articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240716-u-s-not-for-profit-public-college-and-university-fiscal-2023-medians-rising-state-funding-offers-hope-amid-c-13173997 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Public College And University Fiscal 2023 Medians: Rising State Funding Offers Hope Amid Continued Demand Pressures

COMMENTS

How Proposed Immigration Policy Could Affect U.S. Public Finance Issuers' Creditworthiness

COMMENTS

U.S. CDFIs Take On More Debt To Grow Their Lending Capacity: Ratings Will Likely Remain Stable

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, October 2024

COMMENTS

U.S. Social Housing Providers: Laying The Groundwork To Address Affordable Housing Needs


U.S. Not-For-Profit Public College And University Fiscal 2023 Medians: Rising State Funding Offers Hope Amid Continued Demand Pressures

(Editor's Note: This article, originally published July 16, 2024, is being republished to provide the link to the medians interactive dashboard.)

For U.S. public colleges and universities, fiscal 2023 tested their financial resilience as demand pressures continued and operating support from emergency federal money was spent by most institutions if it was not already depleted. Although there was more revenue support received from returning to normalized operations, this was more than offset by falling enrollment and increasing inflation. In fiscal 2023, the big differentiator for public institutions was the growth in state support, given improved state credit quality in the past few years. However, this wasn't enough to quell the operating pressures at smaller regional public universities with weaker credit quality. Although the trend was more muted than at private institutions, public colleges and universities continued to reflect bifurcated credit quality: Large flagship institutions with demand elasticity, sound resources, and excellent reputations held on to their strengths whereas regional institutions with weak selectivity and less financial flexibility faced credit stress.

image

Full details of the medians are available through our interactive dashboard, by clicking here.

The following image is a preview.

image

S&P Global Ratings had 145 ratings on U.S. public colleges and universities as of June 1, 2024. The ratings ranged from 'AAA' to 'CC', with more than 80% of institutions rated in the 'A' or 'AA' category, and the 'AAA', 'BBB', and speculative-grade categories consisting of only seven, 13, and two schools, respectively. Therefore, changes in median metrics for these categories might represent the variability associated with a small sample size, rather than wholesale differences in credit quality. Since our last medians report, we have raised the ratings on five public universities. Three of these upgrades reflected the upgrades on the states of Illinois and Ohio (see "U.S. Higher Education Rating Actions, 2023," published Jan. 23, 2024). We raised the ratings on Montana State University and Clemson University this year because the institutions saw positive enrollment trends, consistent surplus operations, and sustained heathy levels of financial resources. Of note, we didn't lower the ratings on any public colleges and universities and revised the outlook to negative on only one entity during the past year.

All data and ratings included in this report are as of June 1, 2024. We excluded the financial data for two institutions that had not yet published a fiscal 2023 audit as of this date. In general, public universities follow standards issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. However, four public institutions report financials according to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). For comparability, we excluded the financial ratios of public institutions using FASB reporting but included enterprise risk profile data for these schools. Although we rate other types of debt for public colleges and universities, such as housing or other auxiliary-secured debt, the data in this report reflect the underlying credit characteristics of publicly rated universities, colleges, or systems. In addition, while we rate many community colleges and community college systems, we included our ratings on only four-year institutions or systems that primarily constitute four-year programs to maintain data consistency and enable a meaningful comparison between similar entities. 

S&P Global Ratings publishes these medians as general benchmarks to observe broader industry trends. The credit analysis for any institution involves an assessment of qualitative factors that are beyond the scope of this article. Therefore, these medians should not be considered thresholds to achieve a particular rating.

