articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/200403-servicer-evaluation-spotlight-reportt-u-s-commercial-mortgage-servicers-preparing-for-impact-from-covid-19-11423041 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Servicer Evaluation Spotlight Report™: U.S. Commercial Mortgage Servicers Preparing For Impact From COVID-19

COMMENTS

European And U.K. Credit Card ABS Index Report Q3 2024

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: November 2024 Performance

COMMENTS

China Structured Finance Outlook 2025: A Few Sectors Take Off Amid Overall Stagnant Issuance


Servicer Evaluation Spotlight Report™: U.S. Commercial Mortgage Servicers Preparing For Impact From COVID-19

S&P Global Ratings recently surveyed its ranked U.S. commercial mortgage servicers, all of whom have indicated they have successfully deployed their disaster recovery and business continuity plans in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We view this industrywide accomplishment positively, although we recognize that all commercial mortgage servicers are now drinking from the proverbial firehose. While we are not taking any coronavirus-related ranking actions at this time amongst the U.S. commercial mortgage servicers' we rank, we believe significant operating challenges and bottlenecks lie ahead that will place strains on servicers' resources, including:

  • Massive requests for forbearance or other forms of borrower relief;
  • Increase in servicer advancing requirements; and
  • Acceleration of delinquencies and defaults.

We discuss each of these concerns and how servicers are preparing for them below.

Massive Requests For Forbearance Or Other Forms Of Borrower Relief

We expect all servicers will need to take a triaged approach in responding to an accelerating number of borrower requests. With the pandemic catching everyone by surprise, it is unlikely any of them planned for a massive influx in borrower request activity over such a compressed time frame, particularly following an extended period of expanding economic prosperity. Borrowers faced with payment difficulties following the onset of the pandemic are likely to span all property types across the U.S. From our conversations with market participants, lodging and retail appear to be property types requesting the most relief in the private-label commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market at this time. This is unsurprising since many hotels and retail stores have faced temporary forced closure due to shelter-in-place orders and other major restrictions on travel.

Despite this worsening situation, we have observed the CMBS servicing community continuing to work collaboratively with open communications among master and special servicers related to these borrower-relief requests. Furthermore, the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council trade organization published "A CMBS Borrower's Quick Guide for Communicating with Your Servicer in Cases of Need," on March 31, 2020, a resource to help borrowers open the line of communication with their servicers and to maintain transparency regarding interruptions to cash flow as a result of COVID-19.

Nonetheless, the idiosyncratic nature of the CMBS market presents unique challenges to effect borrower relief, which may be exacerbated because CMBS transaction documents are not always consistently interpreted and investor interests may not be aligned. As a result, we expect the majority of these borrower requests will require careful and case-by-case review by servicers. While a standard forbearance agreement similar to the ones offered by the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) may be suitable in many instances (see below), we nonetheless anticipate the need for more varied solutions across servicers and property types will be required.

For servicers who focus on GSE product, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have each offered their own coronavirus forbearance program to borrowers that are modeled off other successful natural disaster relief programs they have recently provided, including for hurricanes and wildfires. Their standardization of these forbearance agreements should somewhat alleviate the challenges that exist in the private-label CMBS market, where specific pooling and servicing agreements (PSAs) govern servicer behavior, although these documents are not always clear. Nonetheless, the potential massive and national scale of the GSE forbearance programs far exceed what servicers have dealt with during prior regional disasters.

To the extent possible, we believe servicers will try to execute forbearance arrangements without a transfer to a special servicer and thus avoid additional fees to investors. For example, we are aware of one CMBS servicer who is attempting to take a programmatic approach across its portfolio in a fashion similar to the GSE forbearance agreement. However, in many cases, that may prove to be impractical, and our communications with servicers suggest that many forms of requested relief will require loans to ultimately be transferred to a special servicer, to among other factors, comply with REMIC rules.

To that end, in our discussions with another CMBS special servicer, we learned that it has prepared standard forbearance agreements for borrowers that are unable to pay their mortgage due to the pandemic. While some individual special servicers may be able to accomplish this to some degree, such a uniform approach would be unprecedented for the CMBS industry as a whole as each situation is different and varied remedies may be necessary.

