Key Takeaways
- The German residential real estate market is proving highly resilient to the COVID-19 shock as investors seek safe havens.
- Transaction volumes are likely to exceed those of 2019, rents rose by 2.6% on average in the first nine months of 2020, while occupancy and rent collection remained stable and high as undersupply of homes persists.
- The market is still highly fragmented, but is on a consolidation trend as residential landlords seek growth through M&A and real estate development.
- In these favorable conditions, residential REITs that we rate have good headroom under their credit metrics and stable prospects.
Multifamily Assets Likely To Break Records In 2020
Fears that the COVID-19 pandemic could damage price developments for German multifamily properties were short-lived. It swiftly became clear that the ongoing lack of alternative investment options, the tremendous amount of capital liquidity, and the European Central Bank's expansive fiscal policies would combine to benefit the residential and multifamily real estate market, driving prices up further. Prime yields in the top seven cities--Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, and Stuttgart--reached a historical low of about 2.5% over the first nine months of this year. Investors are not just focusing on returns; they are also seeking a safe haven. They allocated about 60% of total investment volumes to these seven locations in the first nine months of this year, according to Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), a real estate services company.
Residential investments are leading the German real estate transaction market. Over 130,000 apartments changed ownership in the first nine months of 2020, a total volume of €16.6 billion, compared to €14.5 billion in the same period of 2019, JLL says (see charts 1 and 2). Residential transaction volumes in 2020 are therefore very likely to exceed those of 2019, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, which has dragged down investments in most other property segments significantly. Notably, the largest transaction this year is the takeover of Adler Real Estate AG by Berlin-focused ADO Properties S.A. (now renamed Adler Group S.A.), making it the fourth-largest listed German residential property owner with a portfolio of almost €9 billion. Also notable was Sweden-based Heimstaden Bostad AB's expansion into Germany through the acquisition of about 4,000 units in Berlin for approximately €830 million. Despite the Berlin rent freeze implemented in February this year, the German capital remains an attractive focus for investors.
Chart 1
Chart 2
The Pandemic Has Not Dented Rents And Valuations
Measures to contain the pandemic have taken a significant toll on certain real-estate segments, such as hotels and retail. But residential properties have proved relatively crisis-resilient over the past few months and have weathered the pandemic-induced economic shock largely unscathed. Our rated real estate investment trusts (REITs) with exposure to the German residential market reported an average 2.6% like-for-like rental growth year on year as of Sept. 30, 2020, compared to 4.2% at year-end 2019 (see chart 3). The slower rise is mainly attributable to landlords with larger exposure to Berlin, where new regulation capping rent levels ("Mietendeckel") came into force in February 2020. Occupancy remained broadly stable, at an average rate of 95% as of Sept. 30, 2020, in line with pre-COVID-19 levels (see chart 4). Rent collection rates have also remained unchanged, at 97%-98%.
We believe this resilient operating performance reflects the segment's high degree of asset and tenant diversification, as well as the government's swift reaction to the crisis by dipping into its fiscal, monetary, and regulatory toolkits. The German income protection scheme ("Kurzarbeitergeld") has relieved immediate financial pressure on tenants' creditworthiness and thus prevented a sudden deterioration in rent collection rates. That said, the ultimate effect of the pandemic on unemployment rates and household income will only become visible once income protection schemes and other government support measures are phased out.
Market fundamentals remain extremely favorable for German residential REITs. Structural undersupply, as well as strong demand, persist in most metropolitan areas, and housing construction activity has further slowed as a result of the pandemic. New construction is currently lagging behind the German government's annual target to build 375,000 apartments. While only a few REITs undertook mid-year property revaluations in 2020, we expect positive like-for-like revaluations averaging 2%-4% for the full year for our rated REITs. In its third-quarter interim results, Berlin-based Deutsche Wohnen SE recently announced an expected property portfolio valuation of +6% for 2020.
