Key Takeaways
- The number of U.S. corporate downgrades fell by 74% in the third quarter to 107, its lowest level since fourth-quarter 2018.
- The U.S. corporate upgrade tally rose to 43 in the quarter, matching third-quarter 2019's total, as economic growth rebounded.
- Downgrade risk as measured by negative bias (the percentage of issuer credit ratings with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch with negative implications) for U.S. speculative-grade companies fell by 5 percentage points to 47%.
- Weakness persists at the lowest rating levels as we expect the recovery for many sectors to last into 2023: Companies rated 'B-' and lower accounted for 53% of downgrades in the quarter, and companies rated 'CCC+' and below have a negative bias of 89%.
After hitting a record high in the second quarter of 2020, the number of U.S. corporate downgrades fell in the third quarter to its lowest level since fourth-quarter 2018. S&P Global Ratings lowered 107 U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings in the third quarter--74% fewer downgrades than in the second quarter--as upgrades nearly doubled to 43. Downgrades abruptly slowed and upgrades increased as U.S. GDP rebounded in the third quarter.
Chart 1
Negative Bias Declined As Economic Growth Rebounded
Downgrade potential began to dip in the third quarter for speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) companies after reaching a record high in the second quarter. Credit conditions turned less negative for companies as consumer spending held up better than expected after earlier fiscal stimulus. S&P Global economists predict U.S. GDP grew at an annualized rate of 29.5% in the third quarter, taking an abrupt turn from a 31.4% contraction in the second quarter.
The negative bias (which measures downgrade potential as the percentage of issuer credit ratings with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch with negative implications) for speculative-grade companies fell to 47% on Sept. 30, 2020, from 52% at the end of June.
Meanwhile, the negative bias for investment-grade (rated 'BBB-' or higher) companies held nearly unchanged at 26% (see charts 2 and 3). The overall negative bias (including both investment- and speculative-grade) fell by 3 percentage points to 41%.
Chart 2
Chart 3
The share of speculative-grade companies with ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications fell by more than half to near 3% in the third quarter, as downgrade risk continues to shift from the near term into the intermediate term (see chart 4). A rating on CreditWatch indicates a 1-in-2 chance of a rating change within the next 90 days, while a negative outlook indicates a 1-in-3 chance of downgrade within up to two years for investment-grade companies and generally up to one year for speculative-grade companies.
Chart 4
Lower-rated companies remain at highest risk of downgrades
While the negative bias declined for speculative-grade companies, their downgrade potential remains elevated. The risk is highest for the lowest-rated issuers, and we believe many sectors will not recover their pre-COVID-19 credit metrics until 2022 or, in some cases, 2023. With their weaker credit metrics, lower-rated entities are not as well positioned to weather a business, financial, or economic shock as higher-rated peers. The lowest rating level, 'CCC'/'C', has the highest negative bias, at 89%, followed by 'B+' with a negative bias of 45% and 'B-' with a negative bias of 44% (see chart 5).
Chart 5
With consumer spending proving resilient and GDP growth rebounding in the third quarter, the negative bias declined by 1 percentage point or more in 12 of 18 U.S. sectors (see chart 6).
Chart 6
The oil and gas sector now has the highest negative bias, at 69%, following a 12 percentage point decrease in the third quarter. S&P Global Ratings recently revised its West Texas Intermediate assumption for the remainder of 2020 to $35 per barrel from $25 (the 2021 assumption is unchanged at $45) and cut its assumption for 2022 to $45 from $50. While this change supports credit quality in the near term, these price assumptions are below the average break-even prices (near $50) for U.S. shale. As prices remain below break-even, weaker-rated companies, particularly those with large exposure to oil, remain vulnerable to negative rating actions. More than two-fifths of all rated companies in the sector are rated 'B-' or lower, and more distressed exchanges and bankruptcies are likely over the next year.
