Key Takeaways
- Corporate rating trends have improved dramatically in Europe since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when downgrades reached a high of 149 in second-quarter 2020.
- The number of European corporate downgrades dropped to just 22 in the first quarter of 2021 from 43 in the fourth quarter of 2020, while upgrades rose to 21 from 15.
- Eight companies defaulted in the first quarter, down from the peak of 13 in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 but still above pre-pandemic levels.
S&P Global Ratings downgraded just 22 European companies in the first quarter of 2021--just more than half the number of downgrades in the fourth quarter of 2020 and down from a peak of 149 in second-quarter 2020, when the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic brought swift credit deterioration. Meanwhile, we upgraded 21 European companies in the first quarter, up from 15 in the final quarter of 2020 and a significant increase from just two upgrades in the second quarter of 2020. The downgrade ratio (the proportion of downgrades among all rating actions) fell to 51% in the first quarter (see table 1), down significantly from the peak of 99% in second-quarter 2020.
However, the number of defaults remained elevated at eight in the first quarter--nevertheless an improvement from a high of 13 in both the third and fourth quarters of 2020. One of these defaults came from an investment-grade (rated 'BBB-' or higher) entity in the oil and gas sector, due to a missed principal payment. The remaining defaults were all from speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) entities and concentrated in the automotive, airline, and consumer goods sectors. Distressed exchanges were the most common reason for defaults in the first quarter.
Chart 1
The European 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate rose to 6.1% as of March 31, 2021 (see chart 2). Meanwhile, weakest links (issuers rated 'B-' or lower with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications) in Europe have steadily fallen, dropping to 72 in the first quarter after peaking in the second quarter of 2020 at 106, though they remain well above pre-pandemic levels.
Chart 2
The negative bias (the proportion of issuers with negative rating outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications) in Europe improved to 29% in the first quarter of 2021 from 35% in the fourth quarter of 2020. Negative bias has been higher among lower-rated issuers: European corporate speculative-grade issuers had a negative bias of 34% in the first quarter, well above the historical average of 23%. Among investment-grade-rated companies, the negative bias was about 23% in the first quarter, just above the historical average of 20%.
Table 1
European Corporate Rating Statistics (First-Quarter 2021) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Investment-grade | Speculative-grade | Financial | Nonfinancial | ||||||||
Downgrades | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 19 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 234 | 214 | 20 | 4 | 230 | |||||||
Upgrades | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 21 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 20 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 95 | 33 | 62 | 16 | 80 | |||||||
Total rating actions | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 43 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 39 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 329 | 247 | 83 | 20 | 310 | |||||||
Downgrade ratio (%) | 51 | 67 | 45 | 75 | 49 | |||||||
Historical average* | 66 | 65 | 60 | 58 | 68 | |||||||
High, quarter | 100, 1995 Q1 | 100, 2003 Q1 | 100, 2002 Q1 | 100, 2020 Q4 | 100, 1997 Q1 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 27, 2014 Q2 | 13, 2017 Q4 | 0, 1998 Q1 | 0, 2019 Q1 | 25, 1996 Q4 | |||||||
Negative bias (%) | 29 | 23 | 34 | 26 | 29 | |||||||
Historical average* | 22 | 20 | 23 | 22 | 22 | |||||||
High, quarter | 41, 2009 Q2 | 36, 2009 Q2 | 56, 2009 Q2 | 49, 2012 Q4 | 41, 2020 Q2 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 11, 1997 Q4 | 10, 2017 Q4 | 0, 1995 Q2 | 3, 2007 Q1 | 11, 2014 Q2 | |||||||
Positive bias (%) | 5 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 | |||||||
Historical average* | 8 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 9 | |||||||
High, quarter | 14, 1998 Q3 | 12, 2018 Q1 | 56, 1995 Q4 | 19, 2018 Q1 | 18, 1998 Q3 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 3, 2009 Q1 | 2, 2009 Q1 | 4, 2020 Q2 | 1, 2009 Q1 | 3, 2020 Q2 | |||||||
Note: Rating actions and bias figures exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. *From first-quarter 1995 to first-quarter 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Rating Actions: A Shift In Sector Performance
The concentration of downgrades by sector has shifted since the peak of the pandemic. The oil and gas sector accounted for the greatest portion in the first quarter of 2021, at 23% (see chart 3).