Chart 3
Chart 4
The Regulated Affordable Segment Proves The Most Resilient
While most European residential real estate companies proved relatively resilient during the pandemic, regulated residential market occupancy levels and rent collection rates have fared better than unregulated markets on average. Regulated rents--which limit a landlord's ability to increase rent levels, usually set by the respective national governments of a country--tend to be about 10%-15% below market rents. They also benefit from downside protection in a market environment in which rents are declining. Most residential REITs that we rate focus on affordable housing, with an average apartment size of 60-65 square meters--the segment with largest demand. During the pandemic, metropolitan cities with unregulated rents performed more weakly than metropolitan markets with regulated rents. Landlords, such as U.K.-based Grainger PLC or Finnish SATO Oyj, have experienced more volatility in occupancy and rent collection rates, which dropped a few percent during the second quarter of this year. Conversely, landlords operating in regulated markets, such as Sweden and Germany, have remained nearly untouched by the COVID-19 shock.
Furthermore, in Germany we are not seeing a strong exodus from metropolitan areas to more rural or suburban areas in response to remote working, like in New York, San Francisco, Boston, or Los Angeles (see "Residential REITs: Why Renters Are Flocking To Suburban Markets," published Oct. 7, 2020). This is likely because German metropolitan cities, with the exception of Berlin, tend to have smaller populations (around one million inhabitants or fewer), shorter commuting times, and more affordable rents than in many European metropolitan areas. In Berlin, the average rent per square meter per month at the end of 2019 was €9.1 compared to €27 in central London or €28.3 in Paris, according to Deloitte Residential Property Index 2020.
Chart 5
Consolidation Is Likely To Continue, Along With Higher Development Activity
Germany's real estate market is still highly fragmented, but is on a consolidation trend that we think is likely to continue. The fact that German residential REITs' share prices are still trading at or below their net asset value (NAV) is making mergers and acquisitions attractive, given the positive fundamentals of their underlying assets (see "Bearish Equity Market Sentiment Adds To European Real Estate Companies' Credit Risks," published Oct. 9, 2020). The largest listed residential landlord, Vonovia SE, which owns over 300,000 apartments in Germany, has a market share of less than 5%. The takeover this year of Adler Real Estate by Adler Group (previously ADO Properties) created the fourth-largest listed residential landlord in Germany, after Vonovia, Deutsche Wohnen, and LEG Immobilien AG (LEG). A merger between TAG Immobilien AG and LEG failed earlier this year. Most listed residential property companies' shares continue trading at a discount to NAV. We believe this keeps further consolidation opportunities open.
Nevertheless, the lack of external growth opportunities in the market has expanded companies' own interest in property development. The largest transaction was Adler Group's takeover of Consus Real Estate AG. It currently holds about 64% of Consus' share capital. Consus targets an annual completion of about 1,500-2,000 units and has a total gross development pipeline of about €8 billion. Vonovia targets the completion of around 2,000 units this year (total development pipeline of about 49,000 units), after the takeover of Rhine-Main based residential developer Bien Ries AG.
For the first nine months, Vonovia reported that new construction contributed about 0.6% of its total 3.6% like-for-like rental growth year on year. Deutsche Wohnen took over Munich-based developer Isaria Wohnbau AG and acquired a 40% stake in Quarterback Immobilien AG during 2020, increasing its total development pipeline to over €5 billion. Deutsche Wohnen expects to add about 9,000 units to its own portfolio by 2030.
We view exposure to development activities as increasing the risk for a REIT's creditworthiness, given that profits from development activities are more volatile than rental income. However, we understand that most landlords plan to keep development activities limited to less than 15% of total reported EBITDA.
Chart 6
Risks Of Political And Legislative Rent Intervention
Rent regulation has been in place in Germany for several decades. Since the rental market started booming after the financial crisis in 2008--rents in Berlin have doubled over the past 10 years, for example--social and political tensions over rent affordability have flared. This has translated into protests and demonstrations in recent years, often targeting the largest listed residential landlords. In 2015, the government implemented restrictions on rents on new lettings and introduced the rent brake ("Mietpreisbremse"), tightening possible rent increases further in rent-tense cities. This year, it adjusted the time horizon for comparable rents to six years from four years previously ("Mietspiegelanpassung"). And in February this year, Berlin implemented a rent freeze ("Mietendeckel").