Table 1

Public colleges and universities--Sectorwide fiscal 2023 ratios
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Sample size 149 145 143 145 141 145
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND
Total FTE enrollment
Median 19,541 19,426 18,773 18,650 18,397 18,100
Mean 35,268 35,929 36,248 35,484 36,152 36,308
FTE enrollment change (%)
Median -1.0 -0.6 -0.5 -1.5 -1.9 -0.7
Mean 1.5 1.9 -0.7 -2.1 -1.9 -1.0
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment
Median 81.2 81.5 80.6 82.7 82.0 82.4
Mean 81.0 81.6 80.8 82.2 81.9 82.3
First-year acceptance rate (%)
Median 71.8 72.7 71.8 75.1 77.8 79.6
Mean 69.9 70.4 70.3 72.9 75.7 75.1
First-year matriculation rate (%)
Median 32.3 30.4 28.9 25.8 25.7 24.8
Mean 34.8 32.6 31.1 29.1 27.6 26.5
Average SAT scores
Median 1147 1162 1171 1152 1188 1177
Mean 1152 1172 1173 1157 1183 1180
Average ACT scores
Median 23.4 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 23.9
Mean 23.8 24.3 24.4 24.4 24.7 24.4
Retention rate (%)
Median 80.6 80.3 80.0 82.0 80.2 80.0
Mean 80.0 80.3 80.7 81.3 79.9 79.9
Six-year graduation rate (%)
Median 56.3 59 62.0 61.6 62.4 62.6
Mean 58.3 60.7 62.4 62.1 62.8 63.0
In-state students (%)
Median 79.0 79.6 79.7 77.0 77.5 76.7
Mean 76.5 76.5 76.2 75.8 75.6 74.7
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Operating margin (%)
Median 0.5 0.4 0.5 3.7 2.9 0.3
Mean 0.6 0.5 0.1 4.3 2.9 0.7
REVENUE DIVERSITY
State appropriations to revenue (%)
Median 21.5 21.1 20.9 21.4 20.7 22.9
Mean 23.0 22.1 22.2 21.8 21.9 23.4
Student-generated revenue (%)
Median 47.6 47.3 46.4 41.9 42.3 43.3
Mean 45.1 45.4 44.4 40.1 40.7 41.3
Auxiliary revenue (%)
Median 9.8 10.0 8.4 6.6 8.5 9.2
Mean 10.1 10.1 8.7 6.9 8.7 9.1
Grants and contracts to revenue (%)
Median 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11.3 11.5
Mean 11.1 11.4 12.1 12.0 12.3 12.7
Gifts and pledges to revenue (%)
Median 1.6 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.0
Mean 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 3.1 2.5
Investment and endowment income to revenue (%)
Median 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.3
Mean 1.8 1.6 1.5 3.4 0.2 1.6
FINANCIAL AID/EXPENSE RATIOS
Financial aid burden as a percentage of expenses (%)
Median 9.0 9.3 9.3 9.7 9.1 9.8
Mean 9.5 9.7 9.7 10.1 9.6 9.9
Instruction expense as a percentage of expenses (%)
Median 26.9 26.7 26.2 25.4 23.1 23.3
Mean 27.8 27.6 27.5 27.3 24.8 24.5
Tuition discount rate (%)
Median 24.8 26.2 26.6 27.6 29.0 29.5
Mean 25.7 27.5 27.6 28.6 29.7 31.0
ENDOWMENT
University endowment market value ($000s)
Median 280,997 256,077 243,637 310,900 298,414 316,286
Mean 1,279,107 1,207,481 1,249,529 1,660,882 1,475,863 1,759,341
FINANCIAL RESOURCE RATIOS
Cash and investments to expenses (%)
Median 48.7 49.1 46.9 55.8 95.6 99.1
Mean 60.1 59.0 60.2 70.1 112.3 111.3
Cash and investments to debt (%)*
Median 117.0 109.4 121.2 139.5 231.3 244.9
Mean 157.1 146.1 158.4 183.2 268.7 272.7
DEBT RATIOS
Total outstanding debt ($000s)*
Median 322,940 315,113 342,018 356,473 376,200 390,557
Mean 869,479 924,263 984,463 1,003,116 1,180,558 1,298,499
Average age of plant (years)
Median 14.0 14.2 14.8 15.3 15.1 14.2
Mean 14.5 14.8 15.3 15.7 15.4 14.5
MADS burden (%)
Median 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 4.0
Mean 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.3
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS
Total debt per FTE ($)*
Median 16,167 17,216 17,505 18,183 19,554 21,640
Mean 20,544 22,174 22,414 22,999 26,398 27,121
State appropriations per FTE ($)
Median 7,704 7,929 8,189 8,487 9,350 10,433
Mean 8,734 8,727 8,894 9,663 10,403 11,279
Endowment per FTE ($)†
Median N.A. N.A. 13,586 17,150 15,394 18,597
Mean N.A. N.A. 27,466 36,208 31,691 37,155
FTE--Full-time-equivalent. MADS--Maximum annual debt service. *Foundation cash and investments and debt included in fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022. †Endowment value for fiscal 2023 includes only university-held endowment. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

