articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210727-research-update-university-of-new-south-wales-ratings-affirmed-outlook-negative-12054200 content esgSubNav
In This List
RESUPD

Research Update: University Of New South Wales Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Banks Can Help, Not Fix, Shandong's LGFV Issues

COMMENTS

Higher Education Brief: Muted Relief For Australian Universities Post Election

COMMENTS

Sovereign Brief: UAE's Domestic Debt Capital Market Gains Momentum


Research Update: University Of New South Wales Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

Overview

  • UNSW's global reputation should continue to attract students, and the university is likely to maintain a high level of financial resources and low annual debt service.
  • It is likely to continue demonstrating fiscal flexibility during the next one to two years while under pressure from Australia's tough travel restrictions.
  • We are affirming our long-term issuer credit rating at AA+ and short-term rating at A-1+.
  • The outlook is negative.

Rating Action

On July 27, 2021, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'AA+/A-1+' issuer credit ratings on the University of New South Wales. The outlook is negative.

Outlook

The negative outlook reflects an at least one-in-three chance that we could lower our ratings in the next two years. This could happen if UNSW's financial metrics were to deteriorate beyond our base case if it is unable to achieve adequate savings to mitigate the revenue loss caused by a decline in onshore international students.

Downside scenario

Downward pressure on the ratings could eventuate should the drop in enrollments and corresponding response from the university management materially weaken UNSW's financial profile. This could occur if operating margins were in persistent deficit, causing cash and financial assets to fall and/or debt levels to rise substantially.

We could also lower our ratings on UNSW if we perceived the likelihood of government support to be weakening.

Upside scenario

We could revise our outlook to stable if UNSW is able to manage the effects of COVID-19 without a material erosion in financial metrics, in such a way that enrollments gradually normalize.

Rationale

Like other Australian universities, tough international travel restrictions and campus closures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic continue to crimp UNSW's enrolments of international students, leading to weaker revenues. UNSW's proactive approach to strengthening its financial position via large saving measures and increasing liquidity lines has buffered some of this revenue loss. UNSW is likely to continue displaying fiscal flexibility and deferring capital investment and discretionary spending to support its financial position.

We consider the pandemic to represent the most pressing near-term risk to UNSW and other universities. (see "Outlook For Global Not-For-Profit Higher Education: Empty Chairs At Empty Tables," published Jan. 21, 2021).

UNSW's strong reputation will continue to attract solid student demand, and the university will maintain a high level of financial resources and low annual debt service, during this period of uncertainty. The ratings also reflect our opinion of a moderately high likelihood that the Australian government would provide extraordinary support in the event of financial distress.

UNSW's quality reputation with strong demand supports its enterprise profile

While UNSW's global appeal remains strong, we anticipate international student numbers will shrink in the short term, driven by COVID-19-related travel restrictions. Based on application rates, demand from new domestic students remains robust. This should continue when travel restrictions ease, given UNSW's high global ranking. We believe demand for UNSW will continue when travel restrictions ease, given UNSW's high global rankings. Total full-time equivalent student numbers exceeded 45,000 as of Dec. 31, 2020. However, frosty relations between Australia and China pose a downside risk.

UNSW, established in 1949, has a well-regarded reputation for quality teaching and research. This has allowed it to develop an excellent market position. It is highly ranked globally, with a Times Higher Education (THES) ranking of 67th in 2021 and QS University ranking of 43rd in 2021. We believe a well-executed 2025 strategy--to focus on becoming Australia's leading research and teaching university--could improve its ranking.

UNSW's strategy should ensure ongoing demand from high quality domestic and international students. UNSW is focused on student experience and commitment to educational excellence. Its median entry score of about 91.5 (of a possible 99.95) in 2020 is well above the national average and one of the highest in Australia. In 2020, postgraduate students accounted for about 24.3% of total students. International students represented 36.5% of total students. This exposure to international students has provided strong revenue growth in recent years. However, it also exposes UNSW to the performance of foreign markets, particularly China. Chinese students account for roughly two-thirds of all international students at UNSW and have been greatly affected by the current travel restrictions.

