articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210414-u-s-conduit-cmbs-update-q1-2021-signs-of-improvement-11917988 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Conduit CMBS Update Q1 2021: Signs of Improvement

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2025 (As Of April 25)

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Increased 59 Bps To 6.1% In April 2025; Lodging Rate Climbed To 6.67%

COMMENTS

European CMBS Monitor Q1 2025


U.S. Conduit CMBS Update Q1 2021: Signs of Improvement

This is S&P Global Ratings' fifth quarterly update on U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) conduit transactions published in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to closely monitor the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on U.S. commercial real estate fundamentals and our ratings on U.S. CMBS, particularly in the lodging and retail sectors.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating, uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by year-end or later. We use these assumptions about vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.

The COVID-19 Pandemic's Evolving Impact

The overall delinquency (DQ) rate for U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) transactions decreased 28 basis points (bps) month over month to 5.8% in March 2021 and has steadily declined since peaking to 9% in Summer 2020. Although the overall DQ rate has declined, the share of delinquent loans that are 60-plus-days delinquent (i.e., seriously delinquent) is 87.6%. A substantial majority of the total population of arrears remains in the lodging and retail sectors; the 30-plus-day DQ rate for multifamily, office, and industrial is below 2.2% despite multifamily and office DQ rates ticking up in March.

The forbearance rate increased by 10 basis points (bps) to 7.6% in March, down from the peak slightly above 8% in July and August 2020. Over 87% of these loans are in the retail and lodging sectors.

New Issue Credit Metrics Improved In First-Quarter 2021

The loan metrics for U.S. CMBS conduit new issuance transactions were stronger in first-quarter 2021 despite interest-only (IO) percentages re-testing their "2.0" era highs. These included the following:

  • Leverage fell by over six percentage points quarter over quarter (q/q).
  • Debt service coverage (DSC) ratios rose 0.17x to 2.58x, remaining at a very high level. We note that historically low rates and high IO loan percentages are clearly contributing to elevated DSC ratios.
  • Combined IO percentages are back near the 2.0 peak of 91.9% set in third-quarter 2020. The full-term component increased eight percentage points q/q to 72.1% in first-quarter 2021, and the partial term component was up 30 basis points to 19.5%. As such, the combined total of 91.6% was just shy of the third-quarter 2020 mark.
  • Our average cash flow and value variance to issuer values both decreased by multiple percentage points.
  • Effective loan counts (as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index score) and actual loan counts were up three points, while average deal sizes and loan counts rose considerably.

Our 'BBB-' Credit Enhancement Levels Remain Well Above The Market Average

Our 'AAA' credit enhancement level was nearly flat to the market level in first-quarter 2021, but our 'BBB-' credit enhancement level was still 330 bps higher. We continue to believe these 'BBB-' rated classes could prove relatively more vulnerable to event risk--especially with more concentrated pools--until the ultimate economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CMBS performance becomes clearer. As a result, we have not rated many of these classes in recent vintages.

Our average cash flow and value variance to issuer underwritten values declined considerably on a quarterly basis: 460 bps and 240 bps to 15.6% and 41.4%, respectively, but were more in line with 2020 full-year figures.

Of the six U.S. CMBS conduit transactions that priced in first-quarter 2021, we rated four (see table 1). The six offerings had an average of 53 loans, with top-10 loan concentrations coming down to 55% after posting approximately 60% for three straight quarters. The average effective loan count climbed moderately q/q to 24.1, from 21.1 in the last quarter of 2020.

