(Editor's Note: Our "Risky Credits" series focuses on corporate issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower in emerging markets. Because many defaults are of companies in these categories, ratings with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative are even more important to monitor.)
Key Takeaways
- The number of emerging market issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower slightly decreased to 22 as of Dec. 31, 2022, from 23 as of Sept. 30, 2022, which constitutes 13% of the speculative grade universe.
- The latter has progressively declined to 168 as of year-end 2022 from 210 at year-end 2021, mainly as a consequence of China-based rating withdrawals.
- Downward transition risk is moderating, with 36% of issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower on either a negative outlook or CreditWatch, with the highest concentration in the financial industry.
- Issuance was muted in 2022, with refinancing risk mostly concentrated in the utility industry and Latin America region, although the high interest rate environment is paving the way for more distressed exchanges over the coming quarters.
The number of emerging market issuers rated 'CCC+ and lower' decreased slightly to 22 in fourth-quarter 2022, from 23 in the third quarter (chart 1). S&P Global Ratings downgraded Greater China-based consumer products company China Dili Group to 'CCC' from 'B-' on increased difficulty in accessing financing, while one rating was withdrawn (Central China Real Estate Ltd.), and one lowered to default (China-based property developer Greenland Holding Group Co. Ltd.), after a distressed exchange.
Issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower accounted for 13% of speculative-grade (SG) issuers as of Dec. 31, 2022, up from the 11% registered as of Dec. 31, 2021. This is the result of a progressive decrease in emerging market SG issuers, to 168 from 210 over the same period. Most of the decrease (62%) came from Greater China, which had 26 fewer issuers than the previous year as a consequence of many rating withdrawals following downgrades, especially within the real estate industry after strain on the Chinese property market throughout 2022.
Chart 1
Moreover, more than 75% of issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower at Dec. 31, 2021, remained within the 'CCC' bucket as of Dec. 31, 2022. This signals some risk crystallization in terms of distribution at the lower end of the rating universe and, therefore, persisting credit risk. In emerging markets, 82% of 'CCC+' and lower rated issuers are in Latin America.
The gap between 'CCC' negative bias and 'B-' negative bias widened to 25 percentage points in December 2022 (chart 2), broadly in line with the average since 2017. This signals that default is the most prominent risk to monitor regarding downward rating transitions from the 'B' category to the 'CCC' one. Specifically, distressed exchanges were the cause of 62% of emerging market defaults in 2021-2022, compared with 41% in 2019-2020 (chart 3). Nonetheless, downward transition risk is moderating, with negative bias decreasing to 36% in fourth-quarter 2022 from 41% in the third quarter, well below historical peaks seen in first-half 2020.
Chart 2
Chart 3
Focusing on the industry distribution of issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower with a negative outlook or CreditWatch, we observe that credit rating risk has reshuffled compared with December 2021 (chart 4). Notably, the financial industry is currently more exposed, while utilities and real estate issuers were one year ago. In particular, we revised the outlook on Banco De Galicia Y Buenos Aires S.A.U. to negative in the fourth quarter as a result of the same action on Argentina, given the concentration in the sovereign's peso-denominated debt profile; Mexarrend S.A.P.I. de C.V. remained on CreditWatch negative on pressured liquidity; and Colombia's Credivalores - Crediservicios SAS was assigned a negative outlook because of its weak funding profile that could erode liquidity because of upcoming debt maturities. (Mexarrend was subsequently downgraded to 'D' on failure to make debt payment on Jan. 20, 2023. The default will be reflected in our next edition of EM Risk Credits.)
Chart 4
The aggregate debt represented by issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower dropped to $16 billion in fourth-quarter 2022 from $17.1 billion in the third quarter. The country with the highest concentration of debt is Argentina with $7 billion, but Brazil displays the highest risk, with the rating on telecom company Oi S.A., which has $2.5 billion of debt, placed on negative outlook. Industry-wise, utilities account for $6.9 billion of debt, followed by oil and gas with $3.2 billion, both on positive outlook/Watch Pos (chart 5).
Issuance has been modest throughout the year in emerging markets (chart 6), especially at the lower end of the rated spectrum. Issuance by SG issuers in 2022 totaled $5 billion, a marked drop versus average issuance of $46 billion in 2019-2021. In fact, U.S. dollar issuance collapsed to 10% of that observed in 2019-2021, confirming strong dollar concerns as a looming downside risk for 2023, despite some respite in the past few months (see our latest EM Monthly publication "Emerging Markets Monthly Highlights: Some Good News, Uncertainty Lingers" published Jan. 19, 2023). Emerging market 'CCC+' and lower rated companies did not issue any debt in 2022.
