This report does not constitute a rating action.
Key Takeaways
- We project local and regional government (LRG) borrowings will stay inflated, at about $2.35 trillion per year globally in 2022-2023.
- This will be supported by increasing refinancing needs of Chinese LRGs as well as infrastructure needs in Australia and certain other developed markets.
- We estimate this will push total global LRG debt to a new peak of $16.1 trillion by 2023, with Indian and Canadian LRGs being the most indebted compared with the size of their budgets.
- We expect LRGs in developed markets, China, and India to continue tapping the debt capital markets, while those in other emerging markets will stay away, maintaining unused capacity to borrow.
- We see increased risks to our base-case expectations stemming from higher inflation and slower economic growth, amplified by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Persistent infrastructure needs, rising demand for services, high refinancing requirements, and reduced central government financial support will keep LRG borrowing high over the next two years. We estimate annual gross borrowing will reach over $2.4 trillion in 2023 (see chart 1). As a result, global subnational debt will reach a new record high of $16.1 trillion by the end of 2023--40% higher than pre-pandemic levels. Indian and Canadian LRGs will collectively remain the most indebted in the world in relation to their revenues, followed with a large gap by those in Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.
Chart 1
Our current forecast for new borrowings globally is slightly higher than our previous projection from March 2021, mainly driven by higher forecasts for Chinese LRG gross borrowings. We see heightened uncertainty surrounding global subnational borrowings, owing to higher inflation and slower than previously expected economic growth in North America and Europe, both exacerbated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In the short term, inflation often helps LRGs balance their budgets by increasing revenues, while spending lags behind. In the long term, however, increasing prices of typically rigid cost bases, at a time of slower economic growth might mean budgets will be more difficult to balance. Globally, and especially in Europe, the Russia-Ukraine conflict may also see central governments targeting accelerated reduction in reliance on fossil fuels. If implemented, this policy will increase demand for new energy and energy-saving investments in housing and transport. These developments could lead to looser restrictions on subnational deficits and hamper budget consolidation paths. For emerging markets (EM) in particular, the COVID-19 pandemic also continues to pose a risk to our forecast, although more moderately than previously.
New Borrowing Record As Local Governments Catch Up On Investments
We expect subnational governments in Australia, Canada, and China to substitute the fiscal stimulus provided through the pandemic with rising spend on infrastructure (see chart 2). Together with refinancing needs, this will keep these governments' gross borrowing elevated. In India, we expect that sticky operating costs incurred during the pandemic will impact operating performance for longer, which will eventually push up the states' borrowing needs. By contrast, we expect gross borrowing to stabilize in German and Austrian states, as they work toward budget consolidation.
Chart 2
Investments will also largely drive borrowings of local governments in other developed countries, although at a more modest pace (see charts 3 to 6). Extraordinary government support in many unitary countries shielded the impact on budgets and debt levels throughout the pandemic. As this support and related costs wind down, we expect some LRGs in these countries to resume their central role of delivering capital projects and investments in national infrastructure, which will drive up future borrowings.
Beyond China and India, we expect borrowings in emerging markets to stay contained to refinancing needs. Although infrastructure investments increased in Europe during the pandemic, we expect many regional governments to scale back spending in real terms as the pandemic ebbs. The large infrastructure backlog and the continuous pressure on operating expenditures will also likely constrain subnational budget flexibility in Latin America. Executing local capital projects in the region is increasingly difficult, owing to poor access to financing, high procedural hurdles, and incentives that are not well aligned with undertaking long-term planning and investment.
Chart 3
Chart 4
Chart 5
Chart 6
Debt Capital Markets Remain The Chief Funding Source
We anticipate global bond issuance will average $2 trillion per year in 2022-2023 and cover around 85% of LRGs' funding needs on average. This follows a new peak in bond issuance in 2021, when we estimate subnational bonds issuance will have reached close to $2.1 trillion. Issuances are expected to remain very concentrated, with around 55% of them placed by Chinese provincial governments, and around 20% by U.S. entities.
In developed markets, most LRGs raise debt directly, except in the Nordics, which typically use public sector funding agencies (PSFAs), as do some Japanese LRGs. In most cases globally, LRGs place bonds domestically in local currency, while PSFAs, Argentine provinces, some Canadian provinces and Australian states place bonds in different currencies. Chinese and Canadian provinces, Australian states, and U.S. public sector entities rely entirely on the capital markets (see chart 7). We expect that bond proceeds will cover more than one-half of Indian and German LRG borrowings, and over 40% of Japanese LRG borrowings will be issued through own-name bonds (excluding PSFA debt).
Chart 7
In contrast, Austrian, Italian, and U.K. LRGs cover almost all their funding needs by borrowing from the central government and its agencies: Österreichische Bundesfinanzierungsagentur (OeBFA), Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, and the Public Works Loan Board, respectively.
