articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231011-u-s-auto-sector-ratings-could-remain-resilient-despite-slowing-macro-conditions-and-rising-pricing-pressure-12880815 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Auto Sector Ratings Could Remain Resilient Despite Slowing Macro Conditions And Rising Pricing Pressure

COMMENTS

Credit Cycle Indicator Q1 2025: The Recovery Could Be More Elusive For Some

COMMENTS

U.S. Telecom And Cable 2025 Outlook: Convergence, Consolidation, And Disruption

COMMENTS

Great CapExpectations: Tech, Utility Spending Power Capital Goods Revenue Growth In 2025

COMMENTS

Issuer Ranking: Global Pharmaceutical Companies: Strongest To Weakest


U.S. Auto Sector Ratings Could Remain Resilient Despite Slowing Macro Conditions And Rising Pricing Pressure

After stronger-than-expected auto sales in the U.S. for the first nine months of 2023, we expect the momentum to brake modestly. We now expect flattish volumes into 2024 with sales failing to recover to prepandemic levels by year end 2025. We forecast global production will remain tightly linked to demand as automakers stay disciplined on inventory build-up, given that a pronounced downturn in the labor market in North America and the eurozone could push the global economy into a recession. The underlying macroeconomic scenario remains largely unchanged from our previous forecast (see Global Economic Outlook Q4 2023: Nearing The Rate Plateau, published Sept. 27, 2023, on RatingsDirect).

Gradually rising unemployment and the usual delayed impact of tightening monetary policy on consumers' purchasing power are key factors in our conservative outlook for U.S auto sales for the last quarter of 2023 and into 2024 (see Chart 1). This is consistent with our expectations for a very gradual recovery of global volumes in 2024 and 2025. The recovery comes as demand aligns to subpar global economic growth fueled by higher-for-longer rates ahead after pent-up demand releases from easing supply constraints. For more details, see Global Auto Sales Forecasts: The Pricing Party Is Coming To An End, published Oct. 9, 2023, on RatingsDirect.

In the first nine months of 2023, U.S. auto sales increased 14% as residual supply chain constraints eased, vehicle inventories at dealerships improved relative to mid-2022 levels, and sales to fleets resumed. The industry had been operating at near recession-level auto sales for almost three years, and a recovery over the next two years toward 16 million vehicle sales will depend on further supply chain improvements, labor availability at manufacturing plants, and most importantly, pent-up consumer demand. Our forecasts incorporate narrowing cushions at households to absorb the back-to-back macroeconomic shocks of high vehicle prices, ongoing inflation, and higher interest rates for longer. We expect the weakness of retail buyers to emerge in 2024 once the share of rental car and commercial fleets slows down after returning to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels this year (roughly 20% of light vehicle sales).

Chart 1

image

Limited Upside To Most Ratings In The U.S. Auto Sector

Base-case scenario

U.S. economic data has been coming in stronger than expected, suggesting that an ever-elusive "soft landing" could occur. While we now expect the economy to expand 2.3% this year (up from 1.7% in our June forecast), we forecast growth slowing to 1.3% in 2024 and 1.4% in 2025 before converging to trend-like growth of 1.8% in 2026. We expect the unemployment rate to rise to 4.8% in 2025 before reversing course toward the longer-run sustainable rate of 4.0%-4.5%. We continue to forecast core inflation finally falling closer to 2.0% by this time next year. In this scenario, we expect the Federal Reserve to cut rates more aggressively than what it has penciled in, with rates likely landing at 4.4% and 2.6% by the end of 2024 and 2025, respectively.

We do not anticipate meaningful downgrades over the next 12 months as ratings for many issuers are already below prepandemic peaks. Most companies rated 'BB' and above have increasingly focused on reducing debt and building liquidity. Given the ongoing UAW strike, credit metrics will deteriorate somewhat in the fourth quarter, but our ratings incorporate some short-term fluctuation in credit metrics.

Once production eventually resumes, we expect a reasonably quick recovery in liquidity over companies' minimum operating levels, albeit with some permanently lost earnings if stoppages extend deep into the fourth quarter. Working capital investments and cost inflation will add downside risks to a few weaker issuers, especially if internal cost reduction prospects appear limited.

