articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241112-china-brief-more-transparency-means-more-official-debt-for-local-governments-13321600 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China Brief: More Transparency Means More Official Debt For Local Governments

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will 2024's Ratings Performance Shape The Year Ahead?

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates


China Brief: More Transparency Means More Official Debt For Local Governments

China's long-awaited "hidden debt" swap strategy cuts funding costs for the RMB14 trillion burden.  However, the new debt will go to the balance sheets of local and regional governments (LRGs), increasing their official debt. Risks may arise from debt redistribution between LRG tiers, or larger public investment programs than our current expectation.

Chart 1

image

What's Happening

LRGs now have clear guidelines on how to slash Chinese renminbi (RMB) 14.3 trillion in hidden debt to RMB2 trillion by 2028. They will issue special-purpose bonds (SPBs) to swap out the debt, and mobilize other resources. This is the first time that authorities officially disclosed the amount of hidden debt--off-budget borrowings issued via local government financing vehicles (LGFVs).

Why It Matters

Hidden debt may finally come to an end; the flipside is that official debt could rise by RMB10 trillion or 25% by 2028.  RMB6 trillion in SPBs will come via a new quota, with the remaining RMB4 trillion carved out of the existing quota. This increase is not as drastic as it sounds because many institutions, including S&P Global Ratings, already factor in the debt of key state-owned enterprises into LRG debt assessments.

This latest swap could essentially resolve the vast majority of existing hidden debt,  provided that local governments take heed of the central government's strict warnings against such practices. LRGs are not taking on other commercial debt from LGFVs.

We see downside risk to higher-tier LRGs' fiscal soundness.  This could happen if systemically weak repayment ability at lower-tier LRGs breaks down the mechanisms preventing risks transferring upward. The announced measures move the hidden debt onto tier-one LRGs' balance sheets; however, the tier-one LRGs (i.e., provinces) may then onlend most of the swap bonds to tier-two and below (cities and districts). So the upper-tiers' fiscal health could be jeopardized if their lower counterparts struggle to repay.

LRGs typically have firm mechanisms in place to shield their fiscal positions from growing risks transferring from lower tiers. But in a downside scenario, larger repayment stress may require higher-tier governments to step in to a certain extent.

Accelerated debt accumulation is another downside risk.  The swaps are meant to achieve several agendas at the same time (see "China's Latest Fix For Local Governments Could Turn Out To Be Debt Relief—Or More Burden," Oct. 15, 2024). However, if economic conditions cannot be stabilized then LRGs might receive a greater amount of debt quota than we anticipate, in order to increase project funding/economic activity.

What Comes Next

Our base case assumes SPBs for project funding will likely remain consistent with 2023-2024 levels over the next year.  They may then gradually taper off from about RMB3.5 trillion (see chart 1). We keep our forecast even though the Ministry of Finance (MOF) signaled SPB programs could expand in 2025, given part of the quotas will be diverted to resolving hidden debt. We do not foresee a significant increase in SPBs for project funding, given the already-high debt burdens and limited fiscal space for LRGs.

Broadening SPB investment scope could also help lower the need to significantly increase debt quotas.  In October this year, the MOF said that RMB2.3 trillion in SPBs for 2024 remains unallocated, indicating a higher scrutiny in approving investments and a scarcity of qualified projects. Funding utilization may improve if the investment scope were to broaden, including for the purpose of supporting the property sector and easing restrictions on using SPBs as registered capital in investment projects. This in turn could lower the need to significantly increase debt quotas.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Wenyin Huang, Singapore +65 6216 1052;
Wenyin.Huang@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Christopher Yip, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3593;
christopher.yip@spglobal.com
Felix Ejgel, London + 44 20 7176 6780;
felix.ejgel@spglobal.com
Rain Yin, Singapore + (65) 6239 6342;
rain.yin@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Chen Guo, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in