Chart 5
Chart 6
In addition, the debt of 57% of emerging market companies rated 'CCC+' and lower is expected to mature over 2023-2025 (charts 7-8). Precisely, $3.5 billion of debt will mature through 2024, mainly from utilities in South Africa (ESKOM Holdings SOC Ltd.) and Argentina (Pampa Energia S.A. and Capex S.A.). With high interest rates still in place, and a limited appetite from investors for risky credits, refinancing risk will be an issue for these companies if their strategy is to rollover their debt within the year.
Chart 7
Chart 8
Although 2023 has started with significant uncertainty, financials still look appropriate for the low rating category across asset classes, with debt forecast to decrease over time as a percentage of EBITDA (chart 9) and interest coverage still looking comfortable across industries (chart 10), with the exception of the chemical company Grupo Idesa S.A. de C.V., utility Empresa Distribuidora Y Comercializadora Norte S.A., and telco Oi S.A., whose interest coverage ratio is lower than 1x over 2022-2023.
Chart 9
Chart 10
Table 1
'CCC' Rated Issuers In Emerging Markets As Of Dec. 31, 2022 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry | Issuer name | Rating | Outlook/CreditWatch | Outlook or CreditWatch | Country | Region |
Bank |
Banco De Galicia Y Buenos Aires S.A.U. |
CCC+ | Negative | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Capital goods |
CLISA-Compania Latinoamericana de Infraestructura & Servicios S.A. |
CCC | Positive | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Chemicals, packaging & environmental services |
Grupo IDESA S.A. de C.V. |
CCC+ | Negative | OL | Mexico | Latin America |
Consumer products |
China Dili Group |
CCC | Negative | OL | Greater_China | U.S. |
Financial institutions |
Credivalores - Crediservicios SAS |
CCC+ | Negative | OL | Colombia | Latin America |
Financial institutions |
Mexarrend S.A.P.I. de C.V. |
CCC+ | Negative | CW | Mexico | Latin America |
Homebuilders & real estate co. |
Grupo Gicsa S.A.B. de C.V. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Mexico | Latin America |
Homebuilders/real estate Co. |
PT Kawasan Industri Jababeka Tbk. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Indonesia | Asia/Pacific |
Media & entertainment |
Enjoy S.A. |
CCC+ | Negative | OL | Chile | Latin America |
Metals, mining, & steel |
PT Bumi Resources Tbk and Subsidiaries |
CCC | Positive | CW | Indonesia | Asia/Pacific |
Oil & gas exploration & production |
Compania General de Combustibles S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Oil & gas exploration & production |
YPF S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Telecommunications |
Oi S.A. |
CCC- | Negative | OL | Brazil | Latin America |
Telecommunications |
Telecom Argentina S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Transportation |
Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Transportation |
Azul S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Brazil | Latin America |
Transportation |
Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Brazil | Latin America |
Transportation |
Investimentos e Participacoes em Infraestrutura S.A. - Invepar |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Brazil | Latin America |
Utility |
CAPEX S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Utility |
Empresa Distribuidora Y Comercializadora Norte S.A. |
CCC+ | Negative | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Utility |
ESKOM Holdings SOC Ltd. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | South Africa | Eastern Europe/Middle East/Africa |
Utility |
Pampa Energia S.A. |
CCC+ | Stable | OL | Argentina | Latin America |
Emerging markets consist of Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Mexico; Emerging Asia: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam; EMEA: Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey; Greater China: China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and red chip companies (issuers headquartered in Greater China but incorporated elsewhere).
Glossary And Abbreviations
Negative bias: Percentage of issuers with a negative outlook or on CreditWatch negative.
Related Research
- Emerging Markets Monthly Highlights: Another Tough Year Ahead, Dec. 15, 2022
- Global Credit Outlook 2023: No Easy Way Out, Dec. 1, 2022
- Risky Credits: In Emerging Markets, Downward Rating Transitions Prevail, Nov. 22, 2022
Related Rating Actions
- Central China Real Estate 'CCC-' Rating Withdrawn At The Company's Request, Dec. 16, 2022
- Outlook On Two Argentine Banks Revised To Negative From Stable On Sovereign Rating Action, Ratings Affirmed, Nov .17, 2022
- Mexarrend 'CCC+' And 'mxB-/mxB' Ratings Remain On CreditWatch Negative, Reflecting Tight Liquidity, Nov. 17, 2022
- China Dili Downgraded To 'CCC' From 'B-' On Increased Difficulty In Accessing Financing; Outlook Negative, Nov. 2, 2022
- Argentine Utility Edenor Ratings Raised To 'CCC+' From 'CCC-' On Debt Repayment, Outlook Negative, Nov. 2, 2022
- Credivalores 'CCC+' Ratings Affirmed And Off CreditWatch Negative On Easing Refinancing Pressures, Outlook Negative, Nov. 1, 2022
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Emerging Markets Research: | Luca Rossi, Emerging Markets Research, Paris +33 6 2518 9258; luca.rossi@spglobal.com |
Jose M Perez-Gorozpe, Madrid +34 914233212; jose.perez-gorozpe@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributors: | Vaishali Singh, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
Nivedita Daiya, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.