Although the negative bias for the automotive sector declined by 17 percentage points in the quarter, it remains elevated at 66% (see chart 7). The negative bias fell as U.S. light vehicle sales grew for four consecutive months through August. However, amid questions about the sustainability of recent demand, we expect sales to remain below 2019 levels through 2022. S&P Global Ratings currently forecasts U.S. light vehicle sales will decline 21% year over year to 13.3 million units in 2020. Speculative-grade auto suppliers have experienced the most credit deterioration in the sector.
The media and entertainment sector had the third-highest negative bias at the end of the third quarter, at 61%, down 3 percentage points since the end of the second quarter. S&P Global Ratings doesn't expect a recovery for out-of-home entertainment issuers from the leisure, live events, and movie exhibitor subsectors in the near term, given consumers may not return to venues until a vaccine is widely available. Even when credit metrics do recover, media and entertainment companies may remain at risk to negative rating actions, as existing secular pressures worsened because of the pandemic. With near 40% of all rated issuers in the sector rated 'B-' or lower, more negative rating actions are likely, especially if the economic recovery slows.
Chart 7
Only high tech shows a negative bias below its long-term average
One way we examine downgrade propensity is by comparing the current negative bias with the historical average. The number of sectors with above-average negative bias fell to 17 in the third quarter after all 18 sectors had above-average negative bias at the end of the second quarter. Currently, only the high technology sector displays a negative bias below its long-term average, as credit quality in this sector has held up relatively well amid the pandemic. In particular, rated companies in the services, hardware, and semiconductors subsectors have performed better than expected.
Chart 8
The sectors with current negative biases that are highest above their historical averages are oil and gas and autos (see chart 9).
We use a similar approach to gauge upgrade potential, comparing the current positive bias (the proportion of issuer credit ratings with positive outlooks or on CreditWatch with positive implications) of a sector with its long-term average. As we saw in the second quarter, no sectors currently show above-average upgrade potential (see chart 10).
Chart 9
Chart 10
Downgrades Fell By 74% In The Third Quarter As Upgrades Nearly Doubled
U.S. corporate downgrades totaled 107 in the third quarter, a decline of 74% from the second quarter. Upgrades nearly doubled in the quarter to 43, the highest number since third-quarter 2019 (which also had 43 upgrades). Nonfinancial corporate issuers accounted for 102 downgrades and 39 upgrades. Financial services issuers had just five downgrades during the quarter and nearly as many upgrades (with four) (see chart 11).
Chart 11
Speculative-grade downgrades declined by 75% in the quarter, falling to 95, their lowest level since fourth-quarter 2018. Investment-grade downgrades fell to 12 in the quarter, matching the number from third-quarter 2019 (see chart 12).
The number of speculative-grade upgrades rose in the quarter to 40, reaching its highest level since second-quarter 2019. The number of investment-grade upgrades was unchanged at three (see chart 13).
