articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220509-macro-risks-and-diverging-end-markets-overshadow-u-s-tech-s-mostly-good-results-12371660 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Macro Risks And Diverging End Markets Overshadow U.S. Tech's Mostly Good Results

COMMENTS

U.K. Brief: Removal Of VAT Exemption For Private Schools Is Unlikely To Affect Ratings Over The Short Term

COMMENTS

FAQ: Applying Our Analytical Approach For European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Good Are Companies At Guarding Against Cyber Threats?


Macro Risks And Diverging End Markets Overshadow U.S. Tech's Mostly Good Results

Semiconductor supply limitations are unfolding mostly as S&P Global Ratings expected--supply is getting better, somewhat hampered by China's lockdowns and inflation. Information technology (IT) spending is slated to continue through 2022, as growth in the cloud accelerates, enterprise spending increases, and the 5G smartphone market keeps expanding along with its necessary infrastructure. Nevertheless, this positive landscape could be disrupted by various macroeconomic risks including inflation, fallout from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, COVID-related lockdowns in China, and rising interest rates, leading to some negative rating actions and outlook revisions in the U.S. tech industry. Tech issuers in the lower rating categories are most vulnerable to downgrades this year.

Semiconductor Supply Improving, Curbed By China's Lockdowns, Inflation

We believe the industry is past peak constraint, but supply remains tight, and balance won't return to the hardest hit markets until 2023 at the earliest. Smartphone chips are currently accessible because of good planning between phone makers and foundries, and personal computer (PC) and consumer electronic markets may already be in harmony because of waning demand. Supply for markets that require less advanced chips, like automotive and industrial, are still significantly taut because these chip suppliers are reluctant to significantly increase capacity for fear that new capacity might be idle after demand abates. Rising IT spending, which we expect to continue in 2022, is underpinned by accelerating growth in the cloud, improved enterprise spending, and the ongoing ramp-up of 5G smartphones and related infrastructure. However, macroeconomic risks--such as inflation, shocks to energy and other global markets from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, COVID-related lockdowns in China, and rising interest rates--could disrupt the positive environment we envisioned coming out of last quarter's earnings and worsen the creditworthiness of weaker borrowers. Together, these factors could lead to a negative bias for rating actions in 2022. We find the lower-rated tech issuers to be the most vulnerable to downgrade pressure because of their weaker business fundamentals, more leveraged balance sheets, and low free operating cash flow generation, which rising interest rates will erode.

China Breeds Uncertainty

We think the impact from China's COVID-related lockdowns is more a demand phenomenon than a supply one. Semiconductor makers cite China's mandated restrictions as incrementally negative to their operations and only temporary. Assembly operations are mostly back-up and running with lost production measured in weeks, rather than months. Almost all of Apple Inc.'s final assembly in Shanghai has restarted. However, we believe lockdowns will hurt consumer demand in China this year in categories like smartphones. For instance, Texas Instruments Inc. said that China's restrictions would weigh on second quarter revenues because customers' buying power there has been limited by the lockdowns and due to logistical challenges like shipping, rather than its own production.

Inflation Adds To Angst

Inflation is also starting to hurt tech companies' performance. We downgraded NCR Corp. following a large hit to EBITDA in the first quarter. The company reported a $75 million impact on EBITDA, with $38 million stemming from inflation, $23 million from COVID-related fallout, and the remainder due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict and interest rates. The company explained it paid $2,900 for some chips that were selling for $41 in the second half of last year, and $114 for power chips that were going for $0.42. We think other companies with large price-committed backlogs with low gross margins and high variable costs could face similar results due to less cost flexibility and lower capacity to absorb rising costs. We'll be monitoring upcoming earnings reports from Cisco Systems Inc., Dell Technologies Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., and HP Inc. to determine if NCR is a one-off or the start of a broader trend.

End Markets Are Diverging

Consumer, Computer Markets Are Weakening

Consumer electronics is a weaker market today due to demand pull-forwards over the past couple years. In other words, consumers accelerated the purchase of new electronic devices and aren't likely to replace them any time soon. Consumers are now rotating more spending into services as in-person experiences have reopened, easing demand for goods. Computer demand is weaker, particularly for Chromebooks, because consumer spending for work- and learn-from-home has run its course, although enterprise PC demand is holding steady for now.

