S&P Global Ratings' not-for-profit health care rating actions for the third quarter of 2021 were equal with seven downgrades and seven upgrades. There were also 14 favorable outlook revisions, mostly to stable from negative, and three unfavorable outlook revisions all to negative from stable. In addition, 78 of our 109 rating actions were affirmations, which further supports our stable sector outlook.
The year-to-date total of 46 favorable outlook revisions is significantly higher than the 13 unfavorable outlook revisions. We believe this trend reflects the strength of the sector as operations continue to normalize, although the sector still has ample headwinds related to staffing shortages, uneven volume recovery, varying vaccination and hospitalization rates, and lower pandemic related government stimulus. Year to date rating downgrades (12) outpace upgrades (eight), reflecting the more negative skew of rating actions in the earlier quarters; for instance, there were no upgrades in the first quarter of 2021 and only one upgrade in the second quarter.
September 2021 Had More Downgrades Than Upgrades, But Outlook Revisions Were Firmly Positive
In September, there were limited rating actions with three downgrades and two upgrades (see table 1). However, we took far more outlook actions with September and third quarter favorable outlook revisions exceeding unfavorable outlook revisions and matching cumulative trends in both the first and second quarters. In September, we affirmed 32 ratings without revising the outlooks, and we assigned new ratings to Magnolia Regional Health Center (MS), SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (AK), and Adventist HealthCare (MD). Rating actions include:
- Three downgrades (two downgrades of standalone hospitals and one downgrade of a health system);
- Two upgrades (one upgrade from the speculative-grade category to investment-grade category and one upgrade from the 'BBB' rating category to the 'A' rating category);
- Seven favorable outlook revisions (five outlook revisions to stable from negative and two outlook revisions to positive from stable with all but one of the revisions on stand-alone hospitals); and
- One unfavorable outlook revision (to negative from stable).
In September, we rated 21 new bond issues.
Non-stable outlooks indicate a one-in-three likelihood of a future rating change during the outlook period. We consider a favorable outlook change to include revisions to positive from stable, to stable from negative, or less commonly, to positive from negative, and vice versa for unfavorable outlook changes where the rating itself doesn't change.
Table 1
September 2021 Not-For-Profit Health Care Ratings Actions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Rating | Outlook | Action | Description | |
Hospitals | |||||
Auxilio Mutuo Hospital |
PR | BBB+ | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Beverly Community Hospital Association |
CA | BB | Negative | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Boulder Community Health |
CO | A- | Stable | Rating maintained; outlook revised from negative | Operating trend towards breakeven and improved balance sheet |
Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation |
CA | A- | Stable | Rating raised from 'BBB+'; previous outlook positive | Sustained improved operating performance and growth in unrestricted reserves |
Children's Hospital Colorado |
CO | A+ | Positive | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Conway Regional Medical Center |
AR | BBB+ | Stable | New sale; rating maintained; outlook revised from negative | Operations above expectations |
Dallas County Hospital District |
TX | AA- | Positive | Rating maintained; outlook revised from stable | Financial profile improvement and revenue diversity |
El Paso County Hospital District |
TX | BBB+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Guthrie Clinic |
PA | A | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Southeast Health |
AL | BBB+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Jackson-Madison County General Hospital dba West Tennessee Healthcare |
TN | A- | Stable | Rating lowered from 'A'; previous outlook stable | Weak operating results |
Kootenai Health |
ID | A | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Magnolia Regional Health Center |
MS | BB | Stable | New sale; rating initially assigned | Rating initially assigned |
Methodist Hospital of Southern California |
CA | BBB+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Methodist Hospitals |
IN | BBB- | Stable | New sale; rating maintained; outlook revised from negative | Expectation of continued profitability |
Mohawk Valley Health System |
NY | BB+ | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Nicholas H. Noyes Memorial Hospital |
NY | BB- | Stable | Rating maintained; outlook revised from negative | Expectation of continued profitability and improved balance sheet |
North Oaks Health System |
LA | BBB+ | Positive | New sale; rating raised from 'BB+'; previous outlook positive | Multi-year trend of improved operations and balance sheet metrics |
Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District |
CA | B+ | Stable | Rating maintained; outlook revised from negative | Greatly improved operating performance |
Oak Valley Hospital District |
CA | BB | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Orangeburg-Calhoun Counties Regional Medical Center |
SC | BBB- | Negative | Rating lowered from 'BBB'; previous outlook stable | Consecutive years of negative operating results |
Penn Highlands Healthcare |
PA | A- | Negative | New sale; rating maintained; outlook revised from stable | Financial profile dilution due to acquisition |
SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium |
AK | A- | Stable | New sale; rating initially assigned | Rating initially assigned |
UC Health |
OH | A | Negative | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Louisville Medical Center Water & Steam Plant |
KY | BBB+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Health systems | |||||
Adventist HealthCare |
MD | BBB | Stable | New sale; rating initially assigned | Rating initially assigned |
Advocate Aurora Health |
IL | AA | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Catholic Health System |
NY | BBB | Negative | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Centra Health |
