Key Takeaways
- We see the EU's Fit for 55 decarbonization plan as largely positive for the European utilities sector because it will provoke an investment supercycle to massively expand renewables generation fleet and upgrade energy networks.
- Yet, the energy transition will not be smooth. New, greener technologies, which still need to develop further to push down costs and boost efficiency, will only gradually replace conventional thermal and nuclear generation.
- Therefore, utilities face a number of rising risks: managing a fragile supply-demand balance in the European energy system at least until 2025; maintaining affordability to minimize social and political risks; and overcoming hurdles in the delivery of new projects, including permitting, inflation, supply chain disruption, and human resources.
S&P Global Ratings believes Fit for 55 will sharply increase growth in demand for electricity, primarily from 2030, which will likely support high power prices in the long run. With the plan, the EU has chosen to pursue decarbonization by dramatically shifting its energy mix away from fossil fuel energies through green electrification. To achieve this, Europe will need to add between 45 and 55 gigawatts (GW) of renewable capacity a year this decade (20-30 GW annually for solar and 25 GW for wind). That compares with 30 GW added in 2020 (20 GW of solar and 10 GW of wind). Under the plan, electrification would increase to 30% of the final energy demand by 2030 and 57% by 2050, from just 25% today.
We believe the greater role given to the carbon price to achieve this electrification of the economy will also support power prices this decade. The reform of the EU Emissions Trading System, which in short encompasses a tightening of supply and the inclusion of more industries, implies a large increase in carbon prices, compared with the average price over the past decade, already partly embedded into today's prices (see "A Heightened Focus On CO2 Emissions Stokes Interest In The Carbon Markets," published on Sept. 21, 2021). That said, forecasting power prices remains extremely tricky, given that by 2030 two-thirds of generation may come from zero- or low-marginal-cost renewables, which could actually depress the average power price.
Fit for 55: Decarbonization From Green Electrification
The European Commission's Fit For 55 package, released in July 2021, aims to bring the EU's climate, energy, transport, and taxation policies and laws in line with its goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions at least 55% by 2030 (compared with 1990). The plan includes a range of regulatory and sectoral targets, incentives for creating technological disruption, and other policy instruments to decarbonize the economy and enable change at the consumer level.
To achieve this, the package relies on four distinct pillars:
- Higher carbon pricing in the EU through the extension of the existing Emissions Trading System (ETS) market to include the shipping sector;
- Wider sectoral decarbonization targets;
- An increase in the production and use of low-carbon fuels in the building and mobility sectors; and
- A focus on the mobilization of funds to stimulate innovation and mitigate social impact.
This plan comes in a wider political initiative at European level, including the European Green Deal, the European taxonomy and the Next Generation EU, which all frame Europe's decarbonization ambitions and action plan. We understand the European Parliament and member states still need to negotiate and adopt the package of legislation on reaching these 2030 climate targets, which could take place over the coming quarters.
Table1
Key Features Of The EC's Fit for 55 Package | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carbon pricing | Sectoral targets | Rules | ||||
Revision of the EU emissions trading system (ETS), including its extension to maritime, road transport, and buildings | Revised effort-sharing regulation for member states’ reduction targets in sectors outside the ETS | Stricter CO2 emission standards for cars and vans | ||||
Revised energy taxation directive | Revised land use, land-use change and forestry regulation (LULUCF) | Accelerated deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure | ||||
New carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) | Revised renewable energy directive | ReFuelEU Aviation for sustainable aviation fuels | ||||
Revised energy efficiency directive | FuelEU Maritime for use of sustainable alternative fuels in European shipping and ports | |||||
Support measures | ||||||
Using revenues and regulation to promote innovation, build solidarity, and lessen impacts for the vulnerable, notably through the new Social Climate Fund and enhancements to the Modernisation Fund and Innovation Fund | ||||||
Source: European Commission. |
Clear Positive Momentum For European Utilities
In what will create a largely positive operating environment for utilities, investments in renewables generation and energy networks will need to pick up significantly to support growth in green power. What's more, investment into the infrastructure for low-carbon mobility--such as charging stations and network abilities--will need a considerable boost. (For details, see "Industry Top Trends Update: Utilities EMEA," July 15, 2021, and "The Energy Transition And The Diverging Credit Path For European Utilities," Feb. 16, 2021.)