Table 1

Summary Of S&P Global Ratings-Reviewed Conduits
Weighted averages Q1 2021 Q4 2020 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
No. of transactions reviewed 6 8 28 52 42 48 40
No. of transactions rated 4 3 14 36 19 10 3
Average deal size (mil. $) 991 839 888 926 915 930 856
Average no. of loans 53 41 44 50 50 49 51
S&P Global Ratings' LTV (%) 93.2 99.5 93.7 93.5 93.6 89.1 91.3
S&P Global Ratings' DSC (x) 2.58 2.41 2.39 1.93 1.77 1.83 1.71
Final pool Herf/S&P Global Ratings' Herf 24.1/25.7 21.1/22.0 24.1/33.1 27.7/33.7 28.1/36.3 26.3/34.9 25.4/36.0
% of full-term IO (final pools) 72.1 64.1 70.7 61.6 51.7 46.6 33
% of partial IO (final pools) 19.5 19.2 17.9 21.4 26.2 28.4 33.9
S&P Global Rating's NCF haircut (%) (15.6) (20.2) (15.8) (13.4) (13) (11.9) (10.8)
S&P Global Ratings' value variance (%) (41.4) (43.8) (40.0) (36.0) (35.3) (33.0) (32.1)
'AAA' actual/S&P Global Ratings CE (%)(i) 20.6/20.5 22.0/27.8 20.4/22.9 20.8/24.3 21.0/26.0 21.2/23.5 23.0/25.6
'BBB-' actual/S&P Global Ratings CE (%)(i) 7.1/10.4 7.3/15.3 6.8/11.4 7.0/10.8 7.1/10.9 7.1/9.3 7.8/10.2
(i)S&P Global Ratings' credit enhancement levels reflect results for pools that we reviewed. Actual credit enhancement levels represent every deal priced within a selected vintage or quarter, not just the ones we analyzed. LTV--Loan-to-value. DSC--Debt service coverage. Herf--Herfindahl-Hirschman Index score. IO--Interest-only. NCF--Net cash flow. CE--Credit enhancement.

The conduit deals priced during first-quarter 2021 had lower loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and higher DSCs on a quarterly basis. The average LTV was 93.2%--a 630 bps improvement q/q. Average DSC rose 0.17x to 2.58x in the first quarter, maintaining an elevated level. This likely reflects two factors: lower interest rates and a lot of full-term IO loans. For the purposes of our DSC analysis regarding partial IO periods, we utilize the figure after the IO period ends; but partial IO percentages remain somewhat low.

IO as an overall percentage of the collateral pools jumped to about 92% in the first quarter from about 83% in the fourth quarter. Full-term IO loans make up 72.1% of the collateral pools, an 800-bps increase q/q, while partial-term IO exposures climbed by 30 bps to 19.5%.

In our review, we made negative adjustments to our loan-level recovery assumptions for all IO loans. In some conduit transactions, we made additional pool-level adjustments when we saw very high IO loan concentrations or when an IO loan bucket has no discernible difference in LTV versus the average (i.e., it is not "pre-amortized"). The average S&P LTV for full-term IO loans issued in the first-quarter 2021 was 92.8%, about 40 bps below the overall average.

Effective loan counts, or Herfindahl-Hirschman Index scores, which measure concentration or diversification by loan size, rose 300 bps to 24.1. We consider this level to be moderately well-diversified, but it's still below the recent pre-pandemic vintage range-–2018/2019 vintage averages were about 28, similar to first-quarter 2020. That said, the average deal size increased by over $150 million to $991 million in first-quarter 2021, while the average number of loans rose to 53 from 41 in the previous quarter.

Property Type Exposures Continue to Shift Within Conduits

We continue to see quite a bit of movement in property type exposures within conduits.

Industrial exposure remained elevated at 12% in the first quarter, up slightly from 11% in the fourth quarter, but well above the 6-7% range in recent pre-pandemic (namely 2018 and 2019) vintages. Retail exposure was 14% in the first quarter, down from 17% in the fourth quarter, but above the 8%-9% lows set in mid-2020. Lodging was pretty steady, down a couple points to 7%, from 9% in the fourth quarter and 8% in the third quarter. Office remains number one by a wide margin, even after falling to 35% in the most recent period from 43% in the fourth quarter, a nearly four-year high (46% in first-quarter 2017). Meanwhile, multifamily exposure climbed five percentage points to 11%, and both self-storage and mixed-use notched considerable gains, up over four and five percentage points respectively, to 8% and 13%.

Chart 1

image

Lodging

The lodging sector has been one of the most affected by the pandemic as evidenced by the unprecedented 47.5% decline in U.S. RevPAR in 2020, which stemmed from record low occupancy of 44.0% for the year. Hotels in urban markets were the most severely impacted with RevPAR declines of 63.9%, while upscale hotels fared the worst by chain scale with a 62.0% RevPAR drop. However, the heightened pace of the vaccine rollout coupled with the CDC's recent updated guidance indicating that travel risk for fully vaccinated individuals is low, has resulted in improved U.S. occupancy levels in recent weeks. For the weeks ended March 20th, March 27th, and April 3rd, occupancy improved to the 58%-59% range, versus the 20%-30% range experienced in the same weeks last year. As occupancy continues to recover, year-over-year comparisons will improve significantly due to the 70%-80% RevPAR declines experienced early in the pandemic last year.

