articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210518-china-s-chemical-sector-bonding-growth-to-environmental-goals-11951914 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China's Chemical Sector: Bonding Growth To Environmental Goals

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Festive Will The Holiday Season Be For Retailers In The U.S. And Europe?

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Record-High Health Care Defaults Will Moderate In 2025, Though Higher Than Normal


China's Chemical Sector: Bonding Growth To Environmental Goals

The profits of China's chemical industry are rebounding. This is a much-needed balm for sector players, who need to invest to meet demand in new-economy markets, and to reduce waste in line with national guidelines on greener production. S&P Global Ratings expects our rated Chinese chemical companies to better navigate the broader policy trends that are reshaping the sector.

Fatter margins will also likely restore general growth appetite, prompting more investments to expand capacity. Nonetheless, the government's tight grip on financial leverage should rein in debt-funded capital expenditure.

Higher Earnings Restore Investment Appetite

Chinese chemical companies will likely raise their capital spending in the coming two to three years, supported by their stronger earnings. The higher price environment and a revival of demand this year also favor profitability evaluations of upcoming projects.

A recovery in China's manufacturing activity should fuel chemical demand and improve product spreads, a key profitability indicator for chemical companies. We assume Chinese GDP will expand 8.0% in 2021 and 5.1% in 2022, rebounding from the 2.3% growth of pandemic-hit 2020. Tight supply due to outages and output restrictions will further support prices for some products. For instance, average domestic prices for acetic acid have doubled from last year because of plant outages in Jiangsu and Henan provinces. The domestic price of polyvinyl chloride should remain elevated, as regions such as Inner Mongolia attempt to curb energy intensity by limiting the production of calcium carbide, a key raw ingredient.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

We believe cracking margins in China this year will match levels seen in 2018-2019 (see chart 4). However, they will likely stay below the peak levels set in 2016-2017 due to higher raw material costs. Higher input costs associated with crude oil prices are attributable to supply cuts by the OPEC+ countries. We assume Brent crude oil will average US$60 per barrel for the rest of 2021 and 2022, higher than the average of US$42 per barrel in 2020. Coal-based chemical producers also face higher raw material costs this year. Thermal coal prices have climbed because of higher electricity demand amid the economic upturn. The recent rise in bulk freights and restricted coal imports from Australia also puts a floor under raw material coal prices.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Domestic Policies To Shape Industry Landscape

China's environmental and industrial policies will likely attract investments in two areas: higher value-added products and chemicals that the country isn't fully self-sufficient in. In our view, projects meeting these objectives will tend to obtain better funding access from banks and domestic investors, as well as receiving smoother approvals from authorities. Fixed asset investments in the domestic chemical industry rose 42% in the first quarter, though this is against a low base in the same period in pandemic-struck 2020; this is 3.5% higher than the same period in 2019.

Chart 5

image

Development and production of higher value-added products is in line with China's 14th five-year plan (2021-2025), which calls for upgrading product innovation and technological capabilities. Chemical firms will likely invest and benefit from higher demand for fine chemicals, such as those used in batteries and computer chips. We also expect companies to focus on developing environmentally friendly products, including biodegradable plastics that are cost-competitive.

The second area of investment interest relates to chemicals that China now largely imports. We anticipate greater capital spending to increase domestic capacity for chemicals such as polyethylene, polystyrene, and other products for which China is currently import dependent. This is consistent with the government's vision of a "dual circulation" economic model that emphasizes the importance of self-reliance.

Chart 6

image

Tightening Debt Controls Should Curb Firms' Leverage Growth

Despite potentially higher spending, we believe debt-funded investments by Chinese chemical companies will grow at a milder pace in the coming few years compared with the past. In our opinion, the government's continuing emphasis on financial stability will translate into additional measures to keep financial risks under control. This is particularly the case for the chemical industry, given its capital-intensive nature.

Chart 7

image

The state may introduce industry-specific controls or regulations to restrain highly leveraged chemical companies from funding their growth with debt. These measures could follow the tighter controls introduced to curb the leverage of domestic real estate companies last year. As a result, companies may increasingly partner with domestic or foreign peers to pool funds and share risks. An example of this trend is Zhejiang Petroleum & Chemical Co. Ltd. The company was formed in recent years by several companies for the construction of large petrochemical facilities.

