articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/191121-dutch-covered-bond-market-insights-2019-11081731 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Dutch Covered Bond Market Insights 2019

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: Second Party Opinions

COMMENTS

An Overview Of India's Residential Mortgage And RMBS Market

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: CLO Insights 2025 U.S. BSL Index: Tariffs And Impact On BSL CLO Obligors; Downgrades Across Widely Held Issuers Nudge 'CCC' Buckets Upward

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Hybrid Capital Innovations Affect Our View Of Equity Content


Dutch Covered Bond Market Insights 2019

In its Covered Bond Market Insights reports, S&P Global Ratings presents the local covered bond market, explains how the relevant legal framework works, provides an overview on the local mortgage market, compares key characteristics of the existing programs, and presents the results of a scenario analysis. In this report, we review the Dutch covered bond market. In our view, favorable credit conditions, stable ratings and outlooks on most issuers, and a strong sovereign will continue to support ratings stability for Dutch covered bonds in the medium term.

Overview: An Established But Dynamic Covered Bond Market

The Dutch covered bond regulatory framework was introduced 11 years ago, although Dutch covered bonds had been issued for years before that using the structured model. The covered bond market comprises 10 residential mortgage-backed programs from nine issuers, representing over €87 billion of outstanding issuance.

Although the market is expanding, with an increasing share of global issuances and some innovative structuring, it faces a number of challenges--some widely shared by the covered bond market, some more specific to the Dutch economy.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Eurozone monetary stance will stay loose

Following the European Central Bank's announcement of its new expansionary package, we expect rates to remain low at least until 2023. The ECB resuming net asset purchases of €20 billion a month from November 2019, plus reinvesting €183 billion of maturing debt over the next nine months, should keep covered bond yields close to historical lows.

European covered bond framework under implementation

The European Parliament approved in September the final version of the directive and regulation on the harmonization of covered bonds. Following the publication of the directive and regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union, which we expect before year-end, national authorities have 18 months to transpose it into their national legislation and an additional 12 months to apply the new rules. The alignment of the Dutch legislative framework with the European Banking Authority's best practices is high (see "Harmonization Accomplished: A New European Covered Bond Framework," published April 18, 2019).

Macroprudential measures have not prevented house prices from rising further

We expect house prices in the Netherlands to grow 6.5% this year and 5.5% in 2020. This marks a deceleration from 9.1% in 2018, as worsening affordability and weaker growth weighs on the market. Macroeconomic measures including reduced loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and mortgage interest tax deductibility are expected to sooth demand for housing, which is still high on the back of a stable real economy, low unemployment rate, and favorable financing conditions (see "Europe's Housing Markets Lose Speed As The Economy Weakens," Sept. 24, 2019).

The Legal Framework: Light Regulation Leaves Space For Innovation

Legal framework

The first Dutch covered bonds were structured products entirely defined by documentation. Since 2008, a framework inscribed in the Financial Supervision Act has regulated Dutch covered bond issuance. The framework was further amended in 2014, when it received the status of law, and in 2015.

Bondholders have a dual recourse to receive payments on their debt: they have unlimited recourse to the issuing bank but also recourse to the cover pool assets if the issuer becomes insolvent. The framework stipulates a clear segregation of the cover pool assets for the bondholders' benefit, who have a senior claim to them. This is achieved by a transfer of the assets from the issuing bank to a bankruptcy-remote covered bond company (CBC).

