articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220531-jhf-rmbs-performance-watch-may-2022-stability-continues-despite-covid-12387938 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

JHF RMBS Performance Watch May 2022: Stability Continues Despite COVID

COMMENTS

Global Tariff Tracker: Rating Actions As Of May 2, 2025

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2025 (As Of April 25)

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


JHF RMBS Performance Watch May 2022: Stability Continues Despite COVID

JHF RMBS Transactions
GHLC series 1 to 53 residential mortgage-secured pass-through notes
GHLC series S-1 to S-10 residential mortgage-secured pass-through notes
JHF series 1 to 178 residential mortgage-secured pass-through notes
JHF series S-1 to S-18 residential mortgage-secured pass-through notes
JHF series T-1 to T-9 residential mortgage-secured pass-through notes
GHLC--Government Housing Loan Corp. JHF--Japan Housing Finance Agency

The impact of the pandemic has peaked, and performances of the underlying loans are at pre-pandemic levels.   The performance of the overall Japan Housing Finance Agency (JHF) series pool (see note 1) temporarily deteriorated after a first state of emergency related to COVID-19 was declared in April 2020. After that, we observed a recovery. However, performance of underlying assets could deteriorate if the Japanese economy does. We see a number of factors that could trigger such stress, including soaring energy prices, a depreciating yen, and disruptions in companies' supply chains, as well as a resurgence of COVID-19.

We believe that replacement and withdrawal ratios of the monthly notes are likely to remain stable for the foreseeable future.  Replacement and withdrawal ratios (see note 2) of the monthly notes had as of August 2020 risen considerably, because of the pandemic, to around 1.7% on an annualized basis. However, the ratio is now back to its pre-pandemic level of around 0.4%. If we look at the recent delinquency rate, it is slightly lower than its pre-pandemic level. This leads to our assessment that replacement and withdrawal ratios are unlikely to be volatile.

The pandemic had a limited impact on the replacement and withdrawal ratios of the series S and series T notes.   Underlying pools backing the series S and series T notes have longer seasoning, and redemption of principal payments is further on for these notes than the monthly notes, which we think reduces their sensitivity to stress environments (see charts 5 and 9).

Delinquency rates of the monthly notes temporarily rose after the first state of emergency, but thereafter returned to pre-pandemic levels.   The one-month delinquency rate of the monthly notes had been stable at around 0.5% since 2013. However, after rising to around 0.65% as of May 2020, its declined to 0.3%-0.4% from 2021, below the pre-pandemic level. We believe this is mainly because during the pandemic some borrowers with lower creditworthiness were removed from underlying pools through replacements or withdrawals at a faster pace than usual. The delinquency rate of the series S and series T notes has been slightly lower than it was pre-pandemic (see charts 15 and 19).

Prepayment rates on loans in the monthly notes issued in fiscal 2010 (ended March 31, 2011) and fiscal 2011 have in recent times increased.   This is mainly because of refinancing associated with steps-up in interest rates for the underlying mortgage loans. The prepayment rate of the fiscal 2010 notes, however, has returned to decline. The rates for the fiscal 2011 notes are also likely to peak soon, in our view. On the other hand, prepayment rates for the monthly notes issued in and after fiscal 2016, following the January 2016 introduction of negative interest rates by the Bank of Japan, have been low, at 1%-3%. We believe this is because the applied interest rates for the loans are generally low and borrowers have fewer incentives to refinance. Meanwhile, the prepayment rates of the series S and series T notes have been stable recently because of the completion of the step-up timing in interest rates of the underlying pools. In our view, most outstanding obligors in the underlying pools are less sensitive to movements in interest rates because their prepayment rates are stable even when market interest rates have fluctuated. Prepayment rates for the series S and series T notes have been stable at between 5%-6% (see charts 23 and 27).

We expect regular monthly notes issued in and after fiscal 2016 to have a considerable effect on the current pool's performance.  This is because loan receivables backing these regular monthly notes represent about 68% of the recent outstanding balance of the overall monthly notes pool.

