Key Takeaways
- We consider the anticipation of unrestricted federal aid, representing 29% of fiscal 2022 gap mitigation measures, as the greatest risk to New York State's financial plan.
- S&P Global Ratings estimates the state's general fund receipt shortfall at 6.4% in fiscal 2021 and 12.4% in fiscal 2022 before gap-closing measures.
- Our view of the state's debt burden may worsen based on planned issuances and conversion of pay-as-you-go capital funding, in particular its capital commitment to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), to bond financing.
- The budget proposes continuing extraordinary budget authority, including the ability to issue short-term notes, enter into a line of credit, make across-the-board spending reductions, and suspend its Debt Reform Act another year.
As the State of New York (AA+/Negative) plans for fiscal 2022, it faces an uncertain economic recovery brought on by the pandemic that began nearly a year ago. The state's first confirmed COVID-19 case was reported on March 1, 2020, followed by the governor declaring a state of emergency less than a week later. Looking to recover from the social and economic consequences of the pandemic, the state faces multiple challenges to maintain structural balance.
S&P Global Ratings considers fiscal 2022 a bridge year for the state between the extreme uncertainty in fiscal 2021 and a potential return to social and economic normalcy in fiscal 2023. Decisions made to address this year's budget gap are likely to be consequential for the state's credit quality. In our opinion, the state has the budgetary management tools necessary to maintain structural balance, but practical and political limitations place its ability to do so at risk.
Proposed fiscal 2022 general fund disbursements total $74.7 billion, 3.5% less than those for fiscal 2021, while the total state operating funds budget remains flat at $102.2 billion. After accounting for an improved revenue forecast, the budget closes nearly half of its estimated $10.2 billion receipts shortfall with an expectation of new tax revenues and unrestricted federal aid. The state does not plan to use any of its rainy day or economic uncertainties reserves as part of its gap-mitigation plan, holding reserves flat at fiscal 2021 levels (approximately $4 billion, or 4.8% of proposed fiscal 2022 general fund disbursements).
Table 1
Potential Risks Of The New York State Governor’s 2022 Executive Budget Proposal | |
---|---|
Federal uncertainty | The budget relies on $3 billion of unrestricted federal aid with an ability to implement across-the-board spending cuts if aid does not materialize. Like last year’s plan, we see risk in the state’s ability to effectuate any expenditure cuts in a timely manner. |
Potential for deficit funding | The budget requests extending the state’s ability to issue short-term notes and a line of credit. While unlikely to be used, continuing this authority allows the state potential to fund current-year expenditures with debt proceeds. |
Significant increase in the state's debt burden | Suspending the state’s debt limits for another year and converting cash-funded capital to bond financing have the potential to significantly increase the state’s debt metrics because New York's economic growth will likely be slower than that of the nation. |
Prolonged economic disruption | Outside the timing of vaccine distributions, any long-term permanent changes in business, travel, or consumer patterns in and around New York City are likely to have a material effect on the state’s economic recovery. |
While early approval of several vaccines is a positive development, it is merely the first step. Equally critical is the widespread availability of effective immunization, which could come by mid-2021. Although signs of a recovery have begun to take hold across all states with the steadying of certain revenues, many headwinds will continue to bear down on near-term stability (see "Outlook For U.S. States: Symptoms Persist, But A Shot In The Arm Could Lead To Growth," published Jan. 5, 2021, on RatingsDirect).
Estimated General Fund Budget Gaps Exceed 10% Over The Financial Plan
Based on the updated financial plan released with the executive budget, S&P Global Ratings estimates New York State's general fund receipt shortfall at 6.4% in fiscal 2021 and 12.4% in fiscal 2022 before mitigation (see table 2). During the remaining fiscal years of the plan, we estimate the gap to be 12% or more. The state has outlined a number of proposals to mitigate its revenue shortfall, including raising new revenues, expenditure reductions, and using new federal resources.
