articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220412-local-government-debt-2022-rising-risks-keep-global-borrowing-high-12336359 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Local Government Debt 2022: Rising Risks Keep Global Borrowing High

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will Emerging Markets Shape Global Growth?

COMMENTS

Cyber Risk Brief: U.K. Public Sector Is Increasingly Under Threat

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

China To Balance Debt Against Stagnation As Banks Face More Loan Losses, Say Panelists


Local Government Debt 2022: Rising Risks Keep Global Borrowing High

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Persistent infrastructure needs, rising demand for services, high refinancing requirements, and reduced central government financial support will keep LRG borrowing high over the next two years. We estimate annual gross borrowing will reach over $2.4 trillion in 2023 (see chart 1). As a result, global subnational debt will reach a new record high of $16.1 trillion by the end of 2023--40% higher than pre-pandemic levels. Indian and Canadian LRGs will collectively remain the most indebted in the world in relation to their revenues, followed with a large gap by those in Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.

Chart 1

image

Our current forecast for new borrowings globally is slightly higher than our previous projection from March 2021, mainly driven by higher forecasts for Chinese LRG gross borrowings. We see heightened uncertainty surrounding global subnational borrowings, owing to higher inflation and slower than previously expected economic growth in North America and Europe, both exacerbated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In the short term, inflation often helps LRGs balance their budgets by increasing revenues, while spending lags behind. In the long term, however, increasing prices of typically rigid cost bases, at a time of slower economic growth might mean budgets will be more difficult to balance. Globally, and especially in Europe, the Russia-Ukraine conflict may also see central governments targeting accelerated reduction in reliance on fossil fuels. If implemented, this policy will increase demand for new energy and energy-saving investments in housing and transport. These developments could lead to looser restrictions on subnational deficits and hamper budget consolidation paths. For emerging markets (EM) in particular, the COVID-19 pandemic also continues to pose a risk to our forecast, although more moderately than previously.

New Borrowing Record As Local Governments Catch Up On Investments

We expect subnational governments in Australia, Canada, and China to substitute the fiscal stimulus provided through the pandemic with rising spend on infrastructure (see chart 2). Together with refinancing needs, this will keep these governments' gross borrowing elevated. In India, we expect that sticky operating costs incurred during the pandemic will impact operating performance for longer, which will eventually push up the states' borrowing needs. By contrast, we expect gross borrowing to stabilize in German and Austrian states, as they work toward budget consolidation.

Chart 2

image

Investments will also largely drive borrowings of local governments in other developed countries, although at a more modest pace (see charts 3 to 6). Extraordinary government support in many unitary countries shielded the impact on budgets and debt levels throughout the pandemic. As this support and related costs wind down, we expect some LRGs in these countries to resume their central role of delivering capital projects and investments in national infrastructure, which will drive up future borrowings.

Beyond China and India, we expect borrowings in emerging markets to stay contained to refinancing needs. Although infrastructure investments increased in Europe during the pandemic, we expect many regional governments to scale back spending in real terms as the pandemic ebbs. The large infrastructure backlog and the continuous pressure on operating expenditures will also likely constrain subnational budget flexibility in Latin America. Executing local capital projects in the region is increasingly difficult, owing to poor access to financing, high procedural hurdles, and incentives that are not well aligned with undertaking long-term planning and investment.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Debt Capital Markets Remain The Chief Funding Source

We anticipate global bond issuance will average $2 trillion per year in 2022-2023 and cover around 85% of LRGs' funding needs on average. This follows a new peak in bond issuance in 2021, when we estimate subnational bonds issuance will have reached close to $2.1 trillion. Issuances are expected to remain very concentrated, with around 55% of them placed by Chinese provincial governments, and around 20% by U.S. entities.

In developed markets, most LRGs raise debt directly, except in the Nordics, which typically use public sector funding agencies (PSFAs), as do some Japanese LRGs. In most cases globally, LRGs place bonds domestically in local currency, while PSFAs, Argentine provinces, some Canadian provinces and Australian states place bonds in different currencies. Chinese and Canadian provinces, Australian states, and U.S. public sector entities rely entirely on the capital markets (see chart 7). We expect that bond proceeds will cover more than one-half of Indian and German LRG borrowings, and over 40% of Japanese LRG borrowings will be issued through own-name bonds (excluding PSFA debt).