In the second quarter of 2020, the media and entertainment sector accounted for 18% of the 149 total downgrades. The consumer products sector followed with 9% of the total.
Chart 3
Ratings Bias: Credit Outlooks Remain Negative
The net ratings bias (the positive bias, or the proportion of issuers with positive rating outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch positive, minus the negative bias) for European corporate entities narrowed to negative 23.4% in the first quarter of 2021, an improvement from negative 36.1% in the second quarter of 2020 (see chart 4). However, the measure remains weaker than pre-pandemic levels. The net bias has improved for both financial and nonfinancial sectors since the second quarter of 2020, but the credit outlooks for many sectors remain highly negative based on net bias--at most, perhaps showing a budding recovery.
Chart 4
While the overall negative bias for European corporate entities has improved since hitting a high of 36.1% in the second quarter of 2020, the measure remains well above pre-pandemic levels. Conversely, the positive bias has widened since the second quarter of 2020, to 5.2% from 3.1%.
Chart 5
Chart 6
Chart 7
Performance Continues To Diverge Among Sectors And Countries
Performance continued to diverge between financial and nonfinancial issuers across Europe in the first quarter. The financial institutions sector's negative bias remains relatively elevated at 33% (see chart 8), but negative bias is even higher in some nonfinancial sectors. The media and entertainment sector reported the highest negative bias, at 55%, followed closely by transportation at 54%. A handful of sectors that currently have some of the highest negative biases--specifically, shipping within the transportation sector, the technology sector, and the automotive sector--are expected to recover pre-pandemic credit metrics in 2022.
Chart 8
Among European countries with five or more rated corporate issuers, Spain had the highest corporate negative bias, at 45%, at the end of the first quarter of 2021 (see chart 9). Spain experienced a wave of COVID-19 infections at the beginning of the year, coupled with a slow rollout of the vaccine. Some recovery is expected for the country in the second half of the year. Meanwhile the U.K., which accounts for almost 20% of all rated European corporate issuers, also maintained elevated negative bias due to a wave of new COVID-19 variants and subsequent economic lockdown throughout the quarter.
Apart from Spain and the U.K., the European countries with 50 or more rated corporate issuers exhibited elevated stability rates (the share of ratings that did not change rating categories) in the first quarter as recovery continues to diverge across Europe.
Chart 9
Negative bias has historically remained high among lower-rated issuers. Among investment-grade rating categories, negative bias in the first quarter of 2021 remained below 40% (see chart 10). Speculative-grade rating categories have historically exhibited higher negative bias, and the same was true in the opening quarter of 2021: Among issuers rated 'B-' to 'BB+', negative bias held below 50%. However, issuers rated 'CCC+' and below maintained negative ratings bias of 60% and above. The 'CCC-' and 'CC' ratings reported 100% negative bias.
