articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240926-japan-s-rate-hikes-could-stabilize-sovereign-support-13261719 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Japan's Rate Hikes Could Stabilize Sovereign Support

COMMENTS

FAQ: Applying Our Analytical Approach For European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: EU Taxonomy Assessment

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Japan's Rate Hikes Could Stabilize Sovereign Support

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The end of Japan's negative interest rate policy could stabilize sovereign credit support, if further monetary policy tightening progresses smoothly. The benefits are clear. Higher interest rates and consistently positive inflation could boost banks' financial performances and fiscal revenue. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) also regains short-term interest rates as a policy tool after years of relying on less conventional monetary instruments. This could improve confidence in its ability to manage economic and financial volatility.

In this scenario, the stability of the sovereign ratings on Japan (A+/Stable/A-1) could benefit from consistent economic support. External and monetary assessments, already-strong rating factors, could strengthen further. And there's an increased likelihood of successful fiscal consolidation, resulting in an improvement in budgetary performances.

The journey to higher interest rates has some risks, however. Government revenue growth may not keep up with increased interest payments. Weak business borrowers may not be able to cope with higher debt servicing. And yen-funded foreign investments may unwind abruptly to hurt economic and financial stability.

Consequently, S&P Global Ratings believes the credit impact of the long-awaited monetary tightening in Japan is still dependent on how the BOJ manages it and on a more-or-less favorable external environment.

Positive Policy Rate Equals Positive Credit Implications?

The March policy rate increase is a major milestone for the Japanese economy. It marks the first time since the late 1990s that the central bank no longer considers deflation a serious threat. Instead, it believes that stable inflation--at rates close to its 2% target--is achievable by the fiscal year ending March 2026.

This could help government revenue grow more consistently. Largely owing to weak price trends, Japanese tax revenue did not consistently return to the level in fiscal 1997 until fiscal 2014 (see chart 1). This was when the sales tax rate rose to 8% from 5%. Tax revenue showed another significant pickup, to 10%, in fiscal 2021, after a further tax rate hike in late 2019. If inflation stays persistently at about 2%, it could help revenue grow even without further tax rate increases. This helps reduce Japanese fiscal deficits from the elevated levels of recent years.

Chart 1

image

Monetary policy tightening could also lift banks' profitability and increase their willingness to fund businesses. Persistently low interest rates and large amounts of excess reserves on banks' balance sheets dragged on the financial performances of Japanese banks. Most are ranked among the least profitable banks in Asia-Pacific (see chart 2).

Weak profit margins could have constrained banks' appetite for risk, given their limited capacity to absorb the losses of defaults. The progressive reversal of monetary easing should lead to higher lending rates and a decline in excess reserves.

Chart 2

image

Higher policy interest rates should also afford the central bank more policy flexibility. By our assessment, the BOJ enjoys strong policy credibility. However, it ranks below other central banks--including those of the U.S. and U.K.--that issue what we regard as reserve currencies. An important reason is the prolonged period of weak price trends in Japan. This limits the bank's ability to employ short-term interest rates as a policy tool.

With interest rates at (or below) zero percent, the BOJ had to rely heavily on non-conventional monetary instruments. Over time, as the uncollateralized overnight rate returns as the main monetary policy instrument, it could improve monetary support for the Japanese sovereign ratings.

If the yen exchange rate rebounds with higher interest rates, economic support for the ratings could also be better anchored. In recent years, Japan has slipped in the relative ranking of per capita GDP (measured in U.S. dollars) due to the depreciating yen. This has not affected the sovereign ratings because we expect the exchange rate to recover as global interest rates return to lower levels.

Nevertheless, if Japan's average income doesn't recover over time, it could signal a structural loss of international competitiveness that would weaken sovereign credit support. A sustained recovery of the yen exchange rate would dispel such risks.

Much Depends On What It Does To The Budget…

But higher policy interest rates also come with credit risks. An important one is the increased interest payments that the government must pay on its very high heavy debts. Years of negative short-term interest rates in Japan meant that, in many recent years, budgetary interest costs have fallen even as the government borrowed more (see chart 3).

Chart 3

image

This upside is no longer possible now that yields across the Japanese Government Bond (JGB) yield curve are positive. For fiscal 2024, the Japanese government has budgeted for interest payments to be ¥9.7 trillion. This is more than a third higher than the ¥7.1 trillion actually paid in fiscal 2022.

The Ministry of Finance also estimated that, if Japan achieves average nominal GDP growth of 3% annually, interest payments in fiscal 2033 will rise to nearly 2.5x that in fiscal 2024.

How negatively this development affects sovereign credit metrics depends on future revenue growth and interest rate changes. The very weak fiscal performance in Japan should improve in the next few years as the economy continues its recovery and extraordinary government measures to help households mitigate rising costs come to an end. However, such improvements may be offset by pressures posed by disappointing revenue growth or unexpectedly large increases in JGB yields.

…And To Businesses Used To Low Borrowing Rates

The uncertainty over how well non-government borrowers adjust to rising interest rates also poses risks to sovereign credit support. As of June 2024, more than 70% of Japanese bank lending paid interest at rates of below 1% (see chart 4). Lifting the bar a little higher, more than 90% of bank debtors enjoyed interest rates of below 1.75%.

Chart 4

image

Even before the policy rate increase in March, banks were paring down loans with the lowest interest rates. Since then, they have also been cutting down loans in the next higher interest rate category (see chart 5). Lending rates, long on a declining trend for most borrowers, will continue to rise as banks reset interest rates amid expectations of further monetary tightening.

Chart 5

image

Many businesses may face cash flow difficulties if borrowing rates increase much more. Bank loans to small enterprises account for around 40%of total loans and two-thirds of business loans. Most of these enterprises likely service the domestic economy that has been growing slowly over much of the past two decades. If many of them fail as their interest payments escalate in the future, the social repercussions may mean that the government will have to delay fiscal consolidation again.

Deft Adjustments From The BOJ Also Help

The market volatility of early August highlights another risk of further monetary tightening in Japan. The higher interest rates in other advanced economies since 2022 have sparked significant outflows of Japanese funds. It is likely that some investors have borrowed yen to finance their investments elsewhere, since borrowing rates are low.

Another sharp reversal could cause financial volatility that brings wider negative impact on the Japanese economy. While some of the more leveraged investment positions have reportedly been unwound during the August market turmoil, risks could build again if the current market calm persists. In an environment of monetary easing in most other major economies, such leveraged investment positions complicate the BOJ's future monetary tightening further.

If the central bank's communication is misunderstood, further interest rate hikes could create pressures on economic and fiscal metrics.

Recent Research

Primary Credit Analysts:KimEng Tan, Singapore + 65 6239 6350;
kimeng.tan@spglobal.com
Rain Yin, Singapore + (65) 6239 6342;
rain.yin@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in