The 2020 decline in international student enrolments had less effect on UNSW than its domestic peers. This was because of UNSW's unique trimester model, which meant students were already in the country before the border closed. UNSW reactivated its campuses in 2021 in a measured and COVID-19 safe way, attracting domestic students; it was not plagued with rolling lockdowns like other areas within Australia. Notwithstanding the current New South Wales lockdown, the university has been able to pivot to online learning for the short term. The university has proposed a pilot program to return international students that could start in the second half of 2021. The proposal is awaiting Commonwealth approval after being approved by the state. We believe this will not have a material effect on international student numbers in the short term because the number is capped at 250 students a fortnight; however, it is the first concrete step toward bringing international students back since the onset of the pandemic.

The university showed its financial acumen during the COVID-19 pandemic by deferring nonessential and many infrastructure projects that weren't in hand. The university established Taskforce 2020-2021 working groups to update its organizational and divisional structure, resulting in employee savings. Under its long-term strategic "2025 Strategy," UNSW has delayed some short-term spending, such as for campus activities.

UNSW continues to attract high-caliber vice-chancellors, deputy vice-chancellors, and vice presidents who execute consistent strategies and identify and address financial and operational risks. S&P Global Ratings considers the global higher-education sector to be low industry risk, and Australia to be a very low country risk. Australia's wealthy economy--GDP per capita of US$60,300 in 2021, reflecting an Australian dollar lower than the previous year--supports the higher education sector's economic fundamentals.

Fiscal flexibility to provide a buffer against revenue hits

We expect UNSW's financial profile to remain strong as it responds to the COVID-19 pandemic. The university has ample levels of unrestricted financial resources and robust financial policies. We expect the university to maintain financial resources between 25% and 35% of operating expenses and 1x-2x its total debt, along with relatively modest annual debt service.

UNSW's cash levels have grown since the onset of the pandemic. The university drew down on its bank facilities to have cash on hand in the event of an unforeseen emergency. Our definition of financial resources doesn't include UNSW's endowment fund, Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme assets, and other special-purpose reserves because these assets are generally restricted and unavailable to repay debt. Its consolidated cash and investments increased to 3.28x total debt in 2020 from 3.01x in 2019.

We expect UNSW's average operating margins to narrow but remain in surplus in 2021. As the COVID-19-related restriction continues, we assume a shortfall in student revenues of about 10% to 11% of the total income over the next two years. This is because international students are an important source of funding for UNSW, reducing the university's reliance on government grants in recent years. Meanwhile, it will continue to have some additional costs related to development of virtual learning platforms and hardship support for students, thereby lowering our operating margins expectations for 2022.

UNSW's adjusted operating margins were around 3.1% in 2020 (excluding one-off redundancy costs), up from 0.65% in 2019. We expect the university to maintain an operating balance over the coming years. We note that these assumptions are subject to an unusually high degree of uncertainty at present and will hinge on the timing of any lifting of travel restrictions in Australia and abroad.

UNSW is responding to the COVID-19 shock by curtailing capital and discretionary expenditure, including pay cuts or freezes, reductions in staff headcount, and deferrals of capital investment and discretionary spending to help minimize the financial impact. Staff redundancies undertaken in 2020 locked in operating savings of A$75 million, mitigating some of its revenue losses from weaker international student revenue.

In late 2020, the Australian parliament passed the "Job-ready Graduates Package" of reforms. The reforms will, from 2021, alter the mix of tuition fees paid by domestic students and Commonwealth Grant Scheme subsidies contributed by the Australian government for different courses. This could place further strain on sectorwide operating margins (see "Australian University Finances Under COVID-19: Degrees Of Discomfort," published April 26, 2021). However, the revenue effect should be mitigated by a transition fund, and universities are likely to adjust their course offerings in response to the reforms.

Even when factoring in the current COVID-19 shock, UNSW's debt levels and service costs remain relatively low compared with its international peers. In 2021, the university raised A$200 million via a committed revolving facility, bringing its total undrawn amount as A$400 million. We estimate UNSW's maximum annual debt service will reduce to about 2.35% of operating expenses in 2020, from 3.12% last year. UNSW might also seek to refinance or repay its A$150 million bank line maturing in April 2022.

Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) 16, a new standard adopted in 2019, removed the distinction between operating leases and finance leases. We continue to exclude what were formerly classified as operating lease liabilities from our measures of UNSW's debt, in line with our criteria.

Limiting UNSW's exposure to contingent liabilities is an agreement between the Commonwealth and New South Wales governments to cover its unfunded superannuation retirement benefits. The agreement is outlined in the States Grants (General Revenue) Amendment Act 1987.