Table 2
General Fund Budget Gap Projections Before Mitigation (Mil. $) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal year | ||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||
Midyear update surplus/(Gap) without cuts | (8,180) | (16,725) | (17,743) | (17,419) | (18,722) | |||||||
Improved tax receipts | 3,348 | 6,309 | 7,010 | 6,376 | 6,261 | |||||||
Other receipts | 60 | 215 | 209 | 208 | 206 | |||||||
Updated "base" budget gaps | (4,772) | (10,201) | (10,524) | (10,835) | (12,255) | |||||||
Estimated general fund dibursements | 74,747 | 81,960 | 87,398 | 89,805 | 93,315 | |||||||
"Base" budget gap as % of disbursements | (6.4) | (12.4) | (12.0) | (12.1) | (13.1) | |||||||
Sources: New York State Division of Budget FY 2022 Executive Budget Financial Plan; S&P Global Ratings. |
Unlike the 2021 enacted budget financial plan, the fiscal 2022 plan adds back approximately $8 billion in local assistance or aid-to-localities reductions. Through December 2020, withheld local aid payments are estimated to total $2.9 billion. However, increasing receipts and federal aid has reduced the need for these cuts and the Division of Budget expects to reduce most local aid payments by only 5% from the fiscal 2021 enacted budget estimate (rather than an anticipated 20%).
Improved Revenue Forecast Falls Short Of Balancing Budget
Since the midyear update, improved tax and other receipts reduced the fiscal 2022 gap by $6.5 billion (39%). The governor is also proposing to raise $2 billion in new income tax revenues per year that include:
- A temporary surcharge on taxable income above $5 million effective for tax years 2021 through 2023; and
- Pausing the phase-in of a middle-class tax cut, which began in 2018, by having the 2020 tax rates remain in effect for an additional year.
Chart 1
The improved revenue profile provides much-needed relief but is insufficient to address the state's budget gaps. Reductions in local aid spending are expected to provide savings of $2.2 billion in fiscal 2021 and $3.4 billion in fiscal 2022. School aid is the largest reduction, totaling $1.5 billion in 2022. However, the state's reduction to education aid mostly consists of cuts to its School Tax Relief (STAR) program and is offset by supplemental federal coronavirus relief aid. Further complicating the state's revenue receipts is a potential U.S. Supreme Court case that may direct remote worker income taxes to their state of residence from the physical location of their primary office (see "Massachusetts And New York State Could Lose Billions Of Income Tax Dollars If Lawsuit Challenging Remote Work Succeeds," Jan. 22, 2021).
In fiscal 2021, the state achieved $1.2 billion in Medicaid savings, primarily by reducing rates paid to managed and long-term care insurance carriers based on lower health care utilization. For fiscal 2022, approximately $599 million in savings is expected, mainly from across-the-board reductions and the use of available resources to support spending. Spending under the state's Medicaid Global Cap is expected to increase at the indexed rate. These savings are exclusive of federal support provided by the temporary enhanced Federal Matching Program (eFMAP). (For more information on how Medicaid affects states' budgets, see "Medicaid Diagnosis: U.S. States’ Growing Caseloads Come With Rising Costs," Dec. 8, 2020.)
Federal Support Increases Risks To Proposed Plan
The state benefited from $2.5 billion in Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) and $497 million from the eFMAP in fiscal 2021. For fiscal 2022, the financial plan assumes an additional $995 million in eFMAP funds based on an extension of the program through at least June 30, 2021. The savings is net of estimated increasing Medicaid enrollment and utilization. Further extensions of the eFMAP through the state's fiscal year will also provide additional budgetary relief.
Chart 2
Unlike the eFMAP already authorized, any unrestricted aid still needs Congressional approval. The financial plan assumes $3 billion of this type of aid in fiscal years 2022 and 2023. We view the inclusion of federal aid not yet approved as part of the financial plan as a significant risk to structural balance. If not authorized, the state will need to make further significant budgetary adjustments throughout the fiscal year.
For more detail on the project receipts shortfall and gap-mitigation measures, see the table in the appendix.
Proposal Extends Extraordinary Budget Authority Enacted Last Year
Recognizing the challenging fiscal environment and risk of depending on unrestricted federal aid, the budget proposal includes continuing extraordinary authority granted in fiscal 2021, summarized in table 3. Some expanded authority was never used, but nonetheless provides the state with contingencies to maintain balance as conditions change.
