articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240215-default-transition-and-recovery-european-speculative-grade-default-rate-to-stabilize-at-3-5-by-december-2-13003990.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: European Speculative-Grade Default Rate To Stabilize At 3.5% By December 2024

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: Spotlight On U.S. Defaults In October

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: European Speculative-Grade Default Rate Should Fall To 4.25% By September 2025

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: U.S. Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate To Fall Further To 3.25% By September 2025

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Public Finance Credit Quality: Obligors' Finances Drove Rating Actions In The Third Quarter


Default, Transition, and Recovery: European Speculative-Grade Default Rate To Stabilize At 3.5% By December 2024

Our Base Case Incorporates Generally Stable Credit Quality

Baseline: S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights expects the European trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to level out to 3.5% by December 2024 – essentially unchanged from December 2023 (see chart 1).   Over fourth-quarter 2023, credit quality was largely stable outside of an increase in defaults during December. Meanwhile, market sentiment has turned more positive, as slowing inflation appears to support rate cuts by the European Central Bank (ECB) later this year. Though overall economic growth in Europe slowed in 2023, it remained relatively resilient with only Germany seeing a slight contraction.

Our expectations for 2024 center on a soft-landing economic scenario supported by wage growth and disinflation. In addition, the speculative-grade bond and loan markets have opened up in recent months, allowing firms to reprice and refinance existing debt. That said, expectations for more growth-oriented uses of debt such as mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and capital expenditures remain muted for now, reflecting a still selective investor environment and restrictive interest rates.

Chart 1

image

Optimistic scenario: We forecast that the default rate could fall to 2%.  In a best-case scenario, we think the default rate could decline to about 2% this year. Economic resilience would need to continue or even expand beyond S&P Global economists' base case. Current market pricing appears supportive but would need to be sustained longer, with lenders becoming more open to loans to the still large number of 'CCC/C' issuers. Headline inflation readings at both the consumer and producer levels have been declining consistently. If inflation were to continue falling at the current pace, it could give central banks room to cut rates sooner than our base-case assumption for the second half of 2024, though time is running short on this possibility. Near-term refinancing needs are manageable, particularly after recent stronger issuance, but comparably large amounts of 'CCC'-rated instruments are coming due in 2025.

Pessimistic scenario: We forecast the default rate could rise to 5%.  Our growth expectations for most of Europe next year point to some strengthening, but still subpar growth. Along with rising real rates, speculative-grade issuers are vulnerable to a downturn. In a scenario of even slower economic growth or a recession, or if interest rates stay high throughout 2024, the default rate could rise to 5%.

Slowing earnings for several quarters in a row leave less room to maneuver amid elevated interest rates. Issuers are dealing with refinancing needs, but at a higher cost. The continuing Russia-Ukraine conflict remains a factor for further uncertainty, which could lead to more acute stress as winter approaches. In addition, the latest Israel-Hamas war carries the risk of spilling over to become a larger, regional conflict, further stressing regional trade and financial market sentiment.

image

image

image

Defaults Spiked In December, While Leading Indicators Are Mixed

Defaults increased over the course of 2023, culminating in December with the largest single-month increase in the default rate, taking the speculative-grade default rate to 3.5% from only 2.8% through November. Meanwhile, many leading indicators of defaults ahead have seen little movement or have even declined, such as bond spreads (see table 1).

This summary table generally supports our baseline projection for a stable default rate by year-end 2024, though market measures could indicate a decline. That said, we note that market measures tend to factor in loss given default as well as default probability and that in 2023, distressed exchanges accounted for roughly two-thirds of all European defaults. This is in keeping with the general trend of increased representation of distressed exchanges in recent years, which we expect to continue in 2024.