Public colleges and universities--Fiscal 2023 ratios by rating category
AAA AA A BBB Sector-wide
Sample size 7 53 68 15 145
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND
Total FTE enrollment
Median 60,866 38,162 12,526 3,659 18,100
Mean 81,416 64,595 16,436 4,936 36,308
FTE enrollment change (%)
Median 0.7 -0.3 -2.2 -1.6 -0.7
Mean -0.3 -0.3 -1.4 -1.0 -1.0
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment
Median 75.6 80.2 84.3 88.2 82.4
Mean 74.6 78.0 83.9 87.6 82.3
First-year acceptance rate (%)
Median 52.7 73.7 83.1 84.5 79.6
Mean 46.3 69.2 81.6 79.6 75.1
First-year matriculation rate (%)
Median 32.9 27.1 22.8 21.7 24.8
Mean 36.0 27.1 24.4 26.9 26.5
Average SAT scores
Median 1,347 1,249 1,091 1,020 1,177
Mean 1,350 1,046 925 780 1,180
Average ACT scores
Median 29.7 25.7 22.8 21.0 23.9
Mean 29.6 21.9 20.8 18.6 24.4
Retention rate (%)
Median 95.0 85.6 76.6 66.9 80.0
Mean 92.9 85.5 77.6 66.3 79.9
Six-year graduation rate (%)
Median 91.1 71.0 58.4 47.3 62.6
Mean 86.4 71.7 57.9 45.1 79.9
In-state students (%)
Median 65.6 72.4 81.8 81.0 76.7
Mean 65.5 69.5 78.5 77.1 74.7
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Operating margins (%)
Median 2.9 2.1 -1.0 -4.6 0.3
Mean 2.2 2.7 0.0 -3.1 0.7
REVENUE DIVERSITY
State appropriations to revenue (%)
Median 12.1 17.2 23.3 30.6 22.9
Mean 11.8 18.3 24.0 29.6 23.4
Student-generated revenue (%)
Median 24.3 36.2 47.8 43.8 43.3
Mean 29.4 35.1 43.8 40.1 41.3
Auxiliary revenue (%)
Median 4.2 8.4 9.9 9.7 9.2
Mean 5.7 8.8 8.9 9.6 9.1
Grants and contracts to revenue (%)
Median 16.4 14.5 8.7 6.4 11.5
Mean 15.5 14.5 11.0 7.0 12.7
Gifts and pledges to revenue (%)
Median 4.2 2.7 1.2 1.0 2.0
Mean 4.4 3.0 1.8 1.9 2.5
Investment and endowment income to revenue (%)
Median 3.2 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.3
Mean 4.9 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.6
FINANCIAL AID/EXPENSE RATIOS
Financial aid burden as a percentage of expenses (%)
Median 4.1 7.5 10.3 12.8 9.8
Mean 5.1 7.6 10.4 10.8 9.9
Instruction expense as a percentage of expenses (%)
Median 20.0 21.9 23.9 25.0 23.3
Mean 20.2 21.3 23.8 29.1 24.5
Tuition discount rate (%)
Median 23.6 28.2 28.4 38.2 29.5
Mean 23.0 26.9 29.1 34.4 31.0
ENDOWMENT
University endowment market value ($000s)
Median 6,996,261 1,291,622 152,721 36,015 316,286
Mean 15,435,260 1,947,682 266,963 47,501 1,759,341
FINANCIAL RESOURCE RATIOS
Cash and investments ($000s)
Median 2,125,070 839,721 165,379 27,535 254,531
Mean 1,986,978 1,561,177 307,279 61,005 858,563
Cash and investments to expenses (%)
Median 180.0 116.1 90.1 65.1 99.1
Mean 197.5 117.9 97.9 63.4 111.3
Cash and investments to debt (%)*
Median 467.1 290.2 215.9 141.6 244.9
Mean 197.5 117.9 97.9 63.4 272.7
DEBT RATIOS
Total outstanding debt ($000s)*
Median 3,617,407 985,387 227,298 42,211 390,557
Mean 4,256,412 2,253,344 417,123 80,715 1,298,499
Average age of plant (years)
Median 13.9 12.7 14.4 15.3 14.2
Mean 14.4 12.3 13.8 14.2 14.5
MADS burden (%)
Median 3.3% 3.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.0%
Mean 3.7% 3.5% 4.6% 4.3% 4.3%
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS
Total debt per FTE ($)*
Median 47,517 25,743 18,337 11,588 21,640
Mean 60,966 29,977 21,963 13,807 27,121
State appropriations per FTE ($)
Median 11,021 10,873 9,314 10,408 10,433
Mean 12,236 11,330 9,788 10,971 11,279
Endowment per FTE ($)
Median 165,208 37,928 12,988 11,187 18,597
Mean 176,613 41,582 18,379 10,988 37,155
*Foundation cash and investments and debt included in fiscal 2023. FTE--Full-time-equivalent. MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Enrollment And Demand Medians

