articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/180720-semiconductor-m-a-longer-term-secular-trends-will-fuel-more-consolidation-10626632 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Semiconductor M&A: Longer-Term Secular Trends Will Fuel More Consolidation

COMMENTS

Scenario Analysis: Private Credit Is Insulated But Not Immune From Tariff Risk

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Tech Titans Tack Through Trade Turbulence

COMMENTS

U.S. Containers & Packaging Newsletter: Tariff Induced Volatility Creates Risks For The Industry


Semiconductor M&A: Longer-Term Secular Trends Will Fuel More Consolidation

The proliferation of electronic devices and an increasingly data-driven economy have significantly escalated demand for integrated circuits (ICs). In the past, these semiconductor chips, were mostly used for circuitry in personal computers and mobile phones but they're now used in many different applications. S&P Global Ratings believes semiconductors will be a crucial enabler of technology trends such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), factory automation, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), and smart homes and cities. The broadening of IC use cases undoubtedly contributed to record merger and acquisition (M&A) transaction values for the global semiconductor industry and also led to record-breaking revenue for the semiconductor industry over the past few years (see chart 1). Based on these recent trends and our outlook on the semiconductor industry, we predict even more consolidation over the next year or two.

Chart 1

image

Large Semiconductor M&A Transactions Dominate

The dollar value of semiconductor industry M&A deals surged in both 2015 and 2016 (see chart 2), climbing to more than $80 billion, from approximately $30 billion in 2014. The substantial jump in values primarily stems from particularly large deals such as Intel Corp.'s $16.7 billion purchase of Altera Corp. (2015), Softbank Group Corp.'s $31 billion purchase of ARM Holdings PLC (2016), and Avago Technologies Ltd.'s $37 billion acquisition of Broadcom Corp. (2016). Remarkably, each of these deals on a stand-alone basis exceeded the total transaction value of completed deals within the semiconductor industry in 2007 (approximately $16.4 billion). Moreover, total transaction values for completed semiconductor M&A deals just five years ago, in 2013, was less than $20 billion.

Chart 2

image

Key Drivers Of Semiconductor M&A

We reviewed 14 large semiconductor M&A transactions with a purchase price of more than $3 billion since 2015 (see table 1). Our analysis pinpoints several key motives for M&A, including the ability to improve a company's market position, enlarge its scale, expand its total addressable market (TAM) and intellectual property portfolio, and diversify its products, applications, and customers.

Given the potential for valuable semiconductor content growth in key end markets such as the automotive sector (with the growth of ADAS), industrial production (with a need for factory automation), communications (with the rollout of the latest generation of wireless technology; 5G), and consumers (focused on IoT), many companies prefer acquisitions over organic growth as a way to narrow the competitive field, acquire a new customer base, and speed time to market.

We believe semiconductor companies are more confident in their industry growth prospects ahead and are more willing to pursue larger scale M&A. AI, IoT, and ADAS are expediting the rapid pace of technological change, causing several semiconductor companies to pursue pivotal technology through acquisitions rather than developing intellectual property through in-house solutions. Internal development would likely take longer and wouldn't necessarily result in assured customer design wins. Trends related to electronic content proliferation have also caught the attention of strategic buyers outside the semiconductor industry, such as Siemens AG and SoftBank Group. We believe the acquisitions by these strategic buyers highlight the secular growth trends in semiconductors and the broadening end market reach.

Table 1

Select M&A Deals in the Semiconductor Industry
Announced date Completion date Acquirer Target Semiconductor subsector Purchase price (bil. $)
March 19, 2018 Pending

KLA-Tencor Corp.

Orbotech Inc.

Semi capital equipment 3.2
March 1, 2018 May 29, 2018

Microchip Technology Inc.

Microsemi Corp.

Analog 10.2
Nov. 20, 2017 July 6, 2018

Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

Cavium Inc.

Network communications 6.0
March 13, 2017 Aug. 8, 2017

Intel Corp.

Mobileye N.V. Logic 15.3
Nov. 14 2016 March 30, 2017

Siemens AG

Mentor Graphics Corp. Electronic design automation 4.5
Nov. 2, 2016 Nov. 17, 2017

Broadcom Inc.

Brocade Communications Systems Inc.

Analog 5.9
Oct. 27, 2016 Pending

Qualcomm Inc.

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Mixed-signal 44.0
Sept. 13, 2016 Feb. 25, 2017

Renesas Electronics Corp.