Table 1

Defaults rise in 2023; select leading indicators are mixed
2022 2023 Change (%)
Default rate 2.2% 3.5% 59.1%
Negative bias 16.5% 17.5% 6.1%
Negative bias ('B-' & below) 28.7% 28.2% -1.7%
Percent 'CCC/C' to speculative-grade 9.8% 10.0% 2.4%
High-yield yield 7.5% 6.1% -19.2%
ELLI YTM 8.6% 9.1% 5.7%
High-yield spread 5.0% 4.1% -18.7%
iTraxx-Xover CDX 4.7% 3.1% -34.6%
Unemployment rate 6.7% 6.4% -4.3%
Sources: ICE Benchmark Administration Ltd. (IBA). ICE BofAML Euro High-Yield Index Option-Adjusted Spread (retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). S&P Global Market Intelligence. S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights.

Issuance Was Subdued In 2023 Versus Historical Levels, But Has A Strong Start To 2024

Combined high-yield bond and leveraged loan issuance was subdued in 2023, but still managed to exceed 2022's total by about €15 billion (see chart 2). The pace of bond issuance was by far the stronger of the two debt types, and issuers have used much of the funding for refinancing, helping to reduce near-term liquidity risk. With the improved market sentiment in the fourth quarter, bond yields have come down and issuance picked up in January as well, with high-yield bond issuance up 51% from January 2023.

Chart 2

image

Even if issuance falls off in the second half of the year, upcoming maturities in 2024 remain very manageable (see chart 3). We estimate €50.8 billion in total speculative-grade debt will come due in 2024, but only €5.5 billion of that is in the 'CCC'/'C' category. However, maturities then total €314 billion through 2026. Depending on the economic and interest rate conditions in the next 12 months, these maturities could prove challenging to refinance, particularly the large €117 billion total of 'B' category debt due in 2026.

Chart 3

image

Risk Sentiment Improves, But Debt Costs Rise

European banks' credit standards for loans to firms tightened in fourth-quarter 2023 from the previous quarter, though at the most modest pace since the first-quarter 2022 survey (which reflected fourth-quarter 2021; see chart 4). Banks' risk perceptions were the main driver for tightening in the fourth quarter, followed by lower risk tolerance and liquidity positions. In the first quarter of 2024, banks expect tightening to a slightly higher level than in the fourth quarter. Despite the relative decline in net tightening, cumulative tightening since the start of 2022 has been substantial.

Chart 4

image

Relative risk pricing of both bonds and loans (via spreads) reflect declining risk perceptions on the part of markets (see chart 5). The relative risk of holding corporate debt can be a major indicator of future defaults because companies face pressure if they are unable to refinance maturing debt or service existing debt. In broad terms, speculative-grade spreads have been good indicators of future defaults based on a roughly one-year lead time. At current spreads, our baseline default rate forecast of 3.5% is above what the historical trend suggests.

However in contrast to spreads, current yields continue to rise, increasing the all-in costs of debt that issuers must contend with regardless of risk perceptions. While the ELLI spread may have fallen 117 basis points (bps) over 2023, the ELLI yield-to-maturity has increased 49 bps to 9.05%. In our view, since the start of the current rate hike cycle in 2022, defaults have trended more similarly to yields than spreads.

Chart 5

image

Considering broad measures of financial market sentiment, economic activity, and liquidity, we estimate that in December, the average speculative-grade bond spread in Europe was about 192 bps below our estimate of 600 bps (see chart 6). The gap between the actual and estimated spread implies that bond markets may be overly optimistic in their current stance. This also supports the argument that yields rather than spreads better indicate financial stress in the current conditions.

Chart 6

image

Economic Resilience Remains Key For Weaker Credits

The current deceleration of consumer price inflation is a key factor supporting household demand. Among our weakest rated issuers (in the 'CCC'/'C' category), 32% are in consumer-facing sectors (consumer products and media and entertainment; see chart 7). The default rate for 'CCC'/'C' rated entities reached nearly 50% during the peak of the pandemic in late 2020, implying the potential for very high default risk should a worst-case scenario play out.