Chart 12
Chart 13
Table 1
Third-Quarter 2020 U.S. Corporate Ratings Statistics | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Investment grade | Speculative grade | Financial | Nonfinancial | ||||||||
Downgrades (issuer count) | 107 | 12 | 95 | 5 | 102 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. US$) | 449.5 | 273.7 | 175.8 | 234.4 | 215.1 | |||||||
Upgrades (issuer count) | 43 | 3 | 40 | 4 | 39 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. US$) | 126.6 | 9.3 | 117.3 | 2.9 | 123.6 | |||||||
Total rating actions | 150 | 15 | 135 | 9 | 141 | |||||||
Downgrade ratio | 71.3% | 80.0% | 70.4% | 55.6% | 72.3% | |||||||
Historical average | 63.9% | 59.9% | 64.9% | 54.6% | 64.9% | |||||||
High, quarter | 95% 2020Q2 | 92% 2020Q2 | 95% 2020Q2 | 100% 2000Q3 | 95% 2020Q2 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 30% 1997Q3 | 21% 2012Q2 | 25% 1997Q3 | 9% 1996Q3 | 30% 1997Q3 | |||||||
Negative bias | 41% | 26% | 47% | 30% | 43% | |||||||
Historical average | 22% | 16% | 26% | 18% | 22% | |||||||
High, quarter | 44% 2020Q2 | 28% 2009Q3 | 52% 2020Q2 | 45% 2009Q3 | 46% 2020Q2 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 11% 2013Q4 | 9% 2013Q4 | 12% 2014Q2 | 4% 1996Q1 | 11% 2014Q2 | |||||||
Positive bias | 3% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 3% | |||||||
Historical average | 9% | 7% | 11% | 8% | 10% | |||||||
High, quarter | 17% 1996Q3 | 14% 1997Q4 | 23% 1996Q2 | 17% 2006Q1 | 17% 1996Q2 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 2% 2020Q2 | 1% 2020Q2 | 2% 2020Q2 | 2% 2020Q3 | 2% 2020Q2 | |||||||
Historical average from 1995Q1-2020Q3. See tables 4 and 5 for details. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt. Data as of Sept. 30, 2020, Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Downgrades Were Concentrated At The Lowest Ratings
Downgrades were increasingly concentrated among companies at the lowest rating levels in the third quarter. About 53% of downgrades were of issuers rated 'B-' and lower, up from 39% in the second quarter. Most of these downgrades were of companies rated 'CCC+' and lower, which have the weakest credit metrics and have been less resilient to the rapid deterioration of business and economic conditions.
Meanwhile, 47% of upgrades were also from issuers rated 'B-' and lower. Many of these upgrades reflected better-than-expected financial performance or improved refinancing prospects or liquidity (see chart 14).
Chart 14
Media And Entertainment And Consumer Products Led Downgrades
The media and entertainment sector had the highest number of downgrades for a third consecutive quarter, with 21, down from 80 in the second quarter. All of the third-quarter downgrades from this sector were of speculative-grade companies. Most rating actions in the sector have been concentrated among the travel, leisure, local media, live events, and movie exhibitor subsectors.
The consumer products sector had the second-highest number of downgrades, with 18, all of speculative-grade companies. Upgrades in the sector rose to six (from two in the second quarter). While consumer staples have experienced an increase in demand, which has been a modest credit positive, discretionary subsectors face material declines in sales and profits, and credit metrics will likely take two to three years to recover to 2019 levels. Downgrades in the third quarter were concentrated among issuers within the apparel, food service, and cosmetics subsectors. More negative rating actions in each sector are likely amid tighter financing conditions for weaker-rated issuers, but there are signs that credit deterioration might have peaked.
Downgrades in the oil and gas sector fell to 12 in the third quarter from 48 in the previous quarter. All of these downgrades were of speculative-grade issuers.
The utility sector had the fourth-highest number of downgrades in the quarter, with 11. These downgrades were largely of speculative-grade midstream companies, for which lower commodity prices have affected the creditworthiness of their upstream counterparties.
Although the financial institutions sector had a relatively low number of downgrades, with three, it had the most debt affected by downgrades in the quarter. The downgrade of Wells Fargo & Co. to 'BBB+' from 'A-' accounted for nearly all downgraded debt in the financial institutions sector in the quarter. Wells' overall creditworthiness has declined given the company's ongoing regulatory challenges and preprovision earnings pressures amid the economic downturn.
