articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210712-how-does-canada-stack-up-against-other-aaa-rated-sovereigns-12022399 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

How Does Canada Stack Up Against Other 'AAA' Rated Sovereigns?

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

WAEMU Sovereigns Can Weather Mounting Global Geopolitical And Trade Risks

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: China's Two Sessions: No Surprises In Push To Unlock Growth

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: What Are The Risks To Emerging Markets’ Sound Credit Performance?


How Does Canada Stack Up Against Other 'AAA' Rated Sovereigns?

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings' 'AAA' rating places Canada in an exclusive group of sovereigns. Of the 136 sovereign governments that we rate as of June 30, 2021, only 11 are in the 'AAA' category, which is our highest rating. The group of sovereigns rated 'AAA' has shrunk over time; almost a decade ago, 16 sovereigns were rated 'AAA' (table 1).

Table 1

'AAA' Sovereign Ratings Over Time
Sovereigns rated ‘AAA’ as of June 30, 2021 (long-term foreign currency sovereign rating) Sovereigns rated ‘AAA’ as of Dec. 31, 2011 (long-term foreign currency sovereign credit rating)
Canada Canada
Australia Australia
Denmark Denmark
Germany Germany
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein
Luxembourg Luxembourg
Netherlands Netherlands
Norway Norway
Singapore Singapore
Sweden Sweden
Switzerland Switzerland
Austria*
Finland*
France*
Hong Kong*
U.K.*
*Downgraded between Dec. 31, 2011 and June 30, 2021.

Canada Entered The COVID-19 Pandemic From A Position Of Credit Strength

Strong institutions and a track record of sustainable public finances lend credibility to the federal government's plan to wind down spending, and underpinned our recent decision to affirm our 'AAA' rating on Canada (see "Canada Ratings Affirmed at ‘AAA/A-1+'; Outlook Remains Stable," published April 26, 2021, on RatingsDirect). Canada used its considerable fiscal and monetary policy flexibility to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The general government (which includes the federal government, the provinces, municipalities, and social security programs) ran fiscal surpluses in four of the previous five years, and ran an almost balanced position, on average, in the 15 years preceding the pandemic. As a result of the pandemic, Canada will likely run the largest increase in net general government (GG) debt among all 'AAA' rated sovereigns in 2020 and 2021. However, Canada entered the pandemic with lower net GG debt levels to GDP than two other 'AAA' rated sovereigns, Germany and the Netherlands, which have among the largest economies of the 'AAA' group, similar to Canada (chart 1).

Chart 1

image

Despite Canada's debt-financed spending response to the pandemic, we think that the rating will remain well positioned in the 'AAA' category over the forecast horizon. One of the key reasons for this is Canada's strong institutional and economic profile, which is composed of the two assessments that carry about half the weight under our sovereign methodology for arriving at an indicative rating (see chart 2). Although all 'AAA' rated sovereigns carry the strongest economic assessment--rooted in high per capita income levels--Canada is one of seven that also carry the strongest institutional assessment. Canada has a history of good governance, stable parliamentary democracy, rule of law, a low perception of corruption, and a cohesive society. It also has not had a major anti-establishment political movement in the recent past, and the population has generally been supportive of the broad contours of the government's response to the recent economic downturns. Unlike in several other 'AAA' rated sovereigns that must coordinate their policies within a monetary union, Canada's central bank can design its policy directly to manage domestic economic conditions. The Canadian government has also used this flexibility in designing its sizable and timely response to the pandemic in order to mitigate economic volatility.

Chart 2

image

The strength, credibility, and independence of Canada's monetary policy also factor significantly in determining the 'AAA' rating and position the country as one of five 'AAA' rated sovereigns that carry the strongest monetary assessment (see chart 3). Canada also has an actively traded, free-floating currency and deep domestic financial markets. The Canadian dollar accounts for 5% of global foreign-exchange turnover and has the sixth highest turnover in the world, according to the most recent triennial central bank survey published by the Bank of International Settlements.

Canada's history of low and stable inflation, and policy transparency and predictability facilitate the government's access to funding and sustain investor confidence. Such favorable market perceptions minimized the risk of the Bank of Canada's decision to launch its first quantitative easing (QE) program at the start of the pandemic. Between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021, the central bank's holdings of Government of Canada bonds increased by about C$274 billion, which represents about 87% of the federal government's estimated 2020-2021 budgetary deficit. At the same time, at its current pace of purchasing about C$3 billion worth of government bonds per week, the bank could purchase a sum equal to the entirety of the federal government's projected 2021-2022 fiscal deficit in Government of Canada bonds. Nevertheless, we do expect a quantitative easing reduction, to purchases of C$2 billion per week from the current pace of C$3 billion, to take place at the bank's September 2021 meeting (see "Economic Outlook Canada Q3 2021: Growth Setback In The Spring Will Give Way to Summer Boom," Jun 25, 2021). At the same time, although the size of the increase in the central bank's holdings of federal government debt was higher than that of some peers, the value of these assets relative to the size of the Canadian economy is still fairly low, partially because the bank didn't have a QE program at the start of the pandemic.

