articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210305-french-electricity-and-gas-regulatory-frameworks-very-supportive-11817185 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

French Electricity And Gas Regulatory Frameworks: Very Supportive

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

Rated Mexican Corporates Can Manage Economic Uncertainty And Industry Volatility

COMMENTS

U.S. Tariffs Place Another Straw On The Back Of China Carmakers


French Electricity And Gas Regulatory Frameworks: Very Supportive

Table 1

French Electricity And Gas Market
Regulator Commission de Regulation de l'Energie (CRE)
Key players Power TSO: RTE (50.1% owned by EDF indirectly via CTE)
Power DSO: Enedis (100% owned by EDF)
Gas TSOs: GRTgaz (75% owned by Engie), and TGIF
Gas DSO: GRDF (100% owned by Engie)
Tariff-setting methodology Rate of return on RAB method (WACC on RAB)
WACC (electricity transmission/distribution): 4.6% (TURPE 6)/2.5%
WACC (gas transmission/distribution): 4.25%/4.1%
Regulatory period (four years) Electricity distribution: TURPE 5 (August 2017-2021)
Electricity transmission TURPE 5 (August 2017-2021)
Gas distribution: ATRD6 (July 2020-July 2024)
Gas transmission: ATRT7 (April 2020-April 2024)
Gas storage: ATS2 (April 2020-April 2024)
Regulatory assesment Strong
DSO--Distribution system operator. TSO--Transmission system operator. RAB--Regulatory asset base. WACC--Weighted average cost of capital. TURPE--Tarif d'Utilisation des Reseaux Publics d'Electricite. ATRD/T/S--Tarifs d’accès des tiers aux réseaux de distribution/transport/stockage. Source: Commission de Regulation de l'Energie, S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

image

Operator Profiles

In France, the electricity and gas regulator is Commission de Regulation de l'Energie (CRE). Although the French electricity sector was liberalized in 2007, Electricité de France S.A. (EDF; BBB+/Stable/A-2) remains the leader in terms of generation and supply. The French energy mix is characterized by its low-carbon nuclear fleet, producing about 75% of the total output, and significant hydropower production. Wind and solar account for less than 10% of output today. Because of the high nuclear output, gas penetration is lower than in other Northern European markets.

The EU's Third Energy Package imposed legal unbundling of transmission and distribution system operators (TSO and DSO), as well as storage facilities and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, from generation and supply.

The French electricity distribution network is mostly operated by Enedis, which is fully controlled and owned by EDF, although independent under the French Code of Energy, and run in the form of a concession. By law, EDF is the only company that can operate this concession. Smaller, local distribution networks also exist, but Enedis operates 95% of the national grid. Regarding electricity transmission, RTE Reseau de Transport d Electricite (RTE; A/Stable/A-1) is the only operator. While RTE is majority owned by EDF (50.1%, held as a dedicated financial asset to finance EDF's nuclear liabilities), EDF cannot control RTE due to EU requirements. At the same time, French law requires state-owned entities to fully own and control RTE. Unlike Enedis, RTE owns its assets and operates it via a concession contract with the state.

In the gas market, the distribution network is fully operated by Gaz Réseau Distribution France (GRDF), a 100% subsidiary of ENGIE SA (BBB+/Stable/A-2). GRDF operates under a concession framework (regional collectivities are the owner) and operates under a public service contract (CSP) renewed every five years with the state (current one runs until 2023). The national gas transmission network has two major operators: GRTgaz (75%-owned by Engie) and Terega (owned by a consortium led by Snam and EDF). Unlike electricity networks, gas networks are less constrained on their ownership structure. The law (Loi Pacte 2018) only requires for a majority ownership from state-owned entities for GRTgaz, although we still consider this operator is strategic for the French state.