Chart 3

image

Table 1

Legal Framework Comparison
Netherlands Germany France France U.K.
Product Dutch registered covered bond program Pfandbriefe Obligations à l'Habitat (OH) Obligations Foncières (OF) Regulated covered bonds (RCB)
Legislation Financial Supervision Act as amended in 2014 and subsequent amendments PfandbriefAct (Pfandbriefgesetz - PfandBG) from May 22, 2005, amended in 2009, 2010, 2013, 2014, and 2015 Article L. 515-34 and seq. of the French Monetary and Financial Code The articles L.513-2 to L.513-27 and R.513-1 and seq. of the French Monetary and Financial Code Regulated covered bond regulations 2008 and subsequent amendments
Issuer Universal credit institution with a special license Universal credit institution with a special license Specialized credit institution Specialized credit institution Universal credit institution with a special license
Owner of the cover assets SPE (guarantor of the covered bonds) Issuer Credit institution (pledged to the issuer and transferred upon trigger event) Issuer or credit institution (pledged to the issuer and transferred upon trigger event) SPE (guarantor of the covered bonds)
Cover asset type Public sector assets, mortgage loans, ship loans, credit institutions Public sector assets, mortgage loans, ship loans, aircraft loans, credit institutions Mortgage loans, securitizations Public sector assets, mortgage loans, securitizations, credit institutions Public sector entities, mortgage loans
Mortgage cover asset location EEA (currently domestic only) EEA, Switzerland, U.S., Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, Singapore EEA (currently domestic only) EEA EEA, Switzerland, U.S., Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, Channel Islands, Isle of Man
Residential mortgage cover assets LTV limit 80% 60% 80% Residential: 80%; state-guaranteed loans: 100% Residential: 80% LTV under the CRD; program documents on Regulated Covered Bonds currently a 75% LTV limit
Primary method for mitigating market risk Derivatives "Natural" hedging stress testing "Natural" hedging stress testing Derivatives Derivatives
Mandatory overcollateralization 5% nominal 2% NPV 5% nominal 5% nominal 8% nominal
SPE--Special-purpose entity. EEA--European Economic Area. NPV--Net present value. LTV--Loan to value. Source: European Covered Bond Council, S&P Global Ratings.
Set-off risk

The Dutch mortgage market contains a number of products that raise specific set-off issues upon issuer insolvency. These products, known as savings mortgages ("Spaarhypotheek"), insurance mortgages ("Verzekeringshypotheek"), and investment mortgages ("Beleggingshypotheek"), are designed to take advantage of a tax asymmetry that allows the borrower to obtain a cheaper effective rate of interest on his or her mortgage loan. In effect, the borrower, instead of repaying principal to the lender (the bank), invests in a savings product provided by an insurance company (the insurer). The return on this investment is tax free (as are interest payments) and is used to repay the mortgage loan.

Therefore, following the insolvency of the issuer, there is a potential set-off risk pertaining to deposits maintained by borrowers with the issuer (whose loan has been included in the cover pool). This risk can be mitigated by the coverage tests or additional overcollateralization.

Conditional pass-through covered bonds as an innovative structure

Conditional pass-through covered bonds have been particularly popular in the Netherlands given the very high proportion of interest-only loans in Dutch pools: these increase any potential refinancing costs dramatically in case of a liquidity gap. As conditional pass-through covered bonds structurally eliminate refinancing risk--the risk that the pool administrator is forced to liquidate the assets to repay a maturing bond--we delink the rating on a covered bond from the rating on the issuing bank when the covered bond's overcollateralization is legally or contractually committed. This allows lower-rated issuers to access a 'AAA'-dominated market.

Despite the prevalence of conditional pass-through covered bond programs in the Dutch covered bond market, other maturity structures, such as hard and soft bullet structures, are also present.

As our analysis of covered bond programs starts with the assumption of the issuer's default on day one, we typically model in our cash flows a switch to the pass-through mode and the extension of the bonds to their legal final maturity date. Our rating therefore addresses the timely payment of interest and of principal on the legal final maturity date, and not on the scheduled maturity.

Coverage tests

Issuers typically commit to a minimum level of overcollateralization via contractual asset coverage tests (including the amortization test).

These tests are designed to not only ensure a minimum ratio of cover pool assets for covered bonds, but they also serve to enhance the credit quality of the assets in the portfolio. This is because the tests exclude certain mortgage loans from the amount eligible and therefore create an incentive for issuers to remove them from the cover pool. Non-eligible loans can include mortgages subject to set-off risk or impaired assets, among others.

