articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220202-french-corporates-emerge-from-covid-19-with-lower-downside-risk-12259608 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

French Corporates Emerge From COVID-19 With Lower Downside Risk

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Festive Will The Holiday Season Be For Retailers In The U.S. And Europe?

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


French Corporates Emerge From COVID-19 With Lower Downside Risk

Although the economic shock to France from COVID-19 will linger for years to come, S&P Global Ratings estimates an earnings rebound occurred for most of the country's rated companies in 2021 and will continue into 2022.

Naturally, event risks like a conflict in Ukraine involving widespread sanctions and higher energy prices could alter the scenario of a sustained earnings recovery for 2022, but this is not part of our current base-case forecasts for corporates in France or the rest of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA).

The percentage of stable outlooks on rated French corporates is currently above end-2019's level, before the pandemic started.

COVID-19 prompted rating adjustments in several sectors in France like in the rest of Europe, notably in food services and public catering, real estate, business services, and energy. But these took place mostly in 2020 and during the first half of 2021.

In general, we don't expect negative rating actions following the recent health restrictions announced in France: Our ratings capture the prospects of more muted growth in the early part of 2022.

Naturally, some French companies will rebound better than others. Lower government support may stress companies with unsustainable capital structures. Sectors dominated by small independent businesses, such as restaurants and nonfood retail, will likely struggle to bounce back. Sectors where the pandemic has durably altered consumer habits are also likely to face longer-lasting difficulties--not least business travel, hotels, leisure, and media, and perhaps even business-to-customer services, and office and commercial real estate. But this should largely impact small and midsize enterprises (SMEs), which are not typically rated.

We expect the trailing 12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to average a reasonable 2.5% by September 2022 in our baseline forecast for Europe. Based on the current rating distribution, there is no reason to think that French issuers will fare worse than the European average.

Negative Outlooks Down To 12% From More Than One-Third A Year Ago

At year-end 2021, we publicly rated 171 French corporate entities, adjusting for a few names incorporated in neighboring Luxembourg, the Netherlands, or the U.K. that operate largely in France. (These are Stellantis N.V., Technip Energies N.V., Louis Dreyfus Co. B.V., Airbus SE, and Boost Bidco in the Netherlands; ArcelorMittal, Compact Bidco, and Albéa Beauty Holdings in Luxembourg; and TechnipFMC PLC in the U.K.).

Of the ratings on French corporates, 48% remain in the investment-grade category: 82 had a public rating of 'BBB-' or better at year-end 2021. About two-thirds fall into two groups (see chart 1), each representing about one-third of our pool:

  • The first one in the 'BBB' category (56 ratings) and
  • The other in the 'B' category (63).

This second category corresponds primarily to private-equity-owned companies, most often under leveraged buyout (LBO) capital structures and has grown steadily throughout 2021. In the investment-grade space, the 'AA' category is now down to three: Sanofi and L’Oréal, both stand-alone, and SNCF, the national rail operator, thanks to state support.

A number remain in the 'A' rating category: Unsurprisingly, these include a few government-related entities such as RTE, ADP, and Airbus. Still, within the 'A' category, we also rate several French groups that have a clear international dimension, robust balance sheets, and resilient cash flow (for instance, well-established names like LVMH, Schneider, Legrand, Michelin, L'Air Liquide, Kering, Dassault Systèmes, TotalEnergies, and Vinci).

The lower 'A' category also includes more domestic names that proved rather recession-proof, like motorway operators ASF and Cofiroute. At year-end 2021, almost 78% of the ratings on French corporates carried stable outlooks (see chart 2), significantly up from a low 60% at year-end 2020. The share (78%) of stable outlook also happens to be better than before the pandemic started (67% at year-end 2019).

At end-December 2021, only 12% carried negative outlooks, which is a very substantial change from the situation a year ago when negative outlooks represented a high 37% of our rated portfolio. In January 2022, we revised the outlook on Atos SE, an IT company, to negative and placed the rating on EDF, the domestic power utility, on CreditWatch with negative implications, but this only altered the outlook distribution for French corporates overall by one percentage point.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Several key names in France currently carry positive outlooks, indicating the possibility of an upgrade over the coming quarters: Lafarge, Verallia, Loxam, Rexel, and Nexans, for instance, to which was added TotalEnergies, the France-based oil major in December 2021.

