Key Takeaways
- For U.S. retail and restaurant companies, 2021 was a positive year from a credit ratings perspective despite a nearly broken supply chain, rising inflation, and a labor shortage.
- Most rating actions in the sector were positive last year, a dramatic recovery from the 20% default rate in 2020.
- The recovery in credit quality positions the sector well for challenges ahead.
Despite supply chain bumps, rapidly rising inflation, and labor shortages, 2021 marked one of the most positive years for U.S. retail and restaurant companies from a credit ratings perspective. Specifically, the global pandemic helped accelerate retailers' shift to online sales and provided an unexpected boost in pent-up demand last year to what was one of the most distressed sectors in U.S. corporate ratings pre-pandemic.
The vast majority of rating actions in 2021 were positive and this trend has continued so far in 2022. We expect retailers will continue to report sustained elevated demand going into 2022. Residual pent-up demand from 2021, still elevated excess savings, and a strong jobs market are supporting consumer spending. Despite higher costs in freight, labor, and transportation, retailers have been able to improve margins because consumers remain price inelastic. In addition, operating leverage and efficiency gains provide further uplift in profitability. We believe the current positive operating environment represents a high water mark for the sector and this is apparent in our portfolio of ratings as well: we started the year with only 4% of the portfolio rated in the 'CCC' category, which signals a 1-in-2 likelihood of default. This is the lowest default risk in the portfolio since 2014 and suggests the very low speculative-grade default rate will remain close to the 2% we saw in 2021 in retail, a dramatic recovery from the 20% default rate of 2020.
Chart 1
Chart 2
In the years leading up to the pandemic, the retail industry was under tremendous duress. Brick-and-mortar icons filed for bankruptcy and many others closed doors and liquidated at an unprecedented pace. Further credit distress marked 2020, to be followed by a stark about face in 2021. Some supporting statistics:
- S&P Global Ratings' U.S. retail and restaurant team upgraded 47 companies and downgraded only 4 across the portfolio in 2021. In 2020, we upgraded 27 companies and downgraded 86.
- There were only 2 defaults or selective defaults, versus 19 in 2020 and 8 in 2019.
- We rated 25 new issuers in 2021, versus 17 in 2020 and 11 in 2019.
- Bellwether Amazon.com Inc. (AA/Stable/A-1+) saw a one-notch upgrade in June 2021.
That said, in our view the investment thesis for the sector has also changed and this will bring new risks in coming years. Pre-pandemic, private equity financial sponsors showed a downward arrow on debt leverage with an upward arrow of new-store growth as support. Now the view is online players are asset-lite, with limited or no stores and less capital spending and therefore better cash flows. Already in 2021, that spelled huge dividends after a short hold period, such as a $1.1 billion in distributions to shareholders and management for Mattress Firm Inc. (B+/Positive/--) within a year of a refinancing. Meanwhile, aggressive 2021 leveraged buyouts included:
- Apollo Global Management's acquisition of The Michaels Cos. Inc. (B/Stable/--) for a total consideration of about $5.5 billion (including equity and debt), with the transaction increasing the amount of funded debt on Michaels' balance sheet by $1.6 billion.
- Hellman & Friedman LLC's $2.9 billion tender offer for At Home Group Inc. (B/Stable/--), increasing funded debt by about $1.1 billion upon completion.
Offsetting these deals is the fact that many other companies in the sector are seeing generally lower net leverage, given high cash balances and a decision to use cash for debt reduction. We believe these are prudent moves in a persistently volatile operating environment that should provide some cushion to help avoid a return to high levels of distress for the space in the next one to two years. Aggressive shareholder-friendly share buybacks funded by rainy day liquidity could limit an issuer's ability to navigate a more dramatic decline in consumer spending in the second half than we expect.