Chart 15
Table 2
U.S. Rating Actions By Sector (Third-Quarter 2020) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Number-- | --Mil. US$-- | --Totals-- | ||||||||||||
Up | Down | Up | Down | Number | Mil. US$ | |||||||||
Aerospace/defense | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1,284.0 | 12,057.0 | 5.0 | 13,341.0 | ||||||||
Automotive | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5,998.0 | 2,431.0 | 3.0 | 8,429.0 | ||||||||
Capital goods | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2,099.0 | 942.0 | 4.0 | 3,041.0 | ||||||||
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | 2.0 | 4.0 | 1,625.0 | 4,675.0 | 6.0 | 6,300.0 | ||||||||
Consumer products | 6.0 | 18.0 | 5,945.0 | 33,412.0 | 24.0 | 39,357.0 | ||||||||
Financial institutions | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2,500.0 | 225,204.0 | 5.0 | 227,704.0 | ||||||||
Forest products and building materials | 1.0 | 3.0 | 445.0 | 1,130.0 | 4.0 | 1,575.0 | ||||||||
Health care | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8,664.0 | 9,950.0 | 3.0 | 18,614.0 | ||||||||
High technology | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8,615.0 | 13,940.0 | 13.0 | 22,555.0 | ||||||||
Homebuilders/real estate companies | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 17,693.0 | 3.0 | 17,693.0 | ||||||||
Insurance | 2.0 | 2.0 | 420.0 | 9,166.0 | 4.0 | 9,586.0 | ||||||||
Media and entertainment | 3.0 | 21.0 | 26,769.0 | 56,928.0 | 24.0 | 83,697.0 | ||||||||
Metals, mining, and steel | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 4,800.0 | 6.0 | 4,800.0 | ||||||||
Oil and gas | 1.0 | 12.0 | 1,950.0 | 24,291.0 | 13.0 | 26,241.0 | ||||||||
Retail/restaurants | 6.0 | 2.0 | 4,962.0 | 4,939.0 | 8.0 | 9,901.0 | ||||||||
Telecommunications | 2.0 | 2.0 | 22,350.0 | 1,959.0 | 4.0 | 24,309.0 | ||||||||
Transportation | 2.0 | 5.0 | 2,040.0 | 5,460.0 | 7.0 | 7,500.0 | ||||||||
Utilities | 3.0 | 11.0 | 30,885.0 | 20,514.0 | 14.0 | 51,399.0 | ||||||||
Total | 43.0 | 107.0 | 126,551.0 | 449,491.0 | 150.0 | 576,042.0 | ||||||||
Media and entertainment includes leisure. Utility sector includes midstream companies. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt. Data as of Sept. 30, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Fewer Fallen Angels In The Third Quarter
Fallen angels (issuers downgraded to speculative grade from investment grade) totaled three in the third quarter, down from six in the second quarter. These were aerospace company Howmet Aerospace Inc., fashion retailer Nordstrom Inc., and natural gas pipeline operator Southeast Supply Header LLC.
There was one rising star (an issuer upgraded to investment grade from speculative grade) in the quarter: Mediacom Communications Corp.
Table 3
2016Q1-2020Q3 S&P Global Ratings Trends: U.S. Corporates | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defaulted issuers | Weakest links | Fallen angels | Rising stars | Potential downgrades | Potential upgrades | |||||||||
2016Q1 | 30 | 165 | 9 | 6 | 315 | 141 | ||||||||
2016Q2 | 32 | 187 | 4 | 4 | 339 | 150 | ||||||||
2016Q3 | 25 | 179 | 5 | 5 | 324 | 156 | ||||||||
2016Q4 | 18 | 178 | 4 | 4 | 320 | 143 | ||||||||
2017Q1 | 17 | 169 | 5 | 0 | 290 | 158 | ||||||||
2017Q2 | 23 | 154 | 0 | 9 | 301 | 152 | ||||||||
2017Q3 | 9 | 156 | 2 | 5 | 294 | 166 | ||||||||
2017Q4 | 15 | 147 | 6 | 3 | 294 | 176 | ||||||||
2018Q1 | 18 | 138 | 1 | 5 | 284 | 184 | ||||||||
2018Q2 | 14 | 144 | 5 | 4 | 294 | 190 | ||||||||
2018Q3 | 3 | 145 | 4 | 5 | 301 | 197 | ||||||||
2018Q4 | 12 | 145 | 6 | 2 | 301 | 182 | ||||||||
2019Q1 | 21 | 151 | 4 | 1 | 308 | 166 | ||||||||
2019Q2 | 23 | 168 | 2 | 2 | 314 | 153 | ||||||||
2019Q3 | 13 | 179 | 3 | 2 | 320 | 138 | ||||||||
2019Q4 | 20 | 196 | 4 | 7 | 349 | 126 | ||||||||
2020Q1 | 21 | 319 | 13 | 1 | 571 | 93 | ||||||||
2020Q2 | 62 | 431 | 6 | 1 | 775 | 41 | ||||||||
2020Q3 | 37 | 391 | 3 | 1 | 724 | 59 | ||||||||
Data as of Sept. 30, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Defaults Remain Elevated
The default tally fell to 37 in the third quarter from 62 in the second. Despite the decline, defaults remained considerably higher than in third-quarter 2019 (when 13 companies defaulted). Through Sept. 30, U.S. corporate defaults in 2020 totaled 120, more than double the number over the same period last year.