Intersil Corp.

Analog 3.2
July 26, 2016 March 10, 2017

Analog Devices Inc.

Linear Technology Corp.

Analog 14.8
July 18, 2016 Sept. 5, 2016

SoftBank Group Corp.

ARM Holdings PLC

Intellectual property 31.0
Jan. 19, 2016 April 4, 2016

Microchip Technology Inc.

Atmel Corp.

Analog 3.6
June 1, 2015 Dec. 28. 2015

Intel Corp.

Altera Corp.

Logic 16.7
May 28, 2015 Feb. 1, 2016 Avago Technologies

Broadcom Corp.

Analog 37.0
March 1, 2015 Dec. 7, 2015

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

Mixed-signal 11.8
Note: Data represents announced M&A transactions above $3 billion from Jan. 1, 2015 through June 29, 2018. Source: Company data, Bloomberg.

Capital Allocation For Rated Semiconductor Companies

We believe the semiconductor industry consolidation trend will remain intact over the next several years. We reviewed capital allocation decisions by 32 semiconductor companies we rated as of June 29 (see chart 3), and found that their capital allocation policies were consistent with acquisition spending trends we've noted for the broader semiconductor industry. Acquisition-related spending by these companies increased more than five times in both fiscal 2016 and 2017, compared with that of fiscal 2015. Collectively, these companies have prioritized acquisitions and capital expenditures over shareholder returns for each of the past two years. We believe the synchronized global economic expansion and low interest rate environment (in addition to the favorable long-term semiconductor growth prospects) were catalysts for the active M&A environment in the semiconductor industry over the past few years.

Chart 3

image

Recent Rating Actions In The Semiconductor Sector

We reviewed our rating actions for all semiconductor companies from June 1, 2017, through June 29, 2018 (see table 2). There were eight upgrades, one downgrade, and three positive outlook revisions. Most of the upgrades and positive outlook revisions were consistent with improving industry fundamentals, which in many cases, led to stronger operating performance and lower leverage.

Table 2

Recent Rating Actions On Semiconductor Companies
Ticker Company Business description Rating date Previous S&P Global Ratings' rating S&P Global Ratings' rating Debt/EBITDA Rating change Outlook change Rating rationale
SGH

SMART Worldwide Holdings Inc.

Memory April 30, 2018 B+ B+ 1.5x -- Positive Improving credit metrics
MU

Micron Technology Inc.

Memory (DRAM) April 11, 2018 BB BB+ 0.3x Upgrade -- Good execution and share gains
IDTI

Integrated Device Technology Inc.

RF and mixed signal March 27, 2018 BB- BB- 2.5x -- Positive Stronger credit metrics
CDNS

Cadence Design Systems Inc.

Electronic design automation March 16, 2018 BBB- BBB -- Upgrade -- Consistent revenue growth and stronger profitability
AMD

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

Logic March 16, 2018 B- B 3.0x Upgrade -- Strong operating performance and lower leverage
MTSI

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc.

High performance analog March 9, 2018 B+ B 6.8x Downgrade -- Operating weakness and elevated leverage
KEM

KEMET Corp.

Passive components (capacitors) March 6, 2018 B B+ 2.3x Upgrade -- Strong operating performance and lower leverage
CY

Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

SRAM and NOR flash memory March 5, 2018 BB- BB 2.0x Upgrade -- Improved credit metrics
ENTG

Entegris Inc.

Semi capital equipment related Feb.8, 2018 BB BB 0.6x -- Positive Strong operating performance and lower leverage
MKSI

MKS Instruments Inc.

Semi capital equipment related Sept. 25, 2017 BB BB+ -- Upgrade -- Strong revenue growth and improved credit metrics
NVDA

Nvidia Corp.

Logic Sept. 20, 2017 BBB- BBB+ -- Upgrade -- Operating performance and moderate financial policy
LRCX

Lam Research Corp.

Semi capital equipment related June 15, 2017 BBB BBB+ -- Upgrade -- Continued strong operating performance
Note: Data represents rating actions announced from June 1, 2017 through June 29, 2018. DRAM--Dynamic random access memory. RF--Radio frequency. SRAM--Static random access memory. NOR--Not or. Source: Company data, S&P Global Market Intelligence, S&P Global Ratings.

