Sudden COVID-19-related stay-at-home orders, extreme hoarding of food and other staples, and the rapid acceleration of e-commerce made food-at-home (FAH) companies one of the biggest winners in the U.S. retail and restaurant sector in 2020.
Our rating actions reflected that. Last year, we took 220 rating actions across the nearly 140 rated companies in the retail/restaurant sector, and 55% of these actions were negative. However, among the roughly 20 rated grocery, distributor, dollar store, and big-box issuers, almost all of the more than 20 rating actions in 2020 were positive.
In the consumer products sector, we took 109 rating actions, with 73% negative. However, ratings for consumer staples companies were relatively stable because of the increased demand. Despite the strong comparable sales and profit results in 2020--including, in some cases, triple-digit percent increases in digital revenue--we still believe S&P Global Ratings' lease-adjusted EBITDA performance will be better in 2021 than in 2019.
Key Takeaways
- As Americans socially distanced during the pandemic, restaurant sales plummeted, but food retail sales increased.
- We expect that some of the pandemic-driven changes in consumers' dining habits will persist even after the vaccine is rolled out more widely, leading to long-term market share gains for FAH companies.
- Accordingly, we expect that most companies in this sector will post sales increases again in 2021 despite the unusually strong 2020.
Investors often ask us how permanent the food-at-home trend is, and we are confident part of the increase is here to stay. While we expect restaurants to benefit from pent-up demand in the third quarter, a return to consistent dining-out habits could be delayed by vaccine rollout hiccups, new virus variants, and further case waves. In addition, consumers' time at home will likely remain above pre-COVID-19 levels because of greater working from home and an increase in at-home entertainment options. Looking beyond 2021, Americans' improved meal-planning and cooking skills will not go away.
Industry estimates indicate the U.S. grocery industry gained $77 billion in sales in 2020 from 2019, while the U.S. restaurant industry lost more than $100 billion (see table). Clearly, a good portion of the difference went back into Americans' pockets, as the U.S. personal savings rate increased to 20.5% in January 2021 from 7.6% in December 2019, according to the Federal Bureau of Economic Analysis. Meanwhile, the restaurant industry would need to grow 18% in 2021 to return it to the 2019 level.
U.S. Grocery And Restaurant Trends | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--U.S. grocery-- | --U.S. restaurants and other eating places-- | |||||
Sales (Mil. $) | Change (Mil. $) | % change | Sales (Mil. $) | Change (Mil. $) | % change | |
2019 | 682,862 | 668,864 | ||||
2020 | 759,687 | 76,825 | 11.3 | 564,854 | (104,010) | (15.6) |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. |
We believe the investments grocery stores made in curbside pickup, prepared meals, and speedy and seamless online capabilities will have a lasting impact on consumer shopping and dining habits. We also believe this will help supermarkets and similar players maintain market share even after the pandemic is contained. Given the de-leveraging and increased liquidity that's flooded the FAH sector, we expect this will lead to even more grocery acquisitions, IPOs, and perhaps even private equity leveraged buyouts in the coming one to two years. (In January 2021, Ahold Delhaize and Centerbridge Partners completed their purchase of online grocer FreshDirect for an undisclosed price.) It will also mean further reshuffling of market share among the biggest domestic grocery and restaurant players; Chart 1 illustrates the diverging trends.
Chart 1
Further Up the Proverbial Food Chain, Suppliers Are Also Benefitting
Branded consumer staples have also benefitted from pandemic-related market trends. We expect packaged food manufacturers' sales to grow 1%-2% organically post-pandemic, whereas growth had been negative before the pandemic. We expect household product companies to grow at least 3%-4%, slightly higher than previous levels, due to permanent changes in consumer habits and higher product usage rates.
During the pandemic, consumers navigated back to familiar, trusted brands, and companies were able to flex their supply chains to address the associated demand increase and channel shift. Post COVID-19, we expect these companies to maintain some of the market share they gained through actively managing their portfolios through innovation, bolt-on acquisitions, SKU rationalization, and divestitures. Indeed, companies such as Clorox, General Mills, and Procter & Gamble have increased their long-term growth targets, and other players have indicated they should achieve the high end of theirs.
Consumers' investments in cooking equipment during the pandemic should be a positive for companies that participate in breakfast, lunch, and snacking categories--such as General Mills, Kellogg, Campbell Soup, Conagra, Mondelez, and PepsiCo. In addition, consumers' focus on health and wellness accelerated during the pandemic. We believe companies such as Procter & Gamble, Colgate, Kimberly-Clark, Clorox, Church & Dwight, and Estee Lauder will benefit from this trend.