Even as defaults remain elevated, the number of issuers at greatest risk of default declined in the third quarter. The number of weakest links (issuers rated 'B-' or lower with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch negative) fell to 391 during the quarter from 431 at the end of the second quarter. Still, the number of weakest links is twice as high as in third-quarter 2019. The elevated number supports our view that the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate will continue to climb, reaching 12.5% in June 2021.
Table 4
U.S. Corporate Upgrades (Third-Quarter 2020) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Country | To | From | Date | Sector | |||||||
Alion Science and Technology Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 7/10/2020 | Aerospace/defense | |||||||
MHI Holdings LLC | U.S. | B+ | B | 9/2/2020 | Aerospace/defense | |||||||
Tesla Inc. | U.S. | B+ | B- | 7/28/2020 | Automotive | |||||||
Big Ass Fans LLC |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 9/30/2020 | Capital goods | |||||||
LTI Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 8/31/2020 | Capital goods | |||||||
ASP Emerald Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 7/29/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
Zinc-Polymer Parent Holdings LLC | U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 9/29/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
Badger Finance LLC (Badger Intermediate Holdings LLC) | U.S. | B- | CCC | 9/11/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
CHG PPC Intermediate II LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 9/24/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
GoodRx Inc. | U.S. | B+ | B | 8/28/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Kronos Acquisition Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 7/21/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Utz Brands Holdings LLC (Utz Brands Inc.) | U.S. | B | B- | 8/31/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Vista Outdoor Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 8/20/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Finial Holdings Inc. (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) | U.S. | BBB+ | BBB | 9/25/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
FS Energy and Power Fund |
U.S. | B | B- | 7/23/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
Legg Mason Inc. |
U.S. | A | BBB | 7/31/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
Sabre Industries Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 9/25/2020 | Forest products and building materials | |||||||
Avantor Funding Inc. (Avantor Inc.) | U.S. | BB- | B+ | 8/6/2020 | Health care | |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. |
U.S. | BB+ | BB | 8/20/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Dynatrace Inc. | U.S. | BB- | B | 8/21/2020 | High technology | |||||||
II-VI Inc. |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 7/2/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Lattice Semiconductor Corp. |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 9/17/2020 | High technology | |||||||
ON Semiconductor Corp. |
U.S. | BB+ | BB | 8/17/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Unisys Corp. |
U.S. | B | B- | 7/13/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Vungle Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 8/14/2020 | High technology | |||||||
APCO Super Holdco LP |
U.S. | B | B- | 9/4/2020 | Insurance | |||||||
Activision Blizzard Inc. |
U.S. | A- | BBB+ | 7/24/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (The) | U.S. | B+ | B- | 7/9/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Netflix Inc | U.S. | BB | BB- | 7/28/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Comstock Resources Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 9/24/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
At Home Group Inc. |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 8/13/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
BI-LO LLC (BI-LO Holding Finance LLC) | U.S. | B | B- | 8/14/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
Fresh Market Inc. (The) | U.S. | CCC+ | CCC | 7/9/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
Ingles Markets Inc. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 8/19/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
New Academy Holding Co. LLC |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 9/25/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
PHD Group Holdings LLC |
U.S. | CCC+ | CCC | 8/19/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