JHF exercised call options on notes for which the outstanding balance had fallen to less than 10% of their initial issue amount.   It exercised options on the Government Housing Loan Corp. (GHLC) series 17, 19, 20, 22 to 25, 46, 50, S-6 to S-7, and JHF series S-16 to S-18 notes in April 2022. The GHLC series 1 to 20, 22 to 26, 30, 46, 50, and S-1 to S-7 notes and JHF series S-13 to S-18 notes have been fully redeemed.

The recent rapid spread of the omicron variant highlights the inherent uncertainties of the pandemic as well as the importance and benefits of vaccines. While the risk of new, more severe variants displacing omicron and evading existing immunity cannot be ruled out, our current base case assumes that existing vaccines can continue to provide significant protection against severe illness. Furthermore, many governments, businesses, and households around the world are tailoring policies to limit the adverse economic impact of recurring COVID-19 waves. Consequently, we do not expect a repeat of the sharp global economic contraction of second-quarter 2020. Meanwhile, we continue to assess how well each issuer adapts to new waves in its geography or industry.

Pool Composition By Fiscal Year Of Issuance Or Contractual Fiscal Year

Table 1 (a)

Composition Of Pools (Regular Monthly Notes)
Fiscal year of issuance 2001* 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Series GHLC series 1 to 5 GHLC series 6 to 10 GHLC series 11 to 17 GHLC series 18 to 29 GHLC series 30 to 41 GHLC series 42 to 53 JHF series 1 to 12 JHF series 13 to 23
*Includes GHLC series 1 issued in March 2001.

Table 1 (b)

Composition Of Pools (Regular Monthly Notes)
Fiscal year of issuance 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Series JHF series 24 to 35 JHF series 36 to 47 JHF series 48 to 59 JHF series 60 to 71 JHF series 72 to 83 JHF series 84 to 95 JHF series 96 to 107 JHF series 108 to 119

Table 1 (c)

Composition Of Pools (Regular Monthly Notes)
Fiscal year of issuance 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021*
Series JHF series 120 to 131 JHF series 132 to 143 JHF series 144 to 155 JHF series 156 to 167 JHF series 168 to 178
*Fiscal 2021 includes issuances from April 2021 through February 2022.

Table 2(a)

Composition Of Pools (Series S and Series T Notes)
Contractual fiscal year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1996 1997
Series GHLC series S-1 to S-3 GHLC series S-4 to S-10 and JHF series S-1 to S-3 JHF series S-4 to S-7 JHF series S-8 to S-9 JHF series S-10 to S-11 JHF series S-12 JHF series S-13 to S-15; JHF series T-1 to T-2 JHF series S-16 to S-18; JHF series T-3 to T-4

Table 2(b)

Composition Of Pools (Series S and Series T Notes)
Contractual fiscal year 1998 1999
Series JHF series T-5 to T-8 JHF series T-9

Outstanding Balance Of Receivables

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Performance

Replacement and withdrawal ratios

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

Chart 11

image

Chart 12

image

Cumulative replacement and withdrawal ratios

Chart 13

image

Chart 14

image

Delinquency rates

Chart 15

image

Chart 16

image

Chart 17

image

Chart 18

image

Chart 19

image

Chart 20

image

Chart 21

image

Chart 22

image

Prepayment rates

Chart 23

image

Chart 24

image

Chart 25

image

Chart 26

image

Chart 27

image

Chart 28

image

Chart 29

image

Chart 30

image

Notes for charts 5 to 30
  • Figures for loan pools by fiscal year of issuance or contractual fiscal year are weighted averages of the outstanding balances.
  • Breakdown of loan pools by fiscal year of issuance or contractual fiscal year: Our 12-month moving average starts at the first month, which we define as the month after the one in which JHF issued its first series for that fiscal year.
  • The rightmost portions of trendlines in some charts with seasoning show volatility until a full 12 months of data are accumulated for each fiscal year.