We've generally seen improving credit metrics for most of the semiconductor companies we rate. The sector's strong operating performance over the past year was in line with the strong growth across several semiconductor-product segments tracked by World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS). In 2017, WSTS data showed that seven of the nine major semiconductor product segments grew in the double digits, and memory, sensors, and digital signal processor (DSP) reported the strongest growth (see chart 4 and table 3).

Chart 4

image

Table 3

Worldwide Semiconductor Product Growth 2017
Product segment Change over last year (%)
Memory 61.5
Logic 11.7
Analog 10.9
MPU 2.7
Opto 8.8
Discretes 11.5
MCU 12.2
Sensor 16.2
DSP 14.5
Source: WSTS and SIA estimates.

Fundamental trends revealed in our study of 32 semiconductor companies we rate (see table 4) include:

  • Two consecutive years of EBITDA and free cash flow growth in fiscals 2016 and 2017.
  • Positive revenue growth in fiscal 2017 for 29 of the companies, with 22 generating double-digit revenue growth.
  • EBITDA margin improvement in fiscal 2017 for 24 of the companies, with 15 expanding their margins by more than 400 basis points (led by Micron Technology Inc., Cavium Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Nvidia Corp., and Cypress Semiconductor Corp.).

Table 4

Recent Performance For Rated Semiconductor Companies
Ticker Company Fiscal 2017 revenue growth Fiscal 2017 total revenue ($ mil.) Fiscal 2017 EBITDA margin Fiscal 2016 EBITDA margin Fiscal 2017 EBITDA margin bps change YOY
MU

Micron Technology Inc.

63.9% 20,322 48.4% 25.9% 2,252
CAVM

Cavium Inc.

63.1% 984 18.7% 2.4% 1,633
MCHP

Microchip Technology Inc.

56.8% 3,408 30.2% 31.5% (126)
ADI

Analog Devices Inc.

49.3% 5,108 41.5% 36.6% 490
MKSI

MKS Instruments Inc.

47.9% 1,916 26.4% 20.9% 543
WDC

Western Digital Corp.

46.9% 19,093 22.4% 16.2% 626
XPER

Xperi Corp.

44.0% 374 37.5% 58.5% (2,102)
SGH

SMART Worldwide Holdings Inc.

42.5% 761 11.6% 7.3% 429
ON

ON Semiconductor Corp.

41.9% 5,543 21.8% 18.6% 321
NVDA

Nvidia Corp.

37.9% 6,910 30.7% 21.5% 928
LRCX

Lam Research Corp.

36.1% 8,014 27.7% 24.1% 363
AMAT

Applied Materials Inc.

34.3% 14,537 29.4% 23.5% 595
AVGO

Broadcom Corp.

33.2% 17,636 42.7% 37.8% 482
MTSI

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc.

28.4% 699 20.2% 19.6% 67
AMD

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

24.7% 5,329 6.5% (5.8%) 1,236
BRKS

Brooks Automation Inc.

23.7% 693 15.1% 8.6% 643
CY

Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

21.0% 2,328 15.7% 7.5% 826
KLAC

KLA-Tencor Corp.

16.6% 3,480 38.3% 34.7% 361
QRVO

Qorvo Inc.

16.2% 3,033 26.8% 27.7% (95)
ENTG

Entegris, Inc.

14.2% 1,343 26.5% 22.4% 403
VSH

Vishay Intertechnology Inc.

12.1% 2,604 18.7% 15.5% 312
TXN

Texas Instruments Inc.

11.9% 14,961 46.5% 43.1% 339
MXL

MaxLinear Inc.

8.4% 420 21.9% 25.9% (395)
AMKR

Amkor Technology Inc.

7.5% 4,186 20.9% 21.8% (90)
CDNS

Cadence Design Systems Inc.

7.0% 1,943 23.1% 22.3% 78
INTC

Intel Corp.

5.7% 62,761 42.2% 38.6% 361
MXIM

Maxim Integrated Products Inc.

4.6% 2,296 37.1% 32.3% 477
IDTI

Integrated Device Technology Inc.

4.4% 728 22.2% 25.6% (346)
KEM

KEMET Corp.

3.1% 758 12.1% 11.0% 112
QCOM

Qualcomm Inc.

(5.4%) 22,291 29.4% 35.0% (562)
LSCC

Lattice Semiconductor Corp.

