Overview
- U.S.-based Activision Blizzard Inc.'s leverage fell to 0.2x at the end of 2017 due to continued successful title releases and strong cash flow generation.
- We expect the company will continue to increase its cash flow in 2018 and maintain a conservative financial policy, balancing debt repayment with shareholders returns.
- We are raising our ratings on Activision, including the corporate credit rating to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'.
- The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that Activision will maintain leverage under 1.5x despite fluctuations related to the success and timing of its game releases.
Rating Action
On March 20, 2018, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit rating on Activision Blizzard Inc. to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'. The rating outlook is stable. At the same time, we raised our issue-level rating on Activision's senior unsecured debt to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'.
Rationale
The upgrade is based on our expectation that Activision's leverage will remain low in 2018 and 2019, supported by steady growth in revenue and cash flow and a conservative financial policy. The company's financial position continues to improve and its cash and cash equivalents now exceed its debt level. Recent U.S. tax reform also reduces the company's tax rate and enables Activision to more efficiently repatriate cash to the U.S. We expect that leverage, which was 0.2x at the end of 2017, will remain low due to the company's strong cash flow generation and portfolio of leading franchise titles, and the growth in its ancillary revenue streams from eSports. Activision is one of the largest video game publishers globally. It has a sizable presence in mobile gaming and a history of successful new intellectual property rollouts, such as "Overwatch," which was launched in 2016. We expect that Activision's operating performance will remain largely stable, after adjusting for fluctuations in release slate, due to its portfolio of strong franchise titles and very good profitability. These strengths are partially offset by some revenue concentration around key titles ("Call of Duty," "World of Warcraft," "Overwatch," and "Candy Crush"), heightened competition for leisure time activities from other electronic media, intense rivalry between video game publishers, and high development and marketing costs for new video games. Established franchise games enable Activision to introduce sequels and brand extensions, which are less risky than introducing a new franchise game without any existing brand equity or user base. For example, there are now several off-shoots under "Call of Duty." With its acquisition of King Digital Entertainment PLC in 2016, Activision became one of the largest mobile video game publishers and the owner of "Candy Crush," one of the breakout hits on the mobile platform. However, although Activision has been successful in growing the revenue from "Candy Crush," the underlying user base continues to decline. King's monthly active users declined 18% from the last quarter in 2016 to the same period in 2017; however, declines moderated toward the end of last year. And we expect that mobile revenue could come under pressure if Activision is unable to introduce successful new mobile titles and in-game advertising that more than offset potential future declines in players of "Candy Crush." Although Activision has been successful in diversifying its revenue base to be less reliant on retail game sales, the company still generates the vast majority of its revenue from the sale of games and related content and services to consumers. The company could further diversify its revenue sources by successfully executing its eSports strategy, including selling additional teams, advertising, sponsorships, and media rights, which could take years to reach full potential. Another area of potential growth is the company monetizing its intellectual property (IP) through licensing rights for its brands, titles, and characters for use in movies and other consumer products. These growth areas present upside to revenue growth but carry risk of damage to the company's IP or a distraction away from its core competency of video game publishing. While these are meaningful revenue diversification opportunities, they rely on the success of Activision's top video game franchises such as "Overwatch" and "Call of Duty," highlighting the reliance on the success of a handful of games. We expect Activision's leverage, which was 0.2x at the end of 2017, will remain low in 2018. Over the long term, we expect that Activision will maintain adjusted debt leverage of less than 1.5x, despite the volatility associated with fluctuations in game releases and the business' hit-driven nature. Our base-case scenario incorporates the following expectations:
- U.S. GDP growth of 2.8% in 2018 and 2.2% in 2019, and eurozone GDP growth of 2.0% in 2018 and 1.7% in 2019. Although game sales aren't highly correlated with economic indicators, console sales, which drive game sales, relies on stable to growing GDP.
- Revenue and EBITDA will increase at a mid-single-digit and high-single-digit percentage rate in 2018, respectively, due to healthy growth at the company's Blizzard operating segment and modest growth at Activision and King Digital.
- A new "World of Warcraft" game launch and in-game content releases related to multiple top franchises will drive much of Blizzard's growth in 2018.
- Although we have less visibility into the slate for 2019, we expect the company's revenue will continue to grow, given the expected launches later in 2018, which will carry into next year, and the staggered release schedule for downloadable content and new releases.
