articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240711-economic-research-diverging-pmis-point-to-uncertain-u-s-growth-momentum-13177311.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Diverging PMIs Point To Uncertain U.S. Growth Momentum

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Global Economic Outlook Q1 2025: Buckle Up

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2025: Trade Uncertainty Threatens Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2025: Immigration Policies Hamper Growth Expectations


Economic Research: Diverging PMIs Point To Uncertain U.S. Growth Momentum

(Editor's Note: Welcome to our weekly summer series discussing mixed signals from U.S. economic data. This series will run from July-August 2024.)

Data-related uncertainty has risen since the height of the pandemic, and past empirical relationships have been less reliable for forecasting. Survey data from the Purchasing Managers' Indices (PMIs) are adding to that uncertainty, sending mixed signals about growth headed into the second half of the year. Taking into consideration the differences in sampling and how the PMIs have tracked hard data, we lean toward the more positive growth signal provided by the S&P Global Market Intelligence PMIs.

While the S&P Global Market Intelligence PMIs for both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing show the sectors are expanding, the PMIs by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) show manufacturing has been in contraction year to date and services slowed in June (see charts 1 and 2). (S&P Global Market Intelligence is a division of S&P Global, as is S&P Global Ratings.)

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

We Expect A Modest Pick-up In Manufacturing

S&P Global Ratings economists believe the manufacturing sector has largely overcome supply chain issues but has failed to make meaningful progress beyond that. Industrial production and manufacturers' new orders appear to have been on a sideways trend since late 2022, with a hint of modest firming in the last five months, notwithstanding monthly volatility in September-January (see charts 3 and 4). We don't expect major improvements in manufacturing until the cost of financing eases.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Market Intelligence's manufacturing PMI shows the sector started expanding earlier in the year, while the ISM shows a continued contraction. The recent three-month average PMI for Market Intelligence is 50.9, compared with 48.8 for the ISM. The Market Intelligence manufacturing output subindex has been expanding since February, whereas the ISM equivalent fell unexpectedly in June after starting to pick up in March. The new orders subindex for manufacturing also contracted for ISM but expanded for Market Intelligence.

Much of the discrepancy can be attributed to different sample sizes. The S&P Global Market Intelligence PMI surveys around 800 manufacturers of varying sizes, aiming to better grasp trends in small and medium industries. The ISM, on the other hand, surveys fewer but larger companies--nearly 400 across 20 industries--which can be limited in explaining larger trends in manufacturing (for an in-depth comparison, see "S&P Global PMI® and ISM survey comparisons").

We Look For Moderation In Services Growth

PMIs reveal a conflicting picture of growth momentum in the services sector as well. Hard data also reveals some cooling--with quarterly growth edging down since the third quarter of last year (see chart 5)--and we expect further moderation amid consumer cost fatigue.

The sector has largely returned to pre-pandemic trend, which suggests that the growth impulse from catching up to that trend is now behind us. For the Federal Reserve, this is a signal that monetary policy is cooling consumer demand beyond the interest-rate-sensitive goods sector.

Chart 5

image

The ISM services business activity (BA) index has been quite volatile this year, making it difficult to predict how the services industry will fare. Market Intelligence's Services BA index, meanwhile, picked up in June to its best reading since last summer. The Market Intelligence index is also less volatile, although the ISM index remains significantly above it, apart from an unexpected contraction in June (to 49.6 from 61.4 in May).

This discrepancy also owes to differences in sample sizes used by ISM and Market Intelligence. The smaller sample size used in the ISM survey explains the relative stability of the Market Intelligence services BA index. That said, because the ISM services index includes large industries and government services, we would have expected it to be more resilient to market volatility than the sharp changes so far in 2024 indicate.

Furthermore, the ISM sample might give a narrower snapshot of demand, because it includes larger firms that are represented by official purchasing executives. The Market Intelligence index includes more medium and small companies and surveys more than just official purchasing executives, potentially capturing some nuances for smaller firms that the ISM misses.

New orders fell into contraction in the ISM services PMI in June 2024 for the first time since December 2022, leaving the three-month average now barely expansionary (see chart 6). For the Market Intelligence survey, trends in new orders for services have been volatile but picked up slightly over the last two months (see chart 7).

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

In the ISM index, employment in services has largely contracted since December 2023, while the Market Intelligence index does not show any strong trends in employment between 2023-2024 (see chart 8). Weakening employment in services in the ISM survey is at odds with private services payroll employment gains, which have continued at a steady clip. Hours worked have edged down but remain normal while the percent of private sector industries with increasing employment is higher than that with decreasing employment (see chart 9).

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Different Underlying Data Gives Us Pause About Near-Term Growth Momentum

The different underlying data in the Market Intelligence PMI and the ISM PMI indicates small and medium businesses may be faring better than the ISM is suggesting. Nevertheless, the diverging soft data gives us reason to pause before making any bold claims about the trajectory of the U.S. economy.

The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global Ratings' economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Analysts:Satyam Panday, San Francisco + 1 (212) 438 6009;
satyam.panday@spglobal.com
Aliyah Sahqani

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in