Iridium Communications Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 8/13/2020 | Telecommunications | |||||||
Mediacom Communications Corp. |
U.S. | BBB | BB+ | 8/21/2020 | Telecommunications | |||||||
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 7/1/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
YRC Worldwide Inc. |
U.S. | CCC+ | CCC | 7/9/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
Calpine Corp. (Volt Parent L.P.) | U.S. | BB- | B+ | 9/28/2020 | Utility | |||||||
ExGen Renewables IV LLC (Exelon Corp.) | U.S. | B+ | B | 7/16/2020 | Utility | |||||||
NRG Energy Inc. |
U.S. | BB+ | BB | 7/24/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Rating changes exclude sovereigns and entities with no rated debt. Data as of June 30, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Table 5
U.S. Corporate Downgrades (Third-Quarter 2020) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Country | To | From | Date | Sector | |||||||
Howmet Aerospace Inc. | U.S. | BB+ | BBB- | 9/9/2020 | Aerospace/defense | |||||||
Spirit AeroSystems Inc. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 8/3/2020 | Aerospace/defense | |||||||
Wesco Aircraft Holdings Inc. (Wolverine Intermediate Holding Corp.) | U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 8/19/2020 | Aerospace/defense | |||||||
Garrett Motion Inc. |
U.S. | B | BB- | 9/4/2020 | Automotive | |||||||
Wabash National Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 9/10/2020 | Automotive | |||||||
MAI Holdings Inc. | U.S. | SD | CCC- | 9/9/2020 | Capital goods | |||||||
MTS Systems Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 7/16/2020 | Capital goods | |||||||
LSB Industries Inc. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 7/31/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
Momentive Performance Materials Inc. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 7/23/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
SK Blue Holdings L.P. | Cayman Islands | B- | B | 7/15/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
US Ecology Inc. |
U.S. | BB- | BB | 7/2/2020 | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | |||||||
361 Degrees International Ltd. |
Cayman Islands | B- | B+ | 8/31/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
ARAMARK Holdings Corp. | U.S. | BB- | BB | 8/17/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Ascena Retail Group Inc. |
U.S. | D | CCC- | 7/23/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Boardriders Inc. |
U.S. | SD | CCC+ | 9/4/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
CB Poly Investments LLC | U.S. | SD | B- | 7/28/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Coty Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 7/7/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Jill Acquisition LLC (Jill Holdings LLC) | U.S. | CC | CCC- | 9/1/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
KC Culinarte Holdings LP |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 9/3/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
KCIBT Holdings LP |
U.S. | SD | CCC+ | 8/24/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Oak Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B- | B | 8/25/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Output Services Group Inc. | U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 9/22/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Premier Brands Group Holdings LLC |
U.S. | SD | B- | 9/4/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Renfro Corp. |
U.S. | SD | CCC- | 7/20/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Revlon Inc. |
U.S. | CC | CCC- | 7/28/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Tailored Brands Inc. |
U.S. | D | CCC+ | 7/2/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
TMK Hawk Parent Corp. | U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 9/10/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Tupperware Brands Corp. |
U.S. | SD | CC | 7/10/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
US Foods Inc. |
U.S. | BB- | BB | 9/8/2020 | Consumer products | |||||||
Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC | U.S. | B+ | BB- | 7/15/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. | U.S. | BBB+ | A | 8/10/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 7/22/2020 | Financial institutions | |||||||
Northwest Hardwoods Inc. |
U.S. | SD | CCC- | 8/21/2020 | Forest products and building materials | |||||||
Omnimax International Inc. | U.S. | D | CCC- | 8/19/2020 | Forest products and building materials | |||||||
Tensar Corp. (The) | U.S. | CCC | B- | 8/24/2020 | Forest products and building materials | |||||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc. | U.S. | BB | BB+ | 8/5/2020 | Health care | |||||||
