articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240912-u-k-s-near-final-bank-capital-rules-will-have-a-modest-impact-on-rated-banks-13249169.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

U.K.'s Near-Final Bank Capital Rules Will Have A Modest Impact On Rated Banks

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Cambodian Banking: Covenant Breaches Point To A Survival Of The Fittest

COMMENTS

Real Estate Monitor: Rate Cuts Could Spur Sector Recovery

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Banking: GCC Banks Are Well Positioned To Continue Their Strong Run

COMMENTS

European Banks Continue To Reap The Benefits Of Benign Credit Conditions


U.K.'s Near-Final Bank Capital Rules Will Have A Modest Impact On Rated Banks

LONDON (S&P Global Ratings) Sept. 12, 2024--S&P Global Ratings expects the final implementation of the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)'s Basel 3.1 standards to have only a modest effect on the overall capital held by banks. Furthermore, in our view, the new rules will have no meaningful impact on our measure of rated banks' risk-adjusted capitalization, nor on our ratings and outlooks.

The PRA confirmed today its near final rules for U.K. banks, which will be implemented as of Jan. 1, 2026--a six month delay from the previous July 1, 2025 implementation date, but leaving the U.K. in line with other major international jurisdictions. The PRA's near-final draft contained a handful of material changes, most prominently concerning:

  • Amendments to the treatment of small and midsize enterprise (SME) lending;
  • Amendments to the treatment of infrastructure lending;
  • Lower conversion factors for off-balance sheet items;
  • A simpler approach to the valuation of residential real estate; and
  • An enhanced approach to calculating the credit risk output floor.

The regulator now estimates that total capital requirements for banks subject to the framework will rise by less than 1% at the end of the four-year implementation phase in January 2030. This is a relatively material decline from the 3.2% the PRA estimated last year and speaks to the collective impact of the bank's amendments, all of which have reduced overall capital requirement across Pillar 1 and Pillar 2A. Under Pillar 2A, the regulator aims to capture risks not easily or fully covered in a bank's Pillar 1 modelled capital requirements. As such, the fact that rising Pillar 1 charges for important balance sheet items like SME and infrastructure lending are now being tempered by bank specific Pillar 2A reductions is consistent with the PRA's original intentions.

This final capital impact of the near-final rules is much lower in the U.K. than in other jurisdictions like the U.S. (current estimate of about 9% for global systemically important banks, or 3.5%-4.5% for other large banks) and the EU (9.9% at full implementation). We think this divergence, in part, reflects the PRA's proactive implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards. For instance, since Jan. 1, 2024, U.K. banks have been subject to an amended view of credit risk in their internal models for mortgages, which has increased capital requirements materially for some of the country's major mortgage lenders.

Overall, the new capital rules will have a modest impact on our ratings on U.K. banks. Any modest rises in capital should feed through positively into our own risk adjusted view of bank capitalization, but this is unlikely to fundamentally change our view of their loss absorption capacity through capitalization and earnings. As such, we do not expect these new rules to affect our ratings or outlooks once fully implemented.

At the same time as it published its near final capital rules, the PRA published its Strong and Simple capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs). This definition includes those firms with less than £20 billion of total assets, the vast majority of exposure in the U.K., limited trading activity, and who operate standardized credit risk models. The proposals introduce a new, simplified buffer framework on top of Pillar 1 and Pillar 2A requirements that focuses on stress testing SDDTs and calibrating additional capital needs accordingly, subject to a floor. This new framework aims to reduce the complexity of capital rules for small firms, without diluting their overall capital levels, and the PRA estimates a broadly neutral capital impact to relevant firms accordingly. The proposed implementation date for the Strong and Simple regime is Jan. 1, 2027.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world's leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and financial sector entities. With over 1,600 credit analysts in 27 countries, and more than 150 years' experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt markets worldwide.

Primary Credit Analyst:William Edwards, London + 44 20 7176 3359;
william.edwards@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Richard Barnes, London + 44 20 7176 7227;
richard.barnes@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in