Table 3
Proposed Continuing Extraordinary Budget Authority | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Line of credit | Authorization for up to a $3 billion line of credit at one or more banks. The line of credit would be authorized for a three-year period (through fiscal 2024), and would allow draws in any year, subject to annual appropriation. | |||
Subordinate PIT notes | Authorization to issue up to $8 billion of short-term borrowing in the form of subordinate PIT revenue notes (or bond anticipation notes) during fiscal 2022. The state has $3.5 billion of subordinate notes outstanding maturing March 2021. | |||
Debt Reform Act | Continuation of the suspension of the Debt Reform Act for fiscal 2022 issuances for another year. Any state-supported debt issued in fiscal 2022 is not limited to capital purposes and is not counted toward the statutory caps on outstanding debt and debt service. In addition, fiscal 2022 issuances would not be limited by a maximum maturity (currently capped at 30 years by the Debt Reform Act). | |||
Automatic expenditure reductions | If unrestricted Federal aid is not approved by Aug. 31, 2021, or is approved at an amount less than the amount budgeted, a provision would trigger automatic across-the-board reductions to planned local assistance appropriations and cash disbursements equal to the difference between the Federal aid assumed in the Financial Plan and the amount approved. | |||
PIT--Personal income tax. Sources: New York State Division of Budget FY 2022 Executive Budget Financial Plan; S&P Global Ratings. |
This year, New York issued $4.5 billion of subordinated personal income tax (PIT) notes with the intent to repay them by fiscal year-end and entered into a credit commitment that was never used. Interest expense on the notes and the commitment fee on the credit facility are expected to be reimbursed with Federal aid provided by the CRF, as the financings are due solely to the Federal decision to extend tax filing deadlines in response to the pandemic. The line of credit was never drawn on.
We positively view continuing authority to make across-the-board expenditure cuts if federal aid is less than anticipated. However, we observed these expenditure cuts to be fraught with political uncertainty and most cuts were planned for the last quarter of the fiscal year. Continuing to prolong difficult budgetary decisions only exacerbates fiscal pressures that may result in structural imbalance.
Continued exclusion of debt issuances in fiscal 2022 from statutory limits and allowing maturities to exceed 30 years may negatively affect our view of the state's debt profile and management practices. While the state has some capacity to borrow under some of our debt metrics, its debt profile ranks among the 10 highest of all states in some categories (see "Moderating Debt Burdens Allow Some U.S. States Room To Borrow During A Recession," June 16, 2020).
Planned Debt Issuance May Pressure New York's Debt Profile
The state's Debt Reform Act applies to debt issued after April 1, 2000, and restricts the issuance of state-supported debt to funding capital purposes and limits the maximum term of bonds to 30 years. In addition, outstanding state-supported debt is limited to 4% of state personal income and new debt service costs to 5% of all funds' receipts. In our view, the Debt Reform Act serves as a guard against excessive debt issuance.
Proposed debt issues, coupled with weaker post-pandemic economic growth, have the potential to weaken our view of the state's debt profile. Possible state debt issuance in fiscal 2022 totals approximately $11.6 billion, or 57% higher than the $7.4 billion proposed in last year's enacted capital program and financing plan. The proposed capital program would more than double the amount of state debt excluded from the Reform Act to $23.9 billion in fiscal 2022. While not envisioned at this time, should the state borrow for annual operating expenses, it would likely negatively affect our view of its ability to achieve structural balance.
Chart 3
In the fiscal 2022 budget proposal, the state adds new bond-financed capital commitments of $2.7 billion over its five-year capital plan period. To help the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), it also proposes converting to bond financing its $10.3 billion contribution for the MTA's 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 capital plans that otherwise would have been made through additional local aid payments to the authority. In fiscal 2021, the state issued $2.8 billion of PIT bonds for MTA projects. For further savings, it is also proposing refunding bonds through either its PIT or sales tax security.
Federal stimulus was vital following the Great Recession to prevent steeper declines in capital spending (see "Infrastructure After COVID-19: Risk Of Another Lost Decade Of U.S. State Government Capital Investment," Oct. 29, 2020). An infrastructure package is expected to be proposed by the Biden Administration and any action at the Federal level may affect the state's future capital plans.
State's Economic Recovery Lags Nation's
According to the Division of Budget, New York lost 1.9 million private-sector jobs from March to April 2020 or 8.9% of the total number of private jobs lost nationwide. The state's unemployment rate peaked in July 2020 at 15.9%, while the country's rate gradually declined from a high of 14.7% in April. As of November 2020, the state's unemployment level was elevated at 8.4% compared with a national 6.7% rate.
The state's ability to quickly regain lost jobs was critical to its recovery following the Great Recession and allowed its economy to recover faster than the nation. Although several sectors are projected to see significant growth in 2021, employment in the leisure, hospitality, and other services sector is estimated by the state to be 18% below its 2019 level, even after growing nearly 15% in 2021. The only sector that is expected to surpass its 2019 level is the information sector, as firms like Google, Facebook, and Amazon expand their footprint in New York City.