Table 3

Components Of RAB Remuneration Rates
(%) Power transmission Gas transmission Gas distribution
TURPE 6 TURPE 5 ATRT7 ATRD6
Risk-free rate of return 1.7 2.7 1.7 1.7
Premium for cost of debt 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9
Asset beta (x) 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.48
Unlevered market beta 78 73 86 83
Equity market risk premium 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.2
Leverage (x) 60 60 50 50
Tax rate 26.47 34.43 28.02 28.02
Tax deductability of financial charges 100 75 100 100
Levered pretax cost of debt 2.4 3.7 2.6 2.6
Levered pretax cost of equity 7.8 9.7 8.6 8.4
Nominal pretax WACC 4.600 6.125 5.6 5.5
Inflation N/A N/A 1.3 1.3
Real pretax WACC N/A N/A 4.25 4.10
Power distribution*
TURPE 6 TURPE 5
Risk-free rate of return 1.7 2.7
Asset beta (x) 0.36 0.34
Equity market risk premium 5.2 5.0
Tax rate 26.47 31.79
Regulated equity remuneration 2.3 4.0
Remuneration of RAB (assets) 2.5 2.5
*For power distribution, remuneration rates excluding Linky. bps--Basis points. N/A--Not applicable. RAB--Regulatory asset base. TURPE--Tarif de l'Utilisation des Reseaux Publics d'Electricite. ATRD/T--Tarifs d’accès des tiers aux réseaux de distribution/transport. WACC--Weighted average cost of capital. Source: Commission de Regulation de l'Energie.

Assessment Factors

Regulatory stability: Predictable and transparent framework since 2000

The French regulatory framework has been stable since it was created in 2000, with recent regulatory reviews in line with other European regulatory frameworks in terms of lower overall returns on capital and increased capital expenditure programs. Regulatory periods have been progressively increased to four years. The regulator favors incremental changes to ensure the overall stability of the framework, which provides operators with predictable cash flows.

In early 2020, the regulator CRE approved remuneration calculations for the gas sector's next regulatory periods--which started in April 2020 for transmission (ATRT7) and storage (ATS2), and in July 2020 for distribution (ATRD6)--and confirmed continuity in the formula (see table 2). Incremental changes for gas transmission specifically included:

  • A lower weighted average cost of capital (WACC; 4.25% for transmission, 4.10% for distribution) since the regulator accounts for a pass-through of the reduction in corporate tax in France over the period, the lower cost of debt, and a higher asset beta (0.50x versus 0.48x) to account for the increasing uncertainties that investments in the gas sector are facing with the energy transition.
  • A reduction of incentives for new investments, with a limited period of remuneration of four years for some new projects and the removal of incentives for the development of network interconnections, considering reduced needs with the current gas transmission network being appropriately sized.
  • Additional remuneration to reflect maintenance cost increases due to an ageing network,even if the regulator maintains a solid focus on operating efficiency, it decided to remunerate extra operational costs as requested by gas players. This highlights willingness by the regulator to incorporate industrial challenges into tariff equation.

In January 2021, the CSE, following the CRE's recommendation, confirmed that the tariffs for power transmission over the next four-year regulatory period starting Aug. 1, 2021, (TURPE 6) will be determined following the same remuneration formula and same parameters as during the current period (TURPE 5).

  • We consider that there is broad continuity in the remuneration design, despite the lowering of the WACC to 4.6% from the current 6.125% and marginal adjustments to incentives level.
  • The planned decrease in regulatory remuneration for RTE is in part due to lower income tax during the next regulatory period (26.47% compared with 34.43% currently) and the mechanical erosion of the French treasury yield, which serves as a reference point for determining the WACC, to a risk-free rate of 1.7% from 2.7%.
  • CRE decided to maintain the asset beta unchanged at 0.37x, ensuring proper European benchmarking and considering the framework protects RTE's earnings against most risks

The regulator has also maintained the remuneration formula for power distribution investments in the next regulatory period starting Aug. 1, 2021 (TURPE 6) by leaving the margin on assets unchanged at 2.5%, while decreasing the additional regulated equity remuneration component to 2.3% from 4.0%. This results in compound remuneration dropping to 4.8% from 6.5% in the current period. The margin on assets remained stable at 2.5%, despite a lower risk-free rate and tax rate, thanks to the CRE increasing the asset beta to 0.36x from 0.34x to reflect better European comparability. CRE is reinforcing the incentive measure on quality of service with an aim to reduce the connection timeline by 30% on average by 2024 from 2019 levels.

