This report does not constitute a rating action.
Key Takeaways
- With energy costs skyrocketing, U.K. energy regulator Ofgem announced last week a 54% rise in its default tariff cap alongside reforms of its cap methodology, both of which we consider positive for energy suppliers.
- What's more, the government's £9 billion support package for households signals that intervention will likely focus on helping consumers rather than transferring the burden to power generation and energy supply companies, as we've seen in other European countries.
- If current conditions persist, however, power generators might be increasingly in the spotlight amid a steep rise in the cost of living for U.K households, amplifying the risk of negative political intervention in our view.
Ofgem's revision of its energy price cap and tariff methodology, which was announced Feb. 3 and takes effect on April 1, follows a record rise in gas and power prices over the past six months, with wholesale gas prices quadrupling in the past year. The cap, first implemented in November 2019, limits the amount suppliers can charge certain consumers for a unit of energy with the aim of protecting more vulnerable customers. It applies to domestic consumers on the standard variable tariff (SVT; the default for the majority of energy tariffs) by direct debit or prepayment meters, totaling approximately 22 million households.
Given the surge in wholesale energy prices since the last cap update was announced in August 2021, and the current cap methodology, the 54% increase does not come as a surprise (see "The Energy Price Crisis: Examining The Impact On U.K. Suppliers," published Sept. 30, 2021, on RatingsDirect). The higher limit aims to ensure that energy suppliers can pass through a much larger portion of their costs. This is because wholesale cost allowances in the current tariff cap have been far below that needed to counter the unsustainably high and structurally volatile price environment since the second half of 2021. That situation led to a wave of supplier exits (29 since the start of 2021), of mostly small to midsize operators with limited hedging abilities, and significant working capital outflows for those remaining.
Despite the revised tariff cap and methodology, U.K. energy suppliers will still feel some pressure. The government has introduced measures to ease the immediate burden of increased electricity costs on households, but if energy prices stay high for a long period, this might not be sustainable. S&P Global Ratings believes the authorities' decisions during the next tariff review will be critical to the credit quality of both energy suppliers and power generators.
The Price Cap Hike And Proposed Reforms Don't Fully Insulate Energy Suppliers
From April 1, 2022, the cap update introduces a twofold rise in the allowance for wholesale energy costs, to about 55% of the cap level from an historical average at about 35% (see chart 1). This is by far the biggest increase since the cap's implementation, far exceeding the 12% rise in October 2021, with the cumulative increase at 73% between April 2021 and 2022. However, in our view, it does not fully reflect forward energy prices for the summer. In particular, the index price used for the current price cap determination is about £130 per megawatt hour (/MWh), but the forward power prices for the same time period (the next two quarters) currently point to about £170/MWh-£180/MWh, implying the wholesale cost allowances embedded in the updated cap will be insufficient during that period.
Chart 1
That said, along with the updated cap level, Ofgem also proposed changes that should bring additional flexibility in the price cap determination, which could support U.K. suppliers, namely:
- A change in the methodology to determine wholesale cost allowances. The revised calculation led to a £61 increase (about 11%) of the allowance for the cap from April 2022 to reflect wholesale costs incurred during the current price cap period, following the unprecedented rise in wholesale energy prices and volatility, bringing additional headroom for suppliers in future periods.
- More frequent price cap updates--quarterly instead of semi-annually--from October 2022, to reduce the time lag between market price changes and their reflection in the price cap.
- A change in license conditions from October 2022 to give Ofgem more flexibility to update the price cap level at any time if "exceptional circumstances" warrant it.
Political Intervention Leaves Suppliers And Generators Unscathed
Shortly after the higher price cap was announced, the U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer announced a series of measures, costing the government about £9 billion, to mitigate the shock for SVT customers. These include:
- £200 of credit on energy bills, to be repaid in annual instalments of £40 over the next five years.
- A £150 one-off rebate on council tax, applicable to most (80%) of the U.K. population.
- Extension of the "warm home" discount scheme targeting the most vulnerable customers, to reach three million people.