We believe credit metrics will stabilize to prepandemic levels by late 2024 as most companies will look to preserve liquidity, maintain prudence on reinstating dividends and share buybacks, and limit large, debt-financed acquisitions. We expect limited margin and cash flow improvement in 2024 due to higher interest rates and pricing pressure amid potential demand volatility once supply gradually normalizes.

In our base-case scenario, we incorporate the following high-level assumptions:

  • U.S. auto sales increase to 15.2 million units in 2023, stay flattish in 2024, and only modestly recover in 2025-2026, still below prepandemic levels of 16 million.
  • Average new vehicle prices fall about 10% over the next 24 months and demand shifts to used from new.
  • For automakers operating in North America, the combined impact of marginally higher production volumes, high pricing, and lower commodity costs could offset most other cost inflation in 2023. For 2024 and beyond, despite ongoing cost reduction efforts, we do not assume a material recovery in overall profit margins or cash flows given pricing and product mix pressures amid tougher macroeconomic conditions, higher costs related to EVs, and higher costs associated with negotiating a new contract with the UAW union in the fourth quarter.
  • In anticipation of tough labor negotiations, our current base case for EBITDA margins in 2024 and beyond already incorporates wage increases that would affect margins on average for General Motors Co. (GM) and Ford Motor Co. by 20 basis points (bps) to 40 bps annually. To the extent there are material changes post-contract finalization, we will reassess the impact on future earnings, cost flexibility, and ultimately on the rating outlook. For more details, please refer to Credit FAQ: How Will The United Auto Workers Strike Impact Ratings In The U.S. Auto Sector?, published Sept. 15, 2023, on RatingsDirect.
  • The industry will exercise discipline while rebuilding capacity toward its revised inventory targets, which will be roughly 30% below prepandemic levels. This will ensure reduced pressure on automakers to raise incentives and lower prices, hence protecting their margins somewhat, even if consumer demand weakens over the next 18 months.
  • Suppliers' margins and free cash flow will continue to improve going forward as raw material and freight inflation remain more moderate, volumes improve, and less supply chain uncertainty decreases operating volatility at original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers. However, labor availability and wage inflation along with overall higher energy prices limit margin upside.
  • Higher research and development, capital expenditure (capex), and working capital in the form of tooling to support the launch of new products geared to support EVs. While there is the potential for greater revenue opportunities from newer electrification-related products, initially this transition will be a drag on supplier margins and free cash flow. The impact on credit quality will depend on each suppliers' product portfolio and how they navigate the product transition.

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

With Increased Pricing Pressure, Inventory Management Will Be Critical

New vehicle prices remain about 30% above prepandemic levels in the U.S. so far in 2023 (average transaction prices of over $45,000 in August per J.D. Power). However, we expect about a 10% decline over the next 24 months in the U.S. as used vehicle prices fall (with a potentially higher supply) and consumers opt for lower-trim versions and more entry-level segments.

We believe volatility in automakers' sales (see Table 1 ) could persist over the next few months, especially because of the differences in inventory levels at the end of the third quarter across automakers. We expect most automakers with products skewed toward light trucks, particularly pick-ups, to target 50-60 days of total dealer inventory on a portfolio basis (see Chart 4). That is down over 30% compared with prepandemic levels of 80-85 days (in mid-2019) for light-truck-focused automakers.

Table 1

U.S. auto unit sales and market share comparison
--First nine months of 2022-- --First nine months of 2023--
Units Share (%) Units Share (%) Change (%)

General Motors Corp.

1,640,021 16.1 1,957,998 16.9 19.4

Toyota Motor Corp.

1,571,718 15.5 1,628,816 14.0 3.6

Ford Motor Co.

1,329,393 13.1 1,455,273 12.5 9.5

Stellantis

1,188,802 11.7 1,174,341 10.1 (1.2)

Honda Motor Co. Ltd.

728,257 7.2 970,675 8.4 33.3

Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

538,338 5.3 697,049 6.0 29.5

Total Hyundai Motor Co.

1,087,326 10.7 1,250,482 10.8 15.0
Other 2,084,563 20.5 2,474,693 21.3 18.7
Total 10,168,418 100.0 11,609,327 100.0 14.2
Source: Ward's AutoInfoBank.