Chart 10
Appendix
Table 2
Trends In European Corporate Ratings | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defaulted issuers | Weakest links | Fallen angels | Rising stars | |||||||
2011 Q1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 2 | ||||||
2011 Q2 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2011 Q3 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
2011 Q4 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 2 | ||||||
2012 Q1 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 1 | ||||||
2012 Q2 | 3 | 19 | 8 | 0 | ||||||
2012 Q3 | 1 | 25 | 7 | 0 | ||||||
2012 Q4 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 2 | ||||||
2013 Q1 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 2 | ||||||
2013 Q2 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2013 Q3 | 2 | 24 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
2013 Q4 | 6 | 26 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
2014 Q1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2014 Q2 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2014 Q3 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2014 Q4 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 7 | ||||||
2015 Q1 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
2015 Q2 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
2015 Q3 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
2015 Q4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q1 | 1 | 33 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q2 | 7 | 32 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q3 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 0 | ||||||
2016 Q4 | 4 | 31 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
2017 Q1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
2017 Q2 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2017 Q3 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 5 | ||||||
2017 Q4 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q1 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
2018 Q2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q3 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q4 | 4 | 26 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2019 Q1 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q2 | 4 | 30 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q4 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
2020 Q1 | 4 | 72 | 4 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q2 | 12 | 106 | 6 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q3 | 13 | 97 | 3 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q4 | 13 | 86 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2021 Q1 | 8 | 72 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Fallen angels and rising stars exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. Defaulted issuers include confidentially rated entities. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Table 3
European Corporate Rating Actions (First-Quarter 2021) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Issuer | Sector | Country | Rating action | To | From | ||||||||
January 8, 2021 | Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. | Automotive | Netherlands | Upgrade | BBB- | BB+ | ||||||||
January 25, 2021 |
Horizon Therapeutics plc |
Health care | Ireland | Upgrade | BB | BB- | ||||||||
January 26, 2021 |
TalkTalk Telecom Group PLC |
Telecommunications | U.K. | Downgrade | B+ | BB- | ||||||||
January 27, 2021 |
Kleopatra Holdings 1 S.C.A. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Luxembourg | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
January 29, 2021 |
Atotech UK Topco Ltd. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | U.K. | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
February 2, 2021 |
SK Invictus Intermediate II S.a r.l. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Luxembourg | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
February 9, 2021 | Cookie Acquisition S.A.S. | Consumer products | France | Downgrade | B- | B | ||||||||
February 11, 2021 |
Navico Group AS |
High technology | Norway | Upgrade | CCC+ | CCC | ||||||||
February 11, 2021 |
Vallourec |
Oil and gas | France | Downgrade | SD | CC | ||||||||
February 15, 2021 |
DSV Panalpina A/S |
Transportation | Denmark | Upgrade | A- | BBB+ | ||||||||
February 15, 2021 |
IGT Holding IV AB |
High technology | Sweden | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
February 17, 2021 |
Elior Group S.A. |
Media and entertainment | France | Downgrade | BB- | BB | ||||||||
February 17, 2021 |
TechnipFMC Plc |
Oil and gas | U.K. | Downgrade | BB+ | BBB+ | ||||||||