Enrollment declines slow across the sector

Fiscal 2023 saw the sixth consecutive year of median declines in full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment for public colleges and universities, though they were slower than in recent years. The median enrollment drop of 0.7% in fall 2022 was less than the decreases in the previous two years. As public universities recover from the initial impact of the pandemic on enrollment, demographic pressures persist across the U.S., with fewer students graduating from high school each year in several regions.

Despite these pressures, highly selective schools remained insulated from enrollment decreases in fall 2022, with those in the 'AAA' rating category posting a median increase of 0.7% and those in the 'AA' rating categories remaining essentially flat. This represents the solid demand for these schools and their ability to draw from a wider student population than lower-rated, often very regional institutions. Schools in the 'A' and 'BBB' rating categories reported enrollment decreases on a median basis. Across all rating categories, 19 of 145 (13%) institutions saw FTE enrollment slip more than 5%, while 30 (21%) saw two consecutive years of growth; most of them are rated in the 'AA' category or higher. Preliminary fall 2023 data shows enrollment has continued to recover for rated public universities, with a median FTE enrollment change over one year that is stronger than in previous years.

Chart 3

image

image

Since the start of the pandemic, public colleges and universities have faced uncertain demand and a shrinking applicant pool due to changes in the labor market as well as demographic pressures. This has resulted in many institutions choosing to accept more students with the aim of stabilizing their first-year class. Since fall 2020, the median freshman acceptance rate has weakened further, reaching a high of 79.6% in fall 2022 from 75.1% in fall 2020, and 71.8% in fall 2019. The increasing use of the Common Application and the adoption of test-optional application processes at many institutions in recent years have made applying to colleges easier, resulting in an increase in the average number of applications. This, in turn, has affected institutions' ability to matriculate students. Unlike many other metrics, median first-year matriculation fell across nearly all rating categories, reflective of the competition in the sector broadly. Although public colleges and universities are increasingly challenged in getting students to enroll, they have had better success in retaining and graduating them at a steady rate. In our view, these trends reflect enhanced focus at colleges and universities on initiatives to support student success and outcomes.

Financial Medians

Pressured operating margins reflect the exhaustion of pandemic relief funds, although more state funding provides some offset

Most higher education institutions entered fiscal 2023 expecting weaker financial performance given the exhaustion of federal relief funds, increases in expenses as campus activities returned to pre-pandemic levels, and inflation-related costs. This is evident through the weakening in sectorwide median net adjusted operating income to 0.3% in fiscal 2023 from 2.9% in fiscal 2022 and 3.7%, in fiscal 2021. However, in our view, this metric being in line with pre-pandemic levels indicates strong state support is offsetting student-derived revenues. Pressures associated with demand difficulties and higher expenses were most prevalent at schools in the 'BBB' rating category, with a median operating deficit of 4.6% in fiscal 2023, down materially from the near-breakeven median in the previous year.