Chart 4
A shift in work locations appears to be having an effect on regional recovery. Except for Buffalo, the areas that recovered the smallest percentage of their job losses are among the state's larger metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Data on jobs lost in March and April that have been regained as of November 2020 by major MSAs show New York City lagging while its closest suburbs--Long Island and the Orange-Rockland-Westchester area--are performing better.
Chart 5
Over the long term, any permanent changes in business, travel, or consumer patterns in and around New York City are likely to have a material effect on the state's economy. S&P Global Ratings is monitoring any changes in demographic patterns that may affect long-term credit quality, but only time will tell the extent to which office workers, tourists, and residents will return to the city.
Given the severity of the downturn, it will likely be years before the New York economy gets back to where it was before the pandemic hit. Real gross output in New York is expected to decline in 2020, worse than that of the nation, with much of the recovery expected in 2021 and beyond. In its most recent report, S&P Global Economics forecasts national real GDP will contract 3.9% this year and grow a modest 4.2% in 2021. Adding to the pain of the economic contraction is that the U.S. unemployment rate is unlikely to fall to its pre-crisis low until after 2023 (see, "Economic Research: Home for the Holidays," Dec. 2, 2020).
Appendix
New York State General Fund Surplus/(Gap) Projections | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal year | ||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||
General fund surplus/(Gap) projections and closing plan (Mil. $) | ||||||||||||
Midyear update surplus/(Gap) without cuts | (8,180) | (16,725) | (17,743) | (17,419) | (18,722) | |||||||
Improved tax receipts | 3,348 | 6,309 | 7,010 | 6,376 | 6,261 | |||||||
Other receipts | 60 | 215 | 209 | 208 | 206 | |||||||
Updated "base" budget gaps | (4,772) | (10,201) | (10,524) | (10,835) | (12,255) | |||||||
Estimated general fund dibursements | 74,747 | 81,960 | 87,398 | 89,805 | 93,315 | |||||||
"Base" budget gap as % of disbursements | (6.4) | (12.4) | (12.0) | (12.1) | (13.1) | |||||||
Executive budget closing plan | ||||||||||||
Local assistance* | ||||||||||||
School aid/Local district funding adj | 0 | 1,506 | 1,518 | 1,466 | 1,419 | |||||||
Medicaid | 1,230 | 599 | 351 | 297 | 136 | |||||||
All other | 991 | 1,265 | 880 | 997 | 928 | |||||||
Agency operations | 44 | 110 | (591) | 26 | 43 | |||||||
Debt service/Capital projects | 517 | 135 | 139 | (297) | (245) | |||||||
New revenues | ||||||||||||
PIT high-income surcharge | 0 | 1,537 | 1,404 | 1,195 | 367 | |||||||
PIT middle-class tax cut one-year pause | 0 | 394 | 403 | 445 | 464 | |||||||
All other | 17 | 60 | 348 | 513 | 542 | |||||||
Federal resources | ||||||||||||
Coronavirus Relief Fund | 2,476 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Medicaid FMAP | 497 | 995 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
FEMA reimbursement | (1,000) | 600 | 200 | 200 | 0 | |||||||
Unrestricted Federal aid | 0 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Executive budget gaps | 0 | 0 | (2,872) | (5,993) | (8,601) | |||||||
Remaining gap as a % of disbursements | 0.0 | 0.0 | (3.3) | (6.7) | (9.2) | |||||||
* Includes savings from reductions outside the general fund that are achieved through the transfer of balances. PIT--Personal income tax. Sources: New York State Division of Budget FY 2022 Executive Budget Financial Plan; S&P Global Ratings. and/(or) increase in revenues made available by spending reductions. |
Related Research
- Outlook For U.S. States: Symptoms Persist, But A Shot In The Arm Could Lead To Growth, Jan. 5, 2021
- Massachusetts And New York State Could Lose Billions Of Income Tax Dollars If Lawsuit Challenging Remote Work Succeeds, Jan. 22, 2021
- Medicaid Diagnosis: U.S. States’ Growing Caseloads Come With Rising Costs, Dec. 8, 2020
- Economic Research: Home for the Holidays, Dec. 2, 2020
- Infrastructure After COVID-19: Risk Of Another Lost Decade Of U.S. State Government Capital Investment, Oct. 29, 2020
- Moderating Debt Burdens Allow Some U.S. States Room To Borrow During A Recession, June 16, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Timothy W Little, New York + 1 (212) 438 7999; timothy.little@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | David G Hitchcock, New York + 1 (212) 438 2022; david.hitchcock@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.