northeastern region.
Finally, competition in the Brazilian banking industry has intensified over the past few years, given the implementation of open banking initiatives, the digitalization of the industry and the growth of fintechs. We believe that in response to these trends, cooperatives need to raise their competitiveness in order to meet members' rising demand for digital products and services and broaden their range of offerings, while not eroding bonds and proximity to their members.
Ultimately, we don't expect the economic hardships and rising competition to affect the ratings on one cooperative that we rate, Sicredi. We expect credit unions to continue strengthening their business model, widening and diversifying their product offerings, as they seek to compete more against traditional banks, with the advantage of having a loyal base of clients, given that they're also members of the cooperative system. We also expect them to keep expanding both the number of members and the geographical scope of operations, despite Brazil's deep economic malaise. On the other hand, factors related to the system's operational complexity, faster lending growth than the industry average, and correlation of its businesses are not excessively problematic but can generate additional volatility for credit unions.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Nicole Lazari, CFA, Sao Paulo +55 1138184137; nicole.lazari@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Guilherme Machado, Sao Paulo + 30399700; guilherme.machado@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.