Overall, the net negative bias for France (-2%, calculated as the difference between the percentage of negative and positive outlooks) is even slightly better for the country than the one at the pan-European level (-4%).

Key Rating Movements In 2021

The ratio of upgrades to downgrades was a solid 1.2x for full-year 2021 in France, compared with a low of 0.14x for 2020 (see chart 3).

Chart 3

image

Key ratings upgrades in 2021 were on several names that benefitted indirectly from the public health situation and chose to use the extra cash flow to strengthen their balance sheets. That group includes L'Air Liquide (industrial gases), Loxam (equipment rental), Elis (cleaning services), and CMA-CGM (twice within the year, the shipping company benefitted massively from record freight rates) (see table 1). We also upgraded a few more French corporates benefiting from long-term positive structural trends, such as Paprec, a paper and waste recycling company; and Teleperformance, a customer-relationship call-center subcontractor.

Downgrades were concentrated in three sectors: oil and gas, public catering, and real estate. Our last 2021 downgrade on a French group, in September 2021, was on an IT company, Atos SE (see table 2).

Table 1

Main Upgrades To French Corporates In 2021
Sector Company Upgraded to From Date Comments
Shipping

CMA CGM S.A.

BB/Stable/-- BB-/Stable/-- July
BB-/Stable/-- B+/Stable/-- March Recovery in global trade, record-high shipping rates, deleveraging from FOCF
Capital goods

Loxam SAS

B+/Positive/-- B/Negative/-- May Resilient operating performance, good cost control, positive FOCF
Business services/recycling

Paprec Holding

B+/Stable/-- B/Positive/-- June Strong operational performance, expanding into waste-to-energy, positive FOCF

Elis S.A.

BB+/Stable/-- BB/Stable/-- October Linens and hygiene service provider. Good 2021 earnings, robust and profitable growth

Teleperformance SE

BBB/Stable/-- BBB-/Stable/-- November Outsourcing of customer relationship management, solid FOCF
Chemicals

L'Air Liquide S.A.

A/Stable-A-1 A-/Positive/A-2 July One of the largest industrial gas suppliers worldwide. Strict financial policy discipline
Consumer goods

Afflelou SAS

B/Stable/-- B-/Positive/-- May Franchiser in the optical and hearing aid market. Resilient performance during the pandemic, tight cost management
Health care

CAB (Biogroup)

B/Stable/-- B-/Stable/-- July Laboratory chain in France. Positive FOCF, slight deleveraging
FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

Main Downgrades To French Corporates In 2021
Sector Company Downgraded to From Date Comments
Oil and gas

Vallourec

SD B-/Negative/-- February Following a public distressed exchange; back to B/Stable in July

CGG

CCC+/Stable/-- B-/Stable/-- March Elevated debt and weak cash flows in 2021

Technip Energies

BBB/Negative/A-2 BBB+/Watch Neg/A-2 March Engineering and construction company. Downgrade following separation; back to BBB/Stable in October 2021

TotalEnergies SE

A/Stable/A-1 A+/Watch Neg/A-1 March Following a general change in our industry risk score for oil and gas, ESG-driven. Positive outlook assigned in December 2021
Real estate

Klepierre S.A.

BBB+/Stable/A-2 A-/Negative/A-2 March Shopping center owner. Weaker operating propsects

Altarea SCA

BBB-/Stable/-- BBB/Negative/-- June Plans to acquire real estate asset manager Primonial
Food services/catering

Elior Group S.A.

BB-/Negative/-- BB/Negative/-- February COVID-19 continuing to weigh on performance

Sodexo S.A.

BBB+/Negative/A-2 A-/Negative/A-1 April Slow recovery from COVID-19 disruption
IT services

Atos SE

BBB-/Stable/-- BBB+/Watch Neg/-- September Operational challenges, leading to lower financial flexibility, negative outlook in January 2022 on negative FOCF
FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Steady Flow Of New Ratings In 2021 In A Variety Of Sectors

We assigned 18 new ratings on French corporates in 2021 (see table 3). In the investment-grade category, we notably for the first time rated:

  • Safran SA (BBB+/Stable/--), a leading manufacturer of aerospace propulsion systems, aircraft equipment, and aircraft interiors,
  • SAUR (Holding d’Infrastructures des Métiers de l’Environnement (HIME); BBB-/Stable/--), the third-largest water company in the country operating long-term water concessions in France, Spain, and Portugal, and
  • Argan SA (BBB-/Stable/--), a logistics real estate investment trust.