In emerging markets, where stricter limitations on debt intake typically apply, most LRGs rarely tap the international capital markets. Chinese provinces may issue bonds in the international markets via local government funding vehicles (LGFV), while Indian states' bonds are served by the Reserve Bank of India. We note, however, that bonds issued by Chinese and Indian LRGs are mostly owned by domestic investors. Only Argentinian provinces and several entities in Central and Eastern Europe have a track record of issuing bonds in foreign or domestic currency, available for global investors.
LRG Debt Will Reach A New Peak, But Borrowing Capacity Remains Unutilized
Increased borrowing will push global LRGs' outstanding debt to a record high of about $16.1 trillion by the end of 2023. Global LRG debt remains very concentrated geographically, with China and the U.S. comprising close to 60% of the global LRG debt stock by 2023 (see chart 8). Together, Japan, Canada, Germany, and India account for close to 25%.
Chart 8
Collectively, Indian and Canadian LRGs will remain the most indebted globally, with debt to revenue of close to 200% (see chart 9) by the end of 2023. Compared with pre-pandemic levels, Australian indebtedness weakened the most, followed by the LRGs in Canada, China, and India. Despite rapidly increasing borrowings, the consolidated debt of Chinese LRGs (excluding LGFVs) still slightly lags that of peers, but including debt of key state-owned enterprises with high dependence on LRGs, would be comparable with that of Canadian peers.
Chart 9
Despite the projected increase in borrowings, we believe that many LRGs are underutilizing their borrowing capacity at a time when interest rates remain very low, although now increasing. This limits investments in local infrastructure. We define borrowing capacity as the additional amount of debt that LRGs could raise without a material impact on their credit quality.
Chart 10
Globally, we think LRGs could borrow an additional $850 billion. Borrowing capacity remains extensive in emerging markets because, in most countries, subnational debt remains well below what we consider a relatively modest 60% of annual budget revenue. However, limited development of domestic capital markets, generally low predictability and transparency of fiscal policy, inefficient equalization systems, and restrictions on borrowings or debt levels hinder increased subnational borrowing in emerging markets.
The leverage starting point for LRGs in developed markets is higher than for emerging markets. However, we think developed markets can absorb and manage higher debt than EMs.
Table 1
Top Issuers--Developed Markets | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Long-Term Rating And Outlook* | Bonds outstanding year-end 2021 (mil. USD) | ||||||
Province of Ontario |
Canada | A+/Stable | 356,379 | |||||
Province of Quebec |
Canada | AA-/Stable | 199,337 | |||||
State of North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | AA/Stable | 148,571 | |||||
Province of Alberta |
Canada | A/Stable | 103,992 | |||||
New York City |
U.S. | AA/Stable | 97,700 | |||||
State of California |
U.S. | AA-/Positive | 88,000 | |||||
State of Queensland |
Australia | AA+/Stable | 83,814 | |||||
Province of British Columbia |
Canada | AA+/Stable | 79,185 | |||||
State of New South Wales |
Australia | AA+/Stable | 78,935 | |||||
State of Victoria |
Australia | AA/Stable | 61,728 | |||||
New York State |
U.S. | AA+/Stable | 59,700 | |||||
Kommuninvest I Sverige AB |
Sweden | AAA/Stable | 59,005 | |||||
Tokyo Metropolitan Government |
Japan | A+/Stable | 52,867 | |||||
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
U.S. | BBB+/Stable | 48,300 | |||||
Province of Manitoba |
Canada | A+/Stable | 45,154 | |||||
State of Hesse |
Germany | AA+/Stable | 42,589 | |||||
Kommunalbanken AS |
Norway | AAA/Stable | 41,086 | |||||
State of Western Australia |
Australia | AA+/Positive | 40,499 | |||||
State of New Jersey |
U.S. | BBB+/Positive | 38,400 | |||||
Municipality Finance PLC |
Finland | AA+/Stable | 37,895 | |||||
Aichi Prefecture |
Japan | A+/Stable | 35,276 | |||||
Kommunekredit |
Denmark | AAA/Stable | 34,349 | |||||
City of Los Angeles |
U.S. | AA/Stable | 32,500 | |||||
State of Illinois |
U.S. | BBB/Positive | 29,500 | |||||
State of Baden-Wuerttemberg |
Germany | AA+/Stable | 26,403 | |||||
*As of April 7, 2022. |
Table 2
Top Issuers--Emerging Markets | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Rating and outlook | Bonds outstanding year-end 2021 (mil. USD) | ||||||
Jiangsu Province | China | NR | 293,040 | |||||
Guangdong Province | China | NR | 291,060 | |||||
Shandong Province | China | NR | 269,064 | |||||
Sichuan Province | China | NR | 235,156 | |||||
Zhejiang Province | China | NR | 230,067 | |||||
Hunan Province | China | NR | 209,973 | |||||
Hebei Province | China | NR | 202,966 | |||||
Henan Province | China | NR | 191,225 | |||||
Hubei Province | China | NR | 183,676 | |||||
Guizhou Province | China | NR | 182,872 | |||||
Anhui Province | China | NR | 177,922 | |||||
Yunnan Province | China | NR | 168,749 | |||||
Jiangxi Province | China | NR | 138,770 | |||||
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region | China | NR | 137,440 | |||||
Beijing Municipality | China | NR | 135,429 | |||||
Fujian Province | China | NR | 133,774 | |||||
Shaanxi Province | China | NR | 132,877 | |||||
Chongqing Municipality | China | NR | 132,320 | |||||
Guangxi Autonomous Region | China | NR | 130,618 | |||||
Tianjin Municipality | China | NR | 121,894 | |||||
Liaoning Province | China | NR | 120,703 | |||||
Shanghai Municipality | China | NR | 113,603 | |||||
Xinjiang Autonomous Region | China | NR | 101,475 | |||||
Heilongjiang Province | China | NR | 99,650 | |||||
Jilin Province | China | NR | 95,984 | |||||
NR--Not rated. |
Countries Covered In This Report
Our survey on global LRG borrowing encompasses 49 countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the U.K., the U.S., and Vietnam. We consider this sample as representative of global LRG debt. We have also published separate and more detailed analyses of projected borrowings in the LRG sectors of various regions (see the Related Research section below).