Cleanup Could Still Be Needed In Aisle 6
New risks will emerge for grocers this year. For example, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is proceeding more quickly at U.S. pharmacies than at supermarkets and big-box stores. This translates into millions of new customer data sets for CVS, Walgreens, and others and less traffic for non-consumable businesses. We expect the big, infrequent supermarket trips amid social-distancing concerns in 2020 will revert to more normalized transactions across the sector as soon as the second half of this year.
Moreover, the battle to raise the minimum wage to more than $15 per hour is prompting many retailers to announce higher wages. This--on top of the COVID-19-related cleaning and other expenses required last year--will only further dent adjusted EBITDA margins in the already super thin-margin grocery sector. In the coming year, we are forecasting as much as a 50-basis-point (bp) impact, even for the biggest players.
Why Push A Shopping Cart When You Can Push A Button?
For many pure-play grocers, online sales made up less than 2% of sales in 2019, but this figure doubled during the economic shutdown in the spring of 2020. Subsequent quarters illustrate a moderating but continued relatively high penetration of e-commerce among grocers and big box retailers.
Before the pandemic, we expected e-commerce sales penetration to grow to 10% by 2024, but we now expect that to be closer to 20% by then. The growth in digital sales channels poses risks and opportunities to grocers. The different rates of e-commerce growth indicate an overall market-share gain for Albertsons but a loss for Walmart, though the latter remains the country's largest grocer (see Chart 2).
Chart 2
Chart 3
Similarly, pre-COVID-19, e-commerce was a small fraction of packaged goods sales. The pandemic advanced penetration by four to five years, and manufacturers intend to grow it further. Branded goods companies invested in the direct-to-consumer channel well before the pandemic and easily adapted to the acceleration. Digital engagement is moving manufacturers closer to consumers, enabling packaged good companies to create an engaging customer experience.
Companies are getting a better return on investment because targeted campaigns can effectively drive on-line and physical store purchases. For example, if there is a regional outbreak of the flu, a company will target coupons to consumers in that area for products such as over-the-counter flu medications to boost sales.
2021 Outlooks For Select Big Food Retailers
Walmart Inc. (AA/Stable/A-1+): The company grappled with food and consumable inventory shortages early in the pandemic, and some believe this led to lost ground. However, we don't believe this is a long-term issue. Walmart's U.S. operations had 3,750 pickup locations and 3,000 same-day delivery locations as of the fourth quarter ending Jan. 31, 2021. In that latest quarter, the company's U.S. grocery comparable sales increased in the high-single-digit percentage area.
Kroger Co. (BBB/Stable/A-2): We expected 2021 to be an important transformational year for the grocer given that it will be opening automated fulfillment centers, which it's been building since its tie-up with a company called Ocado a few years ago. It has partnered with Walgreens, piloted ghost kitchens, and recently raised full-year 2020 guidance after a strong fiscal third quarter ended Nov. 7, 2020.
Albertsons Cos. Inc. (BB-/Positive/--): We see the company as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the pandemic-driven market shifts in 2020, with some of the largest increases in digital sales (see Chart 3). The company raised its full-year 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance materially in January 2021 (when it announced third-quarter 2020 results) to $4.4 billion-$4.5 billion from $4.15 billion-$4.25 billion. We upgraded the company one notch and assigned a positive outlook in October 2020. We will be watching its financial policy and capital allocation closely in the coming year.
Target Corp. (A/Stable/A-1): Historically a laggard in the grocery sector, the company's investments in food--including its private Good & Gather label--paid off last year. It recently added fresh and frozen groceries as part of its rapidly growing (more than 500% growth in the same-day service over the holidays) curbside pickup business. Comparable food and beverage sales grew 17% in the November/December period, and while the company is not providing guidance for fiscal 2021 and beyond, we expect continued food growth in the coming year.
Amazon.com Inc. (AA-/Stable/A-1+): In a recent call, the company CFO said that its grocery business will remain a priority for Jeff Bezos in his new role as executive chairman. Its Go, Fresh, and Whole Foods channels are all part of this expansion strategy, with more physical stores expected in 2021. Some in the industry believe Amazon's goal is 2,000 retail locations in the U.S., with 750 of them Whole Foods and the balance under the Fresh banner.
Food Price Inflation: Evergreen Sector Risk Will Moderate In 2021
Food price inflation was much higher in 2020 than in recent years for both FAH and food-away-from-home (FAFH) categories, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The rate was about the mid-3% for both sectors versus the food price inflation 20-year-average of 2%, amid a variety of pandemic-related challenges, including global supply-chain issues for proteins.
After years of fairly stable prices, consumer staples companies are also facing rising commodity costs, such as for packaging, corn, flour, and wheat. These costs come on top of margins already squeezed by labor and freight costs. We expect these companies to offset potential pressures on margins by using levers such as revenue growth management (pricing and promotional optimization), product mix management, cost savings, and price increases.