Chart 7

image

In contrast, Austrian, Italian, and U.K. LRGs cover almost all their funding needs by borrowing from the central government and its agencies: Österreichische Bundesfinanzierungsagentur (OeBFA), Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, and the Public Works Loan Board, respectively.

In emerging markets, where stricter limitations on debt intake typically apply, most LRGs rarely tap the international capital markets. Chinese provinces may issue bonds in the international markets via local government funding vehicles (LGFV), while Indian states' bonds are served by the Reserve Bank of India. We note, however, that bonds issued by Chinese and Indian LRGs are mostly owned by domestic investors. Only Argentinian provinces and several entities in Central and Eastern Europe have a track record of issuing bonds in foreign or domestic currency, available for global investors.

LRG Debt Will Reach A New Peak, But Borrowing Capacity Remains Unutilized

Increased borrowing will push global LRGs' outstanding debt to a record high of about $16.1 trillion by the end of 2023. Global LRG debt remains very concentrated geographically, with China and the U.S. comprising close to 60% of the global LRG debt stock by 2023 (see chart 8). Together, Japan, Canada, Germany, and India account for close to 25%.

Chart 8

image

Collectively, Indian and Canadian LRGs will remain the most indebted globally, with debt to revenue of close to 200% (see chart 9) by the end of 2023. Compared with pre-pandemic levels, Australian indebtedness weakened the most, followed by the LRGs in Canada, China, and India. Despite rapidly increasing borrowings, the consolidated debt of Chinese LRGs (excluding LGFVs) still slightly lags that of peers, but including debt of key state-owned enterprises with high dependence on LRGs, would be comparable with that of Canadian peers.

Chart 9

image

Despite the projected increase in borrowings, we believe that many LRGs are underutilizing their borrowing capacity at a time when interest rates remain very low, although now increasing. This limits investments in local infrastructure. We define borrowing capacity as the additional amount of debt that LRGs could raise without a material impact on their credit quality.

Chart 10

image

Globally, we think LRGs could borrow an additional $850 billion. Borrowing capacity remains extensive in emerging markets because, in most countries, subnational debt remains well below what we consider a relatively modest 60% of annual budget revenue. However, limited development of domestic capital markets, generally low predictability and transparency of fiscal policy, inefficient equalization systems, and restrictions on borrowings or debt levels hinder increased subnational borrowing in emerging markets.

The leverage starting point for LRGs in developed markets is higher than for emerging markets. However, we think developed markets can absorb and manage higher debt than EMs.

Table 1

Top Issuers--Developed Markets
Country Long-Term Rating And Outlook* Bonds outstanding year-end 2021 (mil. USD)

Province of Ontario

Canada A+/Stable 356,379

Province of Quebec

Canada AA-/Stable 199,337

State of North Rhine-Westphalia

Germany AA/Stable 148,571

Province of Alberta

Canada A/Stable 103,992

New York City

U.S. AA/Stable 97,700

State of California

U.S. AA-/Positive 88,000

State of Queensland

Australia AA+/Stable 83,814

Province of British Columbia

Canada AA+/Stable 79,185

State of New South Wales

Australia AA+/Stable 78,935

State of Victoria

Australia AA/Stable 61,728

New York State

U.S. AA+/Stable 59,700

Kommuninvest I Sverige AB

Sweden AAA/Stable 59,005

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Japan A+/Stable 52,867

New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority

U.S. BBB+/Stable 48,300

Province of Manitoba

Canada A+/Stable 45,154

State of Hesse

Germany AA+/Stable 42,589

Kommunalbanken AS

Norway AAA/Stable 41,086

State of Western Australia

Australia AA+/Positive 40,499

State of New Jersey

U.S. BBB+/Positive 38,400

Municipality Finance PLC

Finland AA+/Stable 37,895

Aichi Prefecture

Japan A+/Stable 35,276

Kommunekredit

Denmark AAA/Stable 34,349

City of Los Angeles

U.S. AA/Stable 32,500

State of Illinois

U.S. BBB/Positive 29,500

State of Baden-Wuerttemberg

Germany AA+/Stable 26,403
*As of April 7, 2022.

