articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220316-qatar-could-gain-as-europe-diversifies-from-russian-gas-12310054 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Qatar Could Gain As Europe Diversifies From Russian Gas

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

China's Local Governments: Downside Risk Is Rising For Fiscal Consolidation

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Qatar Could Gain As Europe Diversifies From Russian Gas

S&P Global Ratings believes the EU's planned diversification from Russian gas could have important implications for Qatar (AA-/Stable/A-1+) and, more specifically, state hydrocarbons producer QatarEnergy (QE; AA-/Stable/--). However, the gas major is unlikely to be able to play a major short-term role as the EU looks to reduce its reliance on Russian exports.

The European Commission plan (REPowerEU), announced on March 8, aims to make the EU independent of Russian fossil fuels by 2030 through diversifying supply and replacing natural gas with renewable gas.

Amid the risk that Russia pre-emptively stops pumping gas through its Nord Stream 1 pipeline to Germany, this has focused minds on potential replacements. In our view, Qatar, as one of the world's largest LNG producers via QE, is an obvious candidate, and with additional production coming online could help meet REPowerEU's long-term objectives.

QE Will See Modest Upside To Its Already Strong Financial Position From Higher Oil Prices.

In our view, QE already stands to gain from recent hydrocarbon price volatility. On March 1, 2022, we raised our Brent oil price assumptions to average $85 per barrel (/bbl) in 2022, and $70/bbl in 2023, with our long-term assumption for 2024 unchanged at $55/bbl (see "S&P Global Ratings Raises Near-Term Oil And Gas Price Assumptions Following Russian Invasion Of Ukraine," published Feb. 28, 2022, on RatingsDirect). Since then, Brent has exceeded $100/bbl (last close $99.91/bbl on March 15, 2022) on the back of increased geopolitical tensions linked to the Russia-Ukraine military conflict and subsequent fears of sanctions on Russian oil and gas exports, as well as supply/demand imbalances.

QE will benefit from high average oil prices regardless of the destination for its exports, albeit with a lag, given that most long-term contracts are linked to oil price formulae. However, our stand-alone credit profile (SACP) assessment is already one notch higher ('aa') than our 'AA-' long-term ratings on QE and Qatar. Our SACP analysis focuses on financial policies and commitment to improving balance sheets through debt reduction, particularly for investment-grade companies such as QE given its strong credit metrics and financial standing. Higher gas export revenue will also support Qatar's already strong external and fiscal positions (see "Qatar Ratings Affirmed At 'AA-/A-1+'; Outlook Stable," published Nov. 5, 2021).

QE Could Provide Modest Short-Term Support To Europe

Reduced reliance on Russian gas would likely increase demand for Qatar's LNG. Russia contributed 30%-40% of the EU and U.K.'s natural gas supply (about 158 billion cubic meters [bcm] in 2021, according to the International Energy Agency [IEA]). We understand that approximately 80% of QE's LNG sales are via long-term contracts, predominantly with Asian buyers. According to public statements by Qatar's minister of energy, about 10%-15% of Qatar's gas exports are divertible and could hypothetically be shipped to Europe. We estimate this at about 21 bcm (15.4 million metric tons per year[mmtpa]), assuming Qatar's current LNG capacity is 106 bcm (77 mtpa). This would account for about 13% of the EU's and U.K.'s gas supply from Russia. QE's investment program will bring significant additional gas production volumes onstream by 2027, providing further medium-term upside to European gas supply. The completion of QE's Golden Pass LNG Terminal in the U.S., which is in partnership with Exxon Mobil Corp. (AA-/Negative/A-1+), is scheduled for 2024, with total capacity of approximately 16 mmtpa. The terminal will export U.S. LNG but is another conduit through which QE could support the EU's diversification efforts, given QE's 70% stake.

QE has a leading position in the global LNG market, with more a than 20% share by capacity (including foreign partners' joint venture shares of Qatari LNG) and derives about 60%-65% of its proportionately consolidated EBITDA and assets from LNG. For now, we see modest monetary benefit to QE if it diverts LNG exports to Europe from Asia, given the the relatively small expected volumes, but there will be some upside given higher gas prices in Europe.

At the same time, there are potential limitations on Europe's ability to take delivery of Qatari LNG, at least in the short term. The main one being the shortage of LNG regasification terminals to receive the additional capacity. There are also potential supply chain constraints given the shipping necessary to transport LNG to Europe.

QE has limited exposure to Russia and Ukraine, with no direct ownership in any Russian/Ukrainian entities. The company already exports most of its LNG production to Asia (almost 80%, including India, South Korea, Japan, and China), and about 20% to Europe. QE has access to an LNG fleet with 69 vessels, which have offtake capacity in LNG receiving terminals in the U.K., Italy, Belgium, and elsewhere in Europe. More specifically, QE caters to its existing LNG markets in the U.K. and Europe through its majority owned South Hook LNG regasification terminal in the U.K. (regasification capacity of 15.6 mtpa) and minority owned offshore Adriatic LNG regasification terminal, off the coast of Italy (5.8 mtpa). In addition, it has access to LNG terminals in Belgium, France, and the Grain LNG terminal in the U.K. (starting 2025). As a result, while there is some capacity for Europe to import LNG from Qatar, diverting large shipments from Asia could result in bottlenecks.

According to the IEA, Russia has been reducing its piped gas supplies to the EU and U.K. These lower flows have been partially compensated by higher LNG inflows, which reached 13 bcm in January. Interestingly, Qatar has provided relatively little additional LNG supply so far (see chart 1), which further supports our view of limited flexibility given QE's long-term LNG contracts.

image

EU Gas Diversification Could Bring Longer-Term Benefits For Qatar And QE

Qatar can achieve more than short-term diplomatic gains for supporting the EU during a time of economic stress. Qatari support could enhance its reputation as a reliable strategic partner for the EU, if it becomes a more structural energy supplier over the longer term. QE could also benefit from diversifying its gas export destinations and find a market for the significant increase in its North Field gas production scheduled to come online in 2027. Although there are other LNG exporters that could help bridge the gap (Australia and the U.S.), Qatar's relative proximity to Europe and lower production costs may provide a competitive edge compared with other providers, in our view.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Rawan Oueidat, CFA, Dubai + 971(0)43727196;
rawan.oueidat@spglobal.com
Trevor Cullinan, Dubai + (971)43727113;
trevor.cullinan@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in