Chart 7

image

Consumer products represent 17.6% of the European 'CCC+' and below rated portfolio, which is the biggest share by sector. To some extent, this is due to the size of this sector, which also makes up nearly 17% of European speculative-grade rated issuers. Within consumer products, issuers rated 'CCC+' and below make up 11% of the sector portfolio, just above the 10% average across sectors. The sector's size in terms of number of issuers also partly explains why consumer products has the second-highest amount of floating-rate debt outstanding and has the third-highest total speculative-grade debt outstanding. Subdued consumer demand remains a key challenge to issuers in the consumer products sector, as inflation expectations remain high despite ongoing disinflation. At the same time, labor markets remain tight, and many consumer-facing businesses have to bear the brunt of higher wages on their margins.

The media and entertainment sector is the second-biggest contributor to European speculative-grade rated issuers. It makes up around 15% of issuers in the 'CCC+' and below category, while 11% of speculative-grade rated issuers in the sector are rated 'CCC+' and below.

The ratings outlook for media issuers rated in the 'B' category and lower remains bleak. Refinancing and elevated financing costs will remain risks. Many media companies addressed capital structure issues and extended maturities in 2023, but there's still a high volume of maturities in 2025-2026.

Similar to other consumer-facing sectors, we expect media and entertainment issuers to suffer from weakening consumer balance sheets. Consumer spending on discretionary media will weaken as savings accumulated during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic are depleted. Notably, streaming subscriber growth may take a hit.

The third largest sector contributing to 'CCC+' rated European issuers is chemicals, packaging, and environmental services with 10.8%. Within the chemicals sector, headwinds for European producers extend well beyond 2024 due to higher cost positions and competitive pressures, prompting decisions to examine production footprints. Destocking, some troubled key end-markets (such as housing), and slower-than-expected growth in China have hampered demand in the petrochemicals industry. Additionally, the ramp-up of new capacity and limited permanent capacity closures to date have led to industry oversupply. We expect these challenges, which are exacerbating already weak supply and demand fundamentals, to continue in 2024, delaying a recovery in the sector.

Credit Momentum Reflects Modest Improvement

In the 12 months ended December 2023, speculative-grade credit quality continued to show marginal improvement. Net rating actions stayed positive, but with a negative net bias that implies downgrades ahead (see chart 8). That said, current trends are still far from the declines that preceded the 2009 and 2020 default cycles, and credit quality has recently been trending positive.

Chart 8

image

History shows that the rate of downgrades and net negative bias tend to lead the movement in the default rate by several quarters. Though credit quality has generally shifted positive since 2021, net improvements in credit quality have not been enough to make up for the declines during 2020, leaving speculative-grade issuers still much more vulnerable than they've been historically (see chart 12). Considering that, we think relative default risk is higher than aggregate downgrades imply on their own.

Chart 9

image

How We Determine Our European Default Rate Forecast

Our European default rate forecast is based on current observations and expectations of the likely path of the European economy and financial markets.

This report covers financial and nonfinancial speculative-grade corporate issuers. The scope and approach are consistent with those of our default and rating transition studies. In this report, our default rate projection incorporates inputs from S&P Global Ratings economists that also inform the analysis of our regional Credit Conditions Committees.

We determine our default rate forecast for speculative-grade European financial and nonfinancial companies based on a variety of quantitative and qualitative factors. The main components of the analysis are credit-related variables (for example, negative ratings bias and ratings distribution), the ECB bank lending survey, market-related variables (corporate credit spreads and the slope of the yield curve), economic variables (the unemployment rate), and financial variables (corporate profits). For example, increases in the negative ratings bias and the unemployment rate positively correlate with the speculative-grade default rate. As the proportion of issuers with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications increases, or the unemployment rate rises, the default rate usually increases.

This report covers issuers incorporated in the 31 countries of the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and certain other territories, such as the Channel Islands. The full list of included countries is: Austria, Belgium, the British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Credit Research & Insights:Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698;
nick.kraemer@spglobal.com
Paul Watters, CFA, London + 44 20 7176 3542;
paul.watters@spglobal.com
Sarah Limbach, Paris + 33 14 420 6708;
Sarah.Limbach@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in