Table 1
Retail And Restaurant Companies Rated 'CCC+' To 'CC' From 2015 To 2021 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||||
5.6% | 6.80% | 17.00% | 16.10% | 16.60% | 25.80% | 4.13% | |||||
Bon-Ton Stores Inc. |
99 Cents Only Stores |
New Academy Holding Co. LLC |
HT Intermediate Holdings Corp |
Burger BossCo Intermediate Inc. |
Pier 1 Imports Inc. |
Jill Acquisition LLC |
Rite Aid Corp. |
Tailored Brands Inc. |
Red Lobster Intermediate Holdings LLC |
PHD Group Holdings LLC |
99 Cents Only Stores |
Claire's Stores Inc. |
Bon-Ton Stores Inc. |
99 Cents Only Stores |
Neiman Marcus |
Beverages & More Inc. |
SAL Acquisition Corp. |
Belk Inc. |
NPC International Inc. |
Wok Holdings Inc. |
Party City Holdings Inc. |
Main Event Entertainment Inc. |
Belk Inc. |
Fairway Group Holdings Corp. |
Claire's Stores Inc. |
BI-LO LLC |
Ruby Acquisition Inc. |
PetSmart LLC |
J. Crew Group Inc. |
California Pizza Kitchen Inc. |
J.C. Penney Corp. Inc. |
Belk Inc. |
Jo-Ann Stores LLC |
GPS Hospitality Holding Co. LLC |
Burger BossCo Intermediate Inc. |
Gymboree Corp. |
Gymboree Corp. |
BKH Acquisition Corp. |
J. Crew Group Inc. |
Payless Inc. |
Neiman Marcus |
Beverages & More Inc. |
SAL Acquisition Corp. |
California Pizza Kitchen Inc. |
Rite Aid Corp. |
Fogo de Chao Inc. |
Quidditch Acquisition Inc. |
Logan's Roadhouse Inc. |
J. Crew Group Inc. |
Charlotte Russe Inc. |
FULLBEAUTY Brands Inc. |
P.F. Chang’s |
SSH Holdings Inc. d/b/a Spencer Spirit |
Pier 1 Imports Inc. |
J. Crew Group Inc. |
Beverages & More Inc. |
Cooper’s Hawk |
Quidditch Acquisition Inc. |
Miller's Ale House Inc. |
J.C. Penney Corp. Inc. |
Rue 21 Inc. |
PetSmart LLC |
Tops Holding LLC |
99 Cents Only Stores |
Evergreen AcqCo1 L.P. d/b/a Savers |
99 Cents Only Stores |
Neiman Marcus |
99 Cents Only Stores |
Jill Acquisition LLC |
CEC Entertainment Inc. |
The Men's Wearhouse Inc. |
Sears Holdings Corp. |
Sears Holdings Corp. |
Claire's Stores Inc. |
Sears Holdings Corp. |
Rent-A-Center Inc. |
Bluestem Brands Inc. |
Burger BossCo Intermediate Inc. |
Bluestem Brands Inc. |
Burger BossCo Intermediate Inc. |
Mister Car Wash Holdings Inc. |
Miller's Ale House Inc. |
|
True Religion Apparel Inc. |
True Religion Apparel Inc. |
David's Bridal Inc. |
Steak n Shake Inc. |
Petco Holdings Inc. |
HT Intermediate Holdings Corp |
Petco Holdings Inc. |
Ascena Retail Group Inc. |
Petco Holdings Inc. |
Carrols Restaurant Group Inc. |
Talbots Inc. (The) |
|
Everest Holdings LLC d/b/a Eddie Bauer |
Bluestem Brands Inc. |
Guitar Center Holdings Inc. |
New Academy Holding Co. LLC |
Guitar Center Holdings Inc. |
New Academy Holding Co. LLC |
Guitar Center Holdings Inc. |
Ascena Retail Group Inc. |
BDF Acquisition Corp. |
|||
Evergreen AcqCo1 L.P. d/b/a Savers |
SSH Holdings Inc. d/b/a Spencer Spirit |
GNC Holdings Inc. |
Charlotte Russe Inc. |
GNC Holdings Inc. |
Fresh Market (The) |
GNC Holdings Inc. |
New Academy Holding Co. LLC |
At Home Group Inc. |
|||
Steak n Shake Inc. |
Fresh Market (The) |
Steak n Shake Inc. |
Steak n Shake Inc. |
Fresh Market (The) |
Chart 3
Restaurants across the ratings spectrum saw more upside than downside in 2021 as well.
- In investment grade: We revised the outlook on McDonald's Corp. (BBB+/Stable/A-2) and Starbucks Corp. (BBB+/Stable/A-2) back to stable from negative and upgraded Darden Restaurants Inc. one notch (BBB/Stable/A-2).