With most states recording an improvement in credit quality since 2020, they have relayed more financial support to public higher education institutions through an increase in operating as well as capital appropriations. We observed this trend in several median metrics for fiscal 2023, such as increased median state operating appropriations to revenue of 22.9%, the highest level in the past six years. The shift in revenue mix is also reflected by a decrease in median student-generated revenues. State appropriations per FTE in fiscal 2023 were 11.6% higher than in fiscal 2022 as a result of increased state support as well as a drop in enrollment. With state budgets expected to remain stable in fiscal years 2024 and 2025 in the majority of states, we expect that state funding will continue to offset some demand pressures in the near term for several institutions, although smaller, regional public institutions will still require tight expense controls in parts of the country with unfavorable demographic trends.

Chart 4

image

Gradual growth in financial resources supports mixed trends in debt issuances

Our key metric of a public higher education institution's balance-sheet strength is total cash and investments, including those held at related foundations. We assess this in combination with the level of restriction and the liquidity of the financial resources. Despite some movement in the investment markets, median financial resources in fiscal 2023 relative to adjusted operating expenses and debt improved modestly for almost all rating categories. Since the start of the pandemic, public colleges and universities have steadily invested in maintaining campus infrastructure, as represented by an improvement in the median average age of plant to 14.2 years in 2023 from 15.1 years in 2022. We expect investments in capital projects will continue in the near term as institutions try to remain attractive amid fierce competition and leverage favorable state funding.

What We're Watching

Enrollment challenges:   In line with broader sector trends, we anticipate public colleges and universities will face ongoing demand pressures in the near term. This trend will remain bifurcated, with large flagship and land-grant institutions being positioned more favorably through their wide brand recognition and broader reach. Conversely, we expect that smaller regional public universities will be hit harder by changes in demographics in their service areas. For fall 2024, delayed processing of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid has created heightened uncertainty for colleges and universities amid a rising percentage of prospective college students opting for trade schools or directly entering the labor market after high school.

State support:   According to the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association's annual Grapevine survey, state support (excluding federal relief) for higher education hit $126.5 billion in fiscal 2024, up 10% from fiscal 2023. For fiscal 2024, 41 states reported year-over-year increases in combined state and federal stimulus funding, with 20 states boosting support by more than 10%. Therefore, we expect that state governments will continue to support public higher education institutions as they navigate tough demand conditions, although some states, like Arizona and California, have announced cuts to the higher education budget for fiscal 2025. For more information, see "With The Fiscal 2025 Budget Deadline In Sight, U.S. States Navigate A New Revenue Environment," published June 25, 2024.

Evolving risk management:   The U.S. higher education industry continues to grapple with a multitude of emerging risks. These range from the need for changes to academic offerings based on labor market and student demand, the probable heightening of demographic pressures in certain regions of the country, evolving climate risks, and rising cyber security risks. After a wave of campus protests in 2024, several universities and senior leadership teams have faced heightened scrutiny. This has further contributed to the higher-than-normal presidential turnover at universities in the past few years. We will continue to monitor university enrollment, leadership responses, and potential fundraising implications for any credit impact related to these risks.

Pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) funding:   Fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2024 year-to-date investment returns have generally been favorable compared with fiscal 2022. As a result, we expect improvement in U.S. public pension funded ratios for fiscal 2024. However, conditions are less visible entering fiscal 2025, given uncertainty about monetary policy and the upcoming U.S. presidential election. For more information on U.S. public pension and OPEB credit characteristics, please see "Five U.S. Public Pension And OPEB Points To Watch In 2024," published Jan. 29, 2024.

Capital investments:   During the past few years, several universities have delayed capital projects due to high construction costs and increased interest rates. Although borrowing and construction projects were on the rise early in calendar year 2024, with election season on the horizon, future market activity remains uncertain at this time.

Continued credit bifurcation:  In this environment, we expect higher-rated colleges and universities with strong balance sheets, supportive state legislatures, and significant fundraising capabilities will continue to differentiate themselves, contributing to further bifurcation of credit quality within the sector.