With Great Opportunities Come Greater ESG Responsibilities

China's commitment to reach peak carbon emissions by 2030, and carbon neutrality by 2060 means chemical projects will face greater scrutiny. We expect new plants to be more capital intensive as they will require more investments to meet stringent environmental standards.

We anticipate the industry will lean toward large-scale, highly integrated facilities, which are more energy efficient and involve less waste. These projects reduce energy intensity by reusing certain byproducts as fuel, such as hydrogen produced during the naphtha reforming process for aromatics. Residue from a chemical production process can also be used as input for another product to reduce waste. For smaller and less integrated projects, entities may still have to invest in building additional facilities for environmental protection, such as emissions control.

The upcoming combination of state-owned Sinochem Group and China National Chemical Corp. Ltd. (ChemChina) under a new entity, Sinochem Holdings Corp. Ltd., will also likely shift the country's agrochemical industry. The new entity will likely be tasked by the government to lead the transition to agricultural practices that have a lower carbon footprint. This is supported by the research capabilities of the company's subsidiaries, which will likely be led by Syngenta AG (BBB-/Positive/A-3). One potential method is to capture carbon in the soil by reducing tilling, which is enabled with the help of new agricultural products.

Chart 8

image

China's plan to roll out carbon trading nationwide and across different industries will also involve costs for some chemical players. As the country tightens carbon emission quotas over the coming years, carbon pricing and operating costs for companies could increase. We believe companies will therefore invest more in the short term to reduce their need to buy carbon emissions quota in the future.

The winners in this environment will be companies that have invested to improve energy efficiency and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. These firms may even benefit from selling unused quota in the carbon market. On the other hand, players that have not prepared to cut carbon emissions will likely be hit.

Rated Entities Are Better Positioned To Adapt

The Chinese chemical companies that we rate are typically the larger and more prominent players in the domestic market. Their production processes are generally more integrated, facilitating the reduction of waste and emissions. Compared with their domestic peers, the entities have greater financial resources and funding access. They also tend to have strong research abilities to cope with the transition in the chemical industry.

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

Higher earnings and lower leverage of rated entities in the coming two years will provide larger rating buffers to support their investments. We view that these rated entities will likely align their growth strategy with the country's policy.

For instance, Wanhua Chemical Group Co. Ltd. has been pushing ahead with its development of biodegradable plastics. Elkem ASA, a Norwegian subsidiary of China National Bluestar (Group) Co. Ltd., recently announced it would expand its capacity to produce silicone materials in China. Sinochem International Corp. has been expanding its capabilities in lithium battery and cathode materials, as well as in lightweight material commonly used in autos, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene.

Table 1

Current Ratings And Recent Rating Actions On China's Chemicals Sector
Ratings Latest action

China National Chemical Corp. Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- Outlook revised to positive on April 9, 2021, from stable

China National Bluestar (Group) Co. Ltd.

BBB/Developing/-- Outlook revised to developing on April 9, 2021, from stable

Sinochem International Corp.

BBB+/Developing/-- Outlook revised to developing on April 9, 2021, from stable

Sinochem Hong Kong (Group) Co. Ltd.

A-/Developing/-- Outlook revised to developing on April 9, 2021, from stable

Shanghai Huayi (Group) Co.

BBB/Stable/--

Wanhua Chemical Group Co. Ltd.

BBB/Stable/--

Yingde Gases Group Co. Ltd.

BB-/Stable/--
Note: Rating as of May 14, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Ronald Cheng, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8015;
ronald.cheng@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Lawrence Lu, CFA, Hong Kong + 85225333517;
lawrence.lu@spglobal.com
Danny Huang, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8078;
danny.huang@spglobal.com
Christine Li, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8005;
Christine.Li@spglobal.com
Crystal Wong, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3504;
crystal.wong@spglobal.com
Betty Huang, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3526;
betty.huang@spglobal.com
Allen Lin, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8004;
allen.lin@spglobal.com
Boyang Gao, Beijing + 86 (010) 65692725;
boyang.gao@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in