VA | A- | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Circleport Conference Center Landlord LLC |
KY | AA- | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Deaconess Health System |
IN | A+ | Positive | New sale; rating maintained; outlook revised from stable | Strong financial metrics |
Fairview Health Services |
MN | A | Stable | New sale; rating lowered from 'A+'; previous outlook negative | Operating losses and expense base pressures |
Geisinger Health |
PA | AA- | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Hartford HealthCare |
CT | A | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Memorial Hermann Health System |
TX | A+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
MultiCare Health System |
WA | AA- | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Providence St. Joseph Health |
WA | AA- | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Rush University System for Health |
IL | A+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
RWJ Barnabas Health |
NJ | AA- | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Sentara Healthcare |
VA | AA | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Scripps Health |
CA | AA | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Sparrow Health System |
MI | A | Negative | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
St. Elizabeth Medical Center |
KY | AA | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
University Hospitals |
OH | A | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Long term care and human service providers | |||||
Brethren Home Community dba Cross Keys Village |
PA | A- | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Henry County Health Care Authority |
AL | BB+ | Stable | Rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Kendal at Ithaca |
NY | BBB+ | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Noland Health Services |
AL | A | Stable | New sale; rating maintained | Credit quality consistent with existing rating |
Third-Quarter Rating Actions
In the third quarter of 2021, we lowered seven ratings and also raised seven ratings (see chart 1). We also affirmed 17 ratings while revising their outlooks favorably (14) and unfavorably (3). Furthermore, we initially assigned eight new ratings during the third quarter to the following issuers:
- Tucson Medical Center (AZ)
- Ochsner LSU Health System of Northern Louisiana (LA)
- Antelope Valley Hospital (CA)
- AtlantiCare Health System (NJ)
- St. Lukes Hospital of Duluth (MN)
- Magnolia Regional Health Center (MS)
- SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (AK)
- Adventist HealthCare (MD)
Chart 1
During the third quarter of 2021, upgrades were driven by a fairly even mix of balance sheet and operational performance factors, whereas the downgrades were more skewed toward operational performance weakness (see chart 2). However, we also downgraded a rating in the third quarter due in part to an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk factor related to an issuer's location in southwestern Louisiana.
We believe the factors driving the rating changes reflect that while balance sheet metrics have served as a stabilizing factor for many issuers, operating performance has been dissimilar across our portfolio of credit ratings, as certain issuers have been more affected by industry cost pressures and have struggled to find footing during this leg of the pandemic. We continue to believe that as the trend in patient behaviors continues toward a new normalization, enterprise profiles including market share information will further come into focus as the utilization landscape develops.
The most-cited factors driving both favorable and unfavorable outlook revisions during the third quarter were around operational performance and balance-sheet changes, consistent with the prior quarter (see chart 3).
Chart 2
Chart 3
Rated new sale volume during the third quarter of nearly $9 billion was greater than the second and first quarter rated new sale volume of $8 billion and $6 billion, respectively. New sale issuance during the third quarter was the highest in the southeast region of the United States (see chart 4), and over $6 billion in total new sale issuance was from health systems. We expect that new sale activity will continue to be elevated at least through the current month as providers take advantage of low interest rates.
Chart 4
Credit Quality Expectations For The Remainder Of The Year
We have a stable sector outlook on the not-for-profit acute care sector. Our stable sector outlook is supported by broad balance sheet strength of providers due to the provider relief funds and favorable investment returns since market lows at the start of the pandemic in spring 2020. This balance sheet strength should continue to provide a rating cushion to manage through some mixed operational results related to short-term revenue interruptions, potential market volatility, the phase out of stimulus funding, and expense pressures. In particular we believe staffing will be a persistent challenge due to heightened turnover and salary requirements, burnout, retirements, and a generally tight labor market. The sector may also be affected by surges of the coronavirus, interrupting management plans and in some cases crowding out more profitable services, although this risk is dependent on local market conditions including vaccination rates.
Related Research
- U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Sector View Revised To Stable From Negative, published June 23, 2021
- U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Outstanding Ratings And Outlooks As of June 30, 2021, published July 29, 2021
- Economic Outlook U.S. Q4 2021: The Rocket Is Leveling Off, published Sept. 23, 2021
- U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, July 2021, published Aug. 10, 2021
- U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions: August 2021, published Sept. 13, 2021
- Through The ESG Lens 2.0: A Deeper Dive Into U.S. Public Finance Credit Factors, published April 28, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Alexander Nolan, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4501; alexander.nolan@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Cynthia S Keller, Augusta + 1 (212) 438 2035; cynthia.keller@spglobal.com |
Suzie R Desai, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7046; suzie.desai@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.