Chart 2
Chart 3
We project annual investments of European utilities to grow an average annual 30% over the next three years, to about €133 billion on aggregate for our rated universe, compared with an already high level in 2019-2020. Unsurprisingly, investments will first go to networks, which we estimate will be 46% of aggregate capex for the top 10 rated integrated utilities, that need upgrades to improve resilience, integrate new renewables, and manage intermittency. We note that investments for some transmission system operators (TSOs) are particularly high, including in the U.K. and Germany, to build corridors connecting renewables (and interconnections from the Nordics) from the north to high-consumption areas in the southern areas of the countries. A large part of the remaining will go into renewables (that we estimate at about 30% of the aggregate for the top 10 rated integrated utilities). This may be somewhat of an underestimate since some companies report net investments: We expect a large degree of capital rotation in this area, meaning that utilities will develop and sell part of their renewables projects to recycle capital and reinvest in new projects. Only a minor share of the investment will go into other unregulated generation and supply, in particular in the large life extension program of EDF's French nuclear fleet as well as its new nuclear plant in the U.K.
We believe European utilities could strongly benefit from Fit for 55's emphasis on green electrification because it will meet high customer demand. Indeed, most energy-intensive industries will seek to secure green energy sources to meet their own decarbonization targets. They will likely seek to secure long-term corporate power purchase agreements from renewables sources or by developing sources of green hydrogen, itself produced from renewables. Either way, European utilities would benefit from long-term, profitable supply contracts, which would provide greater visibility about future cash flow.
The plan, together with the previously release European taxonomy, provides clearer EU policies about how and where to invest in the energy transition and allocates targeted public funding for innovation in the energy transition. We also believe the European utilities sector is already in a phase of high innovation, which we expect will intensify as the world looks for new ways to transform and lower the costs of the energy transition.
Sector's ability to attract capital will support credit quality
Although we expect to see a significant mobilization of capital, we also understand most European utilities want to maintain a disciplined financial policy, which would support credit quality in the sector. We currently do not anticipate deterioration in creditworthiness for the European utilities we rate. Indeed, to support these large investments, we expect to see an increase not only in debt issuance but also in equity raising, including issuance of hybrid capital. What's more, we believe the sector has a particularly strong capacity to attract capital, supported by solid growth prospects and the positive environmental impact of these investments--two major considerations for investors.
Table 2
Utilities: Hybrid Capital Issuance So Far In 2021 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pricing Date | Issuer | Mil. € | Rationale | |||||
1/25/2021 | EDP | 750 | Balance sheet support | |||||
2/2/2021 | Iberdrola | 1,000 | Balance sheet support | |||||
2/2/2021 | Iberdrola | 1,000 | Balance sheet support | |||||
2/10/2021 | Orsted | 425 | Green projects | |||||
2/10/2021 | Orsted | 500 | Green projects | |||||
3/3/2021 | Enel | 1,000 | Balance sheet support | |||||
3/3/2021 | Enel | 1,250 | Balance sheet support | |||||
3/23/2021 | Stedin | 500 | Balance sheet support | |||||
5/19/2021 | Vattenfall | 500 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
5/19/2021 | Vattenfall | 3,000 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
5/26/2021 | EDF | 1,250 | Social projects | |||||
6/22/2021 | Vattenfall | 250 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
6/23/2021 | Engie | 750 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
8/24/2021 | EnBW | 500 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
8/24/2021 | EnBW | 500 | Hybrid refinancing | |||||
9/6/2021 | EDP | 500 | Capex | |||||
9/6/2021 | EDP | 750 | Capex | |||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings |
Tighter Energy Supply And Higher Prices, At Least Until 2025
We see a significant tightening in the supply-demand energy balance over the next three years as part of the rollout of Europe's tough decarbonization policies. We note the accelerated anticipated closures of conventional generation plants, notably nuclear and coal, in the next three years. At the same time, the pace of commissioning of new renewables projects and interconnections will not be fast enough to offset the loss of conventional capacity. S&P Global Ratings believes this will lift power prices over 2022-2025 (for details, see "The Energy Transition And What It Means For European Power Prices And Producers: September 2021 Update").
Chart 4
Utilities will need to address the risk of intermittent supply. Renewables like wind and solar cannot produce energy around the clock, and given thinning spare capacity margins and extreme weather events, we see an increasing risk of blackouts and need for dispatchable power--that is power sources that can be turned on and off on demand. As such, intermittency risk will become another key factor to look at when it comes to growth prospects for renewables. To lessen this risk and meet net-zero ambitions, the market will need solutions that boost system reliability (batteries and storage, transmission upgrades, demand-side response, carbon capture, utilization and storage, and hydrogen in the very long term). At the same time, management of security of supply and network inertia will continue to require conventional, reliable, and flexible generation capacity, which gas can offer over the coming decades. However, net-zero ambitions and Europe's lack of clarity about the role of gas in the transition appears to be curbing appetite for investment into gas assets.