Light-vehicle inventory totaled 2.06 million (per Wards AutoInfobank) at the end of September 2023, nearly 45% higher than a year ago. Light-vehicle inventory at dealerships reflected a 40-day supply, up from 32 days a year ago, and a prepandemic range of 60-80 days. There is some divergence across OEMS, as some companies like Stellantis and Ford have higher inventory days and the major Asian players (Toyota, Honda, Hyundai) still have very low days' supply. We believe Stellantis and Ford were probably building inventories ahead of the UAW strike. GM had maintained more conservative levels of inventory, so supply will likely get tighter for it first.

Chart 4

image

EV inventories have increased significantly over the last year for some of the top electric and hybrid plug-in hybrid models (Chart 5). In particular, inventories of the Jeep Wrangler plug-in, Ford's Mach E, and VW ID.4 are trending higher and have surpassed the level of their internal-combustion engine competitors. We expect this will lead to continued competition and lower EV prices.

Chart 5

image

We Expect Pickup Truck And CUV Segments To Remain Strong

In the first nine months of 2023, pickup truck sales increased around 15%, slightly above the overall market, which grew 14%. Historically, pickup truck demand has had a strong correlation with housing starts. With rising interest rates, we expect housing starts to remain flat for several years at 1.4 million, down significantly from 1.6 million in 2021 and 2022. While this could indicate a headwind for pickup truck sales, we expect this to be offset by pent-up demand in recent years (due to supply constraints) to replace aging pickup trucks.

The average age of vehicles in the U.S. remains at an all-time high, at about 12.5 years in 2023, with an even higher average age for pick-up trucks. This will likely support replacement demand for some older vehicles given the supply constraints during the past two years. As a result, pickups from Ford, GM, and Stellantis N.V. are likely to remain the top three selling vehicles for 2023 (table 2).

Crossover utility vehicles (CUVs) continue to gain share faster than the overall market, with sales increasing 18.6% in the first nine months of 2023, and now accounting for 47% of the total light-vehicle market. CUVs have taken share from passenger vehicles and larger CUVs have taken share from small SUVs. Within the CUV market, the middle luxury CUV has grown quickly, likely due to purchasing strength from higher income consumers and attractive product offerings within this segment (Chart 6)

Chart 6

image

Table 2

U.S. top-selling light vehicles
--First nine months of 2022-- --First nine months of 2023--
Rank Vehicle Units Vehicle Units
1 F-Series 425,544 F-Series 531,769
2 Silverado 374,479 Silverado 403,421
3 Ram Pickup 347,280 Ram Pickup 317,799
4 RAV4 303,341 RAV4 302,831
5 Camry 214,403 Model Y 288,408
6 CR-V 178,687 CR-V 262,351
7 Tacoma 175,872 Camry 217,975
8 Grand Cherokee 172,545 Sierra 216,227
9 Corolla 171,556 Rogue 211,091
10 Sierra 169,107 Grand Cherokee 182,871
Source: Ward's Automotive Group, a division of Penton Media Inc.

Potentially Tougher Financing Conditions And Weaker Used Car Prices In 2023 Adds Risk

With a shortage of new and used vehicles inflating prices, lenders are still willing to support loans of 72-84 months to attract borrowers with lower credit scores. Moreover, they're frequently offering loans that exceed the value of the vehicle. The downside risk is that it could prevent many buyers from re-entering the new car market for several years because vehicle owners who would usually trade in for a new model could end up owing more than the car is worth. We believe subprime borrowers are delaying purchases of vehicles for now as higher borrowing costs and inflationary pressures affect their overall spending.

From a historical perspective, total subprime auto lending hasn't returned to pre-Great Recession levels. Subprime loans as a percentage of all U.S. auto loans increased modestly to 16.7% in the second quarter of 2023 after representing an all-time low of 15.3% in the first quarter, but it's still lower than 17%-19% observed in 2009 after the Great Recession.

Auto loan delinquencies (over 90 days) have risen throughout 2023, especially among younger buyers. Notably, captive debt is predominantly owned by prime borrowers and has performed relatively well. Superprime borrowers (with credit scores greater than 760) accounted for nearly 36% of all U.S. auto loan originations, the highest since early 2011 and a significant improvement from an average of about 22% in 2006 and 2007 (chart 7).

Chart 7

image

We expect used vehicle prices to fall 4%-5% in 2023 as increasingly difficult financing terms weigh on demand despite a limited supply of used vehicles and persistently high new vehicle prices. Recently, Carmax (the nation's largest used car retailer) reported a second-quarter comparable store sales decline of 9% due to inflationary pressures, higher interest rates, tighter lending standards, and weak consumer confidence.

