Key Takeaways
- U.S. grocery retailers and distributors will be among the hardest hit retail subsectors in 2022 with the potential for steep margin and profit pressure if rising costs are not offset with other savings.
- The Consumer Price Index was up 8.3% in the 12 months ended in April in the U.S., and food inflation rose for an 11th straight month to 9.4%, the most since April 1981.
- Our hypothetical 150 basis points margin stress test could result in negative rating actions for more than half the grocers we rate, including 75% of speculative-grade companies.
- Discount retailers will benefit as demand increases during the inflationary environment.
U.S. grocery retailers and distributors, after posting stellar operating performance in 2020-2021 amid COVID-19 pandemic stay-at-home trends, could face steep margin and profit pressure in 2022. S&P Global Ratings anticipates grocery will be one of the hardest hit subsectors of U.S. retail--an especially affected corporate sector--after a string of upgrades the past two years.
Grocery chief executives, including those at Kroger Co. and Albertsons Cos. Inc., commented last year that businesses like theirs have done well when food inflation is 3%-4%. Grocers can pass that on in prices at stores and increase their top lines. However, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the Consumer Price Index was up 8.3% in the 12 months ended in April, among the highest in more than 40 years. And specifically, food inflation ramped up for an 11th straight month to 9.4%, the highest reading since April 1981, according to the BLS. S&P Global Ratings (and the U.S. Federal Reserve) believe the situation is not fully transitory. Although supermarkets benefited at the expense of restaurants during pandemic lockdowns, inflation is now eating away at all food sellers as the costs of meat, eggs, dairy, oils, and sugar are expected to continue to soar in 2022 (charts 1 and 2).
Chart 1
Chart 2
As a result, we are very cautious about prospects for the grocery industry this year and believe negative rating actions are possible if cost pressures are not offset. We believe raising prices has diminishing returns over time and that some traffic into groceries with pharmacies because of COVID-19 vaccination distribution will fade. We also think demand is likely to falter, and grocers will need to absorb cost increases into their already thin margins. We understand that after years of investing in e-commerce, there is little cushion for groceries and distributors to pass through all these macroeconomic effects this year. Potential recessionary trends, high gas prices, and elevated labor and other supply chain costs only add further risk. So do declining consumer confidence and reduced purchasing power because of rising interest rates, as well as elevated prices for certain commodities given the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
We expect elevated saving and wage rates in the U.S. should help consumers absorb some higher grocery prices, though less so for the lower-income shopper. We forecast shoppers of all incomes will trade down to smaller packages or cheaper brands. We also expect some market share gains and traffic retention from the pandemic to persist with grocers because restaurant (food-away-from-home) prices are rising too, up 7.2% between April 2021 and April 2022, according to the BLS.
Additionally, we believe customers will consolidate trips to save on gas, for higher basket size and lower grocery traffic this year. Both conventional grocers such as Kroger and Albertsons and more broadly diversified peers including Walmart Inc. will face operating pressure. Walmart, the nation's largest grocer, is already affected. Grocery was a challenged category in earnings for its fiscal year ended April 29, 2022. The discounter must balance low prices and profit preservation, as hard-hit customers look for value. It must also consider that a shift toward lower-margin food and away from higher-margin items such as apparel will dent earnings this year. CEO Doug McMillon said Walmart especially pays attention to "opening price-point food items" that low-income households must buy to feed their families, such as loaves of bread, gallons of milk, cans of tuna, and macaroni and cheese.
Gross margin compression offset top-line strength for midsize grocers in the first part of the year. Ingles Markets Inc. noted that for the first half of fiscal 2022, net sales increased 16.6% compared with the first half of 2021. But gross margins declined about 100 basis points (bps) to 25.3% as inflationary product costs and freight expenses were partially offset with store and labor efficiencies. Comparable club sales increased roughly 4% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc. excluding gasoline revenue. Meanwhile merchandise gross margins, which excludes gasoline sales and membership fee income decreased 30 bps in the quarter ended April 30, 2022.
In 2021, food-at-home prices increased 3.5% and food-away-from-home prices increased 4.5%. The CPI for all food increased an average of 3.9% in 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and BLS (chart 3).
Chart 3
While the food inflation that we expect this year will likely be credit negative, a certain level of other inflation can help grocers. With private sector wages and salaries up 5% in the first quarter of 2022 relative to a year earlier, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, there is some chance customers can accept higher prices than we have anticipated in previous inflationary environments. And discount grocers could expect traffic gains in the coming year.