Chart 1

image
Tariff setting: Detailed and transparent

We view the regulatory process as transparent and allowing players for interacting in detail with the regulator in times of reset. Traditionally, players submit their projected business plans to the regulator, and engage in constructive dialogue on the remuneration framework. Business plans are audited by an external party, leaving CRE the power to make final suggestions and adjustments. The state body Conseil Supérieur de l'Energie (CSE) is in charge of reviewing CRE's proposals. There is a very limited track record of legal dispute between the CRE and regulated entities, and we're not aware of appeal mechanisms in place in terms of disagreement.

The regulatory framework for both power and gas contains a regulatory asset base (RAB)-based tariff with full coverage of costs and a consistent track record of allowing a good return on investment. The tariffs under the TURPE (electricity) and ATRT (gas) framework both are based on a real rate of return with RAB and are linked to projected inflation. Authorized revenues are also linked to inflation with an adjustment mechanism (see CRCP in section below, which is used to adjust between projected and real inflation). It offers protection against volume and commodity price fluctuations since remuneration is RAB-based. Works in progress are remunerated at nominal cost of debt before tax (power and gas transmission), while there is limited remuneration for distribution projects, since they are considered as bearing shorter time lead or insignificant for gas distribution.

RAB-based allowed return

Allowed returns consist of net operating expenses allowed plus investment expenses allowed, calculated based on capital asset pricing model of WACC (nominal pre-tax) return applied to RAB, adjusted for CRCP (see bullet below) and efficiency factors.

  • RAB is equal to the net asset value at opening of the period plus new commissioned investments minus depreciation. The RAB is updated annually to reflect net investments.
  • The WACC is different for DSOs and TSO and between industries; it reflects the cost of debt, expressed as the sum of the risk-free rate of return and a sector-based credit spread (the interest premium that reflects the rate of risk inherent in the investment) and the cost of equity (with beta risk premiums of equity investment).
  • CRCP, or Compte de Régulation des Charges et des Produits, corresponds to a compensation mechanism that allows for the adjustment of realized revenues toward authorized level. The tariff trajectory is corrected each year to match effective and authorized revenue. This enables recovery of revenues shortfall in the subsequent period (CRCP mechanism, tariff fluctuation within +2%/-2% plus French consumer price index).

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image
Incentives to accompany the energy transition

On top of RAB remuneration, the regulator sets out incentive mechanisms to encourage operators to actively manage controllable costs and thus improve their performance. These financial mechanisms result in symmetrical treatment, that is bonuses or penalties, depending on whether objectives are met (with the exception of power distribution penalties for length of connection). Across electricity and gas sectors, we believe those incentives require operators to effectively rationalize costs, but are reasonable and achievable. We also note that the quality of service of the French network is above average, with interruption periods that are among the lowest in the world.

  • Electricity transmission incentive mechanisms refer to operating and capital expenditure (opex and capex) containment measures, quality of service, and research and development (R&D) initiatives (total R&D spending envelope of €156 million for RTE to be spent over 2021-2024, +15% versus the current period)
  • For power distribution, the upcoming regulatory period maintains the current service quality incentives while including a penalty mechanism to encourage the reduction in connection time. CRE disclosed a public objective of a 30% reduction in connection time by 2024 from 2019 levels. R&D allowance for power distribution over the four-year period totals €227 million net of subsidies for the sole operator Enedis.
  • Gas incentives also include service quality, as well as opex and capex targets. Overall, these incentives are very marginal, since they correspond to only minimal incremental revenue. The ongoing regulatory period embeds R&D and innovation incentives primarily around biomethane, representing a total allowance of €124 million for transmission and €62 million for distribution over 2020-2023. Although increasing markedly since the previous regulatory period, these incentives remain lower than to R&D grants for electricity. Hydrogen and renewable gases are also part of the scope of R&D incentives (almost half of the envelope), with no precise targets. This fits France's energy roadmap for 2020-2035 (PPE - programmation pluriannuelle de l'Energie) that made it into law, with targets of injecting 6 terawatt hours (TWh) of biogas into gas grids by 2023 and 14TWh-22TWh by 2028. However, we note the discrepancy between ambitious hydrogen targets and the limited R&D incentives in the regulation until 2023.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Financial stability: Strong, based on full and timely cost recovery, but evolving toward more demanding operating performance and lower remuneration in gas

We assess both the electricity and gas operators' volatility of earnings throughout a regulatory period as low.