While previous tightening of rent regulation had only little impact on the respective markets, the Berlin rent freeze has had an adverse impact on residential landlords in Berlin. Like-for-like rental growth has dampened for Deutsche Wohnen to a reported 0.9% in third-quarter 2020 versus 3.4% for the full-year 2019). Similarly, Adler Group (previously ADO Properties) reported 1.9% like-for-like rental growth in Berlin in third-quarter 2020 versus 5% for the full-year 2019.
Landlords have stopped investing in their Berlin properties, which is likely to lead to a deterioration of asset quality over the medium-to-long term if the trend continues. That said, the strong fundamentals of the Berlin rental market have not changed, and a structural shortage of housing remains. Indeed, according to the Statistical Office Berlin-Brandenburg, building permits for new apartments in the German capital declined by 7% in 2019, when the intention to introduce a Berlin rent freeze was announced. In 2019, building permits stood at 22,500 versus 24,200 in 2018. For the first nine months of 2020, permits reached just 15,400. On the other hand, apartment completions in Berlin have increased steadily over the past 10 years: nearly 19,000 were completed in 2019 versus about 4,300 in 2010.
The Berlin law is facing legal challenges and is under review by the German federal court. However, we understand that a judicial decision is not expected before mid-2021. Independently of the outcome, we believe social pressure, and therefore a further tightening of rent regulation, remains a risk in Germany's metropolitan regions. This could harm landlords' like-for-like rental growth prospects. We believe the gap between demand and supply will remain significant in most metropolitan cities across Germany, putting pressure on rents and prices in the long term. In 2018, the German government announced that it would build 1.5 million apartments during the current legislative period (approximately 375,000 per year), but so far it has failed to reach this target (see chart 7).
Chart 7
Resilient Credit Prospects For Rated REITs
The strength of the German residential real estate market bodes well for rated residential REITs. Overall, we maintain a stable outlook for the majority of them. Most entered the year with solid balance sheets and sufficient liquidity buffers, often backed by committed revolving credit facilities. For 2020, we forecast that our adjusted ratio of debt to debt plus equity will increase on average by about 400 basis points (see chart 8), mainly on the back of growth and a conservative assumption of flat valuations. In addition, we expect EBITDA interest coverage ratios to remain solidly at their current levels or even increase slightly (see chart 9). High rent collection rates and low vacancies, combined with an ongoing low interest rate environment, should support stable and predictable cash flows over the medium term.
Moreover, while rent regulation remains a relevant topic, we see this risk as having a negligible impact on German residential REITs' financial performance over the near term. Reflecting the strong resilience of the businesses of residential property owners, most sizable companies have strong business risk profiles. We have recently reassessed the business risk profile of the largest listed German and European residential owner Vonovia to excellent to reflect little operational interference from COVID-19 and its strong track record of market leadership and strategy execution with a focus on the regulated residential real estate markets. (See "German Residential Landlord Vonovia SE Affirmed At 'BBB+/A-2'; Outlook Stable," published July 22, 2020.)