(9.6%) 386 12.7% 13.8% (113)
MRVL

Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

(11.6%) 2,301 15.3% 7.4% 785
bps--Basis points. YOY--Year over year. Note: Total revenue is presented on a GAAP basis. Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Rating Actions Following Semiconductor M&A Completions

We also reviewed our ratings on companies that have pursued large semiconductor M&A transactions (see table 5). There were several noteworthy findings: Of the 14 large transactions discussed previously, the completed and pending deals resulted in one upgrade and three downgrades, the rest of the transactions did not affect our ratings on the companies. These rating outcomes reflect our positive view of the semiconductor industry and our belief that companies will be able to reduce leverage to an amount appropriate for the ratings. In particular, we note that these rating outcomes demonstrate our belief that the companies will benefit from increased diversification to end markets with strong secular growth drivers.

Table 5

Ratings On Select Semiconductor M&A Deals
Completion Date Acquirer Target Purchase price ($ bil.) Rating pre-transaction Rating post-transaction Leverage pre-transaction Leverage post-transaction
Pending

KLA-Tencor Corp.

Orbotech 3.2 BBB BBB Net cash Net cash
May 29, 2018

Microchip Technology Inc.

Microsemi 10.2 BB BB 1.6x 5.6x
July 6, 2018

Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

Cavium 6.0 N/A BBB- Net cash Mid-1x
Aug. 8, 2017

Intel Corp.

MobileEye 15.3 A+ A+ 0.3x 0.5x
March 30, 2017

Siemens AG

Mentor graphics 4.5 A+ A+ 1.1x 1.6x
Nov. 17, 2017

Broadcom Corp.

Brocade 5.9 BB+ BB+ 2.0x Mid-2x
March 10, 2017

Analog Devices Inc.

Linear technology 14.8 A- BBB Net cash 4.0x
Sept. 5, 2016

SoftBank Group Corp.

ARM 31.0 BB+ BB+ 4.1x 4.6x
April 4, 2016

Microchip Technology Inc.

Atmel 3.6 BB+ BB Low-2x 4.0x
Dec. 28, 2015

Intel Corp.

Altera 16.7 A+ A+ 0.2x 0.7x
Feb. 1, 2016 Avago Technologies Broadcom 37.0 BB+ BB+ 1.3x 3.0x
Dec. 7, 2015

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Freescale 11.8 BB+ BBB- 2.5x 2.7x
Data represents announced M&A transactions above $3 billion since Jan. 1, 2015. Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, Bloomberg.

Fragmentation In Analog Suggests More Consolidation

We find the analog subsector to be fragmented (see table 6) and most poised for consolidation. Long design-in cycles and long product lives, which result in sticky customer relationships for analog firms, and the opportunity to gain scale efficiencies have provided firms in this subsector with incentives for pursuing M&A. On the other hand, the memory and logic subsectors have completed their consolidation phases, in our opinion, and we don't expect significant M&A action in these areas due to the regulatory agencies' concern for antitrust issues.

Table 6

Select Semiconductor Companies By Subsector
Analog/mixed-signal Memory Logic
Fiscal 2017 revenue ($ bil.) Fiscal 2017 revenue ($ bil.) Fiscal 2017 revenue ($ bil.)

Qualcomm Inc.

22.3

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

212.0

Intel Corp.

62.8

Broadcom Inc.

17.6

Intel Corp.

62.8

Nvidia Corp.

6.9

Texas Instruments Inc.

15.0

Toshiba Corp.

37.4

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

5.3

ON Semiconductor Corp.

5.5

SK Hynix Inc.

26.6

Xilinx Inc.

2.3

Analog Devices Inc.

5.1

Micron Technology Inc.

20.3
Skyworks Solutions Inc. 3.7

Western Digital Corp.

19.1

Microchip Technology Inc.

3.4

Qorvo Inc.

3.0

Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

2.3

Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

2.3

Maxim Integrated Products Inc.

2.3

Cirrus Logic Inc.

1.5
Cree Inc. 1.5

Integrated Device Technology Inc.

0.7

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc.

0.7
Semtec Corp. 0.5
Power Integrations Inc. 0.4

MaxLinear Inc.

0.4
Data as of June 29, 2018. Analog companies represent U.S. publicly traded analog companies with a market capitalization above $1 billion. Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, Bloomberg.