Moderately high likelihood of extraordinary government support

We consider there to be a moderately high likelihood of extraordinary government support. This is based on our view of UNSW's important role for the Australian government in fulfilling public policy.

The Australian government has offered only modest relief for the higher-education sector since the onset of the pandemic. In 2020, it made a one-off A$1 billion top-up of the Research Support Program, which funds research grants across Australia's universities; however, did not include universities in other relief measures such as payroll tax relief. We have therefore lowered our assessment of government support to moderately high from high for the university by lowering our assessment of its very important role to important.

UNSW plays an important role in fulfilling the government's public policy and tertiary education objectives. As an independent, not-for-profit entity, it educates students and helps to develop Australia's human capital. We do not believe that recent government funding reforms have led to a weakening in this role.

We consider UNSW to have a strong link to the Australian government. This is demonstrated by the government's track record of funding and oversight of the higher education sector. The government remains the largest source of income for the higher-education sector. UNSW reports on its spending of Australian government funding to the Commonwealth Department of Education, which is responsible for developing higher-education policy and programs.

Further, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency regulates the sector and sets standards that registered higher-education providers must meet to maintain their registration. The NSW Auditor-General audits its accounts and the report is tabled in the NSW parliament.

Environmental, social, and governance factors

In our view, higher-education entities face elevated social risk due to uncertainty over the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The prolonged period of international border closures is casting doubt over 2022 enrollment numbers. We view the risks posed by COVID-19 to public health and safety as a social risk under our ESG factors. Despite the elevated social risk, we believe UNSW's environment and governance risk are in line with our view of the sector.

University of New South Wales: Selected Indicators
--Financial year ended Dec. 31-- Medians for 'AA' rated public colleges and universities
('000s A$) 2020a 2019a 2018a 2017a 2016a 2018a
Enterprise profile
Full-time equivalent enrollment (no.) 45,594 47,867 47,117 45,516 42,465 36,667
Selectivity rate (%) 36.6 29.2 30.1 30.6 31.5 69.6
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment N.A N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 78.8
Retention rate (%) 91.6 91.5 91.5 91.5 91.2 85.7
Graduation rates (five years) (%) 72.3 70.2 70.0 72.0 73.0 MNR
Financial profile
Operating revenue 2,243,774 2,400,631 2,254,609 2,107,339 1,909,713 MNR
Operating expense 2,176,308 2,384,419 2,200,372 1,959,268 1,762,104 MNR
Net operating margin (%)* 3.1 0.7 2.5 7.6 8.4 1.5
Student dependence (%) 47.0 49.0 48.6 47.3 45.3 41.2
Research dependence (%) 15.0 15.1 14.5 15.0 14.0 MNR
Government grant dependence (%) 28.8 24.5 24.7 24.9 26.5 18.3
Endowment and investment income dependence (%) 1.1 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.4
Adjusted outstanding debt§ 406,940 443,129 370,770 358,341 38,341 808,057
Maximum annual debt service/total operating expense (%) 2.4 1.7 1.8 2.1 0.2 3.6
Available resources to adjusted operating expenses (%) 48.6 35.6 38.2 48.6 34.8 36.7
Available resources to total debt (%)† 260.0 228.8 226.6 265.9 1,598.8 92.9
*Net income/operating expense. §Median figures are in U.S. dollars. †Does not include revolving credit facilities as an available resource. MNR--Median not reported. N.A--Not available. a--Actual. e--Estimate.

Related Criteria

Related Research

  • Australia, Canada, Mexico, And U.K. Universities Medians Report: Credit Metrics Remain Largely Stable Through Persistent Headwinds, June 30, 2021
  • Australia Outlook Revised To Stable On Swift Economic Recovery; 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed, June 7, 2021
  • Australian University Finances Under COVID-19: Degrees Of Discomfort, April 26, 2021
  • Australian Universities Go From Boom To Zoom, April 26, 2021
  • Outlook For Global Not-For-Profit Higher Education: Empty Chairs At Empty Tables, Jan. 21,2021

Ratings List

Ratings Affirmed

University of New South Wales (The)

Issuer Credit Rating AA+/Negative/A-1+

University of New South Wales (The)

Senior Unsecured AA+

S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.

Primary Credit Analyst:Rebecca Hrvatin, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2123;
rebecca.hrvatin@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Martin J Foo, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2016;
martin.foo@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in