articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241204-corporates-can-monetary-easing-bring-enough-relief-to-justify-current-market-optimism-13344440.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Corporates: Can Monetary Easing Bring Enough Relief To Justify Current Market Optimism?

COMMENTS

Private Markets: How Will Private Credit Respond To Declining Yields?

COMMENTS

Monetary Easing: What If The Interest Rate Descent Disappoints?

COMMENTS

Energy Transition: How Will The U.S. And Europe Respond To China’s Clean-Tech Leadership?

COMMENTS

Commodities: Could Oil Prices Shock The Global Economy?


Corporates: Can Monetary Easing Bring Enough Relief To Justify Current Market Optimism?

(Editor's Note: In this series of articles, we answer the pressing Questions That Matter on the uncertainties that will shape 2025—collected through our interactions with investors and other market participants. The series is aligned with the key themes we're watching in the coming year and is part of our Global Credit Outlook 2025.)

Monetary easing and accelerating growth should improve corporate credit fundamentals, but trade tensions and sticky inflation are significant risks.

How This Will Shape 2025

Further monetary easing in 2025 should help ease financial pressures on corporates.   The rate of increase in interest costs has already started to slow down as policy rates fall and favorable financial sentiment makes refinancing easier and cheaper. With financing costs steadying, recession seemingly avoided, and EBITDA growth recovering, we anticipate a strong rebound in interest coverage after a period of weakness. However, there are still significant variations likely in the degree of improvement across credit ratings, with stronger entities seeing a more decisive improvement. Even so, we expect EBIT interest coverage for entities in the 'B' category will return to its 20-year average in 2025.

image

Historically, periods of falling interest rates have been difficult for corporate credit.   It's possible that receding recession risks, dwindling inflation, and buoyant financial markets may be as good as it gets for a while. There have been seven major interest rate cutting cycles in the U.S. since 1980 (excluding the short-lived adjustments amid financial market volatility in 1987 and 1998). Default rates rose in all but one of those episodes (the dot.com crash), with an average increase of 2.1%, and the mid-1980s and mid-1990s soft landings also saw defaults rise. The year ahead will need to deliver the improving fundamentals that tight credit spreads imply if risk premia are not to widen again.

What We Think And Why

Growth will likely take over as a cash flow driver, rather than profitability.   Sales and EBITDA growth have been relatively modest in recent results seasons. Chart 3 shows median revenue growth for three ratings categories of U.S. rated nonfinancial corporates, overlaid with rate cutting cycles since 1980. Revenue growth improving as rates fall is not the historical norm. Our base-case economic outlook, however, is more akin to the mid-decade rate adjustments of the 1990s, when revenue growth didn't see precipitous declines, and our analysts expect revenue growth to accelerate in the year ahead. Improving growth would help justify current risk premiums.

image

Margin improvement is unlikely to be such a prominent driver of corporate performance in the years ahead.   In the last decade, a trend of rising margins has largely been confined to stronger credits. Chart 4 shows the contrast between the sustained rise in profitability of 'BBB'-rated entities versus the much more modest upswing seen for the strongest speculative-grade credits. We suspect secular increases in profitability are unlikely to continue, with the gains from global outsourcing played out and at risk from political and social pressures, costly energy transitions under way, and upward pressure on labor costs in the wake of higher prices and interest rates. New technologies like AI offer the clearest opportunity for a productivity-linked boost to profits, but outcomes are uncertain even if the investment costs are real.

Encouragingly, we expect to see positive revenue and EBITDA growth for almost all sectors in 2025.   Charts 5 and 6 show our analysts' median revenue and EBITDA growth projections by global industry, both for investment and speculative grade. With the sole exception of flat revenues expected for investment-grade oil and gas, we currently anticipate growth in every other sector, in both rating groupings. With policy rates falling, significant refinancing achieved this year, and healthy growth projected, this suggests a favorable fundamental credit environment for the year ahead.

image

What Could Change

Inflation could be stickier and rates consequently higher than we anticipated.   Although not our base case, cost of living pressures, trade tariffs, and the reshoring of supply chains for geopolitical reasons could lead to higher inflation and constrain central banks' ability to lower policy rates. A more stagflationary growth environment would likely be less favorable for corporate credit.

Trade disputes and environmental transitions could also hamper revenues and profitability.   Europe and Asia-Pacific could take retaliatory measures if the incoming Trump administration applies tariffs as intended. This could also lead to higher input costs, as companies adjust supply chains to a bloc-based trading environment. Ongoing efforts to curb emissions are already necessitating significant capital expenditure in sectors such as utilities and autos. This also brings risk of new competition, as we have seen in autos where electrification has weakened European and Japanese automakers' competitive positions, relative to new competitors from China and the U.S. Elevated energy input costs are also a concern for heavier industrial sectors.

On the positive side, AI-induced productivity enhancements and emerging clean energy technologies could generate significant opportunities.   For example, we expect generative AI will transform pharmaceutical research and development by strengthening innovation, offering cost efficiencies, and accelerating the traditionally ponderous research-to-market cycle. In the tech sector, insatiable demand for AI services is causing capital expenditure to skyrocket. This is leading to deals for new nuclear electricity to power data centers and reach clean energy goals.

Read More

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Gareth Williams, London + 44 20 7176 7226;
gareth.williams@spglobal.com
Barbara Castellano, Milan + 390272111253;
barbara.castellano@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.