We consider these measures to be rather neutral for suppliers' financial positions, although we don't yet know how the bill rebate mechanism will be implemented. However, we believe they indicate that political intervention will be geared toward easing the burden of energy costs on households, rather than shifting it to the suppliers. Notably, this move points to a change in the government's stance, following adverse intervention in the sector over the past few years.
That said, we expect energy costs will remain a highly sensitive topic in 2022, given its significant political, economic, and social implications. First and foremost, the support package (£350 for the majority of energy customers) will cover only about half of the total increase (£693) of end users' energy bills. The high cost of living is further exacerbated by record inflation, a recent hike in interest rates, and increase in the U.K. annual tax bill from April.
Would Household Support Be Sufficient If Current Conditions Persist?
Given the current level of forward energy prices, Ofgem may announce another increase in its price cap in August 2022 for its October reset if it were to follow the current cap methodology. Unless energy prices and inflationary pressure subside, the government will face a tough decision that will test its ability to provide additional support to households. This would inevitably reignite the debate regarding the government's obligation to address the rising cost of living for the U.K. population.
We note that the current remedy packages do not affect power generators, which are partially benefitting from the currently high power prices (taking into account that the 2022 volumes are almost fully hedged). Based on measures implemented in France, Italy, and Spain, where governments took steps to claw back profits from power producers to decrease the pressure on fiscal budgets, we cannot exclude an impact on U.K. power generation companies in the coming months should prices remain elevated.
The Energy Crisis Is Gradually Changing The U.K. Energy Supply Market
As a result of the unprecedented high energy prices, the number of retail power suppliers in the U.K. dropped to 23 by the end of last year from 49 as of June 30, 2021. We expect market consolidation will continue, albeit to a significantly lesser extent, as energy prices remain high and currently above the wholesale costs allowance. In the current situation, customer churn rates also declined markedly by the end of 2021, given that high commodity prices limit suppliers' ability to offer deals below the price cap level.
Chart 2
Ofgem will also implement reforms to ensure greater resilience for suppliers. New license conditions will allow Ofgem to stop suppliers from taking on new customers temporarily once they reach the 50,000 and 200,000 domestic customers milestones if they don't meet specific requirements. In addition, the regulator launched financial stress testing for suppliers from January 2022, while also reducing its focus on encouraging customers to shop around for the best provider. All these factors will likely help ease competitive pressure and improve profit margins for the sector, after years of challenging operating conditions.
We rate four of the largest energy suppliers in the U.K.:
- Centrica PLC (BBB/Stable/A-2);
- EDF Energy Ltd. (BB+/Watch Neg/B);
- E.ON U.K. PLC (BBB/Stable/A-2); and
- Scottish Power Ltd. (BBB+/Stable/A-2).
Since the beginning of 2021, these suppliers have taken over about 60% of exiting suppliers' customers via the supplier of last resort (SoLR) process. Since the start of 2021, about 2.7 million customers of defunct energy supply companies went through the SoLR process in order to be reallocated to other suppliers; this number excludes Bulb's special administration regime for its 1.7 million customers, which are yet to be allocated.
The remaining suppliers, while increasing their market shares due to taking over such customers, will face material working capital outflows in the first quarter of 2022, as was the case in the fourth quarter of 2021. This is due to commodity purchases in the spot energy market at the current elevated prices to meet additional demand from the new customers, which will only be recovered with a time lag through future price cap changes. The price cap from April 2022 notably includes a £68 SoLR levy in the network costs allowance. The distribution network companies will pay levy claims (totaling about £1.83 billion) to energy companies and recover them from consumers via their charges.
We expect the current high energy prices will likely benefit large, well-established suppliers, due to, among other factors, healthy liquidity, access to capital, and efficient hedging. As an illustration, these elements were among the factors that led to the recent revision of our outlook on Centrica PLC to stable from negative (see "U.K. Energy Supplier Centrica Outlook Revised To Stable On Continuous Deleveraging; 'BBB' Rating Affirmed," published Dec. 15, 2021).