- In high yield: We upgraded IRB Holding Corp. (B+/Stable/--), Brinker International Inc. (BB-/Stable/--) and Wendy’s (B+/Stable/--) one notch.
We rated six new restaurant companies, two of which were Taco Bell franchisees (MIC Glen LLC (B-/Stable/--) and Pacific Bells LLC (B-/Stable/--), amid that brand's strong performance.
We note casual dining establishments saw a material shift in off-premises dining, a trend we see as potentially challenging in years to come as companies work to restore sufficient demand to continue to operate expensive big box restaurants profitably.
Brinker International Inc. (BB-/Stable/--) for instance, reported growth in its off-premises mix for Chili's to 46% of total sales for the first two quarters of fiscal 2021 (ended June 2021). For the same period in 2019, off-premise sales were approximately 17%.
Potential volatility due to geopolitical conflicts, the return of stringent quarantine measures, or the Fed's efforts to tame inflation pose risk to our forecast of a modest slowdown in consumer spending later this year. If any of these risks intensify, choppy financial markets could compound speculative-grade issuers' problems. Whenever a crisis emerges, S&P Global Ratings analysts frisk their portfolio of credits for any that may need to tap financial markets. We've collected a list of speculative-grade credits that have maturities of at least 10% of their reported debt in the next couple of years that would likely be on our watchlist.
Table 2
Maturities Of Select Speculative-Grade Issuers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Issuers with a 2023 maturity | Rating | |||
Fresh Market Inc. (The) |
B-/Stable/-- | |||
BDF Acquisition Corp. |
B/Stable/-- | |||
Brinker International Inc. |
BB-/Stable/-- | |||
Qurate Retail Inc. |
BB-/Stable/-- | |||
Sally Beauty Holdings Inc. |
BB-/Positive/-- | |||
Issuers with a 2024 maturity | ||||
Burger BossCo Intermediate Inc. |
CCC/Negative/-- | |||
Cooper's Hawk Intermediate Holding LLC |
B-/Stable/-- | |||
Jill Acquisition LLC |
B-/Stable/-- | |||
Fogo De Chao Inc. |
B-/Stable/-- | |||
Go Wireless Holdings Inc. |
B/Stable/-- | |||
PHD Group Holdings LLC |
B/Stable/-- | |||
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. |
B+/Stable/-- | |||
Brinker International Inc. |
BB-/Stable/-- | |||
Signet Jewelers Ltd. |
BB-/Stable/-- | |||
BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc. |
BB/Stable/-- | |||
Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
E-Commerce To the Rescue
Before the pandemic, we expected e-commerce sales penetration to grow to 10% by 2024, a figure we now expect to be closer to 20% by then. Over the course of 2021, most companies reported growth in e-commerce sales penetration from pre-pandemic levels. However, very few of them approached the peaks reached during the pandemic.
We note apparel retailers and grocers were able to retain a material portion of e-commerce sales in the pandemic, though department stores were not (chart 4). And across most sectors, margin dilution has offset rising e-commerce penetration as online orders come with higher shipping, fulfillment, and labor costs.
Chart 4
With such high hopes pinned on e-commerce, activist investors have agitated for splitting it off from brick-and-mortar operations in the department store space. Omnichannel capabilities are critical for most retailers and department stores are no exception. The companies invested in digital channels before the pandemic to increase engagement, strengthen loyalty, and benefit from multi-channel customers who typically spend more in aggregate. The pandemic accelerated investment further and created opportunities to leverage retail footprints within the distribution network, providing a seamless customer experience. In our view, digital capabilities are an important part of a department store's long-term relevance with customers. Furthermore, the development of an all-in-one experience has led to interconnections between brick-and-mortar and digital sales, making a separation expensive and complex.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Sarah E Wyeth, New York + 1 (212) 438 5658; sarah.wyeth@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Diya G Iyer, New York + 1 (212) 438 4001; diya.iyer@spglobal.com |
Research Contributors: | Mathew Christy, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7786; mathew.christy@spglobal.com |
Akanksha Bijalwan, GURGAON HARYANA; akanksha.bijalwan@spglobal.com | |
Nidhi Agarwal, Pune; nidhi.agarwal@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.