articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230817-insurers-losses-from-the-tragic-maui-wildfire-are-expected-to-be-manageable-12827668 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Insurers' Losses From The Tragic Maui Wildfire Are Expected To Be Manageable

COMMENTS

Insurance Industry And Country Risk Assessment: Global Property/Casualty Reinsurance

COMMENTS

Insurance Brief: Flash Floods In Spain Have Limited Effect On Insurance Ratings

COMMENTS

Country Risk Assessments Update: October 2024

COMMENTS

Protection And Indemnity Clubs Opt For Rate Hikes In 2025


Insurers' Losses From The Tragic Maui Wildfire Are Expected To Be Manageable

The tragic wildfire that earlier this month destroyed most of Lahaina, Hawaii, is the deadliest in modern U.S. history. The death toll, currently at 110, is still rising as recovery operations continue. It's already well above the death toll from the 2018 Camp fire, which killed 85 people and destroyed the town of Paradise, Calif.

Preliminary estimates for property losses from the Lahaina wildfire indicate that it will not be a major loss event for the U.S. property/casualty (P/C) industry. It will be a long time before more definitive estimates of insured losses are available, but a preliminary analysis published by natural catastrophe modeling firm Karen Clark & Co. estimates insured losses of $3.2 billion. (By comparison, the total insured losses from the 2018 Camp fire in California are estimated to be around $10 billion, according to Bankrate.)

However, we also believe that, because of the area's relatively remote location, chances are high that ultimate loss costs will exceed initial estimates. The demand surge is expected to be substantial as most of the materials needed for rebuilding will have to be brought in either by ship or by plane, which will cause delays. Also, labor costs will likely be elevated because of the limited number of local construction workers; that will mean bringing in workers from elsewhere and paying them enough to offset the high cost of living on the island of Maui.

There's also the potential for business interruption losses across the island, particularly in the hospitality sector--though hotel rooms that had been filled with tourists likely will now be occupied by displaced residents and recovery workers.

Limited Impact On Both Life Insurers And Health Insurers

We believe both U.S. life insurers and U.S. health insurers generally have manageable claims exposure to the wildfire. Health companies with membership in Hawaii include Kaiser Permanente, UnitedHealth Group Inc., Humana Inc., and Centene Corp. Like other natural catastrophes, this event will likely cause immediate physical and behavioral health incidents, particularly for people who suffered smoke inhalation or burns. The strain on Maui health care facilities may disrupt the ability of some members who weren't injured in the wildfire to access health care services and products.

Life insurers will be making death benefit payments to the survivors of some of the people killed in this tragedy, but these will be spread among numerous insurers. And given the relatively small number of claims, this will not materially affect operating results.

Low Impact On Investment Credit Quality

From an investment perspective, insurers have minimal exposure to companies directly affected by this event. According to year-end 2022 data, the life insurance industry's bond exposure to Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. and its subsidiaries was, on average, less than 1% of group capital and surplus, with some companies having no exposure. P/C and health insurers also benefit from their diversified investment portfolios, with only a handful of companies having very modest exposures.

Ratings Impact Expected To Be Limited

We expect that the wildfire will have no ratings impact on the P/C, life, and health insurers and reinsurers we rate. We believe the most significant exposure is the property risk assumed by primary P/C insurers. By using Karen Clark & Co.'s estimate of insured property losses and allocating losses to insurers based on their share of the Hawaii property insurance market, we estimate that gross exposure as a percent of year-end 2022 statutory surplus is below 5% for all of the rated primary P/C insurers active in that market. Of the 21 rated P/C insurers with a market share of 0.5% or higher, only six have an estimated gross exposure greater than 1% of statutory surplus (see table). Reinsurance protection purchased by primary insurers may reduce the gross loss estimates for some, but we do not expect losses for reinsurers to be material.

Tokio Marine's U.S. P/C operations have an exposure of 3.0%, a figure that includes rated insurer First Insurance Co. of Hawaii Ltd. (FICOH). On a stand-alone basis, FICOH would have a much higher exposure, but we view the entity as highly strategic to its ultimate parent, so the ratings on FICOH benefit from reinsurance and other support provided by the Tokio Marine group.

Estimated exposure to Maui wildfire for selected insurers
Based on $3.2 billion industry loss estimate
Hawaii DPW, all lines ($000) Hawaii DPW/U.S. DPW (%) Hawaii commercial property DPW ($000)* Hawaii personal property DPW ($000)§ Total Hawaii property DPW ($000) Hawaii property market share (%) Estimated gross exposure ($000)† Estimated gross exposure as % of year-end 2022 U.S. statutory surplus‡
RLI 35,332 2.3 7,848 20,810 28,658 2.1 66,450 4.7
MS&AD Insurance 61,651 5.5 15,894 9,065 24,959 1.8 57,874 3.7
Allianz 77,759 1.3 43,734 0 43,734 3.2 101,408 3.2
Tokio Marine 325,042 2.9 71,899 72,512 144,410 10.5 334,849 3.0
Assurant 16,784 0.2 5,531 2,945 8,476 0.6 19,652 1.3
Allstate Corp. 126,162 0.3 2,344 75,218 77,562 5.6 179,845 1.3
USAA 137,525 0.5 4,391 85,392 89,783 6.5 208,182 0.8
AIG 92,889 0.6 41,631 11,373 53,004 3.8 122,903 0.6
Farmers Insurance 41,801 0.2 814 15,399 16,213 1.2 37,594 0.6
Zurich 66,595 0.4 18,337 0 18,337 1.3 42,519 0.6
Liberty Mutual 133,601 0.3 7,084 50,567 57,651 4.2 133,677 0.5
Markel 61,153 0.7 9,386 1,912 11,298 0.8 26,198 0.5
State Farm 353,072 0.4 9,995 234,512 244,507 17.7 566,946 0.4
Progressive 81,043 0.2 2,476 27,313 29,788 2.2 69,071 0.4
Munich Re 19,933 0.5 9,951 77 10,028 0.7 23,253 0.4
Great American Insurance 38,411 0.5 6,372 0 6,372 0.5 14,774 0.3
Fairfax Financial 59,665 0.6 6,330 5,834 12,164 0.9 28,205 0.3
Chubb 83,588 0.3 9,764 11,109 20,873 1.5 48,399 0.3
The Hartford 32,423 0.2 617 6,955 7,572 0.5 17,558 0.1
Nationwide 31,262 0.2 8,049 979 9,028 0.7 20,935 0.1
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 303,874 0.5 7,456 116,566 124,021 9.0 287,572 0.1
Total P/C industry 3,182,810 0.4 526,859 853,206 1,380,065 100.0 3,200,000
*Includes allied, fire, commercial auto physical damage, commercial multiperil (nonliability). §Includes homeowners multiperil, personal auto physical damage. †Based on estimate of $3.2 billion in insured property losses. ‡For global insurance groups, includes the statutory surplus of the U.S.-domiciled operating insurance company subsidiaries. DPW--Direct premiums written. P/C--Property/casualty. Sources: Karen Clark & Co. (for industrywide estimate of insured losses) and S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:John Iten, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 1757;
john.iten@spglobal.com
James Sung, New York + 1 (212) 438 2115;
james.sung@spglobal.com
Anika Getubig, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3233;
anika.getubig@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Taoufik Gharib, New York + 1 (212) 438 7253;
taoufik.gharib@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in