articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240912-your-three-minutes-in-cambodian-banking-covenant-breaches-point-to-a-survival-of-the-fittest-13247641 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Cambodian Banking: Covenant Breaches Point To A Survival Of The Fittest

NEWS

U.K.'s Near-Final Bank Capital Rules Will Have A Modest Impact On Rated Banks

COMMENTS

Real Estate Monitor: Rate Cuts Could Spur Sector Recovery

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Banking: GCC Banks Are Well Positioned To Continue Their Strong Run

COMMENTS

European Banks Continue To Reap The Benefits Of Benign Credit Conditions


Your Three Minutes In Cambodian Banking: Covenant Breaches Point To A Survival Of The Fittest

Covenant breaches could affect the availability and cost of funding for Cambodian banks.  In our view, the large banks we rate will ride this out, but if the current tolerance for covenant waivers abates, it could hurt smaller and weaker banks.

What's Happening

Three large Cambodian financial institutions have breached covenants on their borrowings in 2023.  Institutional lenders typically require borrowers to maintain certain financial ratios, most commonly the NPL ratio. Asset quality ratios deteriorated in 2023 because of a slower recovery in key sectors such as construction, real estate, and hospitality. Delays in recognition of weak loans and sluggish loan growth also contributed.

The spike in NPLs (see chart 1) has exhausted the buffers that these banks had between the actual financial ratios and the covenant levels, leading to breaches. Among large financial institutions, ACLEDA Bank Plc, Hattha Bank Plc and LOLC (Cambodia) PLC, have breached their covenants. We expect the number of banks facing breaches could be higher than this, given that many smaller banks have reported an even sharper rise in NPLs and may be at higher risk of covenant breaches.

Chart 1

image

Why It Matters

Covenant breaches could affect the availability and cost of funding for Cambodian banks.  Lenders could demand immediate repayments or higher spreads for the heightened credit risk. That said, breaches are occurring at a time when liquidity in the system is high and the need for funds low because the banks remain cautious about lending. This has alleviated some funding pressure.

Moreover, we expect rated Cambodian banks such as ACLEDA and subsidiaries of strong foreign parents to weather this episode with no major dent on their financials. They have, or are in the process of, negotiating waivers or relaxations on key financial covenants to cope with current economic conditions. While the process is taking time, our base case is that institutional lenders including multilateral agencies that lend to these banks will provide waivers and continue to maintain existing lines.

What Comes Next

We forecast that NPLs in Cambodia's broader financial system will continue to increase to 7.5%-8% of total loans in 2026.  The initial wave of post-pandemic covenant breaches has been generally manageable, and lenders appear amenable to waivers. Overseas lenders, particularly international commercial banks, might be less tolerant of repeated and subsequent breaches. Such a situation could arise if the economy and the stressed sectors to which banks are most exposed struggle to recover. In such a scenario, smaller and weaker financial institutions could face a funding crunch and may be marginalized or in case of an extreme stress, fail.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Ivan Tan, Singapore + 65 6239 6335;
ivan.tan@spglobal.com
Deepali V Seth Chhabria, Mumbai + 912233424186;
deepali.seth@spglobal.com
Ruchika Malhotra, Singapore + 65 6239 6362;
ruchika.malhotra@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Geeta Chugh, Mumbai + 912233421910;
geeta.chugh@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in