Notes

We detail performance trends in the underlying pools of loan receivables backing the notes that JHF issued up to the end of February 2022 (see note 3). We separately examine:

  • The performance of the overall series pool, which consists of all pools of loan receivables backing all regular monthly notes and is mainly made up of loans JHF purchased from private sector financial institutions;
  • The performance of the receivables pools backing each individual series of regular monthly notes, broken down by fiscal year of issuance (see note 4);
  • The performance of the overall series S and series T pools, which consist of all pools of loan receivables that back all series S and series T notes and were extended by JHF itself; and
  • The performance of the receivables pools backing each series S and series T note, broken down by the fiscal year in which the loan agreements were made (see note 5).

1. In this report, "JHF" refers to the former GHLC and JHF, and "JHF notes" refers to notes that either the former GHLC or JHF issued unless otherwise noted.

2. JHF has a replacement scheme for the regular monthly notes it issued before March 2007, and for the series S notes. For regular monthly notes issued in or after April 2007 and the series T notes, JHF has a withdrawal scheme, in which it applies an amount equivalent to the principal on loans close to default and other loans to payment of the JHF notes and withdraws such loans from the entrusted assets. JHF defines receivables close to default and other receivables as:

  • Receivables that are four months overdue,
  • Receivables that JHF deems defaulted,
  • Receivables with extraordinary amendments to terms and conditions,
  • Receivables subject to changes in obligor (contracting party) names, and
  • Other receivables.

The fiscal 2005 loan pool included multiple other receivables that JHF replaced shortly after the transactions closed. These receivables were ineligible for inclusion in the underlying pools of JHF's structured notes because mortgage rights on the condominiums were not established as required. We thus excluded all other receivables for the five-month period following entrustment from the fiscal 2005 pool. The fiscal 2016 loan pool includes the JHF series 108 monthly notes, for which an administrative error at a partner financial institution has led to multiple withdrawals. We thus excluded all "other receivables" for the one-month period following entrustment regarding the JHF series 108 monthly notes.

3. This report updates "Performance Watch: Japan Housing Finance Agency And Government Housing Loan Corp. Residential Mortgage-Secured Pass-Through Notes," which S&P Global Ratings published Dec. 1, 2021. We periodically publish surveillance reports on the structured notes that JHF, formerly GHLC, issued. In this report, we have added the performance data for the collection period from September 2021 to February 2022. The performance data in this report includes that of fully redeemed notes.

4. We aggregated the loans underlying the series of regular monthly notes by fiscal year (ends March 31 of the following year) of issuance. As a result of the relatively short ages of the underlying loans at the time of their entrustment, aggregated data by fiscal year of issuance are almost identical to aggregated data by contractual fiscal year (the fiscal year in which the loan agreement was entered into). Given that only the GHLC series 1 notes were issued in fiscal 2000, we included these notes in our calculation of the performance of the fiscal 2001 pool.

5. For the series S and series T notes, there was a significant period of time between the extension of the underlying loans and JHF securitizing them. We therefore aggregated the loans by contractual fiscal year.

Appendix: Calculation Of Indices

Replacement or withdrawal ratio (annualized)

Receivables replacement or withdrawal ratio for a term "t" = Amount of receivables subject to replacement or withdrawal for term "t" (principal) / Receivables outstanding at beginning of term "t" (principal) x 100 x 12

Cumulative replacement or withdrawal ratio

Cumulative replacement or withdrawal ratio for term "t" = Cumulative amount of receivables subject to replacement or withdrawal from note issuance to end of term "t" (principal) / Initial receivables outstanding (principal) x 100

Delinquency rate

Delinquency rate for term "t" = Amount of delinquent receivables for term "t" (principal) / Receivables outstanding at beginning of term "t" (principal) x 100

Prepayment rate (annualized)

Prepayment rate for term "t" = Amount of prepaid receivables for term "t" (principal) / Receivables outstanding at beginning of term "t" (principal) x 100 x 12

Related Criteria

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Shota Tatewaki, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8276;
shota.tatewaki@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in