Chart 3

image

Having an actively traded currency also makes Canada's external profile less vulnerable to shifts in foreign investment, while the country's large stock of external assets contributes to a better net external debt position than that of some of the larger 'AAA' rated sovereigns, such as Australia and the Netherlands. This, in part, reflects Canada's well-run pension funds and other financial institutions, plus a substantial stock of foreign direct investment held abroad. At the same time, unlike in Australia, where banks are materially reliant on offshore wholesale funding, Canadian banks are net external creditors, making them less exposed to external vulnerabilities. Canada's external asset position strengthened during the pandemic, in part due to valuation effects on external assets. Historically, about two-thirds of Canada's external assets have been denominated in U.S. dollars, while most of its external liabilities are denominated in Canadian dollars. Therefore, the negative impact of periodic adverse changes in Canada's terms of trade (price of exports divided by price of imports) has been buffered by an increase in the value of its external financial assets (as measured in Canadian currency) as the country's currency depreciated. At the same time, Canada's net international asset position strengthened in 2020, in part due to the equity composition of its external assets versus its liabilities. A much larger share of Canada's external assets (more than 70%) is held in the form of equities than its external liabilities (less than 40%).Therefore, changes in stock market conditions, which improved in key external markets by the end of 2020, affect Canada's external assets more than its liabilities.

Chart 4

image

Canada's favorable institutional, economic, monetary, and external assessments collectively weigh more heavily under our sovereign methodology in determining our rating than its less favorable fiscal assessment (which includes its debt burden). However, Canada's GG net debt will likely remain a rating weakness. Based on our forecast, Canada could have the highest net debt-to-GDP levels among all 'AAA' rated sovereigns by the end of 2024.

This higher GG debt burden can, in part, be attributed to the debt levels of the provinces, which are consolidated in our analysis of the sovereign's debt metrics. Before the pandemic, indebtedness of local and regional governments (LRGs; largely provinces) accounted for about two-thirds of Canada's net GG debt. In contrast with most sovereigns, the subnational governments of Canada have higher debt than the sovereign, reflecting the country's decentralized nature. However, since the federal government has funded about 80% of total fiscal support provided by all governments in Canada to respond to the pandemic, we expect the share of net central government (CG) debt will rise to more than 50% of net GG debt this year from about one-third in 2019(chart 5). The high level of LRG debt in Canada, and subsequently lower share of net CG debt as a share of net GG debt, is an outlier compared with most other 'AAA' rated sovereigns, and is most comparable with Germany. In Germany's case, net CG debt represents about 60% of net GG debt, and we expect this ratio will remain stable over the forecast horizon.

Canada's 10 provinces have considerable economic and constitutional capacity to manage their own finances, compared with their counterparts in other countries. They are responsible for education; health care; public security; and infrastructure such as roads and electricity. Subnational governments, including municipalities, account for most of Canada's public sector capital spending (including about 85% of infrastructure spending). With higher debt levels and lower ratings, provinces also have higher borrowing costs than the federal government.

Chart 5

image

Looking Ahead

Canada remains well positioned within the 'AAA' rated sovereign group, which was reflected in our recent rating action. The country's credit strengths, both within and outside its peer group, more than offset its weakened fiscal and debt position, in our view.

We have a stable outlook on our rating on Canada. We expect real GDP will recover sharply this year, surpassing 2019 levels, and increase by an unprecedented 6.1% as daily coronavirus caseloads remain far below previous peaks, provinces lift restrictions, and vaccinations roll out at an impressive pace. We continue to assume that a "full-vaccine" economy will materialize in late summer and believe that these conditions will set the stage for a strong rebound in demand as the summer progresses (see "Economic Outlook Canada Q3 2021: Growth Setback In The Spring Will Give Way to Summer Boom," June 25, 2021). We expect that this recovery will lead to an improvement in the government's fiscal deficit over the next several years. However, future fiscal performance and policy signals will be important indicators that we will monitor. As we highlighted in our most recent research update, we could lower our rating on Canada in the next two years if the government's weakened fiscal position persists without signals of future corrective actions, and should this be accompanied by unexpectedly poor economic performance or substantial and sustained weakening in Canada's net external position, which would signal rising external vulnerabilities. While we have recently raised our Canadian economic growth outlook and believe that risks to our forecasts are largely balanced, a new rise in coronavirus cases and a new round of restrictions could negatively impact consumer spending and GDP growth, and present downside risks to our growth outlook. The evolution of the economic recovery will be key to the government's fiscal consolidation plans and supporting the government's higher debt burden over the next two years.

Primary Credit Analyst:Julia L Smith, Toronto + (416) 507-3236;
Julia.Smith@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Joydeep Mukherji, New York + 1 (212) 438 7351;
joydeep.mukherji@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in