This report does not constitute a rating action.
Index name | 7-day net yield (%) | 30-day net yield (%) | WAM-R (days) | WAM-F (days) | Total net assets (bil. $) | A-1+' : 'A-1' credit quality (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 4.15 | 3.92 | 13 | 64 | 71.3 | 99:1 | ||||||||
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 4.38 | 4.14 | 26 | 67 | 211.5 | 67:33 | ||||||||
LGIP--Local government investment pool. WAM-R--Weighted average maturity to reset. WAM-F--Weighted average maturity to final. |
'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools
The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk, as defined in S&P Global Ratings' principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our PSFR criteria, as shown in the affirmation of our 'AAAm' ratings during 2022. In our rating analysis, we place emphasis on the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs.
LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates in a similar way to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return. A key difference is that LGIPs are not registered with the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) but typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.
Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment, while metrics well above them may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.
Market Comment
U.S. LGIPs we rate have substantial influence on the management and demand of high credit quality money-market instruments. Such investment pools, with assets collectively exceeding $280 billion, follow a prime or government strategy and are rated under our PSFR criteria. Over the year to December 2022, rated LGIPs following a government strategy (government LGIPs) saw assets increase by 20.6%, while asset growth for rated prime LGIPs was 14.8%, due to improving tax receipts from increased home values.
Chart 1
Combined with asset growth, the most notable element that all LGIP investors would value is higher LGIP returns. Looking back to December 2021, seven-day yields for government LGIPs and prime LGIPs were a paltry 0.02% and 0.07%, respectively. 12 months later, after several interest rate hikes by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed), LGIP seven-day yields have broken through the 4% barrier for the first time since the global financial crisis (see table 1). They are now well on their way to providing a rate of return that can compete with interest on bank deposits.
Table 1
'AAAm' LGIP Seven-Day Net Yield (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Dec-21 | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 0.02 | 0.21 | 1.24 | 2.77 | 4.15 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 0.07 | 0.33 | 1.38 | 2.81 | 4.38 |
Focusing on the NAV per share, rated LGIPs performed quite well despite the rapid interest rate rises by the Fed. The NAV per share averaged 0.99976 in 2022, about 22 basis points higher than our lowest NAV threshold of 0.9975 for 'AAAm' PSFRs (see chart 2). Notably though, following the Fed's double rate rise in the second quarter of last year, including the 75-basis-point hike in June, the largest since 1994, we observed a decline in LGIP NAVs, with the lowest recorded at 0.99891 but still 14 basis point above the 'AAAm' threshold.
Chart 2
This NAV deterioration was common across most LGIPs, as well as among money market funds registered under SEC 2a-7 rules. Subsequently, LGIPs took steps to reduce risk and improve their weekly liquidity profiles, since they generally benefit from stable asset flows that are seasonal and very predictable. For example, government LGIPs (on average) had 51.7% of their assets maturing on a weekly basis for the first six months of 2022 and this improved to 65% by December 2022. For prime LGIPs, the adjustment was not as dramatic, but they still improved their weekly liquidity profiles (on average) to 45% in July to December 2022, from 39.3% in January to June (see chart 3).
Chart 3
Weighted average maturities, key indicators to interest rate risk, have almost halved over the last 18 months. The bulk of the decline in 2022 (see table 2 and chart 4) can be attributed to fluctuations in global market conditions caused by geopolitical uncertainty and the rise in inflation that prompted corrective action from the Fed.
Table 2
'AAAm' LGIP Weighted Average Maturity (In Days) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Dec-21 | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 42 | 31 | 24 | 21 | 13 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 46 | 36 | 29 | 24 | 26 |
Chart 4
Chart 5
In looking at 2023 and recognizing the nature of the underlying instruments in LGIP portfolios--generally high credit quality ('A-1' or higher; see table 3 and chart 6) government, agency, and bank investments--we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "U.S. Banks Outlook 2023: A Strong Banking System Prepares For A Weakening Economy," Jan. 11, 2023, and "Credit Conditions North America Q1 2023: Worse Before It Gets Better," Dec. 1, 2022, published on RatingsDirect.