We base our survey on data collected from statistical offices, as well as on our assessment of the sector's borrowing requirements and outstanding debt, which includes bonds and bank loans. The reported figures are our estimates and do not necessarily reflect the LRGs' own projections. For comparison, we present our aggregate data in U.S. dollars.
Related Research
- For an interactive version of our global and regional local and regional government borrowing forecasts see "Local And Regional Government Debt 2022"
- Local Government Debt 2022: Credit Quality Recuperating For Largest Regions In Developed Markets, April 12, 2022
- Local Government Debt 2022: Why Developed Markets May Not Be Able To Reduce Borrowings, April 12, 2022
- Local Government Debt 2022: Emerging Market Borrowing Loses Momentum, April 12, 2022
- Local Government Debt 2022: Can German, Austrian, And Swiss Borrowing Volumes Continue Their Post-COVID Normalization?, April 6, 2022
- Local Government Debt 2022: Australian State Debt To Breach Half A Trillion Dollars, March 8, 2022
- Canadian Local And Regional Government Debt: Economic Recovery Will Temper Borrowings In Fiscal 2022, March 31, 2022,
- Local Government Debt 2022: French LRGs Drive The Investment-Led Recovery While Reducing Debt Intake, March 22, 2022
- China Local Governments' Escalating Issuance May Finally Be Testing Liquidity, March 1, 2022
Primary Credit Analysts: | Felix Ejgel, London + 44 20 7176 6780; felix.ejgel@spglobal.com |
Sarah Sullivant, Austin + 1 (415) 371 5051; sarah.sullivant@spglobal.com | |
Susan Chu, Hong Kong (852) 2912-3055; susan.chu@spglobal.com | |
Noa Fux, London 44 2071 760730; noa.fux@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Bhavini Patel, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2558; bhavini.patel@spglobal.com |
Jane H Ridley, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4487; jane.ridley@spglobal.com | |
Alejandro Rodriguez Anglada, Madrid + 34 91 788 7233; alejandro.rodriguez.anglada@spglobal.com | |
Carl Nyrerod, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5919; carl.nyrerod@spglobal.com | |
Anthony Walker, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2019; anthony.walker@spglobal.com | |
Kensuke Sugihara, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8475; kensuke.sugihara@spglobal.com | |
Stephanie Mery, Paris + 0033144207344; stephanie.mery@spglobal.com | |
Thomas F Fischinger, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9243; thomas.fischinger@spglobal.com | |
Manuel Orozco, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 4819; manuel.orozco@spglobal.com | |
Michael Stroschein, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9251; michael.stroschein@spglobal.com | |
Stephen Ogilvie, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2524; stephen.ogilvie@spglobal.com | |
Wenyin Huang, Beijing (86) 10-6569-2736; Wenyin.Huang@spglobal.com | |
Ruchika Malhotra, Singapore + 65 6239 6362; ruchika.malhotra@spglobal.com | |
Omar A De la Torre Ponce De Leon, Mexico City + 52 55 5081 2870; omar.delatorre@spglobal.com | |
Yotam Cohen, RAMAT-GAN; yotam.cohen@spglobal.com | |
Mariamena Ruggiero, Milan + 390272111262; mariamena.ruggiero@spglobal.com | |
Constanza M Perez Aquino, Buenos Aires + 54 11 4891 2167; constanza.perez.aquino@spglobal.com | |
YeeFarn Phua, Singapore + 65 6239 6341; yeefarn.phua@spglobal.com | |
Martin J Foo, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2016; martin.foo@spglobal.com | |
Hugo Soubrier, Paris +33 1 40 75 25 79; hugo.soubrier@spglobal.com | |
Michelle Keferstein, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-104; michelle.keferstein@spglobal.com | |
Linus Bladlund, Stockholm + 46-8-440-5356; linus.bladlund@spglobal.com | |
Louis Portail, Paris; louis.portail@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.