Chart 8
Chart 9
Table 1
Real Estate Companies With Exposure To The German Market | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Rating | Exposure to German residential properties (% of portfolio value) | Brief description | |||||
Adler Group S.A. (previously ADO Properties) |
BB/Stable/B | 100% | Adler Group S.A. is the fourth-largest listed German residential player, with about €8 billion of investment properties by fair value as of September 2020. It holds over 70,000 units. Its largest exposure is in Berlin, with about 49% of total yielding properties. The company is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. | |||||
Adler Real Estate AG |
BB/Stable/-- | 100% | Adler Real Estate AG is part of the Adler Group S.A. At the end of September 2020, Adler's portfolio comprised over 50,000 units, with a focus on residential and a small number of commercial units, mostly in Northern and Western Germany. The fair value of its portfolio amounts to around €5.3 billion. | |||||
Akelius Residential Property AB |
BBB/Stable/A-2 | 33% | Akelius is a privately owned Sweden-based real estate company focusing on holding residential assets. As of Sept. 30, 2020, the company's portfolio comprised about €11.9 billion of properties and 44,100 residential units located in 12 metropolitan cities in North America (31%), Scandinavia (25%), and other European countries (44%). The company's ultimate owner is Akelius Foundation. | |||||
Blackstone Property Partners Europe Holdings S.a r.l. |
BBB/Stable/-- | 17% | BPPEH is a wholly owned subsidiary of Blackstone Property Partners Europe, an open-ended, core plus fund managed by Blackstone Group Inc. (A+/Stable/--). The company has a gross asset value of €6.2 billion as of June 30, 2020, across the logistics, residential, and office sectors, primarily in Western European countries. | |||||
Covivio |
BBB+/Stable/A-2 | 23% | Covivio is one of the key players in the European real estate market and had a total consolidated portfolio worth about €24 billion on Dec. 31, 2019. We analyze Covivio on a proportionate consolidated basis. The company's group share portfolio of about €16 billion mainly comprises €9 billion of office assets, principally in France and Italy (€11 billion consolidated), €4 billion of residential assets in Germany (€4 billion consolidated), and €2.5 billion of hotel assets across Europe (€6.5 billion consolidated). | |||||
Deutsche Wohnen SE |
A-/Negative/A-2 | 100% | Deutsche Wohnen is one of the largest publicly listed residential property companies in Germany. As of Sept. 30, 2020, its portfolio comprises 162,706 residential and 2,953 commercial units, as well as approximately 10,500 beds and apartments for assisted living for a total fair value of about €24.9 billion. Approximately 71.2% of its residential property portfolio is located in Greater Berlin. The company is listed on the German stock exchange (DAX). | |||||
Grand City Properties S.A. |
BBB+/Stable/A-2 | 83% | GCP is a Luxembourg-incorporated property investment company focusing on owning and managing properties, mainly in the German residential real estate market. Recently, the company has expanded its footprint to London, which now represents 17% of its portfolio value. As of Sept. 30, 2020, its total portfolio value amounts about €7.9 billion, consisting of 63,223 units. The company is listed on the German stock exchange (MDAX). | |||||
Heimstaden Bostad AB |
BBB-/Positive/-- | 2% | Heimstaden is a Sweden-incorporated private real estate company investing in residential properties across Sweden (33% of portfolio value as of November 2020), Denmark (27%), the Netherlands (17%), Norway (12%), the Czech Republic (10%), and Germany (2%). As of Sept. 30, 2020, the company's portfolio comprises over 100,000 homes worth about Swedish krona (SEK) 139 billion (about €13.5 billion). The company is 52% owned (voting rights) by Heimstaden AB, 39% by Alecta, 6% by Folksam, 2% by Ericsson, and 1% by Sandvik. | |||||
Peach Property Group AG* |
B+/Stable/-- | 98% | PPG is a Switzerland-based real estate company focused on long-term German residential properties. PPG's current portfolio is worth about Swiss franc (CHF) 2 billion, and its assets are typically located in secondary cities in commuting distance of larger metropolitan areas, such as Kaiserslautern, Gelsenkirchen/Gladbeck, and Oberhausen. PPG is listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange. | |||||
Vonovia SE |
BBB+/Stable/A-2 | 81%* | Vonovia is the leading listed residential real estate holding company in Germany, and the second-largest listed real estate landlord by portfolio size in Europe. As of Sept. 30, 2020, its portfolio is worth about €54 billion, and comprises over 400,000 owned residential units in Germany, Sweden, and Austria. The company is listed on the German stock index (DAX). | |||||
*As a percentage of total rental income. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Nicole Reinhardt, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9303; nicole.reinhardt@spglobal.com |
Franck Delage, Paris + 33 14 420 6778; franck.delage@spglobal.com | |
Sophie Nehrer, Frankfurt; sophie.nehrer@spglobal.com | |
Additional Contact: | Industrial Ratings Europe; Corporate_Admin_London@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.