FAH prices increased dramatically in 2020 from 0.9% in 2019. This perennial issue posed a unique challenge to grocers given they had to pass on higher product costs to preserve margins while also trying to stay competitive and gain the market share that was up for grabs. Having to raise prices will continue to be a challenge in the coming year.
Chart 4
The USDA forecasts that FAH prices will climb only 1%-2% in the coming year versus 2%-3% for FAFH. Similar data from the U.S. Census Bureau is below. We believe supermarkets' lower prices versus restaurants could mean continued gains for the grocery sector in the coming year.
The Rising Tide Has Lifted All Boats, But Regional Players Could Be Left High And Dry
Regional grocers benefitted from the FAH trend and consumers' preference to shop closer to home during the pandemic. As behavior normalizes over the next 12 months, we expect the segment's organic growth to moderate to the low-single-digit percentages. Regional grocers can benefit from effective merchandising and are progressively using scale to compete on price and maintain store traffic. However, their limited digital penetration poses a medium- to long-term risk because of increasing investments in digital channels by larger players and big box retailers. As the effects from the coronavirus pandemic wane, we believe industry margins will decline due to sales deleveraging. We also believe they'll remain under pressure as competition for shifting market share heats up.
2021 Outlooks For Select Regional Grocers
BI-LO LLC (B/Stable/--). Southeastern Grocers' performance improved over the past several quarters as management executed its turnaround strategy, renewing its fleet and shutting underperforming stores. With a surge in sales during the pandemic, the company has generated significant positive cash flow, which it has used (along with proceeds from the sale of its BI-LO pharmacy business) to reduce funded debt by over $400 million. In addition, the company plans to divest the BI-LO banner, which we believe should improve operating efficiency, with adjusted EBITDA margin consistently above 5%. However, despite recent improvements, the company continues to lag behind national peers in store productivity metrics. The company had been planning an IPO at the beginning of this year but has since shelved those plans.
Wegmans Food Markets Inc. (BBB+/Stable/--) Wegmans Food Markets Inc. has benefitted from the increased demand for groceries and fresh food for at-home consumption as shoppers practice social distancing and avoid crowds. After a challenging second quarter, revenue increased by 13.1% in third-quarter 2020 (+9.7% for existing stores) and was the most profitable quarter ever. Gross profits improved, and operating expenses benefitted from the June termination of the extra $2/hour store program for store employees. Robust private-label offerings, high-quality perishables, and value-added prepared foods are driving traffic and contributing to positive comparable-store sales. However, hard discounter growth and intense price competition from industry leader Walmart continue to constrain unit pricing across the food retail industry.
Increased Food At Home Also Benefits Food Distributors
Higher demand at grocers translates to increased sales and operating leverage for food distributors. In particular, scale remains a key competitive factor when expanding their client base or delivering higher-margin private brands. Those that successfully navigated kinks in the supply chain due to restrictions and shortages during the pandemic--such as by consolidating distribution centers or investing in automation to improve operating margins--are best positioned to capitalize on the tailwinds.
2021 Outlooks For Select Food Distributors
United Natural Foods Inc. (UNFI; B/Positive/--) Sales grew 7.1% in the second quarter (ended Jan. 30, 2021). UNFI did not complete its planned sale of the retail grocery business it inherited with the acquisition of SUPERVALU in 2018 because the retail operations also benefited from a supportive grocery environment amid the pandemic. However, risks remain in the highly competitive wholesale food distribution segment. This is particularly the case given UNFI's concentrated exposure to Whole Foods, which makes up close to 20% of total sales--albeit with a contract running until 2027. We revised the outlook on the company to positive from negative in October 2020.
C&S Group Enterprises LLC (BB-/Stable/--) Despite phasing out its agreements with Ahold Delhaize USA over the next three years, we expect C&S to remain one of the four largest wholesale grocery distributors in the U.S., with leading market shares, especially in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Its purchasing power and reach allow it to be a relatively low-cost operator in an industry with high barriers to entry. Like many essential retailers, C&S's results were positive during the pandemic, with sales growth of about 7% in the last two quarters of fiscal 2020. We expect sales will continue to benefit from this surge of demand over the short term before they revert to the long-term trend of low-single-digit percent growth.
Appendix: Additional Charts
Chart 5
Chart 6
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Diya G Iyer, New York + 1 (212) 438 4001; diya.iyer@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Sarah E Wyeth, New York + 1 (212) 438 5658; sarah.wyeth@spglobal.com |
Diane M Shand, New York + 1 (212) 438 7860; diane.shand@spglobal.com | |
Khaled Lahlo, New York + 1 (212) 438 1012; khaled.lahlo@spglobal.com | |
Bea Y Chiem, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5070; bea.chiem@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributor: | Poonam U Zawar, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.