Despite the 100%-plus RevPAR gains reported in the last three weeks, driven mainly by spring break-related travel, we do not expect RevPAR will return to 2019 levels until 2023. Year-end 2020 RevPAR levels dropped below the nominal levels achieved in 1997 and will take time to recover. Certain hotels will recover faster than others, depending on price point, location, and market mix. We continue to expect that properties in urban markets and those that depend on business travel and meeting and group demand, particularly large groups, will take the longest to recover. Finally, the supply pipeline has moderated (-3.6% in 2020 and -2.1% year-to-date through February) as construction has slowed due to lack of financing, which will aid in the recovery (data in this section is from STR).

Retail

Retail malls have been facing significant challenges and deteriorating revenues for the past several years due to factors including the proliferation of retailer bankruptcies and store closures as consumer shopping preferences shifted to e-commerce from brick-and-mortar stores. Meanwhile, grocery-anchored retail, home improvement stores, and some larger big-box retailers are generally outperforming the traditional retail stores. Given this bifurcated outlook, we revised our capitalization rate assumptions for retail malls to reflect the long-term secular challenges facing the sector in late 2020.

Office and multifamily

The office and multifamily sectors are facing some uncertainty going forward, although delinquencies remain low at 2.2% for multifamily and 2.0% for office.

For offices, most of the questions regard future space demand given the increase in flexibility afforded by employers. We expect this picture to come into a sharper focus over the coming quarters, with more clarity likely in mid/late 2021 with the reentry of more workers to their offices, and corporations making longer-term decisions. Further, we expect results to vary by industry. (See "Remote Working Is Testing U.S. Office Landlords' Credit Quality," published Feb. 11, 2021).

It is also important to note that office leases are typically for longer terms, on the order of 10 years or more, so we expect any potential distress would likely take place over an extended period as rollovers occur. In the near-term, we'd expect a somewhat bumpy 2021, as landlords will likely provide concessions to protect the level of "face" rents given increases in vacancy and subleasing. We may also see firms sign shorter term leases to delay longer-term decisions. Beyond 2021, as the broader economy continues rebounding, we will closely track these metrics to measure the potential long-term structural shifts in the supply/demand dynamics of office space demand.

We've already seen some evidence that multifamily rents have declined in certain large cities, and concessions have also been increasing, especially at newer properties that are struggling to lease up to a stabilized level. Overall (institutional quality) apartment building values have declined about 4% versus the pre-COVID-19 period, according to Green Street, similar in magnitude to the all property value decline of 6% (office is down about 9%). Like offices, some risk of deterioration in property fundamentals/values exists due to a potential population shift away from denser city centers, which could increase vacancies and drive down rents. There is some evidence of this supporting multifamily rents in suburbs, exurbs, and smaller markets. The trend is expected to continue as work-from-home flexibility could mean that employees don't need to be near offices and may continue to seek out (larger) spaces to accommodate a home office. However, dwindling housing inventory and record-approaching price appreciation may serve to counter some of this trend, as long as it persists.

$15 Billion In New Issuance During 2021

There was about $15 billion in first-quarter 2021 private label CMBS issuance excluding commercial real estate CLOs. The breakdown between single asset single borrower and conduit was roughly 60%/40%, or about $9 billion SASB and $6 billion conduit. That total was down about 30% versus first-quarter 2020's $22 billion figure. Our forecast remains at $70 billion for the full year, as we expect some increase in origination/securitization volume as the recovery progresses.

Related Criteria

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Senay Dawit, New York + 1 (212) 438 0132;
senay.dawit@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Rachel Buck, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4928;
rachel.buck@spglobal.com
James C Digney, New York + 1 (212) 438 1832;
james.digney@spglobal.com
Ryan Butler, New York + 1 (212) 438 2122;
ryan.butler@spglobal.com
Natalka H Chevance, New York + 1 (212) 438 1236;
natalka.chevance@spglobal.com
Global Structured Finance Research:James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028;
james.manzi@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in