Increase In Servicer Advancing Requirements

Within the CMBS market and Freddie Mac K-deal, the three major master servicers will face an increase in advancing requirements with an anticipated acceleration in the volume of loans receiving forbearance of principal and interest payments. These large servicers, Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Servicing, Midland Loan Services, and Keybank Real Estate Capital, are either divisions or subsidiaries of Wells Fargo (see "Wells Fargo & Co.," published Oct. 29, 2019), PNC (see "The PNC Financial Services Group Inc.," published Dec. 17, 2019), and KeyCorp (see "KeyCorp," published Aug. 9, 2019), respectively, all of which are well-capitalized banks. In addition, all three of these servicing institutions maintain strong policies and tight control regarding advancing decisions, and all successfully navigated their advancing responsibilities during the Great Recession. We do note, however, that CMBS "2.0" is now awash in an abundance of pari passu loans scattered in many single-asset/single-borrower (SASB) and conduit deals, which adds the potential for an additional layer of complexity in advancing and may require extra coordination among servicers to determine who is the responsible party. We believe that the A-1 controlling note certificate servicer, typically in the SASB deal or initial conduit transaction, would be in the driving seat for advancing decisions.

Alternatively, Fannie Mae's delegated underwriting servicers (DUS), some of which may not be as well capitalized as the aforementioned master servicers, are typically required to advance unpaid principal and interest payments to investors. However, at present, it is unclear if the DUS servicers will remain obligated to advance for those loans subject to the COVID-19 forbearance relief program. To the extent that external liquidity from Fannie Mae or another government-supported program does not become available to aid DUS servicers, we expect some of these servicers may face a liquidity challenge.

Acceleration Of Delinquencies And Defaults

While forbearance may work for borrowers in the short run, with more than 10 million Americans newly unemployed and the U.S. economy in recession (see "It's Game Over For The Record U.S. Run; The Timing Of A Restart Remains Uncertain," published March 27, 2020), the default rate will certainly accelerate significantly in the near term. We have observed that many special servicers downsized their special servicing staff during 2019 in concert with significant resolution activity and shrinking portfolios remaining to be resolved. We also note that there are new entrants to the special servicing industry, which, while staffed with industry veterans, have not had their platforms tested yet. Furthermore, we are aware of controlling class certificateholders in certain SASB CMBS transactions seeking to replace the special servicers existing in these transactions, often with their own special servicing affiliates, many of which operate ranked servicers that have not been active in the CMBS market in recent years.

We believe that all servicers will need to add and/or redeploy resources to manage an increased workload for at least the next several months and likely longer, as it may take time to work out many of these problem loans. With many companies currently operating primarily or even completely away from their primary offices, this will be an increased challenge to successfully interview, hire, and onboard qualified personnel. It may also be difficult to find sufficient available resources, as all active servicers are likely to be increasing their staffing. Further, management, oversight, and training of newly hired staff working from a remote location, particularly if done in volume, poses even greater challenges.

For loans that face credit issues that are not solvable via forbearance and are transferred to the special servicer due to imminent default, or those that reach a 60-day delinquency trigger, we expect social distancing measures, if still in effect, will present challenges for properties to be inspected appropriately and/or from appraisals being conducted. Each of these services are typically required to be performed by special servicers (or their vendors) within defined time periods under PSAs and before completing any loan modification.

Notwithstanding the challenges of performing these services in a timely manner, an appraiser's ability to value commercial real estate in the new market environment is a potential industry concern that existed during the Great Recession, particularly since valuations underpin advancing and modification decisions.

S&P Global Ratings Research

  • It's Game Over For The Record U.S. Run; The Timing Of A Restart Remains Uncertain, March 27, 2020
  • The PNC Financial Services Group Inc., Dec. 17, 2019
  • Wells Fargo & Co., Oct. 29, 2019
  • KeyCorp, Aug. 9, 2019

Other Research

  • A CMBS Borrower's Quick Guide for Communicating with Your Servicer in Cases of Need. crefc.org, March 31, 2020, http://cmbs.informz.net/z/cjUucD9taT03ODcwMjU4JnA9MSZ1PTg0MzE1MzQ3OSZsaT02NDQyNzExOQ/index.html)

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Servicer Analysts:Steven Altman, New York (1) 212-438-5042;
steven.altman@spglobal.com
Paul L Kirby, New York (1) 212-438-1365;
paul.kirby@spglobal.com
Geoffrey C Danek, Centennial (1) 303-721-4689;
Geoffrey.Danek@spglobal.com
Marilyn D Cline, Farmers Branch (1) 972-367-3339;
marilyn.cline@spglobal.com
Analytical Manager, Servicer Evaluations:Robert J Radziul, New York (1) 212-438-1051;
robert.radziul@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in