So what can derail the elevated M&A activities over the near term? We think the relatively high equity valuations are significant hurdles that could slow the pace of M&A. The median price-earnings (P/E) ratio for a semiconductor industry peer group composed of 18 companies reached 22.9x at the end of June 2018--substantially higher than the median P/E ratio just a few years ago (see chart 5 and table 7). We believe the higher hurdle rates associated with elevated equity valuations could cause some semiconductor firms to refrain from pursuing sizable acquisitions over the next few years.

Chart 5

image

Table 7

Bloomberg Intelligence Semiconductor Industry Peer Group
Ticker Companies
AMD

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

ADI

Analog Devices Inc.

IFNNY

Infineon Technologies AG

INTC

Intel Corp.

MXIM

Maxim Integrated Products Inc.

MDTKF MediaTek Inc.
MCHP

Microchip Technology Inc.

MU

Micron Technology Inc.

NVDA

NVIDIA Corp.

NXPI

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

QCOM

QUALCOMM Inc.

RNECY

Renesas Electronics Corp.

ROHCY

Rohm Co. Ltd.

SSNLF

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

HXSCL

SK Hynix Inc.

SWKS Skyworks Solutions Inc.
TXN

Texas Instruments Inc.

XLNX

Xilinx Inc.

Source: Bloomberg Intelligence.

We also believe U.S. national security concerns and the current trade dispute with China represent additional near-term risk factors for semiconductor M&A. In our view, large-scale cross-border M&A is most at risk of being delayed (e.g., Qualcomm/NXP Semiconductors N.V.) or canceled altogether (e.g., Broadcom/Qualcomm) given the required regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions. Qualcomm's announced deal to acquire NXP Semiconductors has been approved by all regulatory bodies globally except by China's regulator (see table 8), which we attribute to rising U.S.-China political tensions. Furthermore, as cited in the U.S. Government's rejection of Broadcom's deal to acquire Qualcomm, semiconductor chips have increasingly become linked to national security as the potential use cases have multiplied rapidly. Although we mostly view the current escalation in U.S.-China trade tensions as transitory, the extent to which it will continue to impact large-scale cross-border M&A within the semiconductor industry remains uncertain.

Table 8

Number Of Days Between Transaction Announcement And Completion For Select M&A Transactions
Announced date Completion date Days to transaction close Acquirer Target
March 19, 2018 Pending --

KLA-Tencor Corp.

Orbotech Inc.

March 1, 2018 May 29, 2018 89

Microchip Technology Inc.

Microsemi Corp.

Nov. 20, 2017 July 6, 2018 228

Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

Cadvium
March 13, 2017 August 8, 2017 148

Intel Corp.

Mobileye
Nov. 14, 2016 March 30, 2017 136

Siemens AG

Mentor Graphics
Nov. 2, 2016 Nov. 17, 2017 380

Broadcom Inc.

Brocade Communications Systems Inc.

Oct. 27, 2016 Pending --

Qualcomm Inc.

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Sept. 13, 2016 Feb. 25, 2017 165

Renesas Electronics Corp.

Intersil Corp.

July 26, 2016 March 10, 2017 227

Analog Devices Inc.

Linear Technology Corp.

July 18, 2016 Sept. 5, 2016 49

SoftBank Group Corp.

ARM Holdings PLC

Jan. 19, 2016 April 4, 2016 76

Microchip Technology Inc.

Atmel Corp.

June 1, 2015 Dec. 28, 2015 210

Intel Corp.

Altera Corp.

May 28, 2015 Feb. 1, 2016 249 Avago Technologies

Broadcom Corp.

March 1, 2015 Dec. 7, 2015 281

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

Average 187
Median 188
Source: Company data.

Still, we find the near-term prospects for continued M&A to be a more dominant force. As we review the historical performance of the semiconductor industry, it's evident to us that the industry is in a long-term secular growth trend, with ebbs and flows influenced by global economic trends. The current global economic bull cycle is in the late stages with above-average growth and early signs of inflation. While interest rates are rising, they are still low by historical standards. S&P Global economists forecast global GDP to grow 3.9% in 2018 and 2019, and this economic backdrop should bode well for continued semiconductor revenue growth over the next two years, despite a stellar year of 22% revenue growth in 2017. In addition, the passing of the U.S. tax reform removes uncertainty related to capital planning, providing further support for semiconductor M&A.

Only a rating committee may determine a rating action and this report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Ryan Rich, CFA, CPA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0318;
ryan.rich@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:David T Tsui, CFA, CPA, New York (1) 212-438-2138;
david.tsui@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in