Let's Not Minimize The Many Risks
Europe's ambitious Fit for 55 plan, that is, the energy transition, also presents other large risks for utilities: cost inflation, supply chain disruptions, permitting snags, a scarcity of skilled workers, and increasing social and political risk stemming from record-high energy prices. They all could threaten the pace of renewables growth.
Cost inflation
Renewable energy production costs are showing their first deviation from the expected long-term decline of about 40% on average by 2030. S&P Global Platts Analytics estimates that commissioning costs for solar photovoltaic plants will increase up to 10% this year, and that the cost of offshore and onshore wind projects will rise 4% and 8%, respectively, by the end of 2021 (see "European Offshore Wind Will Continue To Lead Global Growth," Sept 8, 2021). The increases stem from higher prices of raw materials--such as copper, aluminum and steel--that are used for solar and wind plants, which are causing setbacks to both manufacturing and new-build activity. Additionally, bottlenecks in shipping are contributing to the high-cost environment by making it more difficult to procure materials. If the surge endures, it could throw into question the anticipated gradual decline in production costs and slow the pace of growth.
Supply chain snags
As demand continues to grow, we see increasing pressure on European utilities' supply chains, which could result in heightened execution risks as they increase investments in renewables assets. Meanwhile, renewables supply chains are already struggling to keep up with the required pace of development, notably with domestic demand in China. We note that the European green electrification strategy increases the region's dependency on China for a large number of strategic parts and resources. We believe this situation, which we see as unlikely to change over the medium term, could add a degree of execution risks for European utilities. In its May 2021 Report ("The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions"), the International Energy Agency flags the significant market share of China on some critical products necessary for the energy transition. In particular, China processes about 90% of rare earths (notably used in batteries), 40% of global copper (key for network cables); and about 60% for cobalt and lithium (also for batteries). Beyond dependency upon China's imports, the European supply chain needs to scale up in cadence with growth in investment and demand, which takes time and heavy investments. However, we understand that the largest renewables European players at this stage may have better procurement access than smaller ones.
Permitting remains a key hurdle
So far, the administrative process to build new renewable projects in Europe has been one of the greatest operating challenge for developers, and one that could jeopardize returns for projects due to delays and unforeseen additional costs. This is in part due to local opposition to such projects ("not in my backyard"). Local communities claim harms to the local environment (wildlife, noise, landscape) but also the competition for land such projects may create with agricultural projects. This comes on top of large population density (compared with that in the U.S., for example) and other constraints, such as nonconstructable or military zones. Europe and domestic energy policies aim to tackle the issue by accelerating and simplifying the administrative process for renewables. However, this is yet to be seen; legal procedures in Europe remain protracted, and there are currently many ways for local communities to challenge these projects.
Where will skilled workers come from?
We believe that workforce scarcity could slow down the pace of growth and ambitions for the sector or lead to higher staff costs. Fast acceleration in greener energies—including networks--require building a skilled workforce, which implies hiring, training, and converting workforces to new technologies. This obviously takes time but is a big challenge for the sector. Indeed, it requires indeed a significant ramp-up of engineers and skilled staff ready to work on these new projects in sometimes remote places,
Record-high energy prices elevate social and political risk
Affordability concerns will remain a major risk for the sector as part of this ambitious energy transition. We see policy risks as already on the rise for utilities. Spiking gas, carbon, and power prices are putting social issues, such as energy affordability, in the spotlight. We believe the social implications of rising power prices could result in waning political support and give way to a social and political backlash. The Fit for 55 package explicitly aims at managing these risks by offering a set of fiscal measures and incentives to the most vulnerable population and markets, through its Social Climate Fund. Meanwhile, we see pressure growing and political moves in countries, like Spain, which introduced clawbacks on gas prices for Spanish generators with immediate effect. While the situation is so far unique in Europe, other countries could take sector-negative measures to offset the surge in power prices.
Editor: Rose Marie Burke.
Related Research
- A Heightened Focus On CO2 Emissions Stokes Interest In The Carbon Markets, Sept. 21, 2021
- The Energy Transition And What It Means For European Power Prices And Producers: September 2021 Update, Sept. 17, 2021
- European Offshore Wind Will Continue To Lead Global Growth, Sept 8, 2021
- Industry Top Trends Update: Utilities EMEA, July 15, 2021
- The Energy Transition And The Diverging Credit Path For European Utilities, Feb. 16, 2021
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Pierre Georges, Paris + 33 14 420 6735; pierre.georges@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.