In 2021, we also assigned an inaugural new rating to Iliad Holding SAS (BB/Stable/--), the holding company of the fourth-largest French telecom operator, Free.

Other new ratings in the speculative category came from a diversity of industries with sustained activity, notably in consumer products, retail, recycling (like Derichebourg, Seche Environnement S.A.), building materials, and health care (see table 3).

Table 3

New Ratings On French Corporates In 2021
Issuer Group Rating Sector Date of assignment

Goldstory SAS

Histoire d'Or B/Stable/-- Retail Jan. 2021

Safran SA

Safran BBB+/Stable/-- Aerospace and defense Feb. 2021

Care BidCo SAS

Cooper B/Stable/-- Capital goods Apr. 2021

Chrome HoldCo SAS

Cerba Healthcare B/Stable/-- Health care May. 2021

Takecare Bidco

Santé Cie B/Stable/-- Health care May. 2021

Derichebourg

Derichebourg BB/Stable/-- Business services Jun. 2021

GGE Bco 1 SAS

Galileo Global Education B/Stable/-- Media and entertainment Jun. 2021

Tarkett Participation

Tarkett BB-/Stable/-- Building materials Jun. 2021

Ecotone HoldCo III SAS

Ecotone B/Stable/-- Consumer products Jul. 2021

Labeyrie Fine Foods SAS

Labeyrie B/Stable/-- Consumer products Jul. 2021

Holding d’Infrastructures des Métiers de l’Environnement (HIME)

SAUR BBB-/Stable/-- Utilities Sep. 2021

Compact Bidco B.V.

Consolis B-/Stable/-- Building materials Sep. 2021

Seche Environnement S.A.

Séché Environnement BB/Stable/-- Business services Oct. 2021

Iliad Holding SAS

ILIAD BB/Stable/-- Telecom Oct. 2021

IM Group

Isabel Marant Group B-/Stable/-- Consumer products Oct. 2021

Argan SA

ARGAN BBB-/Stable/-- Property and real estate Nov. 2021

Boost Bidco SAS

BRUNEAU B/Stable/-- Retail Dec. 2021

The Grandir Group SAS

Grandir B-/Positive/-- Media and entertainment Dec. 2021
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Overall, by sector, the pool of rated French corporates is highly diverse, with all key industries being represented at year-end 2021 (see chart 4). The pool is skewed somewhat toward industrial operations, although not as much as in other European jurisdictions. Manufacturing operations (including autos, capital goods, consumer products, chemicals, and aerospace and defense) represent about one-third of the French pool; it is closer to 50% in Germany and Scandinavia. The sum of service providers (including telecom, health care, retail, transportation, leisure/media and IT, in addition to business and consumer services) total about 50% of our rated portfolio and real estate is at 9%, percentages close to their share of domestic GDP.

Chart 4

image

Considering the distribution by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit indicators, the picture is slightly better for our E credit indicator on our portfolio of French rated corporates than it is for the EMEA at large (see chart 5). For instance, E-1 plus E-2 combined account for 86% of public corporate ratings in France versus 75% across EMEA. A lower proportion of names operating in sectors exposed to high environmental risks like heavy industries, oil and gas, mining and metals in France largely explains this difference.

For the G indicator, distribution for France is very similar to that at the EMEA level, with 42% of the French pool at G-3, capturing governance concerns related to private equity ownership, the LBO market being as developed in France as it is in other European countries.

We observe that several French companies, generally rated in the investment grade category, are assigned a G-1 positive governance credit indicator (for instance, well-established names like L'Oréal, LVMH, and Pernod Ricard in the consumer goods industry, Schneider in capital goods, Michelin in autos, and Klépierre in real estate).

image

By underlying key factors, governance structure is listed as a risk driving the overall ESG credit indicators in 35% of cases in France but this simply reflects the prevalence of private equity ownership for speculative grade issuers. Climate transition risk comes second at 18%, highlighting the importance of sustaining a trajectory to cut greenhouse gas emissions for many names in the country.