Inflationary Stress Test Assumptions
To assess the impact of inflation on the 19 U.S. grocery and food distribution companies that we publicly rate, we designed a hypothetical stress test to sensitize gross margin and understand how much it would take to trigger a downgrade of each issuer. We designed the test as a simple "what if" scenario that indicates our view of the vulnerability of select issues to additional inflation. Therefore, we did not include offsetting actions such as optimizing inventory or labor, reducing capital expenditures, or pausing share buybacks. We included all of our publicly rated grocery and grocery distributor companies. Of the 19, seven are investment-grade and 12 are speculative-grade.
Our takeaways:
- A 100 bps decline in gross margin would result in 35% of the portfolio being downgraded.
- A 200 bps decline in gross margin would result in 65% of the portfolio being downgraded.
- Investment-grade companies can withstand 80 bps of gross margin compression before being downgraded.
- Speculative-grade companies can withstand 17 bps of gross margin compression before being downgraded.
Table 1 summarizes the companies from best- to worst-positioned in our view for a 150 bps gross margin inflationary shock. We also highlight the minimum gross margin pressure they could absorb before triggering a negative rating action.
Table 1
Grocery Subsector Stress Test | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Subsector | Rating as of May 24, 2022 | Outlook | Downgrade or outlook revision threshold | Inflation stress (bps) | Potential rating action at 150 bps stress |
Costco Wholesale Corp. |
Discounter/food retailers | A+ | Stable | Mid-1x leverage | 500 | No |
Target Corp. |
Discounter/food retailers | A | Stable | Mid-2x leverage | 490 | No |
Dollar Tree Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | BBB | Stable | >3x leverage | 400 | No |
Dollar General Corp. |
Discounter/food retailers | BBB | Stable | mid-3x leverage | 300 | No |
BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | BB | Stable | >4x leverage | 255 | No |
GOBP Holdings Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | B+ | Positive | >5x leverage | 180 | No |
Walmart Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | AA | Stable | >2x leverage | 165 | No |
Ingles Markets Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | BB | Positive | >2x leverage | 160 | No |
SEG Holding LLC |
Discounter/food retailers | B+ | Stable | >4x leverage | 145 | Yes |
Albertsons Cos. Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | BB | Stable | >5x leverage | 118 | Yes |
Kroger Co. |
Discounter/food retailers | BBB | Stable | >4x leverage | 117 | Yes |
Wegmans Food Markets Inc. |
Discounter/food retailers | BBB+ | Stable | Mid-2x leverage | 90 | Yes |
Quirch Foods Holdings LLC |
Distribution services | B | Stable | >7x leverage | 85 | Yes |
United Natural Foods Inc. |
Distribution services | B+ | Stable | >5x leverage | 35 | Yes |
C&S Group Enterprises LLC |
Distribution services | BB- | Stable | >4x leverage | 20 | Yes |
KeHE Distributors Holdings LLC |
Distribution services | B+ | Stable | Low-5x leverage | 18 | Yes |
The Fresh Market |
Discounter/food retailers | B- | Stable | Capital structure is potentially unsustainable | N/A | Yes |
Moran Foods LLC |
Discounter/food retailers | CCC+ | Negative | Specific default scenario over the next 12 months | N/A | Yes |
99 cents only stores LLC |
Discounter/food retailers | CCC+ | Negative | Intensifying competition further eroding profitability or execution problems with margin-expansion initiatives. | N/A | Yes |
Leverage defined as S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA. bps--Basis points. N/A--Not applicable. |
Of the selected 19 companies, we believe about 58% (11 companies) would qualify for a rating action with just 150 bps of inflation stress. Two of the 11 are investment-grade and the rest are speculative-grade. We note that while high-rated Costco Wholesale Corp. can absorb more than 500 bps of gross margin hit, smaller low-margin grocery distributors such as KeHE Distributors Holdings LLC only need 18 bps to hit negative rating action leverage thresholds. We believe dollar stores or lower-price retailers will benefit as the demand for their products increases during the inflationary environment.
Investment-grade issuers retain greater pricing power and have more options to restore credit measures, such as larger cost-reduction actions, reducing share repurchases, or halting acquisitions, but near-term credit measures could deteriorate substantially in a hyper-inflationary environment. Therefore, for large investment-grade issuers, we would likely revise outlooks to negative for most versus immediate downgrades despite near-term deterioration in credit measures.
Most of the negative rating action potential was for speculative-grade issuers. Many would need to approach or exceed this leverage amount on a sustained basis to see a downgrade. Others could face unsustainable capital structures or liquidity crunches because of already high leverage, pushing many 'B-' issuers into the 'CCC' category.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Diya G Iyer, New York + 1 (212) 438 4001; diya.iyer@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Sarah E Wyeth, New York + 1 (212) 438 5658; sarah.wyeth@spglobal.com |
Poonam U Zawar, Mumbai; Poonam.Zawar@spglobal.com | |
Bea Y Chiem, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5070; bea.chiem@spglobal.com | |
Lauren E Slade, Centennial + 1 (212) 438 1421; lauren.slade@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.