Appendix

Table 3

Public colleges and universities--Rating list
As of June 1, 2024
Institution State Outlook
AAA
Indiana University IN Stable
Purdue University IN Stable
Texas A&M University System TX Stable
University of Michigan MI Stable
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC Stable
University of Texas System TX Stable
University of Virginia VA Stable
AA+
Clemson University SC Stable
Florida State University FL Stable
Florida State University System FL Stable
Texas A&M at College Station TX Stable
Texas Tech University System TX Stable
University of Alabama Birmingham AL Stable
University of Delaware DE Stable
University of Florida FL Stable
University of Kentucky KY Stable
University of Missouri MO Stable
University of Pittsburgh PA Stable
University of Utah UT Stable
University of Washington WA Stable
University System of Maryland MD Stable
AA
Arizona State University AZ Stable
College of William & Mary VA Stable
Iowa State University of Science and Technology IA Stable
Michigan State University MI Stable
North Carolina State University at Raleigh NC Stable
Ohio State University* OH Stable
Pennsylvania State University PA Stable
State University of Iowa IA Stable
University of Alabama AL Stable
University of California CA Stable
University of Houston TX Positive
University of Minnesota MN Stable
University of Nebraska System NE Stable
University of South Florida FL Stable
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University VA Stable
AA-
Auburn University AL Stable
Ball State University IN Stable
California State University CA Stable
City University of New York* NY Stable
East Carolina University NC Stable
Florida International University FL Stable
Georgia Tech Facilities Inc.§ GA Stable
Montana State University MT Stable
Minnesota State College & University MN Stable
Nevada System of Higher Education NV Stable
North Dakota State University ND Stable
Oklahoma State University OK Stable
University of Alabama Huntsville AL Stable
University of Arizona AZ Negative
University of Central Florida§ FL Stable
University of Cincinnati* OH Stable
University of Illinois IL Positive
University of Kansas KS Stable
University of Maine System ME Negative
University of Massachusetts MA Stable
University of New Mexico NM Stable
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center OK Stable
University of Oregon OR Stable
University of Wyoming WY Stable
Virginia Commonwealth University VA Stable
A+
Boise State University ID Stable
Bowling Green State University* OH Stable
Central Michigan University MI Stable
Cleveland State University* OH Stable
Colorado School of Mines CO Stable
Colorado State University System CO Stable
Ferris State University MI Negative
Grand Valley State University MI Stable
Kansas State University KS Positive
Kent State University* OH Stable
Missouri State University MO Stable
Morgan State University MD Stable
New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology NM Stable
New Mexico State University NM Stable
Northern Arizona University AZ Stable
Ohio University* OH Stable
Old Dominion University VA Stable
Rutgers University NJ Stable
State University of New York*§ NY Stable
Temple University PA Stable
Troy University AL Stable
University of Alaska AK Stable
University of Central Missouri MO Stable
University of Connecticut CT Stable
University of Louisville KY Stable
University of North Carolina at Charlotte NC Positive
University of North Carolina at Greensboro NC Stable
University of Oklahoma OK Stable
University of Rhode Island RI Stable
University of South Alabama AL Stable
University of Vermont & State Agricultural College VT Positive
University System of Georgia§ GA Stable
University System of New Hampshire NH Stable
Washington State University WA Stable
Wayne State University MI Stable
Youngstown State University* OH Stable
A
College of New Jersey NJ Stable
Florida Atlantic University§ FL Stable
Metropolitan State University of Denver CO Stable
Minot State University ND Stable
Nebraska State College NE Stable
New Jersey Institute of Technology NJ Stable
Northern Michigan University MI Stable
Pennsylvania College of Technology PA Stable
Ramapo College NJ Stable
Rowan University NJ Stable
Saginaw Valley State University MI Stable
Southeast Missouri State University MO Stable
University of Idaho ID Stable
University of North Alabama AL Stable
University of North Florida FL Stable
University of Northern Iowa IA Positive
University of Southern Indiana IN Stable
University of Toledo* OH Stable
West Virginia University WV Stable
Western Carolina University§ NC Stable
Western Michigan University MI Positive
Worcester State University MA Stable
A-
Eastern Kentucky University KY Stable
Fayetteville State University NC Stable
Florida Gulf Coast University§ FL Stable
Illinois State University IL Positive
Kean University NJ Stable
University of Louisiana at Lafayette LA Stable
University of Montevallo AL Stable
University of Northern Colorado CO Stable
Western Kentucky University KY Stable
Winston-Salem State University NC Stable
BBB+
Indiana University of Pennsylvania PA Stable
Lake Superior State University MI Negative
Mayville State University ND Stable
Southern Illinois University IL Stable
Valley City State University ND Stable
BBB
Governors State University IL Stable
Jacksonville State University AL Stable
Missouri Western State University MO Stable
Nicholls State University§ LA Stable
University of North Carolina at Pembroke§ NC Stable
BBB-
Alabama State University AL Positive
Delaware State University DE Stable
Eastern Illinois University IL Stable
Florida Polytechnic University§ FL Stable
Missouri Southern State University MO Stable
Western Illinois University IL Stable
BB+
Northeastern Illinois University† IL Stable
CC
University of Puerto Rico PR Negative
*Rating reflects application of the Government-Related Entites methodology. §Rating may reflect notching off of the underlying rating on the institution based on the security structure of the debt. †Rating changed subsequent to June 1, 2024.