- S&P Global's economists now expect U.S. GDP to contract 0.1% in 2023, with a mild recession in the first half and below-trend growth for the remainder of the year.
- There are signs that inflation is easing; it's still running well above the Fed's target. Any perceived monetary-policy misstep (in either direction) could push financing costs even higher and tighten liquidity further, straining borrowers' debt-service capacity.
- Borrowers and investors face a prolonged period of elevated interest rates. With the high likelihood of a recession ahead and structural changes afoot--from decreased Treasury market liquidity to the retirement of LIBOR--market liquidity could dry up in earnest. Bank liquidity could decline more than expected due to a combination of higher-than-expected deposit runoff and stronger loan demand.
- The Fed will keep policy tight with the Fed Funds Rate peaking at 5.00%-5.25% in the second quarter with rate cuts possible late in the year.
Table 3
'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' Credit Quality (%) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Dec-21 | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 | |||||||
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 99 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 | |||||||
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 67 | 66 | 68 | 72 | 67 | |||||||
LGIP--Local government investment pool. |
Chart 6
Chart 7
Chart 8
Table 4
'AAAm' LGIPs--Top 10 By Assets | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
Principal stability fund rating | Local government investment pool | Net assets (mil. $) | --Portfolio maturity (days)-- | 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | NAV per share | |||||||||
WAM-R | WAM-F | |||||||||||||
AAAm | TEXPOOL | 27,377 | 14 | 77 | 99 | 1.00000 | ||||||||
AAAm | North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio | 16,661 | 6 | 60 | 97 | 1.00017 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund | 8,611 | 4 | 40 | 100 | 0.99984 | ||||||||
AAAm | New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) | 7,221 | 36 | 44 | 100 | 0.99978 | ||||||||
AAAm | Lone Star Investment Pool - Government Overnight Fund | 5,719 | 9 | 68 | 98 | 1.00005 | ||||||||
AAAm | New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account | 1,494 | 24 | 58 | 100 | 1.00000 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) | 1,347 | 19 | 98 | 100 | 0.99964 | ||||||||
AAAm | New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio | 1,064 | 11 | 12 | 100 | 0.99999 | ||||||||
AAAm | Nebraska Liquid Asset Fund | 732 | 26 | 92 | 94 | 0.99999 | ||||||||
AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PRIME) | 639 | 15 | 100 | 100 | 0.99979 | ||||||||
Prime LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
Principal stability fund rating | Local government investment pool | Net assets (mil. $) | --Portfolio maturity (days)-- | 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | NAV per share | |||||||||
WAM-R | WAM-F | |||||||||||||
AAAm | Florida PRIME | 24,505 | 18 | 61 | 58 | 0.99994 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) | 16,668 | 30 | 76 | 61 | 0.99998 | ||||||||
AAAm | State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) | 16,255 | 30 | 65 | 60 | 0.99989 | ||||||||
AAAm | Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund | 14,192 | 28 | 85 | 78 | 1.00048 | ||||||||
AAAm | California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio | 12,206 | 31 | 52 | 56 | 1.00000 | ||||||||
AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) | 11,170 | 28 | 79 | 63 | 1.00002 | ||||||||
AAAm | Virginia Local Government Investment Pool | 10,780 | 47 | 98 | 76 | 0.99984 | ||||||||
AAAm | Local Government Investment Cooperative | 9,806 | 17 | 58 | 64 | 1.00010 | ||||||||
AAAm | Maryland Local Government Investment Pool | 9,801 | 26 | 102 | 94 | 0.99991 | ||||||||
AAAm | TEXPOOL Prime | 9,671 | 16 | 57 | 70 | 1.00001 | ||||||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Related Research
- U.S. Banks Outlook 2023: A Strong Banking System Prepares For A Weakening Economy, Jan. 11, 2023
- Credit Conditions North America Q1 2023: Worse Before It Gets Better, Dec. 1, 2022
- Rapidly Rising Rates Are Putting Some Money Market Funds At Risk, July 22, 2022
Primary Credit Analyst: | Andrew Paranthoiene, London + 44 20 7176 8416; andrew.paranthoiene@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642; michael.masih@spglobal.com |
Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547; kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.