Table 2

Dutch Covered Bond Programs--Overview
Program Long-term issuer credit rating Covered bond rating Outstanding covered bonds (mil. €) Program type Collateral type Link to surveillance report Link to transaction update
AEGON Bank N.V. A+/Negative/A-1+ AAA 2,250 CPT 100% residential AEGON Bank N.V. TU Aegon Bank N.V.
ING Bank N.V. A+/Stable/A-1 AAA/stable 21,289 Soft and hard bullet 100% residential ING Bank N.V. TU ING Bank N.V.
ING Bank N.V. Soft Bullet A+/Stable/A-1 AAA/stable 9,500 Soft bullet 100% residential ING Bank N.V. Soft Bullet TU ING Bank N.V. SB
Nationale-Nederlanden Bank N.V. A-/Stable/A-1 AAA 2,595 CPT 100% residential NN Bank N.V. TU NN Bank N.V.
NIBC Bank N.V. BBB+/Stable/A-2 AAA 3,000 CPT 100% residential NIBC Bank N.V. TU NIBC Bank N.V.
Van Lanschot N.V. BBB+/Stable/A-2 AAA 1,500 CPT 100% residential Van Lanschot N.V. TU Van Lanschot N.V.
CPT--Conditional pass-through.

Mortgage Market Overview: Slower Price Gains Expected

A thriving economy

Over the past several years, the Dutch economy has expanded at a faster pace, and the unemployment rate has trended lower than the eurozone average. We expect to see this trend continue in the medium term as well. Key risks to the country's economy stem from the external environment including the U.K.'s exit from the EU (Brexit), the slowdown in global growth, and escalating trade tensions.

Table 3

Economic Indicators
Year Real GDP growth (%) Unemployment rate (%) HPI change (%)
2018 2.5 3.8 9.1
2019f 1.7 3.4 6.5
2020f 1.3 3.4 5.5
2021f 1.5 3.5 4.6
2022f 1.5 3.4 4.0
Source: S&P Global Ratings. HPI--House price index.

Chart 4

image

Price rises slow on worsening affordability and weaker growth

Solid economic growth, a buoyant labor market, negative real interest rates, and sluggish supply mean house prices have continued to rise strongly. Therefore, housing has become increasingly hard to afford with a price-to-rent ratio at 24% and price-to-income ratio at 28% above their long-term averages, respectively. We expect that stretched affordability together with macroprudential measures will cool the housing market. A deceleration in transactions since mid-2017 underpins this assumption.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Dutch cover pool

Even though the Dutch covered bond legislation contemplates public loans, commercial mortgages, and shipping loans, currently all existing programs comprise residential mortgage-backed covered bonds.

The Dutch mortgage market is characterized by high LTV ratios and a large proportion of interest-only loans. This has resulted in the Netherlands having one of the highest household debt ratios compared to other European economies: 239% of the net disposable income as of 2018, based on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development data.

Since 2013, newly originated mortgages need to amortize to benefit from tax deductibility, and banks are encouraging households to amortize interest-only mortgages contracted previously. As a result, the share of various amortizing structures (linear mortgage loans, annuity mortgages) are gaining popularity in the market.

Also, the maximum LTV ratio has been reduced in incremental steps to 100% by 2018 from 120% in the early 2000s. The majority of the outstanding mortgages pay a fixed interest rate for a period ranging from five to 15 years. At the end of the fixed-rate period, the interest rate typically resets to a new fixed rate.

The homeownership rate in the Netherlands (68%) is comparable with other Western European countries (66% on average) and is lower than in most Eastern and Southern European economies (81% on average). We expect the Netherlands' residential mortgage market to stay stable at around its current level in the medium term despite macroprudential measures that discourage investment into real estate.

High social benefit support

The Dutch social security system is one of the most comprehensive in Europe, encompassing sick leave, unemployment benefits, disability benefits, maternity leave, child support, and pensions. As such, it provides a safety cushion for borrowers if personal circumstances change or if the economy takes a downturn. In particular, employees are entitled to unemployment benefits in the Netherlands if they partially or completely lose their jobs, resulting in more stable collateral performance for residential pools throughout economic cycles.

Tax incentive for mortgages

The structure of the long-standing generous tax-relief system for residential mortgages has largely influenced the profile of the Dutch mortgage market (mortgage interest payments have long been fully tax-deductible for up to 30 years). This explains the long maturities and still-dominant share of interest-only loans because there was no incentive to repay principal. Since 2013 and for newly originated mortgages, only amortizing loans are eligible for the interest-rate tax deductibility, leading to a new origination profile comprising mostly annuity loans. Further, the interest deductibility on mortgages is being gradually reduced to 37% by 2023 from the current 49%.