Data Center, Auto, Industrial Markets Are Strengthening

Robust hyperscale data center spending is supporting the data center market and we expect it to accelerate in the second half of this year. The public cloud businesses of Microsoft Corp., Google LLC, and Amazon.com Inc. continue growing in the 30%-50% range, which requires significant capital expenditures (capex) just to keep pace with demand. Meta Platforms Inc., better known as Facebook, is sticking with its capex guidance range, which calls for near-70% growth at the midpoint.

The 5G rollout and new flagship smartphone models boosted the smartphone market, although demand weakness in China is partly offsetting gains. Supply in the automotive and industrial markets remains highly constrained so semiconductor suppliers have solid pricing power and there's no end in sight as large backlogs continue to build. Enterprise demand in the second half of the year is questionable--if companies tighten information technology (IT) spending in response to a weakening economy, the solid demand tech companies have enjoyed for the past two years could begin to wane.

Rising Interest Rates Create A New Risk For LBOs

In a recent report, we concluded that despite higher financing costs, holding all else equal, many low-rated issuers shouldn't have trouble meeting their debt service obligations or are unlikely to breach their downgrade triggers over the next two years (see "Macroeconomic Uncertainties Matter More Than Rising Interest Rates To Low-Rated U.S. Tech," March 29, 2022). We identified the five most vulnerable companies in danger of their cash flows approaching breakeven. We based this on an expected 150 basis point (bps) increase in 2022 and a 125 bps increase in 2023. Since then, the Fed has mounted a more aggressive tightening campaign that we expected. We now expect two 50 bps increases at the May and June meetings, and possibly another in July. So much of the increase we anticipated across two years will happen in 2022. And should the Fed exceed our expectations again in 2023 and move rates to the 4%-5% range that former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers suggested might be necessary to contain inflation, we would anticipate low-rated issuers to focus even more on buttressing their liquidity positions. We would also expect their financial-sponsor owners to provide additional support to mitigate rising default risk due to increased debt costs on otherwise healthy businesses.

The Russia-Ukraine Conflict Isn't Hurting U.S. Tech Sales, Supply Much

Conflict in Eastern Europe isn't having much topline impact for most companies. The headwind of no longer selling to Russia will be about 1.5% for Apple, less than 1% for Microsoft, and 0.5% for IBM. According to International Data Corp., IT spending totaled about $52 billion in Russia and $5 billion in Ukraine, accounting for 1% of the worldwide total. The impact on supply is also muted. The most significant issue is availability of neon gas, which is used in the lithography processes in semiconductor manufacturing. Fifty percent of global semiconductor-grade neon comes from Ukraine and has been shut down. The 2014 Russian invasion of Crimea caused neon prices to temporarily increase 600%, after which the semiconductor industry diversified its neon sources, carried more inventory, and found ways to recycle neon gas in the chip-making process. The surge in price is less concerning because neon gas is a very small expense that the industry can easily absorb.

We believe semi makers have neon gas inventories for several months and they're working to secure new sources. Given that neon is a byproduct of steel production, we expect additional capacity to come from China and other countries, which would help avoid stoppages in the semi production process. TSMC Global Ltd. and Micron Technology Inc. said they don't expect disruption to their production because of neon scarcity. (For more details on our view of the impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, see "Macroeconomic Uncertainties Matter More Than Rising Interest Rates To Low-Rated U.S. Tech," published March 17, 2022.)

Macro Downturn, Rising Rates Could Turn Rating Bias Negative

Rising IT spending, which we expect to continue in 2022, is underpinned by accelerating growth in the cloud, improved enterprise spending, and the ongoing ramp-up of 5G smartphones and related infrastructure. However, macroeconomic risks--such as inflation, shocks to energy and other global markets from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, COVID-related lockdowns in China, and rising interest rates--could disrupt the positive environment we envisioned coming out of last quarter's earnings and worsen the creditworthiness of weaker borrowers. Together, these factors could lead to a negative bias for rating actions in 2022. We find the lower-rated tech issuers to be the most vulnerable to downgrade pressure because of their weaker business fundamentals, more leveraged balance sheets, and low free operating cash flow generation, which rising interest rates will erode.

Related Resources

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Christian Frank, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5069;
christian.frank@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:David T Tsui, CFA, CPA, San Francisco + 1 415-371-5063;
david.tsui@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in