Key Takeaways
- We expect a strong macroeconomic recovery, shortages of critical components, and dwindling inventory to result in tight supply chain conditions into 2022, supporting favorable technology industry conditions even as the sector adds capacity.
- Customers are buying 5G smartphones at a brisk pace, which is seeding demand for wireless service. The completion of the C-Band auction in the U.S. in the first quarter sets the stage for increasing network investments in the second half.
- Tensions between the U.S. and China remain high and the Biden administration wants to incentivize more domestic semiconductor production to mitigate geopolitical risk.
- Hyperscale data center spending is rebounding with enterprise demand not far behind.
- Memory fundamentals are strong with good demand and supply discipline.
- We expect strong fundamentals for the tech industry to result in a positive bias in rating actions for U.S. tech in 2021.
Very strong results, dwindling inventory, and confidence in the outlook from nearly every U.S. technology management team suggests to S&P Global Ratings that there will be favorable conditions into 2022. Even as the tech industry adds capacity, demand will stay relatively high for the foreseeable future.
Semiconductor Supply To Remain Very Tight Into 2022
Chip scarcity has sent ripples throughout industrial manufacturing, with many end markets feeling the impact. For example, we estimate the chip shortage could result in a net loss of up to 3 million car/trucks produced in 2021, roughly 3%-5% of global production. Also, the new iPhone was delayed by a few weeks in the fall of 2020. And the shortage continues to constrain the availability of PCs and peripherals.
Chip suppliers are racing to catch up. Semiconductor manufacturing facilities (fabs) are running at very high utilization and need several months of lead time to increase capacity. Recent disruptions, including the Texas freeze and the Renesas factory fire in Japan, exacerbated the situation and will cap sales in the second quarter.
Still, the situation is good for chip makers. Many are slowing or stopping normal price declines and some are raising prices, and the unmet demand will extend into future quarters, increasing revenue visibility. And to grow capacity, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC) will invest $100 billion over the next three years, and Samsung and Intel are planning on spending tens of billions to build new fabs in the U.S.
For more details on our view, see "Global Chip Shortage Engulfs A Growing List Of Tech Players", published April 19, 2021.
5G Phones Selling Well, Infrastructure Investments To Ramp Up Through The Year
5G smartphones have enjoyed fast adoption. Qualcomm Inc. estimated 225 million 5G handset units were shipped in 2020, largely toward the end of the year, and it forecasts 450 million to 550 million in 2021. That compares to an estimated global smartphone installed base in the low-4 billion area, according to Gartner, so there remains room after 2021 for further penetration. While Apple has enjoyed success, we expect 5G models from Asia to gain traction in the coming quarters, which will be meaningful given their much larger share of units.
While wireless carrier spending was weak in the first quarter, 5G smartphone sales are seeding demand for wireless service. The C-Band auction in the U.S. concluded in the first quarter and we expect the infrastructure investment that will build out this spectrum to ramp up through the year, which should benefit Ericsson, Nokia, CommScope Inc., and Casa Systems. Demand for 5G access will be greater than for prior standards because of new use cases in enterprise, industrial, and automotive end markets. Also, building out higher frequencies requires more infrastructure. We believe these two factors will drive an investment cycle that should last for several years.
U.S. China Tensions Remain Status Quo; Biden Wants More Domestic Production
President Biden's administration continues the confrontational posture toward China established by his predecessor. While his approach may include more allies and may be more predictable, the supply ban on Chinese entities, tariffs, and high scrutiny of acquisitions remain. The bipartisan consensus now holds that the U.S. should challenge China more directly, pushing back against the Made in China 2025 initiative, which aims to build out China's indigenous semiconductor capabilities, and China Standard 2035, which seeks to set global standards for 5G, internet of things, artificial intelligence, clean energy, and autonomous vehicles, some of which the U.S. believes are areas of national security interest.
The concentration of semiconductor production in Asia, which accounts for 75% of global chip production (the U.S. makes up a paltry 12%), poses severe supply chain risks. Taiwan is a major production center, and is home to TSMC, which has dominance in the outsourced manufacturing of the most advanced chips. However, Taiwan is vulnerable to military action from China, a risk that is now front and center because of China's assertion of territorial claims. Taiwan is also in the midst of its worst drought in half a century, which threatens all of its industries.
Geographic concentration is also a problem in the U.S., as the recent Texas freeze demonstrated. To mitigate these risks, Biden has included incentives for U.S. production in the American Jobs Plan and semiconductor players are planning new investments. Intel said it would spend $20 billion to build two new fabs in Arizona; Samsung is reportedly considering investing $17 billion in an advanced chip fab in the U.S.; and TSMC announced plans to build a $12 billion facility in Arizona.
For more details on our view, see "Semiconductor Supply Shortage And U.S. Policy Response Mark A Renaissance For Domestic Manufacturing And Equipment Investments," published April 26, 2021.
Cloud Spending Accelerating, Green Shoots In Enterprise
Cloud providers (known in the industry as hyperscalers) resumed hefty spending in the first quarter after a two quarter pause. We believe demand signals are good and that the current investment cycle will last through 2021. Over the longer term, we expect pauses in hyperscale spending to be short-lived--they can only break for so long until demand requires them to expand capacity, and periods of investment will last longer than cloud acclimatization (or "digestion") phases despite their ongoing efforts to optimize their infrastructure.
Microsoft Azure continued to gain share at scale, growing revenues 50% year-over-year compared to Amazon Web Services growing a spry 32% at a larger revenue base. We believe Microsoft is leveraging its installed base of enterprise customers, its broad product portfolio, and its support for hybrid cloud and multi-cloud deployments to gain traction. Google may be taking a more aggressive approach by leveraging benefits across its platform as it did to win Univision by packaging benefits across YouTube, search, and ads. Through the pandemic, we believe enterprises reinforced their preference for outsourcing more of their IT infrastructure, so the demand environment should remain strong for all players for several years.
We believe signs of loosening enterprise IT budgets are emerging as managers become more confident in the recovery. A new hybrid model with workers splitting more time between the office and home should drive network and security spending, and digital transformation, cloud migration, and data analytics remain priorities. PC demand also remains strong; we recently raised our forecast for 2021 PC unit shipments to 8% after we raised it to flat from negative 7% in January.
Memory Is Inflecting
Demand for memory chips is as strong as ever, supported by 5G smartphones, resumption of investment by hyperscalers, expectations for stronger enterprise investment through the year, and PC demand that remains strong. DRAM pricing is already increasing, which we expect to continue through 2021. NAND pricing is bottoming and we expect increases starting next quarter, one quarter sooner than we had expected. While supply discipline is stronger in DRAM, capacity additions for NAND are reasonable and do not threaten the improving pricing conditions we expect.
Rating Actions Are Likely To Have A Positive Bias In 2021
We expect a positive bias to U.S. tech rating actions in 2021, due in part to reversing negative actions stemming from pandemic-related demand weakness, as well as a very strong demand environment throughout 2021. Negative actions peaked in March and April of last year, but we have seen positive actions exceeding negative ones in almost every month since July. Reversal of the negative actions from the early months of 2020 account for part of the activity, but we believe that has mostly run its course. Now U.S. tech companies are faced with the best demand environment we have seen in many years, which will drive improvement in credit metrics and could cause us to take more favorable views of business fundamentals for certain companies, potentially leading to more positive actions.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Christian Frank, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5069; christian.frank@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | David T Tsui, CFA, CPA, San Francisco + 1 415-371-5063; david.tsui@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.