articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220307-s-p-global-ratings-to-enhance-transparency-in-covered-bond-credit-analysis-with-esg-credit-indicators-12298541 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

S&P Global Ratings To Enhance Transparency In Covered Bond Credit Analysis With ESG Credit Indicators

COMMENTS

Scenario Analysis: Middle-Market CLO Ratings Withstand Stress Scenarios With Modest Downgrades (2024 Update)

COMMENTS

U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2024 (As Of Dec. 6)

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2023 Annual Mexican Structured Finance Default And Rating Transition Study

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Rose 35 Basis Points To 5.6% In November 2024; Office Rate Is Nearing 10.0%


S&P Global Ratings To Enhance Transparency In Covered Bond Credit Analysis With ESG Credit Indicators

(Editor's Note: This report was updated April 27, 2022.)

S&P Global Ratings recognizes external stakeholders' increasing desire for more information about how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors influence our credit rating analysis. We've underscored these efforts in various ways, including publication of Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings criteria, ESG industry report cards for covered bonds, and a monthly ESG in Credit Ratings Newsletter. Also, our credit rating reports for covered bonds include dedicated ESG paragraphs that describe in a narrative format our opinion of the influence that ESG factors have on credit rating analysis. We also aim to provide information on ESG factors when they are key drivers of our credit rating actions.

S&P Global Ratings remains committed to providing additional transparency as to how it incorporates ESG factors into its credit ratings methodology and analytics. We have already enhanced our communication to the market with implementation of ESG credit indicators in our corporates and infrastructure, banks, and insurance ratings practices, and announced that U.S. public finance will follow a similar approach. Our ESG credit indicators provide additional disclosure and transparency at the entity level and reflect our opinion of the influence that ESG factors have on our credit rating analysis. ESG credit indicators are intended to communicate, similar to our current narrative format, how ESG factors affect the credit rating analysis but in a supplementary format that may be more easily digestible and readily comparable, as shown in table 1. Our current narrative (descriptive) format and the ESG credit indicators combine to communicate how--for a specific entity--ESG factors influence our credit rating analysis.

Importantly, ESG credit indicators do not affect our existing credit ratings. Rather, they reflect how influential ESG factors are to our credit rating analysis. We incorporate in our credit rating analysis those ESG factors that materially influence creditworthiness and for which we have sufficient visibility and certainty. ESG credit indicators do not affect a rating committee's decision nor change our approach to credit ratings. They are not a sustainability rating or an S&P Global Ratings ESG evaluation.

We expect to implement ESG credit indicators for individual covered bond programs starting in first-quarter 2022. Further information regarding how we assess ESG factors through our criteria and the implementation of ESG credit indicators for covered bond programs can be found in ESG Credit Indicator Definitions And Application.

We disclose separate credit indicators for E, S, and G that range from E-1 to E-5, S-1 to S-5, and G-1 to G-5, depending on the magnitude and direction of the influence on our credit rating analysis. ESG credit indicators are not intended be used as a measure of how entities are positioned in terms of ESG performance. Instead, they reflect our qualitative assessment about whether ESG factors have a neutral, positive, or negative influence on the key components of our credit rating analysis identified within our sector-specific criteria. The scale below has a negative skew, which reflects our view that ESG considerations often have a more negative than positive influence within our credit rating analysis when they are not considered neutral. A neutral ESG credit indicator does not necessarily mean that ESG factors are irrelevant, it just means that currently they do not materially influence our credit rating analysis.

Table 1

Range Of ESG Credit Indicators
Influence on credit rating analysis Environmental indicator Social indicator Governance indicator
Positive E-1 S-1 G-1
Neutral E-2 S-2 G-2
Moderately negative E-3 S-3 G-3
Negative E-4 S-4 G-4
Very negative E-5 S-5 G-5

Table 2 shows an example of how ESG credit indicators are disclosed through an example for an entity where environmental and governance factors negatively influence our credit rating analysis. E-4 indicates that environmental factors (physical risk, in this case) have a negative influence on our credit rating analysis for that entity, while G-3 shows that governance factors (transparency and reporting, in this case) have a moderately negative influence. S-2 indicates that social factors are neutral for our credit rating analysis.

image

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Antonio Farina, Milan + 34 91 788 7226;
antonio.farina@spglobal.com
Matthew S Mitchell, CFA, Paris +33 (0)6 17 23 72 88;
matthew.mitchell@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in