- A 100 basis point EBITDA margin expansion in 2018 as the revenue mix continues to shift to higher-margin digital downloads.
- Cash flow from operations of roughly $2 billion per year in 2018 and 2019.
- Capital spending of roughly $150 million to $175 million per year.
- Dividends of about $260 million in 2018 and about $275 million in 2019.
- A resumption of share repurchases that could consume about $500 million in 2018.
- Debt repayment of $1 billion or more in 2018.
- Net leverage will remain very low (near 0x) in 2018 and 2019.
Liquidity
Activision has strong liquidity supported by substantial cash balances and healthy discretionary cash flow, in our view. Liquidity sources will exceed uses by more than 5x over the next 12 months. Given the company's sizable cash and liquid investments and ample margin of compliance with its net debt covenant, we expect that it could withstand a high-impact, low-probability event without refinancing. Activision has been able to successfully access the credit markets while reducing its cost of borrowing, which demonstrates a generally high standing in the credit markets. The company also demonstrates prudent risk management, including balancing debt repayment with shareholder returns and growing its sources of liquidity. Principal liquidity sources:
- Cash and equivalents of $4.7 billion as of Dec. 31, 2017;
- Cash flow from operations, before working capital, totaling roughly $2 billion in 2018; and
- An undrawn $250 million revolving credit facility.
Principal liquidity uses:
- Working capital swings of up to $300 million, depending on the release slate;
- Annual shareholder dividends of $250 million to $275 million;
- Annual capital spending of roughly $150 million to $175 million; and
- Share repurchases of roughly $450 million to $550 million annually.
Outlook
The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that Activision will maintain leverage below 1.5x despite fluctuations related to the success and timing of its game releases. We also expect that Activision will be able to maintain the vitality of its key franchise titles, including "Call of Duty," "World of Warcraft," and "Candy Crush."
Downside scenario
We could lower the corporate credit rating if the company experiences meaningful performance deterioration relative to our expectation (likely due to weakness in key franchise titles). Additionally, a downgrade could occur if Activision is unable to maintain its adjusted debt leverage below 1.5x given the potential for fluctuations in leverage from acquisitions and the success and timing of releases.
Upside scenario
We could raise the rating if Activision significantly reduces its revenue concentration, becoming less reliant on a small number of key titles and revenue from consumer purchase of games and related services. An upgrade would also likely entail the company maintaining its conservative financial policies and low leverage level.
Ratings Score Snapshot
Corporate credit rating: BBB+/Stable/-- Business risk: Satisfactory
- Country risk: Low
- Industry risk: Intermediate
- Competitive position: Satisfactory
Financial risk: Modest
- Cash flow/leverage: Modest
Anchor: bbb+ Modifiers
- Diversification/portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
- Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
- Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
- Liquidity: Strong (no impact)
- Management and governance: Fair (no impact)
- Comparable rating analysis: Neutral (no impact)
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
In 2017, all of the company's subsidiary guarantors were released from their respective guarantees provided under the credit agreement. As a result, all of the company's $4.44 billion debt is now unsecured.
Capital structure
Activision's weighted-average remaining debt term extends to roughly eight years. We expect that Activision will refinance or repay its upcoming debt maturities proactively, given the group's strong credit standing in combination of its available cash and cash equivalents, which totaled $4.7 billion on Dec. 31, 2017. The company's board of directors authorized debt repayments of up to $1.8 billion in 2018.
Analytical conclusions
We rate Activision's senior unsecured debt 'BBB+', in line with the issuer credit rating, since no significant elements of subordination risk are present in the capital structure.
Related Criteria
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Reflecting Subordination Risk In Corporate Issue Ratings, Sept. 21, 2017
- General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings , April 7, 2017
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
- Criteria - Corporates - Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Media And Entertainment Industry, Dec. 24, 2013
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, Nov. 19, 2013
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers, Nov. 13, 2012
- General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
Ratings List
Upgraded To From Activision Blizzard Inc. Corporate Credit Rating BBB+/Stable/-- BBB/Stable/-- Senior Unsecured BBB+ BBB
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on the S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Jeanne L Shoesmith, CFA, Chicago (1) 312-233-7026; jeanne.shoesmith@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Elton Cerda, New York (1) 212-438-9540; elton.cerda@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.