Table 4

Glossary of ratios and terms
Metric or ratio Definition
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND
Average ACT scores Average ACT scores for entering first-year students
Average SAT scores Average combined math and reading SAT scores for entering first-year students
First-year acceptance rate (%) Number of students accepted/total number of completed first-year applications
FTE enrollment Total students enrolled on a full-time-equivalent basis
In-state students (%) Students enrolled who come from within the state/total students enrolled
Matriculation rate (%) Total number of enrolled students/total number of accepted students
Retention rate (%) First-year students who matriculated for sophomore year/total students who completed their first year
Six-year graduation rate (%) Students who graduate from the university within six years/total students in the first-year cohort
Undergraduate students (%) Total number of undergraduate students/total students
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Operating margin (%) Adjusted net operating income/total adjusted operating expense
REVENUE DIVERSITY
Gifts and pledges (%) Gifts and pledges/total adjusted operating revenue
Grants and contracts (%) Government grants and contracts/total adjusted operating revenue
Investment and endowment income (%) Endowment spending income and investment income/total adjusted operating revenue
State appropriations (%) Total state operating appropriations/total adjusted operating revenue
Student-generated revenue (%) (Gross tuition and fees + auxiliary revenue)/total adjusted operating revenue
FINANCIAL AID/EXPENSE RATIOS
Financial aid burden (%) Total financial aid expense/total adjusted operating expense
Instruction (%) Instructional expense/total adjusted operating expense
Tuition discount rate (%) Total financial aid expense/gross tuition revenue
ENDOWMENT
Foundation endowment market value ($000s) Market value of foundation as of fiscal year-end
University endowment market value ($000s) Market value of endowment as of fiscal year-end
FINANCIAL RESOURCE RATIOS
Cash and investments to expenses (%) Cash and investments/total adjusted operating expense
Cash and investments to debt (%) Cash and investments/total debt
Cash and investments including foundation to expenses (%) Cash and investments, including those of related foundations/total adjusted operating expense
Cash and investments including foundation to debt (%) Cash and investments, including those of related foundations/total debt including foundation
DEBT RATIOS
Average age of plant Accumulated depreciation/depreciation expense
MADS burden (%) Maximum annual debt service/total adjusted operating expense
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS
Endowment per FTE ($) Market value of foundation and endowment/FTE enrollment
State appropriations per FTE ($) Total state operating appropriations/FTE enrollment
Total debt per FTE ($) Total debt/FTE enrollment
DEFINITIONS
Cash and investments Cash, unrestricted and restricted financial investments, including those of related foundations
Total adjusted operating expense Total operating expenses + institutionally funded financial aid + interest expense – noncash pension and other postemployment benefits expenses
Total adjusted operating revenue Total operating revenues + institutionally funded financial aid + government appropriations + government grants + endowment spending - realized and unrealized gains/losses
FTE--Full-time equivalent. MADS--Maximum annual debt service.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Ruchika Radhakrishnan, Toronto + 1 (647) 297 0396;
ruchika.r@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004;
jessica.wood@spglobal.com
Laura A Kuffler-Macdonald, New York + 1 (212) 438 2519;
laura.kuffler.macdonald@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Athira Chennamangalath, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Pune
Additional Contacts:Beth Bishop, Chicago +1 3122337141;
beth.bishop@spglobal.com
Vicky Stavropoulos, Chicago +1 3122337035;
vicky.stavropoulos@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in