U.K. Energy Supplier Exits And Takeovers | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New appointed supplier | Domestic customers | % of allocated customers | Old supplier | Timing of the exit | ||||||
Centrica (British Gas) |
723,200 | 26.3 | ||||||||
50,000 | Simplicity | Jan. 27, 2021 | ||||||||
82,000 | PfP Energy | Sept. 7, 2021 | ||||||||
9,000 | MoneyPlus Energy | Sept. 7, 2021 | ||||||||
350,000 | People's Energy | Sept. 14, 2021 | ||||||||
5,900 | Bluegreen Energy Services Limited | Nov. 1, 2021 | ||||||||
14,800 | Zebra Power Limited | Nov. 2, 2021 | ||||||||
5,500 | Social Energy Supply Ltd | Nov. 16, 2021 | ||||||||
30,000 | Neon Reef Limited | Nov. 16, 2021 | ||||||||
176,000 | Together Energy Retail Ltd | Jan. 18, 2022 | ||||||||
EDF Energy |
591,700 | 21.5 | ||||||||
360,000 | Green Energy Network | Jan. 27, 2021 | ||||||||
220,000 | Utility Point | Sept. 14, 2021 | ||||||||
11,700 | Zog Energy Limited | Dec. 1, 2021 | ||||||||
Octopus Energy | 580,000 | 21.1 | Avro Energy | Sept. 22, 2021 | ||||||
Shell Energy | 536,000 | 19.5 | ||||||||
255,000 | Green Supplier Limited ('Green.') | Sept. 22, 2021 | ||||||||
15,000 | Colorado Energy | Oct. 13, 2021 | ||||||||
235,000 | Pure Planet | Oct. 13, 2021 | ||||||||
9,000 | Daligas | Oct. 14, 2021 | ||||||||
22,000 | GOTO Energy | Oct. 18, 2021 | ||||||||
E.ON Next | 239,000 | 8.7 | ||||||||
6,000 | Hub Energy | August 9, 2021 | ||||||||
48,000 | Symbio Energy | Sept. 29, 2021 | ||||||||
179,000 | Igloo Energy | Sept. 29, 2021 | ||||||||
6,000 | ENSTROGA | Sept. 29, 2021 | ||||||||
Scottish Power |
70,400 | 2.6 | ||||||||
65,000 | Orbit Energy Limited | Nov. 25, 2021 | ||||||||
5,400 | Entice Energy | Nov. 25, 2021 | ||||||||
Yü Energy | 600 | 0.0 | Ampoweruk Ltd | Nov. 2, 2021 | ||||||
SmartestEnergy | - | 0.0 | MA Energy Limited | Nov. 2, 2021 | ||||||
Utilita | 6,000 | 0.2 | Omni Energy Limited | Nov. 2, 2021 | ||||||
Pozitive Energy | - | 0.0 | CNG Energy Limited | Nov. 3, 2021 | ||||||
Special Administration Regime | 1,700,000 | Bulb | Nov. 24, 2021 | |||||||
Totals | ||||||||||
Total domestic customers | 4,446,900 | |||||||||
Reallocated | 2,746,900 | |||||||||
Source: Ofgem. |
Related Research
- U.K. Energy Supplier Centrica Outlook Revised To Stable On Continuous Deleveraging; 'BBB' Rating Affirmed, Dec. 15, 2021
- U.K. Energy Reforms Unlikely To Prevent Imminent Supplier Failures But Will Boost Resilience Over Time, Nov. 2, 2021
- The Energy Price Crisis: Examining The Impact On U.K. Suppliers, Sept. 30, 2021
Primary Credit Analyst: | Julien Bernu, London + 442071767137; Julien.Bernu@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Massimo Schiavo, Paris + 33 14 420 6718; Massimo.Schiavo@spglobal.com |
Beatrice de Taisne, CFA, London + 44 20 7176 3938; beatrice.de.taisne@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.