That said, for electricity, although the regulatory hedge is effective against volume and market volatility over several years, it can lag events by some time, mitigating the positive effects. RTE has historically experienced a relatively high amount of noncontrollable costs, especially compared with the gas transmission networks. This can create high volatility in earnings for a particular year, although over several years the impact is close to neutral.

The tariff for power transmission operator RTE in place from Aug. 1, 2021, remains very much aligned with the current remuneration formula, although it embeds an important reduction of the WACC to 4.6% from the current 6.125%. These lower returns will come at a peak time in the investment cycle, with increasing investments during the TURPE 6 period, and will put pressure on RTE to continuously improve efficiency in the context of the energy transition. CRE has validated RTE's long-term investment plan principles (SDDR, or Schema decennal de developpement du reseau), which requires about €33 billion over the next 15 years on top of €3 billion for ancillary investments (real-estate, IT, logistics). We thus expect investments needs to remain high for RTE, with an increase of its annual spending from about €1.5 billion in 2019 (up to €2.1 billion in 2022 and €2.35 billion in 2024). This corresponds to a 50% increase of investments on average in the upcoming regulatory periods from the current one. Those investments will help integrate increasing renewable energy sources, including offshore wind, and encompass large interconnection projects in 2024. We note that RTE has invested significantly over the past decade in the resilience of its network, notably to bury a large part of its lines to protect them from extreme weather conditions. All in all, we still view financial stability as strong for electricity transmission, with a strong projected increase in RAB allowing earnings' growth, despite lower WACC and manageable incentives.

Electricity distribution activities will be supported by the maintenance of a healthy return on investments and the significant increase of the RAB as a result of the digitalization of the network via Linky smart meters, with an estimated book value of about €3 billion by 2021 and remunerated at a 7.25% nominal pre-tax rate of return from 2022, plus additional incentives. Average annual Linky capex will amount to €226 million under next regulatory period, while it reached €742 million over 2017-2019. Excluding Linky, distribution RAB is increasing by about 2.3% each year due to maintenance and small expansion projects. This increase in the asset base will compensate for the remuneration of investments on the distribution grid (excluding Linky) falling to 4.8% from 6.5% currently. Enedis' earnings over the next four years will benefit from the positive CRCP balance (€588 million as at Jan. 1, 2021) and the contribution of the CRL Linky (see chart 4).

Regarding gas, the structure of the new tariffs is very much in line with that of previous periods and ensures predictability. The new regulatory parameters applied in 2020 maintain a fair but diminished level of remuneration for gas assets, while acknowledging higher uncertainties for the role of gas going forward, taking into consideration accelerated electrification and lower gas consumption by 2030. Lower rates of return for gas transmission, distribution, and LNG storage are primarily a reflection of lower interest rates and a decrease in the applied tax rate as an average over the regulatory period. It is partially compensated by higher asset beta, reflecting the higher risk of the gas sector than in the last period. CRE assesses the transmission gas network as adequately sized, with the end of large investments for the merging zones in France. Most new investments will come from innovation, including biomethane and hydrogen, but at a relatively small scale during the current regulatory period. In distribution, which represents a €15 billion RAB, investments in biomethane will partly compensate for the lack of expansion projects. For about €1,000 million of investments per year, 25% is dedicated to smart metering.

Regulator's independence: Strong owing to independent finances and annual board replacements

The French Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) is a body independent from the French government. It shows a very low level of political interference. There is a solid track record of stability of the regulator since 2001, with four-year regulatory periods and a well-defined regulatory framework with transparent conditions. The CRE's president is nominated for a six-year mandate by decree of the French president.

Appendix

image

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Claire Mauduit-Le Clercq, Paris + 33 14 420 7201;
claire.mauduit@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Pierre Georges, Paris + 33 14 420 6735;
pierre.georges@spglobal.com
Pauline Pasquier, Paris + 33 14 420 6771;
pauline.pasquier@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Federico Loreti, Paris + 33140752509;
federico.loreti@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in