Chart 6

image

Credit Trends And Credit Metrics Forecasts

On an aggregated basis (adding all the company-specific forecasts that we have made for rated corporates based in France), we estimate 2021 revenue rebounded almost to the 2019 level, so broadly in line with the pre-pandemic basis (see chart 7). That measure is obviously an aggregate and real divergences by sector will persist for some time. Full-year figures for 2021, once available for most French groups, are likely to show that sectors like transportation, hospitality, media, and leisure are trailing behind. A recovery should gather momentum this year, and our global forecasts foresee a 6.4% rebound in sales for rated French corporates in 2022.

Recently, the fast-spreading omicron variant has sapped some economic momentum, principally through reduced mobility, staff shortages, and a dip in consumer confidence. In terms of sectors most sensitive to restrictions, such as air travel, we think this will likely weigh on the positive momentum gained in the second half of 2021. However, indications from the countries earliest into the wave are that the variant is less severe, with lower hospitalization and mortality rates. This gives grounds for optimism that restrictions may be eased relatively quickly.

In parallel with the recovery in sales, French corporates are likely to restore EBITDA margin for 2021 through cost-saving initiatives and higher prices. And we foresee further improvement for 2022 (see chart 8). We note that until now, French rated issuers have largely been able to pass through higher costs from rising energy prices or supply chain disruptions to their final customers. That ability is likely to be further tested in 2022.

For some individual companies, several factors like prolonged supply chain disruptions, unmitigated rising energy prices (less likely in France than in some other countries, at least for power) and a catch-up in wages in particular, could all weigh on profitability measures this year But at this stage, we don't consider that this will derail the overall improvement trend that we forecast on an aggregated basis.

Against that backdrop of restored earnings on an aggregate basis, our debt index for French rated issuers at year-end 2021 should be no higher than 1.8% above the year-end 2019 level (see chart 9). French companies continued to borrow throughout 2021 but obviously, not all has been spent. Cash piles have risen and, on an S&P Global Ratings-adjusted basis (that is, largely deducting cash held), debt for rated corporates in France should largely be stable over 2021-2023 (see chart 9). The high-yield market was very active throughout 2021 for French issuers, with many LBO companies deciding to take advantage of the extremely competitive funding conditions last year to refinance part of their debt or complete takeovers, notably in the health care sector.

While year-end 2020 was a low point for credit metrics, we estimate final figures, once available, will show an improvement in 2021and we expect a further step of similar magnitude in 2022 (see chart 10).

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

Overall, we expect S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to bottom out by year-end 2022, returning to 4.2x from 5.1x two years earlier. Adjusted funds from operations to debt should show a similar trend.

Reasonably robust financial results for 2021 and a sound recovery in 2022, with weaker demand momentum during first quarter, are embedded in our current ratings. Despite the uncertainty the pandemic is causing, we do not foresee a risk of a number of negative rating actions on French corporates for now. More likely, rating actions will be based on sector- and company-specific factors.

Default Expectations

At year-end 2021, we rated 19% of speculative-grade French companies 'B-' or lower, which compares favorably with a 30% average across Europe. By then, only four names were in the 'CCC' category, whose capital structures we considered fundamentally unsustainable. Of those included is Europcar, currently on CreditWatch with positive implications, to be taken over by a consortium led by Volkswagen (table 4).

Table 4

French Corporates: Entities In The 'CCC' Rating Category And Below At Year-End 2021
Company Long-term foreign currency issuer credit rating Outlook Sector Comments

CGG

CCC+ Stable Energy (oil and gas) Downgraded from' B-' in March 2021 on cash flow burn and elevated debt, capital structure unsustainable in the long term

Europcar International S.A.S.U and Europcar Mobility Group

CCC+ CreditWatch Positive Transportation (car rental) Potential takeover by a consortium led by VW

Technicolor S.A.

CCC+ Stable Media and entertainment Upgraded from 'SD' in September 2020, following an about 50% debt-to-equity swap considered a distressed exchange
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Overall, S&P Global Ratings expects the European trailing 12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to reach a reasonable 2.5% by September 2022 in its baseline forecast, from 1.8% at end-December 2021, on a trailing 12-month basis (for more information, see "The European Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate Could Reach 2.5% By September 2022," published on Nov. 18, 2021). Based on the current rating distribution, there is no reason to think that French issuers will fare any worse than the European average.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Eric Tanguy, Paris + 33 14 420 6715;
eric.tanguy@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Nicolas Baudouin, Paris + 33 14 420 6672;
nicolas.baudouin@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in