articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/211025-regulatory-reinforcements-loom-to-allay-runaway-housing-risks-for-australian-banks-12154405 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Regulatory Reinforcements Loom To Allay Runaway Housing Risks For Australian Banks

COMMENTS

China's Monetary Stimulus Adds Strain For Banks

COMMENTS

European 'AAAm' Money Market Fund Trends (First-Quarter 2025)

COMMENTS

Why Most EMEA Emerging Markets Are Slow To Adopt Bank Recovery And Resolution Plans

COMMENTS

Forecast Change: China's Bad Loans Likely To See Larger Tariff-Related Downside


Regulatory Reinforcements Loom To Allay Runaway Housing Risks For Australian Banks

Soaring house prices in Australia are no longer just a problem for frustrated home buyers. Higher prices, home lending growth, and higher household debt present systemic risks for Australian banks. The regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), has sought to mitigate these risks by introducing macroprudential measures. The announced measures will have limited impact, in our view. Consequently, we expect more regulatory actions on this front in the next few months.

House prices in Australia grew rapidly by about 12% in the first six months of 2021; to date this growth trend has continued. The growth in residential property prices reflects the current very low interest rate environment as well as ongoing supply shortages.

This time around, anecdotal evidence suggests that the growth in property prices is widespread across capital cities and regional areas whereas previous growth spurts occurred mainly in Australia's two largest cities, Sydney and Melbourne.

Chart 1

image

Home lending growth has also accelerated to about 6.1% (12-month period to August 2021) from about 3.4% (12-month period to December 2020). Lower interest rates and higher property prices were the two key factors that supported the higher growth in home loans.

Chart 2

image

We doubt that banks loosened their lending standards to drive growth in home lending. Lending characteristics appear to have either improved or remained largely unchanged in the past year. This is reflected in the proportion of new investor, interest-only (IO) and high loan-to-value ratio (LVR) lending. Anecdotal information also suggests that some of the banks have tightened their lending practices in recent months. That said, as of June 2021 the proportion of the major banks' new lending at debt-to-income higher than six times (x) has increased substantially to about 22% of new lending as of June 2021, compared with 17% a year ago.

Table 1

Selected New Residential Mortgage Lending Standards Statistics
June 2020 June 2021
Investor and interest-only portion of new loans funded
Investor 30% 28%
Interest-only 20% 18%
Owner-occupier: LVR of new loans funded
90%<LVR<95% 10% 10%
LVR>95% 2% 1%
Investor: LVR of new loans funded
90%<LVR<95% 3% 3%
LVR>95% 0.7% 0.5%
Debt-to-income ratios of new loans funded (owner-occupier + investor)
>6x 17% 22%
LVR--Loan-to-value ratio. Source: APRA Quarterly authorized deposit-taking institution statistics.

Risks Rising

We believe rising house prices and accelerating home loan growth typically lead to a buildup of risk for a banking system. Residential mortgages account for almost two-thirds of bank lending in Australia. If house prices plunge and unemployment rises, bank customers will be less able to service loans. This could lead to a material rise in credit losses, and consequently hurt the creditworthiness of the entire banking sector. These risks are accentuated when property prices and household debt have risen rapidly.

APRA has fired the first shot to mitigate these risks, but it is unlikely to achieve much. APRA, as a member and in consultation with the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR), recently announced macroprudential measures to increase the minimum interest rate buffer by 50 basis points (bps) to 3% above the loan product rate when assessing the serviceability of new home loan applications.

We believe this is likely to have only limited success in arresting the rising risks to the banking system, or house price growth. This is mainly because only a small proportion of customers borrow at their absolute capacity; some borrowers are already constrained by the floor rate; and investors may also be sitting on liquidity buffers, in our view.

APRA's own assessment suggests that a 50bps increase in the serviceability buffer will reduce maximum borrowing capacity for a typical borrower by about 5%. APRA chose this measure because it acts as a cap on higher leveraged lending, is simple to implement, and will not affect mortgage interest rates. In addition, APRA has asked the banks to examine their risk appetite and monitor their residential portfolio concentrations of high debt-to-income loans.

Further Macroprudential Measures Likely

APRA (and the CFR) are likely to reload and introduce further macroprudential measures--such as restrictions on high debt-to-income lending--in our view. We understand that the CFR will look to tailor its actions to address emerging risks and avoid unintended consequences such as the impact on first-home buyers.

Other macroprudential measures, including caps on high LVR lending, interest-only loans and investor loans, are less likely as they are not key factors in the risk buildup in the current cycle, in our view. We note that caps on interest-only loans and investor loans were successful in 2017 to 2019 and supported an orderly unwinding of housing risks (especially in interest-only loans and investor loans) that had built up in the periods prior.

Our current ratings on Australian banks--most of which are on positive outlook--factor in our expectation that the regulators will take timely and effective actions to mitigate risks from rapidly rising house prices and home loan growth. Failing this, the upside for our ratings on the Australian banks is likely to recede.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).

Primary Credit Analyst:Nico N DeLange, Sydney + 61 2 9255 9887;
nico.delange@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Sharad Jain, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2077;
sharad.jain@spglobal.com
Lisa Barrett, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2081;
lisa.barrett@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in