Pioneer UK Midco 1 Ltd. | U.S. | B- | B | 9/24/2020 | Health care | |||||||
DXC Technology Co. | U.S. | BBB- | BBB | 7/2/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Electronics for Imaging Inc. | U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 7/2/2020 | High technology | |||||||
GlobalLogic Holdings Ltd. | U.S. | B | B+ | 8/5/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Omnitracs Holdings LLC | U.S. | B- | B | 9/10/2020 | High technology | |||||||
SuperMoose Newco Inc. | U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 9/17/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Xerox Holdings Corp. | U.S. | BB | BB+ | 8/3/2020 | High technology | |||||||
Boston Properties Inc. |
U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 8/3/2020 | Homebuilders/real estate companies | |||||||
Service Properties Trust |
U.S. | BB- | BB | 8/26/2020 | Homebuilders/real estate companies | |||||||
Washington Prime Group Inc. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 8/24/2020 | Homebuilders/real estate companies | |||||||
Doctors Co. an Interinsurance Exchange |
U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 8/17/2020 | Insurance | |||||||
Jackson National Life Insurance Co. (Prudential PLC) | U.S. | A | A+ | 8/11/2020 | Insurance | |||||||
Affinity Gaming |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 7/17/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | SD | CC | 8/3/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
AVSC Holding Corp. |
U.S. | CCC- | CCC | 9/3/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Bioplan USA Inc. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 7/10/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Carlson Travel Inc |
U.S. | CC | CCC | 7/10/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Cedar Fair L.P. |
U.S. | B- | B+ | 9/30/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Cengage Learning Holdings II Inc. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 9/4/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Cinemark Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 8/10/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 7/21/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Hornblower HoldCo LLC |
U.S. | CCC- | CCC+ | 7/29/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
IAC/InterActiveCorp | U.S. | BB | BB+ | 8/12/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Lakeland Holdings LLC | U.S. | CCC- | CCC+ | 7/16/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 9/2/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
McGraw-Hill Education Inc. | U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 9/4/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
NCL Corp. Ltd. |
Bermuda | B+ | BB- | 8/12/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. |
U.S. | B+ | BB | 8/31/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 7/28/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Sabre Corp. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 8/20/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Six Flags Entertainment Corp. |
U.S. | B- | B+ | 9/30/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Town Sports International Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | SD | CC | 8/26/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Travel Leaders Group LLC |
U.S. | CCC | B- | 7/17/2020 | Media and entertainment | |||||||
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | U.S. | B+ | BB- | 9/14/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Arch Resources Inc. | U.S. | B | B+ | 8/12/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Hi- Crush Inc. |
U.S. | D | CC | 7/13/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Hi- Crush Inc. |
U.S. | CC | CCC+ | 7/2/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Peabody Energy Corp. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 7/10/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Peabody Energy Corp. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B | 8/14/2020 | Metals, mining, and steel | |||||||
Ascent Resources Utica Holdings LLC |
U.S. | CC | CCC+ | 9/11/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Bruin E&P Partners LLC | U.S. | D | CC | 7/17/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
California Resources Corp. | U.S. | D | CC | 7/1/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Chaparral Energy Inc. | U.S. | D | CCC- | 7/16/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Denbury Resources Inc. | U.S. | D | CCC+ | 7/2/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Forum Energy Technologies Inc. | U.S. | CC | CCC- | 7/7/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Forum Energy Technologies Inc. | U.S. | SD | CC | 8/4/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