Table 2

Top Issuers--Emerging Markets
Country Rating and outlook Bonds outstanding year-end 2021 (mil. USD)
Jiangsu Province China NR 293,040
Guangdong Province China NR 291,060
Shandong Province China NR 269,064
Sichuan Province China NR 235,156
Zhejiang Province China NR 230,067
Hunan Province China NR 209,973
Hebei Province China NR 202,966
Henan Province China NR 191,225
Hubei Province China NR 183,676
Guizhou Province China NR 182,872
Anhui Province China NR 177,922
Yunnan Province China NR 168,749
Jiangxi Province China NR 138,770
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region China NR 137,440
Beijing Municipality China NR 135,429
Fujian Province China NR 133,774
Shaanxi Province China NR 132,877
Chongqing Municipality China NR 132,320
Guangxi Autonomous Region China NR 130,618
Tianjin Municipality China NR 121,894
Liaoning Province China NR 120,703
Shanghai Municipality China NR 113,603
Xinjiang Autonomous Region China NR 101,475
Heilongjiang Province China NR 99,650
Jilin Province China NR 95,984
NR--Not rated.

Countries Covered In This Report

Our survey on global LRG borrowing encompasses 49 countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the U.K., the U.S., and Vietnam. We consider this sample as representative of global LRG debt. We have also published separate and more detailed analyses of projected borrowings in the LRG sectors of various regions (see the Related Research section below).

We base our survey on data collected from statistical offices, as well as on our assessment of the sector's borrowing requirements and outstanding debt, which includes bonds and bank loans. The reported figures are our estimates and do not necessarily reflect the LRGs' own projections. For comparison, we present our aggregate data in U.S. dollars.

Related Research

Primary Credit Analysts:Felix Ejgel, London + 44 20 7176 6780;
felix.ejgel@spglobal.com
Sarah Sullivant, Austin + 1 (415) 371 5051;
sarah.sullivant@spglobal.com
Susan Chu, Hong Kong (852) 2912-3055;
susan.chu@spglobal.com
Noa Fux, London 44 2071 760730;
noa.fux@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Bhavini Patel, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2558;
bhavini.patel@spglobal.com
Jane H Ridley, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4487;
jane.ridley@spglobal.com
Alejandro Rodriguez Anglada, Madrid + 34 91 788 7233;
alejandro.rodriguez.anglada@spglobal.com
Carl Nyrerod, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5919;
carl.nyrerod@spglobal.com
Anthony Walker, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2019;
anthony.walker@spglobal.com
Kensuke Sugihara, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8475;
kensuke.sugihara@spglobal.com
Stephanie Mery, Paris + 0033144207344;
stephanie.mery@spglobal.com
Thomas F Fischinger, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9243;
thomas.fischinger@spglobal.com
Manuel Orozco, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 4819;
manuel.orozco@spglobal.com
Michael Stroschein, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9251;
michael.stroschein@spglobal.com
Stephen Ogilvie, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2524;
stephen.ogilvie@spglobal.com
Wenyin Huang, Beijing (86) 10-6569-2736;
Wenyin.Huang@spglobal.com
Ruchika Malhotra, Singapore + 65 6239 6362;
ruchika.malhotra@spglobal.com
Omar A De la Torre Ponce De Leon, Mexico City + 52 55 5081 2870;
omar.delatorre@spglobal.com
Yotam Cohen, RAMAT-GAN;
yotam.cohen@spglobal.com
Mariamena Ruggiero, Milan + 390272111262;
mariamena.ruggiero@spglobal.com
Constanza M Perez Aquino, Buenos Aires + 54 11 4891 2167;
constanza.perez.aquino@spglobal.com
YeeFarn Phua, Singapore + 65 6239 6341;
yeefarn.phua@spglobal.com
Martin J Foo, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2016;
martin.foo@spglobal.com
Hugo Soubrier, Paris +33 1 40 75 25 79;
hugo.soubrier@spglobal.com
Michelle Keferstein, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-104;
michelle.keferstein@spglobal.com
Linus Bladlund, Stockholm + 46-8-440-5356;
linus.bladlund@spglobal.com
Louis Portail, Paris;
louis.portail@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in