Early Signs Of Slowing Momentum In U.S. EV Demand Leads To A Slight Downward Revision In Our 2025 Base Case

In the past quarter, we have seen a slight slowdown in market share gains for EVs with rising inventories for several models. As a result, we expect automakers to take a more measured approach on volume build-out in 2024 to avoid pricing wars with incumbents for upcoming launches.

With manufacturer subsidies from the IRA, investments in local supply chains, and tax credits, we still expect significant launches at more affordable price points through 2025. Together, we believe these factors will help bridge the volume gap with Europe and China. In our view, both GM and Ford have adequately invested in EV architecture and vertical integration (including securing battery capacity). However, a higher-than-expected adoption rate for EVs would likely dampen profitability and cash flow in 2023-2025, especially if it cannibalizes the market share of their legacy high-margin internal combustion engine trucks. For more on our views on electrification, see Credit FAQ: How Will The Electric Revolution Impact The Credit Quality For The Global Auto Industry?, published Oct. 20, 2022, on RatingsDirect.

Our estimate for the combined market share for EVs and plug-in hybrids is about 10% for 2023 and about 18% by 2025. This compares with a combined market share of EV and plug-in hybrids of about 9% in the first nine months of 2023, up from 6.4% for the same period in 2022.

Prices remain quite high for EVs but are falling given recent price cuts, such as the ones from Tesla (see Tear Sheet: Tesla Inc. Charges Forward With Solid Ratings Cushion Despite Margin Headwinds , published July 21, 2023, on RatingsDirect). According to Cox Automotive, the average EV price was $53,376 in September 2023, down from about $66,000 as of the end of 2022. Battery prices could fall modestly over the next year after hitting highs in 2022 as lithium, nickel, and cobalt prices have fallen 20%-60% in the first eight months of 2023. Raw materials contribute at least 70%-80% of the total cost of EV batteries.

However, significant cost reduction will depend on more lithium refining capacity coming online. Ongoing investments in global capacity, partnerships, and vertical integration will enable automakers to launch affordably priced models and improve profitability within this segment in the next three years. For new entrants and start-ups, the slumping stock market and rising interest rates will persist and make it tough to raise fresh capital from investors.

Beyond 2025, we expect lower battery costs, significant model launches, and regulatory proposals the Environmental Protection Agency announced in April 2023, which could tighten emission standards each year between 2027 and 2032, will increase EV affordability. These factors will likely help bridge the EV volume gap with Europe and China as new model launches challenge incumbents across all segments (see Charts 8 and Table 3).

Chart 8

image

Table 3

U.S. top 10 electric vehicles/plug-in hybrids
--Fiscal year 2022-- --First nine months of 2022-- --First nine months of 2023--
Brand Subseries Units sold % share Units sold % share Brand Subseries Units sold % share
Tesla Model Y 207,300 22.6 152,400 23.2 Tesla Model Y 288,408 27.7
Tesla Model 3 187,500 20.4 141,700 21.6 Tesla Model 3 162,463 15.6
Jeep Wrangler 43,176 4.7 32,685 5.0 Jeep Wrangler 49,003 4.7
Ford Mustang Mach-E 39,458 4.3 28,089 4.3 Chevrolet Bolt EUV 30,119 2.9
Tesla Model X 32,350 3.5 22,450 3.4 Ford Mustang Mach-E 28,882 2.8
Tesla Model S 28,950 3.1 22,250 3.4 Jeep Grand Cherokee 27,705 2.7
Chevrolet Bolt EUV 27,091 2.9 15,849 2.4 Volkswagen ID.4 27,155 2.6
Hyundai Ioniq 5 22,982 2.5 18,492 2.8 Hyundai Ioniq 5 25,306 2.4
Volkswagen ID.4 20,511 2.2 11,072 1.7 Tesla Model X 22,586 2.2
Kia EV6 20,498 2.2 17,564 2.7 Chrysler Pacifica 21,095 2.0
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Nishit K Madlani, New York + 1 (212) 438 4070;
nishit.madlani@spglobal.com
David Binns, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3604;
david.binns@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Nicholas Shuey, Chicago +1 3122337019;
nicholas.shuey@spglobal.com
Gregory Fang, CFA, New York +(1) 332-999-5856;
Gregory.Fang@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Suraj Rajani, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in