FTS International Inc. |
U.S. | CC | CCC- | 8/25/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
FTS International Inc. |
U.S. | D | CC | 9/23/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Oasis Petroleum Inc. |
U.S. | CCC- | CCC+ | 7/2/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Oasis Petroleum Inc. |
U.S. | D | CCC- | 9/18/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
UTEX Industries Inc. | U.S. | D | CCC | 8/10/2020 | Oil and gas | |||||||
Nordstrom Inc. |
U.S. | BB+ | BBB- | 9/3/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
Party City Holdings Inc. (PC Nextco Holdings LLC) | U.S. | SD | CC | 7/27/2020 | Retail/restaurants | |||||||
Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. |
U.S. | D | CCC- | 7/22/2020 | Telecommunications | |||||||
IPC Corp. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 9/30/2020 | Telecommunications | |||||||
eHi Car Services Ltd. |
Cayman Islands | B | B+ | 8/23/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
SIRVA Inc. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 8/25/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
The Pasha Group |
U.S. | B- | B | 9/23/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
United Airlines Holdings, Inc |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 7/9/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
Voyager Aviation Holdings LLC |
U.S. | CCC+ | B | 7/22/2020 | Transportation | |||||||
Commonwealth Edison Co. (Exelon Corp.) | U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 7/21/2020 | Utility | |||||||
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd. (ENN Investment Holdings Co. Ltd.,) | Cayman Islands | BBB | BBB+ | 9/7/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Epic Crude Services L.P. (EPIC Midstream Holdings L.P.) | U.S. | B- | B | 9/17/2020 | Utility | |||||||
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. (GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd.) | Bermuda | CCC- | CCC | 9/14/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. |
U.S. | CC | CCC- | 7/10/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. |
U.S. | SD | CC | 8/14/2020 | Utility | |||||||
PSEG Power LLC (Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.) | U.S. | BBB | BBB+ | 8/5/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Southeast Supply Header LLC |
U.S. | BB+ | BBB- | 9/22/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Summit Midstream Partners L.P. | U.S. | CC | CCC | 9/2/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Summit Midstream Partners L.P. | U.S. | SD | CC | 9/25/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Third Coast Midstream LLC | U.S. | B- | B | 8/18/2020 | Utility | |||||||
Rating changes exclude sovereign and entities with no rated debt. Data as of Sept. 30, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
S&P Global Ratings acknowledges a high degree of uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic. The current consensus among health experts is that COVID-19 will remain a threat until a vaccine or effective treatment becomes widely available, which could be around mid-2021. We are using this assumption in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.
Related Research
- COVID-19 Impact: Key Takeaways From Our Articles, Oct. 7, 2020
- COVID-19 Heat Map: Updated Sector Views Show Diverging Recoveries, Sept. 29, 2020
- Credit Conditions North America: Potholes On The Road To Recovery, Sept. 29, 2020
- 'BBB' Pulse: Potential Fallen Angels Remain Stable In August, With Five Outlook Revisions To Stable And Just One Downgrade, Sept. 28, 2020
- Global Auto Sales Forecasts: Hopes Pinned On China, Sept. 17, 2020
- The Gap Between Market Expectations And Credit-Based Indications Of U.S. Defaults Is Growing, Aug. 27, 2020
- Credit FAQ: How S&P Global Ratings Factored Counterparty Risk Into Recent Midstream Energy Rating Actions, Aug. 26, 2020
- COVID-19 Battered Global Consumer Discretionary Sectors But Lifted Staples; Recovery Varies By Subsector, Aug. 4, 2020
- U.S. Corporate Downgrades Rise To A New High In Second-Quarter 2020, July 15, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Ratings Performance Analytics: | Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York (1) 212-438-1698; nick.kraemer@spglobal.com |
Evan M Gunter, New York (1) 212-438-6412; evan.gunter@spglobal.com | |
Jon Palmer, CFA, New York; jon.palmer@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributor: | Lyndon Fernandes, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.