NHG guarantee

Owner-occupier borrowers can apply, subject to strict conditions and limitations, to a Nationale Hypotheek Garantie (NHG) from the Homeownership Guarantee Fund (Waarborgfonds Eigen Woningen; WEW), which is an independent institution that has fallback agreements with the Dutch government and municipalities. The guarantee covers the major part of the losses remaining to a lender at the end of the foreclosure process on a defaulted mortgage loan. It will be effective only if certain conditions are met so that the WEW will not necessarily cover NHG-guaranteed loans if the borrower defaults.

We equate the creditworthiness of the WEW to that of the Dutch sovereign and give credit to the NHG guarantee in our loss-given default calculation on a case-by-case basis, depending on the historical payout rate from the NHG that the bank can show. The presence of a large proportion of NHG-guaranteed loans in some of our rated programs has by and large led to a below-average weighted-average loss severity (WALS; our measure of loss-given default) for our rated Dutch pools compared to other countries (see "Global Covered Bond Characteristics And Rating Summary Q3 2019" published Sept. 10, 2019).

Table 4

Dutch Covered Bond Programs--Key Characteristics
Program Outstanding assets (mil. €) No. of loans WA LTV - indexed (%) WA seasoning (months) Interest rate type Repayment type WAFF (%) WALS (%)
AEGON Bank N.V. 2,663 15,810 62.80 61.3 Fixed (94.9%); floating (5.1%) Amortizing (66.7%); interest-only (33.3%) 13.7 16.1
ING Bank N.V. 26,124 157,570 60.72 154.9 Fixed (88.0%); floating (12.0%) Amortizing (17.9%); interest-only (80.7%); other (1.5%) 9.3 29.5
ING Bank N.V. Soft Bullet 11,624 62,646 66.79 114.8 Fixed (93.6%); floating (6.4%) Amortizing (13.8%); interest-only (86.2%) 14.3 44.0
Nationale-Nederlanden Bank N.V. 3,064 12,381 68.98 75.5 Fixed (99.1%); floating (0.9%) Amortizing (55.6%); interest-only (44.4%) 17.0 45.1
NIBC Bank N.V. 3,799 17,305 72.43 76.8 Fixed (97.8%); floating (2.2%) Amortizing (47.7%); interest-only (52.3%) 18.1 34.0
Van Lanschot N.V. 1,766 3,872 55.60 106.7 Fixed (98.1%); floating (1.9%) Amortizing (30.4%); interest-only (69.6%) 16.5 39.4
WA--Weighted average. LTV--Loan to value. WAFF--Weighted-average foreclosure frequency. WALS--Weighted-average loss severity.

Chart 7

image

Ratings Outlook: Covered Bonds Are Well Insulated From Risk Of Bank Downgrades

On top of a buoyant economy, Dutch covered bonds benefit from highly rated issuers, which are the first recourse for bondholders. Moreover, programs with a highly rated issuer and which are not conditional pass-through can benefit from unused notches of uplift, offering some protection against downgrades of the issuing bank.

Chart 8

image

Table 5  |  View Expanded Table

Dutch Covered Bond Programs--Credit Enhancement
Program Available credit enhancement (%) Target credit enhancement (%) 'AAA' credit risk (%) O/C consistent with the current rating (%) Unused notches
AEGON Bank N.V. 18.60 2.50 2.50 2.50 N/A
ING Bank N.V. 22.71 17.22 2.89 2.89 4
ING Bank N.V. Soft Bullet 22.35 17.19 4.40 4.40 4
Nationale-Nederlanden Bank N.V. 18.08 3.87 3.87 3.87 N/A
NIBC Bank N.V. 26.64 2.50 2.50 2.50 N/A
Van Lanschot N.V. 17.73 4.35 4.35 4.35 N/A
Note: This table can be expanded on www.capitaliq.com to view all of the data presented in tables 2, 4, and 5 in one combined table. The data can also be exported to Microsoft Excel. O/C--Overcollateralization. N/A--Not applicable.

Chart 9 shows the breakdown of the average target credit enhancement levels compared to available credit enhancement across countries. We define the target credit enhancement as the overcollateralization commensurate with the maximum collateral-based uplift.

Dutch programs on average have both lower credit and market risk compared to those of peer countries. Consequently, the available credit enhancement is also lower relative to peer countries' programs.

