articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231101-aaam-local-government-investment-pool-trends-third-quarter-2023-12899536 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (Third-Quarter 2023)

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure

COMMENTS

Navigating Regulatory Changes: Assessing New Regulations On Brazil's Financial Sector

Global Banks Outlook 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: Five Takeaways From The IIF Annual Membership Meetings


'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (Third-Quarter 2023)

image

The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria.

In our rating analysis, we emphasize the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs. For more, see the "'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools" section at the end of this report.

U.S. LGIPs' Assets Remained Unchanged In The Third Quarter, Maintaining A Steady Plateau

Both government and prime LGIPs held steady around $80 billion and $245 billion in the third quarter, mirroring their second quarter asset levels. (Prime LGIPs are those with the ability to invest in corporate credit securities--similar to prime money market funds.)

Outflows and/or slower growth are common in the second and third quarters owing to the cyclical nature of LGIPs. Conversely, we anticipate LGIP inflows in the fourth quarter. Our view is largely guided by historical trends as LGIPs typically gain assets in November and December. Year-end inflows are primarily attributed to seasonal tax revenue.

Chart 1

image

LGIPs Continue To Offer A Competitive Rate Of Return

Following the U.S. Federal Reserve's 25-basis-point interest rate hike in July 2023, LGIP seven-day yields neared 5.5% (see table 1), and the 30-day yields broke through the 5% barrier. In our view, LGIPs maintain a competitive edge, net of fees, as they continue to outpace institutional money market funds and remain competitive with bank deposits.

Table 1

AAAm' LGIP seven-day net yield (%)
Index Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 2.77 4.15 4.7 5.04 5.3
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 2.81 4.38 4.84 5.22 5.48

NAV Stability

The net asset value (NAV) per share averaged 0.99996 in the third quarter of 2023, compared with 0.99998 in the second quarter. The third quarter average is about 25 basis points higher than our lowest NAV threshold of 0.9975 for 'AAAm' rated PSFRs (see chart 2). Rated LGIP managers have continued to follow a conservative investment focus, maintaining liquidity, and high quality investments, even with asrate hikes are expected to end soon.

Chart 2

image

LGIP manager strategy is typically influenced by the direction of rates, combined with the shape of the yield curve, among other factors. As such, we note that rated LGIP managers increased maturities modestly, implying a nearing end to rate hikes. Although managers have extended maturities, further lengthening of maturities is constrained by the inverted yield curve (see chart 9). Credit quality continues to remain strong, despite increased maturities. Government-focused LGIPs, on average, had 64% of their assets maturing weekly in September 2023, falling from 68% the prior quarter. Prime LGIPs also have had a subtle decline in weekly liquidity, dropping to 39% from the previous quarter's 40%.

Chart 3

image

Weighted Average Maturities Steadily Increased Throughout The Third Quarter

The increase in weighted average maturities--a key indicator of interest rate risk--can be attributed to managers predicting that rate hikes are nearing an end (see table 2 and chart 4). On average, government focused LGIPs had a weighted average maturity (WAM) of 27 days in September, up from 24 days in the second quarter. Prime LGIPs averaged a 41-day WAM in September, an increase from 36 days. Given historical patterns, there is a likelihood of a modest increase in the extension of WAMs as fourth quarter inflows materialize. However, limited value in extending may serve as a countervailing factor.

Table 2

'AAAm' LGIP Weighted Average Maturity (In Days)
Index Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 21 13 17 24 27
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 24 26 30 36 41

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Economic Updates

The underlying instruments in LGIP portfolios are generally high credit quality ('A-1' or higher) government, agency, and bank investments (see table 3 and chart 6). Recognizing this, we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "Credit Conditions North America Q4 2023: Shift to Low Gear," Sept.26, 2023, and "Economic Outlook U.S Q4 2023: Slowdown Delayed, Not Averted," Sept. 25, 2023.

  • S&P Global Ratings' economists forecast one more rate hike from the Federal Reserve and don't expect the central bank to lower its policy rate until mid-2024, at the earliest.
  • U.S Economic data has been stronger than expected, suggesting a slowdown will be pushed into 2024.
  • S&P Global Ratings' economists expect the economy to expand 2.3% this year, and growth to decline to 1.3% for 2024, suggesting a gradual recovery.
  • Defaults are rising, and credit conditions could erode further. In 2023, most defaults have been first-time defaulters, or those who last defaulted years ago.

Table 3

'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' Credit Quality (%)
Index Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 98 99 99 99 99
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 72 67 66 64 64
LGIP--Local government investment pool.

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Table 4

'AAAm' LGIPs--Top 10 By Assets
Government LGIPs
Principal stability fund rating Local government investment pool Net assets (mil. $) --Portfolio maturity (days)-- 'A-1+' credit quality (%) NAV per share
WAM-R WAM-F
AAAm TEXPOOL 28,793 27 92 100 0.99984
AAAm North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio 18,267 23 65 100 1.00009
AAAm Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund 10,064 31 58 100 0.99979
AAAm New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) 8,586 39 82 100 1.00006
AAAm Lone Star Investment Pool - Government Overnight Fund 5,479 21 97 98 1.00014
AAAm Pennsylvania School District Liquid Asset Fund - Max Series 4,002 26 27 100 0.99995
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) 1,303 22 70 100 0.99988
AAAm New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account 1,166 31 89 100 1.00001
AAAm New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio 1,117 38 28 100 0.99999
AAAm Nebraska Liquid Asset Fund 788 32 86 100 0.99997
Prime LGIPs
Principal stability fund rating Local government investment pool Net assets (mil. $) --Portfolio maturity (days)-- 'A-1+' credit quality (%) NAV per share
WAM-R WAM-F
AAAm State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) 22,211 46 66 64 1.00003
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) 21,576 49 72 58 0.99997
AAAm Florida PRIME 19,979 35 75 55 1.00006
AAAm Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund 17,965 40 87 84 0.99996
AAAm California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio 14,832 39 68 58 0.99994
AAAm Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) 13,436 49 78 56 0.99999
AAAm TEXPOOL Prime 12,532 45 78 59 0.99998
AAAm Maryland Local Government Investment Pool 11,341 44 64 81 1.00002
AAAm Virginia Local Government Investment Pool 10,829 45 84 71 1.00002
AAAm Local Government Investment Cooperative 10,433 43 84 55 1.00004
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools

The 'AAAm' LGIP trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk, as defined in S&P Global Ratings' PSFR criteria.

LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates similarly to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return.

Unlike money market funds registered with the SEC, LGIPs are not regulated by the SEC and therefore not subject to SEC rule 2a-7. However, LGIPs typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well as from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.

Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment. Metrics well above our benchmarks may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547;
kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642;
michael.masih@spglobal.com
Andrew Paranthoiene, London + 44 20 7176 8416;
andrew.paranthoiene@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in