articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241024-brokerage-brief-china-s-new-swap-program-will-likely-squeeze-capital-ratios-13298620.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Brokerage Brief: China's New Swap Program Will Likely Squeeze Capital Ratios

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure

COMMENTS

Navigating Regulatory Changes: Assessing New Regulations On Brazil's Financial Sector

Global Banks Outlook 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: Five Takeaways From The IIF Annual Membership Meetings


Brokerage Brief: China's New Swap Program Will Likely Squeeze Capital Ratios

Chinese brokerages participating in a new central bank-led swap program will likely increase their holdings of domestic equities over the next 12 months. We view these investments as volatile and of a higher risk than fixed-income securities, potentially hitting brokerages' capital ratios.

What's Happening

The central bank has created a swap program to boost the country's stock market.   The tool provides institutions with low-cost liquidity that can only be used to buy stocks. Institutions exchange high-risk securities for risk-free bonds. Entities pledge the bonds as collateral against loans, using the money to buy stocks.

Why It Matters

The swap program may lead to increased stock holdings by brokerages, eroding their ratio of capital to risk assets. 

  • By our estimation, stock holdings typically comprise 5%-15% of the total assets of the Chinese brokerages that we rate, without considering hedging effects.
  • The Chinese renminbi (RMB) 500 billion swap program, if all invested by brokerages into stocks, could increase this ratio of share holdings to total assets by another four percentage points at the sector level. This is not negligible.

Moreover, the regulator will give brokerages special dispensation for the assets they hold through the program. The stock holdings from this program will not affect regulatory capital ratios very much, despite the addition of risk assets.

However, such holding may hit our risk-adjusted capital ratio assessment.   The treatment would therefore widen the gap between the regulatory capital ratio and our risk-adjusted capital ratio.

We do not view this program as a fundamental change for sector liquidity.  The program is a tool to facilitate an increase in stock holdings by securities companies; it is not a tool to provide emergency liquidity.

Chart 1

image

What Comes Next

Much will depend on the extent to which brokerages tap the swap program.   We expect firms' willingness to participate in the swap, and the pace of their investment, will be mostly commercially driven, and will depend on their investment strategies. The take-up will depend on market conditions. Companies with strong risk discipline will participate more cautiously, according to their risk tolerance.

The central bank may expand the program.  That decision will depend on the effectiveness of the current round, market behavior and associated risks. Approval and implementation have so far been swift, indicating that authorities are keen to jump-start the stock market.

Editor: Jasper Moiseiwitsch

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Xi Cheng, Shanghai + 852 2533 3582;
xi.cheng@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Yiran Zhong, Hong Kong 25333582;
yiran.zhong@spglobal.com
Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3532;
ryan.tsang@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in