Chart 9

image

Scenario Analysis: Dutch Covered Bonds Withstand House-Price Corrections

Despite a strong economy, we have carried out a scenario analysis with large drops in house prices to gauge whether these would affect the overcollateralization that is commensurate with our rating. We have decided to test this scenario analysis using house price drops of 20% and 30% because 20% is the drop seen after the financial crisis between 2008 and 2014.

Table 6 shows the impact of the house price decline on our WALS calculation. The overcollateralization in line with the current rating does not increase significantly. These hypothetical house price drops do not affect the achievable rating on any of the programs either.

Table 6

Impact Of House Price Declines
Year Aegon Bank N.V. ING Bank N.V. ING Bank N.V. Soft Bullet Nationale-

Nederlanden

Bank

NIBC Bank N.V. Van Lanschot CB
House price haircut
Base case
WALS (%) 16.09 29.51 44.03 45.14 34.04 39.42
'AAA' credit risk (%) *2.50 2.89 4.40 3.87 *2.50 4.35
Target credit enhancement (%) *2.50 17.22 17.19 3.87 *2.50 4.35
Overcollateralization commensurate with rating (%) *2.50 2.89 4.40 3.87 *2.50 4.35
Stress scenario 1 - 20%
WALS (%) 17.74 32.23 46.84 47.47 36.42 42.11
'AAA' credit risk (%) *2.50 3.14 4.89 4.34 *2.50 4.82
Target credit enhancement (%) *2.50 17.59 17.81 4.34 *2.50 4.82
Overcollateralization commensurate with rating (%) *2.50 3.14 4.89 4.34 *2.50 4.82
Stress scenario 2 - 30%
WALS (%) 19.97 35.54 50.15 50.53 39.24 45.08
'AAA' credit risk (%) *2.50 3.38 5.39 4.94 *2.50 5.28
Target credit enhancement (%) *2.50 18.08 18.42 4.94 *2.50 5.28
Overcollateralization commensurate with rating (%) *2.50 3.38 5.39 4.94 *2.50 5.28
*Floor to the 'AAA' rating is 2.5% credit enhancement. WALS--Weighted-average loss severity. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Related Criteria

  • Global Methodology And Assumptions: Assessing Pools Of Residential Loans, Jan. 25, 2019
  • Covered Bond Ratings Framework: Methodology and Assumptions, June 30, 2015
  • Covered Bonds Criteria, Dec. 9, 2014
  • Methodology For Assessing Mortgage Insurance And Similar Guarantees And Supports In Structured And Public Sector Finance And Covered Bonds, Dec. 7, 2014

Related Research

  • Credit Conditions EMEA: Lingering in the Lowzone, Sept. 30, 2019
  • Europe's Housing Markets Lose Speed As The Economy Weakens, Sept. 24, 2019
  • Global Covered Bond Characteristics And Rating Summary Q3 2019, Sept. 10, 2019
  • Global Covered Bond Insights Q3 2019, Sept. 10, 2019
  • S&P Global Ratings' Covered Bonds Primer, June 20, 2019
  • Summary: Netherlands, May 17, 2019
  • Harmonization Accomplished: A New European Covered Bond Framework, April 18, 2019
  • Glossary Of Covered Bond Terms, April 27, 2018
  • An Inside Look At Conditional Pass-Through Covered Bonds, May 25, 2017

Related Transaction Updates

  • Transaction Update: ING Bank N.V. (Mortgage Covered Bonds), Sept. 13, 2019
  • Transaction Update: ING Bank N.V. Covered Bond Program, July 29, 2019
  • Transaction Update: Van Lanschot N.V. Conditional Pass-Through Mortgage Covered Bond Program, April 25, 2019
  • Transaction Update: NIBC Bank N.V. Covered Bond Programme, April 16, 2019
  • Transaction Update: Aegon Bank N.V., Jan. 15, 2019
  • Transaction Update: NN Bank N.V. (Conditional Pass-Through Covered Bond Program), Jan. 8, 2019

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Judit O Woelk, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-319;
judit.woelk@spglobal.com
Andreas M Hofmann, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9314;
andreas.hofmann@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Antonio Farina, Madrid (34) 91-788-7226;
antonio.farina@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in