February 18, 2021 |
Royal Dutch Shell PLC |
Oil and gas | U.K. | Downgrade | A+ | AA- | ||||||||
February 18, 2021 |
Total SE |
Oil and gas | France | Downgrade | A | A+ | ||||||||
February 19, 2021 |
DEPFA Bank PLC (FMS Wertmanagement Anstalt des oeffentlichen Rechts) |
Financial institutions | Ireland | Downgrade | BBB | BBB+ | ||||||||
February 22, 2021 |
CatLuxe Sarl (CatLuxe Acquistion Sarl) |
Consumer products | Luxembourg | Downgrade | SD | CCC+ | ||||||||
February 24, 2021 |
Arvos LuxCo S.a.r.l. |
Capital goods | Luxembourg | Downgrade | CCC | B- | ||||||||
February 24, 2021 |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC |
Forest products and building materials | Ireland | Upgrade | BBB- | BB+ | ||||||||
February 25, 2021 |
Atotech UK Topco Ltd. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | U.K. | Upgrade | B+ | B | ||||||||
March 1, 2021 |
CORESTATE Capital Holding S.A. |
Financial institutions | Luxembourg | Downgrade | BB- | BB | ||||||||
March 2, 2021 |
National Grid PLC |
Utilities | U.K. | Downgrade | BBB+ | A- | ||||||||
March 4, 2021 |
Alstria Office REIT-AG |
Homebuilders/real estate companies | Germany | Upgrade | BBB+ | BBB | ||||||||
March 4, 2021 |
CEVA Logistics AG |
Transportation | Switzerland | Upgrade | BB- | B+ | ||||||||
March 4, 2021 |
CMA CGM S.A. |
Transportation | France | Upgrade | BB- | B+ | ||||||||
March 9, 2021 |
ACS, Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA |
Capital goods | Spain | Downgrade | BBB- | BBB | ||||||||
March 15, 2021 |
CGG |
Oil and gas | France | Downgrade | CCC+ | B- | ||||||||
March 15, 2021 |
DEMIRE Deutsche Mittelstand Real Estate AG |
Homebuilders/real estate companies | Germany | Downgrade | BB- | BB | ||||||||
March 15, 2021 |
Zurich Insurance Co. Ltd. (Zurich Insurance Group.) |
Insurance | Switzerland | Upgrade | AA | AA- | ||||||||
March 16, 2021 |
EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A. |
Utilities | Portugal | Upgrade | BBB | BBB- | ||||||||
March 18, 2021 |
Codere S.A. |
Media and entertainment | Spain | Downgrade | CC | CCC | ||||||||
March 18, 2021 |
LSF10 XL Investments S.a.r.l |
Forest products and building materials | Luxembourg | Downgrade | B | B+ | ||||||||
March 19, 2021 |
Syncreon Intermediate BV |
Consumer products | Netherlands | Upgrade | B- | CCC+ | ||||||||
March 22, 2021 |
Fluidra S.A. |
Consumer products | Spain | Upgrade | BB+ | BB | ||||||||
March 23, 2021 |
Al Mistral Holdco Ltd. |
Transportation | U.K. | Downgrade | SD | CCC+ | ||||||||
March 23, 2021 |
Belron Group S.A. |
Media and entertainment | Luxembourg | Upgrade | BB+ | BB | ||||||||
March 23, 2021 | DTZ UK Guarantor Limited | Financial institutions | U.K. | Downgrade | B+ | BB- | ||||||||
March 23, 2021 |
Hapag-Lloyd AG |
Transportation | Germany | Upgrade | BB | BB- | ||||||||
March 25, 2021 |
Klepierre S.A. |
Homebuilders/real estate companies | France | Downgrade | BBB+ | A- | ||||||||
March 25, 2021 |
L1R HB Finance Ltd |
Retail/restaurants | U.K. | Upgrade | B- | CCC+ | ||||||||
March 29, 2021 |
Altarea SCA |
Homebuilders/real estate companies | France | Downgrade | BBB- | BBB | ||||||||
March 30, 2021 |
Diamond (BC) B.V. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Netherlands | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
March 31, 2021 |
BCP VII Jade Topco (Cayman) Ltd. |
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | U.K. | Downgrade | B- | B | ||||||||
Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt. Actions on subsidiaries show parents listed in parentheses. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Related Research
- The European Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate Could Fall To 5.25% By March 2022, May 26, 2021
- Despite A Pickup In Positive Rating Actions, The Weakest Links Tally Remains High, May 6, 2021
- European Economic Snapshots: Unlike The Rest Of Europe, The U.K. Is Looking Beyond COVID-19, April 28, 2021
- EU's Vaccine Supply Boost Will Aid The Race Against COVID Mutations, April 28, 2021
- 'BBB' Pulse: Fallen Angel Downgrade Risk Is Set To Decline Sharply In 2021, April 14, 2021
- Credit Conditions Europe Q2 2021: New Horizons, Old Risks, March 31, 2021
- COVID-19 Heat Map: Some Bright Spots In Recovery Amid Signs Of Stability, Feb. 17, 2021
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Ratings Performance Analytics: | Kirsten R Mccabe, New York + 1 (212) 438 3196; kirsten.mccabe@spglobal.com |
Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698; nick.kraemer@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributor: | Shripati Pranshu, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.